Gee, who could have predicted...

[easyt65]

There are idiots and hot heads on both sides.

Don't blame anyone else for the UNPRECEDENTED violent, seditious, treasonous acts the DEMOCRATS ate doing right now!

'Idiots' and 'hot-heads' are one thing. Calling for the overthrow of the govt, burning the American flag, the racist murder of whites, and the assassination of our new President - those are acts of political donestic terrorists, enemies of the state - acts people like Barry's terrorist buddy Bill Ayers used to do. Ayers has got to be loving this right now...and since it has all been linked to Hillary, Barry, and Soros they must be as well.

 

[easyt65]

...libs would lose their fucking minds, call for the overthrow of the govt, call for the racist murders of whites, burn the American flag, and call for the assassination of the President - after demanding the GOP accept the outcome of the election - because they LOST and did not get their way?!

Actually, the question should be who DIDN'T see this coming?!

We're not doing that.

BS - you lie. That's EXACTLY what they're doing, as reported and shown in the photis of these anarchists.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Maybe they're annoyed that this is the 2nd time in 16 years that they've lost an election by getting MORE votes than the other side.

http://m.townhall.com/tipsheet/chri...at-donald-trump-won-the-popular-vote-n2244077

Doesn't really matter, it's still a flawed system regardless of whether she did or didn't.

The SYSTEM as set up by the Founders is perfect. The problem is, the left keeps screwing with it because of their ignorance.

Perfect for who?

I disagree that it's perfect.

Firstly, it leads to only two parties. Two parties which are controlled by the rich for the rich. This isn't democracy.

Secondly, I've seen better systems working elsewhere. Systems that lead to more voice, more control for the people.

It best protects the RIGHTS of all.

We don't have a Democracy. You guys keep advocating Mob Rule -- the tyranny of the majority. You just don't get it and never will.

Read The 5,000 Leap

 

[ding]

Who could have predicted that the Democrats would lose? Anyone with half a brain. Americans are never going to accept a socialist government or a corrupt candidate like Clinton.

Who could have predicted that the Democrats would react to their loss the way they did? Anyone with half a brain. They have elevated their beliefs to a religion. They behave like religious fanatics when their religion is attacked, and they have no concept of accountability.

 

[Freewill]

Maybe they're annoyed that this is the 2nd time in 16 years that they've lost an election by getting MORE votes than the other side.

Nope, it was 218 to 290, which is less.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Maybe they're annoyed that this is the 2nd time in 16 years that they've lost an election by getting MORE votes than the other side.

http://m.townhall.com/tipsheet/chri...at-donald-trump-won-the-popular-vote-n2244077

Doesn't really matter, it's still a flawed system regardless of whether she did or didn't.

The SYSTEM as set up by the Founders is perfect. The problem is, the left keeps screwing with it because of their ignorance.

Perfect for who?

I disagree that it's perfect.

Firstly, it leads to only two parties. Two parties which are controlled by the rich for the rich. This isn't democracy.

Secondly, I've seen better systems working elsewhere. Systems that lead to more voice, more control for the people.

It best protects the RIGHTS of all.

We don't have a Democracy. You guys keep advocating Mob Rule -- the tyranny of the majority. You just don't get it and never will.

Read The 5,000 Leap

if you look at all the pictures, most of those acting up right now are younger kids. I suspect that we are seeing the ones that wanted Bernie in the first place. Spoiled little brats that are afraid of trying to make it on their own without some form of assistance, mommy and daddy brought them up thinking everything they wanted or needed would be supplied by someone else.
They are upset now that they see work in their future.
You dont see as many older working age people in those pictures, some, but not many.
I think even the older liberals have more sense than to start something that is likely to end them up in jail.
ever since the 60s and the protests against Nam, every generation that follows seems to have a need to fight for some cause or another. If not Trump, then it would be against a congress that might not support hillary, something.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Maybe they're annoyed that this is the 2nd time in 16 years that they've lost an election by getting MORE votes than the other side.

http://m.townhall.com/tipsheet/chri...at-donald-trump-won-the-popular-vote-n2244077

Doesn't really matter, it's still a flawed system regardless of whether she did or didn't.

The SYSTEM as set up by the Founders is perfect. The problem is, the left keeps screwing with it because of their ignorance.

