Garbage Articles From The Left

[Billy_Kinetta]

Stupidest thing I've read this week. Why do they write shit like this? The comments are dead-on.

The F-22 came face to face with Russia's top fighter and was at a major disadvantage

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

I blame the Senators from states that build military weapons and the brass that wants a 7 figure salaries when they retire.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

I blame the Senators from states that build military weapons and the brass that wants a 7 figure salaries when they retire.

Blame for what? The "disadvantage" noted is complete crap.

 

[Bleipriester]

The "disadvantage" noted is complete crap.

The disadvantage noted is absolutely true. You just were way too furious to read the entire article, where it is explained.

"During an intercept, a jet pulls up next to the plane that has invaded its airspace and tells the plane via radio some version of "turn around or this will escalate."

At this time, it's customary for the jet to tilt its wings and show the intruding adversary a wing full of missiles. But the F-22 can never do that. Because of its stealth design, the F-22 stores all missiles and bombs internally.

A pilot intruding into US or US-protected airspace and meeting an F-22 really has no idea whether the jet is armed."

"If a fight were to start during an intercept like the one this week, the Russian pilot would start with the huge advantage of having the F-22 in sight. What's more, the Russian Su-35 can actually maneuver better than the F-22."

You can see, the article is not really about aircraft capabilities but about the rules of engagement active according to the Russian-US agreement.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

"A pilot intruding into US or US-protected airspace and meeting an F-22 really has no idea whether the jet is armed."

Total nonsense. Every single Russian fighter pilot is aware of the F-22's capabilities, as we are theirs.

 

[Bleipriester]

"A pilot intruding into US or US-protected airspace and meeting an F-22 really has no idea whether the jet is armed."

Total nonsense. Every single Russian fighter pilot is aware of the F-22's capabilities, as we are theirs.

Whether the jet is armed or not is not about capabilities. The F-22 cannot show its teeth. This might be unimportant but in the end the article is right and other planes are better suited to do the intercept job.
If you ask me, it is kindergarten. Tragic kindergarten. All countries should unite to fight terrorism. Very tragic that a Su 25 needs protection from a Su 35 to carry out a mission against ISIS.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

"A pilot intruding into US or US-protected airspace and meeting an F-22 really has no idea whether the jet is armed."

Total nonsense. Every single Russian fighter pilot is aware of the F-22's capabilities, as we are theirs.

Whether the jet is armed or not is not about capabilities. The F-22 cannot show its teeth. This might be unimportant but in the end the article is right and other planes are better suited to do the intercept job.
If you ask me, it is kindergarten. Tragic kindergarten. All countries should unite to fight terrorism. Very tragic that a Su 25 needs protection from a Su 35 to carry out a mission against ISIS.

The problem here is, the Russians like to press the envolope from time to time. The line of Deescalation is there to prevent this. But the Russians will cross it. Part of it is to gain information on the US and the other part is, they have always done this stupidity.

I agree that the wrong bird was used by the US for intercept. The F-15 should have been the one used. The Rules of engagement works better if you are bristling with missiles in plain site. Can a SU-35 out manuever a F-15? That was once said about the Mig-29 but that was proven in combat as false more than once.

 

[Bleipriester]

"A pilot intruding into US or US-protected airspace and meeting an F-22 really has no idea whether the jet is armed."

Total nonsense. Every single Russian fighter pilot is aware of the F-22's capabilities, as we are theirs.

Whether the jet is armed or not is not about capabilities. The F-22 cannot show its teeth. This might be unimportant but in the end the article is right and other planes are better suited to do the intercept job.
If you ask me, it is kindergarten. Tragic kindergarten. All countries should unite to fight terrorism. Very tragic that a Su 25 needs protection from a Su 35 to carry out a mission against ISIS.

The problem here is, the Russians like to press the envolope from time to time. The line of Deescalation is there to prevent this. But the Russians will cross it. Part of it is to gain information on the US and the other part is, they have always done this stupidity.

I agree that the wrong bird was used by the US for intercept. The F-15 should have been the one used. The Rules of engagement works better if you are bristling with missiles in plain site. Can a SU-35 out manuever a F-15? That was once said about the Mig-29 but that was proven in combat as false more than once.

