Gerrymandering may have a bumpy future now that Supreme Court just set a precedent .......one can only hope

merrill

Gold Member
Dec 27, 2011
2,476
1,050
198
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to impose new limits on state courts reviewing certain election-related issues by ruling against Republicans in North Carolina fighting for a congressional district map that would heavily favor their candidates.


The justices ruled in a 6-3 vote that the North Carolina Supreme Court was acting within its authority in concluding that the map constituted a partisan gerrymander under the state Constitution.



In doing so, the court declined to embrace a broad version of a hitherto obscure legal argument called the “independent state legislature” theory, which Republicans say limits the authority of state courts to strike down certain election laws enacted by state legislatures.


Supporters of former President Donald Trump cited the theory in various cases during the 2020 presidential election and its aftermath.

The ruling was widely welcomed by voting rights groups and Democrats who had been worried about the implications of a ruling that would curb state court power.

"Today the Supreme Court rejected the fringe independent state legislature theory that threatened to upend our democracy and dismantle our system of checks and balances," former President Barack Obama tweeted.



 
Again, I agree with the court ruling. Despite all the "what about the Supreme Court" to get people to vote for lousy candidates, I find myself agreeing likely 80-90% of their rulings.
 
So a pro "snake by the lake" ruling? :laughing0301:

13065716-6990001-image-m-20_1556917492251.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top