PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #141
I recently read this book, very cute. Who knew Bill O'Reilly wrote children's books?
Bet you don't know that Roosevelt embraced every desire that Joseph Stalin had, huh?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I recently read this book, very cute. Who knew Bill O'Reilly wrote children's books?
I recently read this book, very cute. Who knew Bill O'Reilly wrote children's books?
Bet you don't know that Roosevelt embraced every desire that Joseph Stalin had, huh?
I recently read this book, very cute. Who knew Bill O'Reilly wrote children's books?
Bet you don't know that Roosevelt embraced every desire that Joseph Stalin had, huh?
The part where Bill goes on and on about how Stalin's daughter could never celebrate Christmas moved me to tears.
I recently read this book, very cute. Who knew Bill O'Reilly wrote children's books?
Bet you don't know that Roosevelt embraced every desire that Joseph Stalin had, huh?
The part where Bill goes on and on about how Stalin's daughter could never celebrate Christmas moved me to tears.
So....what have we learned from your post?
It is well know that among Liberals emotion replaces intellect.
'Feeling' often passes for knowing.
I recently read this book, very cute. Who knew Bill O'Reilly wrote children's books?
Bet you don't know that Roosevelt embraced every desire that Joseph Stalin had, huh?
The part where Bill goes on and on about how Stalin's daughter could never celebrate Christmas moved me to tears.
So....what have we learned from your post?
It is well know that among Liberals emotion replaces intellect.
'Feeling' often passes for knowing.
Amazing how much you can learn about someone from reading what they write here.
Bet you reasonable men and women know that you are a fool for making that statement. But you are a fool making money harvesting among fools, so it is what it is.I recently read this book, very cute. Who knew Bill O'Reilly wrote children's books?
Bet you don't know that Roosevelt embraced every desire that Joseph Stalin had, huh?
I recently read this book, very cute. Who knew Bill O'Reilly wrote children's books?
Bet you don't know that Roosevelt embraced every desire that Joseph Stalin had, huh?
The part where Bill goes on and on about how Stalin's daughter could never celebrate Christmas moved me to tears.
So....what have we learned from your post?
It is well know that among Liberals emotion replaces intellect.
'Feeling' often passes for knowing.
Amazing how much you can learn about someone from reading what they write here.
Wait...you're a Liberal.....how can you use the term "learn"???
Bet you reasonable men and women know that you are a fool for making that statement. But you are a fool making money harvesting among fools, so it is what it is.I recently read this book, very cute. Who knew Bill O'Reilly wrote children's books?
Bet you don't know that Roosevelt embraced every desire that Joseph Stalin had, huh?
Go take a graduate class in WWII history, please.
Bet you reasonable men and women know that you are a fool for making that statement. But you are a fool making money harvesting among fools, so it is what it is.I recently read this book, very cute. Who knew Bill O'Reilly wrote children's books?
Bet you don't know that Roosevelt embraced every desire that Joseph Stalin had, huh?
Go take a graduate class in WWII history, please.
Decoding your posts has become effortless since it has become evident that you lie about everything.
That's the truth, isn't it, Jakal.
again, kiddo, it's a great conspiracy theory, but that's all it is. it's built on a whole lot of conjecture, most of it, including this so called relationship between roosevelt and stalin, rather dubious.
it also depends on roosevelt pulling strings after his death. doesn't seem likely.
"..... it's built on a whole lot of conjecture, most of it, ..."
And that is pretty much the definition of history.
12. Based on actions for which there is no logical explanation other than Roosevelt's desire to support and sustain Soviet communism, there can be no doubt about the control that Joseph Stalin exercised over FDR, and his administration.
The winner of WWII was Joseph Stalin.
Not the United States.
Proof?
How about the fact that Stalin wound up controlling half of Europe.....
....and this:
a. Communism is international socialism. Key on the word 'international.'
b. Stalin's wish was the formation of the United Nations.
c. The first Sec'y General was Stalin's spy, Alger Hiss.
d. Russia had three votes in the United Nations, to one for the United States.
e. Almost every aim of the post war Communist Party of the Unite Stated (CPUSA) have been accomplished or are part of the program of the party that controls this nation, the Democrat Party.
The aims are listed here: The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
f. The communists have been successful as well in hiding behind their battle cry "McCarthism!!!"
But... when the apologists are asked to name a single innocent whose life was 'ruined' by Senator McCarthy.....cannot.
Not a single one.
Total victory by communism....thanks to Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
So....why would anyone consider that Joseph Stalin was behind the murder of General George Patton was a stretch?
Unless they needed to shield the god of the Liberals, Franklin Roosevelt, from the truth.
Who had a monopoly on manufacturing with an untouched industrial base after the war? Not to mention the largest military? And only lost 460k troops compared to several million?The winner of WWII was Joseph Stalin.
Not the United States.
Proof?
How about the fact that Stalin wound up controlling half of Europe.....