Mig-29 can even out maneuver F-16 and an F-15 has the mass of two F-16.
It´s always the same blame game. In the end, Russia has been invited to Syria and Russian planes fly there legally.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

"A pilot intruding into US or US-protected airspace and meeting an F-22 really has no idea whether the jet is armed."

Total nonsense. Every single Russian fighter pilot is aware of the F-22's capabilities, as we are theirs.

Whether the jet is armed or not is not about capabilities. The F-22 cannot show its teeth. This might be unimportant but in the end the article is right and other planes are better suited to do the intercept job.
If you ask me, it is kindergarten. Tragic kindergarten. All countries should unite to fight terrorism. Very tragic that a Su 25 needs protection from a Su 35 to carry out a mission against ISIS.

The problem here is, the Russians like to press the envolope from time to time. The line of Deescalation is there to prevent this. But the Russians will cross it. Part of it is to gain information on the US and the other part is, they have always done this stupidity.

I agree that the wrong bird was used by the US for intercept. The F-15 should have been the one used. The Rules of engagement works better if you are bristling with missiles in plain site. Can a SU-35 out manuever a F-15? That was once said about the Mig-29 but that was proven in combat as false more than once.

Mig-29 can even out maneuver F-16 and an F-15 has the mass of two F-16.
It´s always the same blame game. In the end, Russia has been invited to Syria and Russian planes fly there legally.

Part of the F-15 record shows that:

One Mig-29 must have had a really good pilot. He got inside a F-15C to start. The turning and jinxing began. In the end, the F-15 bagged him close up with an Aim-9. The F-15 credited the kill

Another Mig-29 ended up with a F-15 on his read. The Mig-29 turned and jinxed hard. Meanwhile, the F-15 stayed with him. In the end, it kept getting lower and lower until the Mig-29 ate the grass. No kill on that one.

Both of these were Iraqi Pilots and were hotter than a fire cracker. Just not as good as the USAF pilots. One got to punch out and the other buried himself still in his seat. That has been the only time that the Mig-29 got that close to any F-15 in combat. 115-0 says it all.

 

[Bleipriester]

"A pilot intruding into US or US-protected airspace and meeting an F-22 really has no idea whether the jet is armed."

Total nonsense. Every single Russian fighter pilot is aware of the F-22's capabilities, as we are theirs.

Whether the jet is armed or not is not about capabilities. The F-22 cannot show its teeth. This might be unimportant but in the end the article is right and other planes are better suited to do the intercept job.
If you ask me, it is kindergarten. Tragic kindergarten. All countries should unite to fight terrorism. Very tragic that a Su 25 needs protection from a Su 35 to carry out a mission against ISIS.

The problem here is, the Russians like to press the envolope from time to time. The line of Deescalation is there to prevent this. But the Russians will cross it. Part of it is to gain information on the US and the other part is, they have always done this stupidity.

I agree that the wrong bird was used by the US for intercept. The F-15 should have been the one used. The Rules of engagement works better if you are bristling with missiles in plain site. Can a SU-35 out manuever a F-15? That was once said about the Mig-29 but that was proven in combat as false more than once.

Mig-29 can even out maneuver F-16 and an F-15 has the mass of two F-16.
It´s always the same blame game. In the end, Russia has been invited to Syria and Russian planes fly there legally.

Part of the F-15 record shows that:

One Mig-29 must have had a really good pilot. He got inside a F-15C to start. The turning and jinxing began. In the end, the F-15 bagged him close up with an Aim-9. The F-15 credited the kill

Another Mig-29 ended up with a F-15 on his read. The Mig-29 turned and jinxed hard. Meanwhile, the F-15 stayed with him. In the end, it kept getting lower and lower until the Mig-29 ate the grass. No kill on that one.

Both of these were Iraqi Pilots and were hotter than a fire cracker. Just not as good as the USAF pilots. One got to punch out and the other buried himself still in his seat. That has been the only time that the Mig-29 got that close to any F-15 in combat. 115-0 says it all.

