Garland vows to hold all those involved in January 6th accountable

It was exactly that. Trump tried to overturn the election. He used a brainwashed mob to help. The entire world knows.

You only resist because you supported it and buy the big lie. So transparent and predictable. You guys all share one brain cell.


Your hysterical liars are pumping up a simple riot, into something it was not, to justify your next escalation in the partisan conflict.


That is all this is. And you are an asshole.
 
Your hysterical liars are pumping up a simple riot, into something it was not, to justify your next escalation in the partisan conflict.


That is all this is. And you are an asshole.
Have your baby hissy fit.

It's not going to cover for the real reasons you're having a little hissy fit, which are that you supported the Insurrection and you believe the big lie.
 
If the final state tally was based on fraud, then tossing that state would have been a reasonable and practical response
Based on t
It was exactly that. Trump tried to overturn the election. He used a brainwashed mob to help. The entire world knows.

You only resist because you supported it and buy the big lie. So transparent and predictable. You guys all share one brain cell.

The impression I get from Correll ‘s writing is that this cultural Christian white traditional American does not buy the big lie. He essentially says the election was not fair to Trump because Officer Derek Chauvin murdered George Floyd and black people are brainwashed by Democrats to believe Trump is a racist and that makes criminals riot and loot at the behest of BLM ANTIFA and the entire Democratic Party because mob violence hurts TRUMP and helps Democrats.

Correll also pushes the concept that if DJT believes the big lie to him it’s true so any action taken based on the BIg Lie is justified.
 
Nope. Gore used lawyers, even worse.


His attempt was a bald faced attempt to steal the election. And I did not get hysterical like you leftards have done.


So, your claim was wrong. That is my point. A response to your point. Do you have a comment to make that addresses that?
Gore never submitted fake elector documents, aka alternate electors.
Gore never called up a state to ask them for 11,780 more votes.

But Trump did use lawyers after the election,, at least 63 lawsuits

 
Gore asked for a selective recount, of only dem heavy counties.
Correll wrote 22JAN27-POST#0076 above

NFBW wrote: The recounts were prior to the safe harbor deadline and Gore conceded after following an absolutely established legal process in a state that Bush won by 400 or so votes. Here is an excerpt on that.
Meanwhile, on December 6 the Republican-controlled Florida legislature convened a special session to appoint a slate of electors pledged to Bush, as the U.S. Constitution bestows upon state legislatures the duty to determine how its state's electors are appointed. On December 12, the same day as the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, the Florida House approved awarding the state's electoral votes to Bush, but the matter was moot after the Court's ruling. Some have argued that awarding the electors in this manner would be illegal.[15]
On December 13, Gore conceded the election to Bush in a nationally televised address.​

DJT did not follow an established legal process after the safe harbor deadline
had passed. DJT pressured Pence to unilaterally decide on a “whim” to declare he had received two slates of electors from six states that he and DJT lost. Because of two sets of electors the votes from those states will not be counted. Trump Therefore wins. 22JAN27-POST#0091
 
Last edited:
It was an attempt to use the established legal process to get votes that were, in their view, tainted, thrown out, so that the election would be based on actual votes.
Correll wrote 22JAN27-POST#0071 above

NFBW wrote
: Your original argument Correll was that DJT wanted the election redone after the DECEMBER 14 certification safe harbor date “so that the election would be based on actual votes.” which is what certification in safe harbor is. Then it was pointed out to you Correll that ‘counting all” 150 million legal actual votes was not what DJT pressured Pence to do. DJT wanted Pence to delete six states with certified votes from the electoral total vote count just enough to finaggle the numbers to declare TRUMPpence the winner.. So you adjusted your argument saying it is perfectly reasonable to deprive the multicultural political party the right to choose a President if the mostly white monocultural primarily white evangelical Christian traditional American party runs a President who decides entirely on his own that the only reason that he lost was due to fraud in big cities where most of the multicultural voters reside.

