No, and no.
That is simply a lie.
A big old fat fucking lie.
A lie? Bullshit, how do you think Wind Turbines are made of? Sugar and Spice? The world's largest structures covering hundreds of miles did not increase the use of oil?
Amazing, Green Energy is magically green, must grow on trees.
Lets of course ignore the fact that once these 300 ton structures start turning that means parts moving. Moving parts in the past needed to be lubricated, but not in the 300 ton Wind Turbines, they operate on magic.
Production and Maintenance, that doesn't count? We are to believe the largest Wind Farms in the World required zero petro-chemicals? No need for even Propene?
Magic, they simply appear.
I already wrote in my very first response to Flacaltenn that -some- oil products are required to build wind turbines, underwater turbines, solar panels and even nuclear power plants - but those things pay for themselves with time.
It's called "capitalism" and making a wise investment. You should try it, you might even like it.
Just for example: if I need the equivalent of 500 gallons of crude oil for the creation of one wind turbine, but within three years, that turbine creates the energy the equivalent of 50,000 gallons of crude oil, then that's a 5,000 to 1 return.
Thank you for playing.
History is not on your side on this one and in 50 years, a lot of people are going to be laughing at fools like you who scoff at renewables.
Oh, and Flacaltenn, btw, the reason why many Wind-Turbines are taken offline for 2 days in a month is for cleaning and maintenance so that less oil products are needed to keep said wind turbine in good shape. This is why a good wind farm has many turbines working at various rates, depending on wind speed and direction of turbine. And on any given day, assuming 15 turbines, one of them may be offline for this very reason. But it is the average output per month, per farm, that counts, and German wind farms are exceeding the output estimates, by far.