Gallup Poll:Only 4 in 10 Americans Believe In Evolution

I don't believe it was ever meant to. Darwin came up with a very workable theory that explains why there is such a proliferation of species on this planet. It was never meant to explain everything back to The Big Bang.
Exactly right. The more excitable of the religious types in these threads, however, screech about the failure of "Darwinism" while being completely oblivious to what the theory actually does address.
 
Exactly right. The more excitable of the religious types in these threads, however, screech about the failure of "Darwinism" while being completely oblivious to what the theory actually does address.
Pascals's wager....
 
At most, fossils show that there were once many animals and plants on Earth that are no longer living. They dont tell us anything about how they came to be, why those particular animals died off and why there are so many different species.
That’s wrong. They and the surrounding fossilized “environment” that is found around each can provide evidence for every bit of it. It’s OK to do a little research.
 
That’s wrong. They and the surrounding fossilized “environment” they are found around it provide evidence for every bit of it. It’s OK to do a little research.
You seem to have done very little, or you would present it.

Dagosa, we got off on the wrong foot. Dial down the personal attacks and make a coherent argument.

What are some of the fossils that show why extinct animals died off?
 
Ok so you misspoke about the fossils being a "written record?"
Hence putting “ written record “ in quotes.
BTW, there were at least nine different species of humanoids where now there are only one. As many as 90% of the species in the ocean having even been discovered yet.
So whether the number of species is decreasing or increasing is not that conclusive over all.
 
What are some of the fossils that show why extinct animals died off?
That’s a reasonable question. You can get pretty reliable answers by going to any one of thousands of web sites and asking. It’s simple. You get the same answers time after time from accredited schools, then it’s reliable. That’s where the environment they were found in comes in.
 
Hence putting “ written record “ in quotes.
Was that you? I thought it was that "rightwinger," guy?
BTW, there were at least nine different species of humanoids where now there are only one. As many as 90% of the species in the ocean having even been discovered yet.
So whether the number of species is decreasing or increasing is not that conclusive over all.
Ok, how does that prove evolution?

Species die off, is the best interpretation of the fossils.

That doesn't mean that humans evolved from these "humanoids." Do evolutionary researchers really call them that?

That’s a reasonable question. You can get pretty reliable answers by going to any one of thousands of web sites and asking. It’s simple. You get the same answers time after time from accredited schools, then it’s reliable. That’s where the environment they were found in comes in.
But, you yourself have not visited these websites nor attended the accredited schools you speak of?

If you did, why not just say, "here's the proof, the fossils of blah-blah species show why extinct animals died off?" If you don't know, and you're just relying on those with expertise in the field, that's fine.
 
What are some of the fossils that show why extinct animals died off?

A fossil can be a piece of dessicated bone or it could be just the imprint of a dead organism left in the surrounding material. How would you determine pathology or morbidity from that?

Fossils proved that an organism existed and approximately what time period it existed. It doesn't give a detailed diary of its life.
 
A fossil can be a piece of dessicated bone or it could be just the imprint of a dead organism left in the surrounding material. How would you determine pathology or morbidity from that?

Fossils proved that an organism existed and approximately what time period it existed. It doesn't give a detailed diary of its life.
That's exactly right.

It is kind of shocking how tiny and fragmentary some of the supposed breakthrough fossils are. Especially considering the fanfare that evolutionist propaganda gives them.
 
Was that you? I thought it was that "rightwinger," guy?

Ok, how does that prove evolution?

Species die off, is the best interpretation of the fossils.

That doesn't mean that humans evolved from these "humanoids." Do evolutionary researchers really call them that?


But, you yourself have not visited these websites nor attended the accredited schools you speak of?

If you did, why not just say, "here's the proof, the fossils of blah-blah species show why extinct animals died off?" If you don't know, and you're just relying on those with expertise in the field, that's fine.
You, yourself and your other self should have attended the science curriculum in school. Fossil remains identify that some animals alive today did not go extinct.

Did the space aliens play a cruel joke on you?

 
Was that you? I thought it was that "rightwinger," guy?

Ok, how does that prove evolution?

Species die off, is the best interpretation of the fossils.

That doesn't mean that humans evolved from these "humanoids." Do evolutionary researchers really call them that?


But, you yourself have not visited these websites nor attended the accredited schools you speak of?

If you did, why not just say, "here's the proof, the fossils of blah-blah species show why extinct animals died off?" If you don't know, and you're just relying on those with expertise in the field, that's fine.
Ok, how does that prove evolution?
Nothing “ proves” evolution. That’s why it’s called a theory.
But, you yourself have not visited these websites nor attended the accredited schools you speak of?
Geesus, informed people do it all the time. It’s funny you question the institutions that provide explanations on evolution which thousands of people including doctors, refer to al, the time for treatments for diseases like prostate cancer.
That doesn't mean that humans evolved from these "humanoids." Do evolutionary researchers really call them that?
We have DNA evidence that’s as conclusive as to where our species originated as it does for the FBI and other law Enforcement cases to use to help juries conclude innocences and guilt of “humanoids “ all the time. It’s a joke that anyone would not use these sources.
Really, why would I look it up when it’s easily available to you and anyone else ?
 
That's exactly right.

It is kind of shocking how tiny and fragmentary some of the supposed breakthrough fossils are. Especially considering the fanfare that evolutionist propaganda gives them.
Oh, dear. Your evilutionist atheist conspiracy theory must be true afterall.

Maybe alert Harun Yahya.
 
Nothing “ proves” evolution. That’s why it’s called a theory.
Correct. Unfortunately, there is no way to prove or disprove what happened in the past. Evolution is not science, it is natural history. No experiment can be performed to disprove evolution, therefore it is not subject to experimental research.
Geesus, informed people do it all the time. It’s funny you question the institutions that provide explanations on evolution which thousands of people including doctors, refer to al, the time for treatments for diseases like prostate cancer.

We have DNA evidence that’s as conclusive as to where our species originated as it does for the FBI and other law Enforcement cases to use to help juries conclude innocences and guilt of “humanoids “ all the time. It’s a joke that anyone would not use these sources.
Really, why would I like it up when it’s easily available to you ?
Ok, what is that DNA evidence?

If you want to have a debate, telling me to go find web sites is a very poor debate technique. If you just want to troll, I guess that works for you.

It is clear at this point, that you haven't read these websites you speak of.
 
You seem to have done very little, or you would present it.
That’s hilarious. All deniers are interested in is playing gotcha games. They should do their own research so we can all laugh when they keep claiming they know more them JHU, Mass General, Harvard and UCLA Med and research facilities……among 3400 plus others.
 
That’s hilarious. All deniers are interested in is playing gotcha games. They should do their own research so we can all laugh when they keep claiming they know more them JHU, Mass General, Harvard and UCLA Med and research facilities……among 3400 plus others.
It is fascinating that an anonymous poster with an obvious lack of science training posting on a message board can singlehandedly “destroy evolutionism”.
 
That’s hilarious. All deniers are interested in is playing gotcha games. They should do their own research so we can all laugh when they keep claiming they know more them JHU, Mass General, Harvard and UCLA Med and research facilities……among 3400 plus others.
So, you have literally nothing?
 
Back
Top Bottom