If the final state tally was based on fraud, then tossing that state would have been a reasonable and practical response

Correll wrote 22JAN27-POST#0078 above

So tossing out the entire state after two months of finding that no significance of game changing fraud exists so the loser gets to win is reasonable and practical response in your mind. I guess it would be reasonable and practical to racist fascists types who don’t want people of color voting in blue counties with big cities. The shoe fits you well. 22JAN27-POST#0092
 
Last edited:
No, it wasn't. It was an attempt to use the established legal process to get votes that were, in their view, tainted, thrown out, so that the election would be based on actual votes
Count Correll wrote 22JAN27-POST#0071 above

NFBW wrote:
The Eastman Memo says nothing about throwing out tainted ballots leading up to Jan6. .

And then you support throwing out the entire state for any evidence of fraud that you think Trump was searching for.
Three voters from Florida have been arrested on charges of voting more than once in the 2020 presidential elections.​
The three are all residents of The Villages committed in Florida and were arrested over the last two weeks. They include, Jay Ketcik, 63; Joan Halstead, 71; and John Rider, 61​

Are you for dumping all votes in Florida because of these MAGA double voters? 22JAN27-POST#0096
 
Your hysterical liars are pumping up a simple riot, into something it was not, to justify your next escalation in the partisan conflict
Correll wrote 22JAN27-POST#0081 above

NFBW wrote:
I am presenting credible observable facts that have nothing to do with the observable facts of massive violence or whatever you wish to call it that happened on Jan6 at the US Capitol. If you pay attention to news coverage of the Jan6 Committee you would be aware of the heightened interest in Trump Lawyer John Eastman. This Trump adviser who is fast becoming a very interesting witness to the White House insider insurrection/coup attempt that also has nothing to do with violence. His plan called for “multiple slates of electors”
John Eastman, a conservative lawyer working with then-President Donald Trump's legal team, outlined in a two-page memo a scheme to try to persuade then-Vice President Mike Pence to subvert the Constitution and throw out the 2020 election results on January 6.​
The Eastman memo:​
1. VP Pence, presiding over the joint session (or Senate Pro Tempore Grassley, if Pence recuses himself), begins to open and count the ballots, starting with Alabama (without conceding that the procedure, specified by the Electoral Count Act, of going through the States alphabetically is required).​
2. When he gets to Arizona, he announces that he has multiple slates of electors, and so is going to defer decision on that until finishing the other States. This would be the first break with the procedure set out in the Act

Why is that a big deal a Trump die-hard zombie might ask? The forged election certificates are a connection between at least fifty some state Republicans who may have committed election related crimes and who are connected through Eastman and Guilliani to the White House in what has to be some form of working together to overturn the election and declaring Trump the winner against the will of the American people. Is that seditious conspiracy to overturn the election? We shall see. 22JAN27-POST#0098
 
Last edited:
When is Garland going to hold the Negroes and Communists accountable that spent six months looting, burning, rioting, murdering and destroying government and civilian buildings in over 200 American cities?

Huh?
Those BLM and Antifa rioters are Democrats or at least they helped out the Democratic efforts to cause Trump to lose in 2020. Democrats likely helped financed those rIots and we know some bailed the rioters out so they could go back to rioting again. Therefore chances are they will NEVER be prosecuted.

Notice how the riots have basically stopped now that a Democrat is in the Oval Office.

 
Democrats likely helped financed those rIots and we know some bailed the rioters out so they could go back to rioting again.
Batcat wrote 22JAN27-POST#0099 above

NFBW wrote: You are a propaganda spewing racist.. Police described the group that walked on I-94 to protest the murder of George Floyd as organized and peaceful. They were not rioters, You are one helluva keyboard agent provocateur aiding those trying to incite a race war. - - - Protesters sometimes commit civil disobedience, peacefully, it disrupts things. In this case a highway, no one was hurt. 46 protesters were arrested for a misdemeanor. , Bail was set at $1500 - People donate to a fund to help civil disobedience protesters out. It’s not set up to bail out violent criminals in order to promote riots - You are a sick racist to suggest that’s what happened here.

About 1,500 people who gathered for a large protest at the Capitol in St. Paul on Sunday began marching later in the afternoon and walked onto Interstate 94. They headed westbound for about an hour before they exited.


Police described the group as organized and peaceful. After leaving the Capitol, the group used the St. Anthony Avenue ramp to enter Interstate 94 West shortly after 4 p.m. They exited at Lexington Parkway about 5 p.m. to University Avenue, headed east and returned to the Capitol. 22JAN28-POST#0100
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top