Perfect for who?

I disagree that it's perfect.

Firstly, it leads to only two parties. Two parties which are controlled by the rich for the rich. This isn't democracy.

Secondly, I've seen better systems working elsewhere. Systems that lead to more voice, more control for the people.

It best protects the RIGHTS of all.

We don't have a Democracy. You guys keep advocating Mob Rule -- the tyranny of the majority. You just don't get it and never will.

Read The 5,000 Leap

Mob rule? No, the thing that makes any system not mob rule is that there are rights that have to be taken into account. Germany isn't mob rule. You can shout it as much as you like, but it's just not the case. However during the election Trump supporters were calling for this change. Now they're not. Funny that.

Tyranny of the majority. Whats the difference between an election where most of the time it is the majority that decides, but sometimes it isn't the majority that decides? What difference does it make that Trump won by not getting the majority, or Trump won by getting the majority?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Maybe they're annoyed that this is the 2nd time in 16 years that they've lost an election by getting MORE votes than the other side.

Nope, it was 218 to 290, which is less.

Yeah, let's play dumb.

 

[owebo]

http://m.townhall.com/tipsheet/chri...at-donald-trump-won-the-popular-vote-n2244077

Doesn't really matter, it's still a flawed system regardless of whether she did or didn't.

The SYSTEM as set up by the Founders is perfect. The problem is, the left keeps screwing with it because of their ignorance.

Perfect for who?

I disagree that it's perfect.

Firstly, it leads to only two parties. Two parties which are controlled by the rich for the rich. This isn't democracy.

Secondly, I've seen better systems working elsewhere. Systems that lead to more voice, more control for the people.

It best protects the RIGHTS of all.

We don't have a Democracy. You guys keep advocating Mob Rule -- the tyranny of the majority. You just don't get it and never will.

Read The 5,000 Leap

Mob rule? No, the thing that makes any system not mob rule is that there are rights that have to be taken into account. Germany isn't mob rule. You can shout it as much as you like, but it's just not the case. However during the election Trump supporters were calling for this change. Now they're not. Funny that.

Tyranny of the majority. Whats the difference between an election where most of the time it is the majority that decides, but sometimes it isn't the majority that decides? What difference does it make that Trump won by not getting the majority, or Trump won by getting the majority?

I believe Trump won 40 of the 50 states....so.....

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Mob rule? No, the thing that makes any system not mob rule is that there are rights that have to be taken into account. Germany isn't mob rule. You can shout it as much as you like, but it's just not the case. However during the election Trump supporters were calling for this change. Now they're not. Funny that.

Republicans were? When was that?????

 

[BlueGin]

Libs throwing a tantrum because they lost and burning the flag on Veterans Day.

Is anyone really surprised?

 

[Freewill]

Maybe they're annoyed that this is the 2nd time in 16 years that they've lost an election by getting MORE votes than the other side.

Nope, it was 218 to 290, which is less.

Yeah, let's play dumb.

Nope, you play solitaire.

 

[esthermoon]

I never thought I'd see a lib who I can respect....

I really like your signature

 

[tycho1572]

I never thought I'd see a lib who I can respect....

I really like your signature

Thanks

 

[Freewill]

Doesn't really matter, it's still a flawed system regardless of whether she did or didn't.

The SYSTEM as set up by the Founders is perfect. The problem is, the left keeps screwing with it because of their ignorance.

Perfect for who?

I disagree that it's perfect.

Firstly, it leads to only two parties. Two parties which are controlled by the rich for the rich. This isn't democracy.

Secondly, I've seen better systems working elsewhere. Systems that lead to more voice, more control for the people.

It best protects the RIGHTS of all.

We don't have a Democracy. You guys keep advocating Mob Rule -- the tyranny of the majority. You just don't get it and never will.

Read The 5,000 Leap

Mob rule? No, the thing that makes any system not mob rule is that there are rights that have to be taken into account. Germany isn't mob rule. You can shout it as much as you like, but it's just not the case. However during the election Trump supporters were calling for this change. Now they're not. Funny that.

Tyranny of the majority. Whats the difference between an election where most of the time it is the majority that decides, but sometimes it isn't the majority that decides? What difference does it make that Trump won by not getting the majority, or Trump won by getting the majority?