The Mig 29 downed as many planes as it was downed in Iraq. And you cannot take your fully equipped F-15 with a pilot who has hundreds of hours of flying experience, throw it against an old ramshackle and downgraded Mig-29 that was never maintained and is flown by a pilot with little experience.Also take in consideration the better framework the F-15 works in. AWACS, ect.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

"A pilot intruding into US or US-protected airspace and meeting an F-22 really has no idea whether the jet is armed."

Total nonsense. Every single Russian fighter pilot is aware of the F-22's capabilities, as we are theirs.

Whether the jet is armed or not is not about capabilities. The F-22 cannot show its teeth. This might be unimportant but in the end the article is right and other planes are better suited to do the intercept job.
If you ask me, it is kindergarten. Tragic kindergarten. All countries should unite to fight terrorism. Very tragic that a Su 25 needs protection from a Su 35 to carry out a mission against ISIS.

The problem here is, the Russians like to press the envolope from time to time. The line of Deescalation is there to prevent this. But the Russians will cross it. Part of it is to gain information on the US and the other part is, they have always done this stupidity.

I agree that the wrong bird was used by the US for intercept. The F-15 should have been the one used. The Rules of engagement works better if you are bristling with missiles in plain site. Can a SU-35 out manuever a F-15? That was once said about the Mig-29 but that was proven in combat as false more than once.

Mig-29 can even out maneuver F-16 and an F-15 has the mass of two F-16.
It´s always the same blame game. In the end, Russia has been invited to Syria and Russian planes fly there legally.

Part of the F-15 record shows that:

One Mig-29 must have had a really good pilot. He got inside a F-15C to start. The turning and jinxing began. In the end, the F-15 bagged him close up with an Aim-9. The F-15 credited the kill

Another Mig-29 ended up with a F-15 on his read. The Mig-29 turned and jinxed hard. Meanwhile, the F-15 stayed with him. In the end, it kept getting lower and lower until the Mig-29 ate the grass. No kill on that one.

Both of these were Iraqi Pilots and were hotter than a fire cracker. Just not as good as the USAF pilots. One got to punch out and the other buried himself still in his seat. That has been the only time that the Mig-29 got that close to any F-15 in combat. 115-0 says it all.

The Mig 29 downed as many planes as it was downed in Iraq. And you cannot take your fully equipped F-15 with a pilot who has hundreds of hours of flying experience, throw it against an old ramshackle and downgraded Mig-29 that was never maintained and is flown by a pilot with little experience.Also take in consideration the better framework the F-15 works in. AWACS, ect.

Most elected to sit on the ground and be destroyed or fly to Syria or Iran. You can't stand it that not one F-15 has ever been lost in combat. You can even blow one wing completely off and it gets home just fine (with tanker support)

Get over it. The Mig-29 is listed as not wanted by anyone anymore. And even the Mig-35 just isn't selling either. It's become a joke of the fighter skies.

 

[Bleipriester]

Whether the jet is armed or not is not about capabilities. The F-22 cannot show its teeth. This might be unimportant but in the end the article is right and other planes are better suited to do the intercept job.
If you ask me, it is kindergarten. Tragic kindergarten. All countries should unite to fight terrorism. Very tragic that a Su 25 needs protection from a Su 35 to carry out a mission against ISIS.

The problem here is, the Russians like to press the envolope from time to time. The line of Deescalation is there to prevent this. But the Russians will cross it. Part of it is to gain information on the US and the other part is, they have always done this stupidity.

I agree that the wrong bird was used by the US for intercept. The F-15 should have been the one used. The Rules of engagement works better if you are bristling with missiles in plain site. Can a SU-35 out manuever a F-15? That was once said about the Mig-29 but that was proven in combat as false more than once.

Mig-29 can even out maneuver F-16 and an F-15 has the mass of two F-16.
It´s always the same blame game. In the end, Russia has been invited to Syria and Russian planes fly there legally.

Part of the F-15 record shows that:

One Mig-29 must have had a really good pilot. He got inside a F-15C to start. The turning and jinxing began. In the end, the F-15 bagged him close up with an Aim-9. The F-15 credited the kill

Another Mig-29 ended up with a F-15 on his read. The Mig-29 turned and jinxed hard. Meanwhile, the F-15 stayed with him. In the end, it kept getting lower and lower until the Mig-29 ate the grass. No kill on that one.

