Well, the 'Conservatives' are certainly hoping that GM will go bankrupt, and would raise Bin Laden up from the dead, were they able. They really want to demonstrate their love of America.
I am a conservative and I want GM to succeed; however, success comes only when a company provides a product of competitive qualify at a competitive price. The public may by duped, at least temporarily, by creative advertising but only to a point. Eventually, the concepts of quality and price become the controlling factors in consumer choices. When government subsidizes a product, the true cost includes not only the purchase price but also the amount of the subsidy which is ultimately paid by the taxpayers.
You think that ALL bankruptcies are a bad thing but it ain't so, Joe. Bankruptcies have salvaged many failing companies by giving them a chance to reorganize and begin anew. Contrary to complaints from liberals, there is no evidence that jobs were saved by the GM bailout. If GM had gone through normal bankruptcy procedures, they would have been able to restructure the UAW wages and benefits package to make GM competitive again. Not only would everyone's job be saved but it is even possible that reduced manufacturing costs would have resulted in increased sales and seven more employment at GM. What, you didn't know that lower cost can lead to more sales and more employment?
Also, had GM gone completely down the tube no one knows how many total jobs would have been lost. My best guess would be
. none. If consumers cannot buy GM cars, they will purchase another type of vehicle which means other companies will have to hire more people. Consumers are not going to start walking and taking public transportation just because they cannot buy a GM car. When the government intervenes to help one car company, all other auto makers suffer as a result.
No one mourns the loss of all those blacksmiths jobs lost as a result of the automotive industry, and many big name companies have folded over the years due to changing consumer demand. If GM bites the dust, that's what is called the survival of the fittest. Competition without government favoritism is the best thing going for consumers. Only open and honest competition can assure the public of the best quality at the lowest possible price.
This concept of too big to fail is not just stupid, it is totally insane. Any company that cannot withstand competition deserves to fail. The bigger the company is, the more foolish it is to expect the public to support it with taxpayer-funded subsidies. Outright competition is something that should only be feared by business owners, never by consumers.
Actually, as a result of the bailout many dealerships were forced to close costing many people to lose their jobs, and 20,000 non-union workers at Delphi lost their health care and most of their retirement benefits. Those dealerships that had gained favor with the Obama administration were allowed to continue while others were terminated, and all union workers retained their plush benefits packages while those who were not union lost almost everything. That's Obama: reward your friends and punish your enemies.
But that is just my own humble opinion (OK, I lied about the humble part).