What criminal history? He had never been arrested for anything.Martin's criminal history was consistent with that. Only in the Leftardocracy is it wrong to hold people's past against them.The only important part of his story was that martin attacked him. Without that it isn't self defense. There was no evidence to support that claim besides zimmerman's storyYes, true.nobody besides zimmerman said martin attacked him. that was enough for an acquittal.Is there anyone besides the lunatic shooter saying that?The Z man, in an effort to flaunt his manhood, waved his gun in the air. This is according to reports. If he did, then that, in itself, is probably enough to show a threatening demeanor. But is sounds like both are walking disasters. And they both are probably still packing heat.....
Oh and his injuries and all the ballistic and forensic evidence which backed up his story too.
All that was enough for an acquittal.
Unlike Zimmerman, who's been arrested what, like 5 or 6 times now?