I believe Trump won 40 of the 50 states....so.....

I don't blame them for being pissed at the constitutional system they can not rig nor flood the country with voters and win.

 

[l.todd]

Maybe they're annoyed that this is the 2nd time in 16 years that they've lost an election by getting MORE votes than the other side.

Nope, it was 218 to 290, which is less.

Yeah, let's play dumb.

You know, this whole "he or she won the popular vote" is really a canard and not applicable. IF everyone knew that was the way the votes would be counted, then you might have a point. As it is, the candidates campaign completely differently and the mindset of voters in states that really aren't in play (California, NY, TX) would be different as well, so you really don't know how it would have turned out.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

http://m.townhall.com/tipsheet/chri...at-donald-trump-won-the-popular-vote-n2244077

Doesn't really matter, it's still a flawed system regardless of whether she did or didn't.

The SYSTEM as set up by the Founders is perfect. The problem is, the left keeps screwing with it because of their ignorance.

Perfect for who?

I disagree that it's perfect.

Firstly, it leads to only two parties. Two parties which are controlled by the rich for the rich. This isn't democracy.

Secondly, I've seen better systems working elsewhere. Systems that lead to more voice, more control for the people.

It best protects the RIGHTS of all.

We don't have a Democracy. You guys keep advocating Mob Rule -- the tyranny of the majority. You just don't get it and never will.

Read The 5,000 Leap

if you look at all the pictures, most of those acting up right now are younger kids. I suspect that we are seeing the ones that wanted Bernie in the first place. Spoiled little brats that are afraid of trying to make it on their own without some form of assistance, mommy and daddy brought them up thinking everything they wanted or needed would be supplied by someone else.
They are upset now that they see work in their future.
You dont see as many older working age people in those pictures, some, but not many.
I think even the older liberals have more sense than to start something that is likely to end them up in jail.
ever since the 60s and the protests against Nam, every generation that follows seems to have a need to fight for some cause or another. If not Trump, then it would be against a congress that might not support hillary, something.

That's part of it. The other part is they believe Trump is who the leftists say Trump is, not who he actually is. Many of them probably never spent a half-hour reading or listening to what he actually has to say.

 

[BlueGin]

Doesn't really matter, it's still a flawed system regardless of whether she did or didn't.

The SYSTEM as set up by the Founders is perfect. The problem is, the left keeps screwing with it because of their ignorance.

Perfect for who?

I disagree that it's perfect.

Firstly, it leads to only two parties. Two parties which are controlled by the rich for the rich. This isn't democracy.

Secondly, I've seen better systems working elsewhere. Systems that lead to more voice, more control for the people.

It best protects the RIGHTS of all.

We don't have a Democracy. You guys keep advocating Mob Rule -- the tyranny of the majority. You just don't get it and never will.

Read The 5,000 Leap

if you look at all the pictures, most of those acting up right now are younger kids. I suspect that we are seeing the ones that wanted Bernie in the first place. Spoiled little brats that are afraid of trying to make it on their own without some form of assistance, mommy and daddy brought them up thinking everything they wanted or needed would be supplied by someone else.
They are upset now that they see work in their future.
You dont see as many older working age people in those pictures, some, but not many.
I think even the older liberals have more sense than to start something that is likely to end them up in jail.
ever since the 60s and the protests against Nam, every generation that follows seems to have a need to fight for some cause or another. If not Trump, then it would be against a congress that might not support hillary, something.

That's part of it. The other part is they believe Trump is who the leftists say Trump is, not who he actually is. Many of them probably never spent a half-hour reading or listening to what he actually has to say.

Judging from most of these morons twitter and FB rants. Most of them don't read. Period.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Who could have predicted that the Democrats would lose? Anyone with half a brain. Americans are never going to accept a socialist government or a corrupt candidate like Clinton.

I wouldn't go that far. If the Democrats ran a Socialist not as corrupt as Hillary, we may have very well voted that person in unfortunately.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

There are idiots and hot heads on both sides.

Remember the calls for "revolution" if Hillary won.

The rhetoric of the campaign was heated and hurtful.

On both sides?

Rhetoric is one thing and actions are quite another. Now can you show me a video of a Tea Party person jumping up and down on a police car, or burning a flag when DumBama won the last two elections?