Both of these were Iraqi Pilots and were hotter than a fire cracker. Just not as good as the USAF pilots. One got to punch out and the other buried himself still in his seat. That has been the only time that the Mig-29 got that close to any F-15 in combat. 115-0 says it all.

The Mig 29 downed as many planes as it was downed in Iraq. And you cannot take your fully equipped F-15 with a pilot who has hundreds of hours of flying experience, throw it against an old ramshackle and downgraded Mig-29 that was never maintained and is flown by a pilot with little experience.Also take in consideration the better framework the F-15 works in. AWACS, ect.

Most elected to sit on the ground and be destroyed or fly to Syria or Iran. You can't stand it that not one F-15 has ever been lost in combat. You can even blow one wing completely off and it gets home just fine (with tanker support)

Get over it. The Mig-29 is listed as not wanted by anyone anymore. And even the Mig-35 just isn't selling either. It's become a joke of the fighter skies.

Russia was second lagerst arms exporter before 2015. The involvement in Syria increased the interest for Russian arms.

The Syria War Is Showcasing Russian Arms, Promoting Sales

You have totally ignored my points, by the way. F-15 is bombing Palestinian civilians, what losses do you expect?

 

[Daryl Hunt]

The problem here is, the Russians like to press the envolope from time to time. The line of Deescalation is there to prevent this. But the Russians will cross it. Part of it is to gain information on the US and the other part is, they have always done this stupidity.

I agree that the wrong bird was used by the US for intercept. The F-15 should have been the one used. The Rules of engagement works better if you are bristling with missiles in plain site. Can a SU-35 out manuever a F-15? That was once said about the Mig-29 but that was proven in combat as false more than once.

Mig-29 can even out maneuver F-16 and an F-15 has the mass of two F-16.
It´s always the same blame game. In the end, Russia has been invited to Syria and Russian planes fly there legally.

Part of the F-15 record shows that:

One Mig-29 must have had a really good pilot. He got inside a F-15C to start. The turning and jinxing began. In the end, the F-15 bagged him close up with an Aim-9. The F-15 credited the kill

Another Mig-29 ended up with a F-15 on his read. The Mig-29 turned and jinxed hard. Meanwhile, the F-15 stayed with him. In the end, it kept getting lower and lower until the Mig-29 ate the grass. No kill on that one.

Both of these were Iraqi Pilots and were hotter than a fire cracker. Just not as good as the USAF pilots. One got to punch out and the other buried himself still in his seat. That has been the only time that the Mig-29 got that close to any F-15 in combat. 115-0 says it all.

The Mig 29 downed as many planes as it was downed in Iraq. And you cannot take your fully equipped F-15 with a pilot who has hundreds of hours of flying experience, throw it against an old ramshackle and downgraded Mig-29 that was never maintained and is flown by a pilot with little experience.Also take in consideration the better framework the F-15 works in. AWACS, ect.

Most elected to sit on the ground and be destroyed or fly to Syria or Iran. You can't stand it that not one F-15 has ever been lost in combat. You can even blow one wing completely off and it gets home just fine (with tanker support)

Get over it. The Mig-29 is listed as not wanted by anyone anymore. And even the Mig-35 just isn't selling either. It's become a joke of the fighter skies.

Russia was second lagerst arms exporter before 2015. The involvement in Syria increased the interest for Russian arms.

The Syria War Is Showcasing Russian Arms, Promoting Sales

You have totally ignored my points, by the way. F-15 is bombing Palestinian civilians, what losses do you expect?

Your cite shows that some countries are interested in support equipment like their radar sites and such. Not much interest in their Aircraft.

As for your points, since you just make crap up, I ignore it. Besides, it's the F-16s that do the bombing. If they don't like it, stop lobbing in those missiles into Israel. Pretty simple solution.

 

[Bleipriester]

Your cite shows that some countries are interested in support equipment like their radar sites and such. Not much interest in their Aircraft.

Can´t afford or already have.

As for your points, since you just make crap up, I ignore it.

They are totally valid. Those airforces don´t have the trillions...

Besides, it's the F-16s that do the bombing. If they don't like it, stop lobbing in those missiles into Israel. Pretty simple solution.

Ask them, not me. Here you go:
http://hamas.ps/en/