....and this:
again, kiddo, it's a great conspiracy theory, but that's all it is. it's built on a whole lot of conjecture, most of it, including this so called relationship between roosevelt and stalin, rather dubious.
it also depends on roosevelt pulling strings after his death. doesn't seem likely.
"..... it's built on a whole lot of conjecture, most of it, ..."
And that is pretty much the definition of history.
12. Based on actions for which there is no logical explanation other than Roosevelt's desire to support and sustain Soviet communism, there can be no doubt about the control that Joseph Stalin exercised over FDR, and his administration.
The winner of WWII was Joseph Stalin.
Not the United States.
Proof?
How about the fact that Stalin wound up controlling half of Europe.....
....and this:
a. Communism is international socialism. Key on the word 'international.'
b. Stalin's wish was the formation of the United Nations.
c. The first Sec'y General was Stalin's spy, Alger Hiss.
d. Russia had three votes in the United Nations, to one for the United States.
e. Almost every aim of the post war Communist Party of the Unite Stated (CPUSA) have been accomplished or are part of the program of the party that controls this nation, the Democrat Party.
The aims are listed here: The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
f. The communists have been successful as well in hiding behind their battle cry "McCarthism!!!"
But... when the apologists are asked to name a single innocent whose life was 'ruined' by Senator McCarthy.....cannot.
Not a single one.
Total victory by communism....thanks to Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
So....why would anyone consider that Joseph Stalin was behind the murder of General George Patton was a stretch?
Unless they needed to shield the god of the Liberals, Franklin Roosevelt, from the truth.
Him and the Jews, certainty not us.
Who had a monopoly on manufacturing with an untouched industrial base after the war? Not to mention the largest military? And only lost 460k troops compared to several million?The winner of WWII was Joseph Stalin.
Not the United States.
Proof?
How about the fact that Stalin wound up controlling half of Europe.....
....and this:
Hardly since Hitler was never going to surrender and attempts on Hitler's life failed, all 23 times they tried...The allies learned about how to deal with Germany after the events of WWI...Who had a monopoly on manufacturing with an untouched industrial base after the war? Not to mention the largest military? And only lost 460k troops compared to several million?The winner of WWII was Joseph Stalin.
Not the United States.
Proof?
How about the fact that Stalin wound up controlling half of Europe.....
....and this:
".... And only lost 460k troops...."
Pretty cavalier about American boys dying.
Let's remember, if Roosevelt hadn't acquiesced to Stalin's 'unconditional surrender' demands, half of that number wouldn't have died.
To get an idea of the cost of the extended war...."....over one hundred thirty-five thousand American GIs died –a startling figure today – between D day[june 6, 1944] and V-E day,[May 8, 1945]...."So did the Red Army really single handedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence
Get that?
135,000 brave American boys whose lives were offered up as a gift to Stalin....to make certain that communism survived.
Based on the ration of deaths to wounded, that would suggest almostan additional 200,000 wounded, just between Normandy and Germany's surrender.
Totally attributed to 'unconditional surrender.'
Hardly since Hitler was never going to surrender and attempts on Hitler's life failed, all 23 times they tried...The allies learned about how to deal with Germany after the events of WWI...Who had a monopoly on manufacturing with an untouched industrial base after the war? Not to mention the largest military? And only lost 460k troops compared to several million?The winner of WWII was Joseph Stalin.
Not the United States.
Proof?
How about the fact that Stalin wound up controlling half of Europe.....
....and this:
".... And only lost 460k troops...."
Pretty cavalier about American boys dying.
Let's remember, if Roosevelt hadn't acquiesced to Stalin's 'unconditional surrender' demands, half of that number wouldn't have died.
To get an idea of the cost of the extended war...."....over one hundred thirty-five thousand American GIs died –a startling figure today – between D day[june 6, 1944] and V-E day,[May 8, 1945]...."So did the Red Army really single handedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence
Get that?
135,000 brave American boys whose lives were offered up as a gift to Stalin....to make certain that communism survived.
Based on the ration of deaths to wounded, that would suggest almostan additional 200,000 wounded, just between Normandy and Germany's surrender.
Totally attributed to 'unconditional surrender.'
Hitler was never going to surrender is not a logical fallacy, it is a fact...Hardly since Hitler was never going to surrender and attempts on Hitler's life failed, all 23 times they tried...The allies learned about how to deal with Germany after the events of WWI...Who had a monopoly on manufacturing with an untouched industrial base after the war? Not to mention the largest military? And only lost 460k troops compared to several million?The winner of WWII was Joseph Stalin.
Not the United States.
Proof?
How about the fact that Stalin wound up controlling half of Europe.....
....and this:
".... And only lost 460k troops...."
Pretty cavalier about American boys dying.
Let's remember, if Roosevelt hadn't acquiesced to Stalin's 'unconditional surrender' demands, half of that number wouldn't have died.
To get an idea of the cost of the extended war...."....over one hundred thirty-five thousand American GIs died –a startling figure today – between D day[june 6, 1944] and V-E day,[May 8, 1945]...."So did the Red Army really single handedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence
Get that?
