Your hysterical liars are pumping up a simple riot, into something it was not, to justify your next escalation in the partisan conflict
Correll wrote 22JAN27-POST#0081 above
NFBW wrote: I am presenting credible observable facts that have nothing to do with the observable facts of massive violence or whatever you wish to call it that happened on Jan6 at the US Capitol. If you pay attention to news coverage of the Jan6 Committee you would be aware of the heightened interest in Trump Lawyer John Eastman. This Trump adviser who is fast becoming a very interesting witness to the White House insider insurrection/coup attempt that also has nothing to do with violence. His plan called for “multiple slates of electors”
John Eastman, a conservative lawyer working with then-President Donald Trump's legal team, outlined in a two-page memo a scheme to try to persuade then-Vice President Mike Pence to subvert the Constitution and throw out the 2020 election results on January 6.
The Eastman memo:
1. VP Pence, presiding over the joint session (or Senate Pro Tempore Grassley, if Pence recuses himself), begins to open and count the ballots, starting with Alabama (without conceding that the procedure, specified by the Electoral Count Act, of going through the States alphabetically is required).
2. When he gets to Arizona, he announces that he has multiple slates of electors, and so is going to defer decision on that until finishing the other States. This would be the first break with the procedure set out in the Act
Why is that a big deal a Trump die-hard zombie might ask? The forged election certificates are a connection between at least fifty some state Republicans who may have committed election related crimes and who are connected through Eastman and Guilliani to the White House in what has to be some form of working together to overturn the election and declaring Trump the winner against the will of the American people. Is that seditious conspiracy to overturn the election? We shall see. 22JAN27-POST#0098