There is no solid evidence of a "man loving gene", for the millionth time. Quit pushing this lie.
no solid evidence means there is the possibility that there is ..so it's not a lie..
I thought you pulled your skirts and ran away.
Male sexual orientation influenced by genes, study shows | Science | The Guardian
Headline says loudly in bold black Text: "Male sexual orientation influenced by genes, study shows"
Underneath it, it contradicts itself: "Genes examined in study are "not sufficient" or "necessary" to make men gay but do play some role in sexuality, say US researchers"
"A region of the X chromosome called Xq28 had some impact on men's sexual behaviour – though scientists have no idea which of the many genes in the region are involved, nor how many lie elsewhere in the genome.
Another stretch of DNA on chromosome 8 also played a role in male sexual orientation – though again the precise mechanism is unclear."
So basically it's speculation, folks. The headline says one thing, the article says another. They say the gene has something to do with male sexuality, not that it determines whether they will be sexually oriented towards the same sex or not.*
SlyHunter's claim that they've found a "male loving gene" is easily disprovable bullshit, just by using common sense...they have NOT found a "man loving gene" or else they found "the gay gene" as well.
There is never going to be any proof of a genetic or any other biological cause for homosexuality in males, and so far, there has been no similiar genes found in women that they claim to hint at in men attracted to the same sex.
Not one single bit of evidence for genetic causes of lesbianism. Look it up for yourself. Wonder why that is?
Shouldn't you be atleast a little skeptical instead of just hoping & praying with your fingers crossed?*
Get over it, it's an enviromentally & socially caused sexual abnormality. It is not worthy of holding up as good for society.
Lol! You fail at this, Dawson's Creek. I'm not going anywhere anytime soon.