135,000 brave American boys whose lives were offered up as a gift to Stalin....to make certain that communism survived.
Based on the ration of deaths to wounded, that would suggest almostan additional 200,000 wounded, just between Normandy and Germany's surrender.
Totally attributed to 'unconditional surrender.'
Don't hide behind "Hitler was never going to surrender."
No one ever said that....and by throwing in that 'red herring' you have inadvetently admitted the truth:
Germany would have surrendered if Stalin and Roosevelt allowed it to.
How? And don't leave out Great Britain as they were going for unconditional surrender also, which also will lead you to also include Churchill in your diatribe of opinion...Hardly since Hitler was never going to surrender and attempts on Hitler's life failed, all 23 times they tried...The allies learned about how to deal with Germany after the events of WWI...Who had a monopoly on manufacturing with an untouched industrial base after the war? Not to mention the largest military? And only lost 460k troops compared to several million?The winner of WWII was Joseph Stalin.
Not the United States.
Proof?
How about the fact that Stalin wound up controlling half of Europe.....
....and this:
".... And only lost 460k troops...."
Pretty cavalier about American boys dying.
Let's remember, if Roosevelt hadn't acquiesced to Stalin's 'unconditional surrender' demands, half of that number wouldn't have died.
To get an idea of the cost of the extended war...."....over one hundred thirty-five thousand American GIs died –a startling figure today – between D day[june 6, 1944] and V-E day,[May 8, 1945]...."So did the Red Army really single handedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence
Get that?
135,000 brave American boys whose lives were offered up as a gift to Stalin....to make certain that communism survived.
Based on the ration of deaths to wounded, that would suggest almostan additional 200,000 wounded, just between Normandy and Germany's surrender.
Totally attributed to 'unconditional surrender.'
Don't hide behind "Hitler was never going to surrender."
No one ever said that....and by throwing in that 'red herring' you have inadvetently admitted the truth:
Germany would have surrendered if Stalin and Roosevelt allowed it to.
How? And don't leave out Great Britain as they were going for unconditional surrender also, which also will lead you to also include Churchill in your diatribe of opinion...Hardly since Hitler was never going to surrender and attempts on Hitler's life failed, all 23 times they tried...The allies learned about how to deal with Germany after the events of WWI...Who had a monopoly on manufacturing with an untouched industrial base after the war? Not to mention the largest military? And only lost 460k troops compared to several million?The winner of WWII was Joseph Stalin.
Not the United States.
Proof?
How about the fact that Stalin wound up controlling half of Europe.....
....and this:
".... And only lost 460k troops...."
Pretty cavalier about American boys dying.
Let's remember, if Roosevelt hadn't acquiesced to Stalin's 'unconditional surrender' demands, half of that number wouldn't have died.
To get an idea of the cost of the extended war...."....over one hundred thirty-five thousand American GIs died –a startling figure today – between D day[june 6, 1944] and V-E day,[May 8, 1945]...."So did the Red Army really single handedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence
Get that?
135,000 brave American boys whose lives were offered up as a gift to Stalin....to make certain that communism survived.
Based on the ration of deaths to wounded, that would suggest almostan additional 200,000 wounded, just between Normandy and Germany's surrender.
Totally attributed to 'unconditional surrender.'
Don't hide behind "Hitler was never going to surrender."
No one ever said that....and by throwing in that 'red herring' you have inadvetently admitted the truth:
Germany would have surrendered if Stalin and Roosevelt allowed it to.
again, kiddo, it's a great conspiracy theory, but that's all it is. it's built on a whole lot of conjecture, most of it, including this so called relationship between roosevelt and stalin, rather dubious.
it also depends on roosevelt pulling strings after his death. doesn't seem likely.
"..... it's built on a whole lot of conjecture, most of it, ..."
And that is pretty much the definition of history.
12. Based on actions for which there is no logical explanation other than Roosevelt's desire to support and sustain Soviet communism, there can be no doubt about the control that Joseph Stalin exercised over FDR, and his administration.
The winner of WWII was Joseph Stalin.
Not the United States.
Proof?
How about the fact that Stalin wound up controlling half of Europe.....
....and this:
a. Communism is international socialism. Key on the word 'international.'
b. Stalin's wish was the formation of the United Nations.
c. The first Sec'y General was Stalin's spy, Alger Hiss.
d. Russia had three votes in the United Nations, to one for the United States.
e. Almost every aim of the post war Communist Party of the Unite Stated (CPUSA) have been accomplished or are part of the program of the party that controls this nation, the Democrat Party.
The aims are listed here: The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
f. The communists have been successful as well in hiding behind their battle cry "McCarthism!!!"
But... when the apologists are asked to name a single innocent whose life was 'ruined' by Senator McCarthy.....cannot.
Not a single one.
Total victory by communism....thanks to Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
So....why would anyone consider that Joseph Stalin was behind the murder of General George Patton was a stretch?
Unless they needed to shield the god of the Liberals, Franklin Roosevelt, from the truth.
Him and the Jews, certainty not us.
Who is the "us"?