Gallup: Obama Drops Again

[theDoctorisIn]

No matter how many polls you post Sinatra, it doesn't take away from the fact that you've been talking about how Obama's poll numbers are falling like a stone - but in reality, his numbers have been pretty much the same for the last 6 months.

And they're still higher than Reagan's were, at this point in his presidency. Poll numbers mean NOTHING right now.

You may be right.
But the 38% saying that his policies are not creating prosperity tells us much in temrs of favoring liberal politcies.
But yes, as for his poularity...time will tell. People are selfish. They want to see the money.
They arent seeing the money yet.

It tells us nothing. As conservatives have been constantly pointing out, Obama hasn't really been doing many "liberal" policies - he's been the same as Bush and everyone else.

 

[Oldandtired]

No matter how many polls you post Sinatra, it doesn't take away from the fact that you've been talking about how Obama's poll numbers are falling like a stone - but in reality, his numbers have been pretty much the same for the last 6 months.

And they're still higher than Reagan's were, at this point in his presidency. Poll numbers mean NOTHING right now.

You may be right.
But the 38% saying that his policies are not creating prosperity tells us much in temrs of favoring liberal politcies.
But yes, as for his poularity...time will tell. People are selfish. They want to see the money.
They arent seeing the money yet.

It tells us nothing. As conservatives have been constantly pointing out, Obama hasn't really been doing many "liberal" policies - he's been the same as Bush and everyone else.

He supports C and T....and contrary to what you may believe, I beleieve it is a liberal policy.
He wants to make major adjustments to compensate for global warming or whatever they call it now...climate change I think is the most recent term. That too, to me, is a liberal belief...so any policy compensating for it is a liberal policy.
He is s strong advocate for "spread the wealth" ideas.....I see that as a liberal policy...

But I am a conservative....so I see Bush as a liberal....so dont go by what I say.

 

[Modbert]

Did you read some of the stimulus that he approved when he signed?

I did, all those tax cuts!

 

[theDoctorisIn]

You may be right.
But the 38% saying that his policies are not creating prosperity tells us much in temrs of favoring liberal politcies.
But yes, as for his poularity...time will tell. People are selfish. They want to see the money.
They arent seeing the money yet.

It tells us nothing. As conservatives have been constantly pointing out, Obama hasn't really been doing many "liberal" policies - he's been the same as Bush and everyone else.

He supports C and T....and contrary to what you may believe, I beleieve it is a liberal policy.
He wants to make major adjustments to compensate for global warming or whatever they call it now...climate change I think is the most recent term. That too, to me, is a liberal belief...so any policy compensating for it is a liberal policy.
He is s strong advocate for "spread the wealth" ideas.....I see that as a liberal policy...

But I am a conservative....so I see Bush as a liberal....so dont go by what I say.

First, outside of these political message boards, the vast majority of scientists and people believe in man-made climate change, left and right.

And I see you've returned to the "spread the wealth" quote. As much as conservatives love to pull that quote out (simply because it sounds communist) - what exactly has Obama done to "spread the wealth"?

 

[Oldandtired]

It tells us nothing. As conservatives have been constantly pointing out, Obama hasn't really been doing many "liberal" policies - he's been the same as Bush and everyone else.

He supports C and T....and contrary to what you may believe, I beleieve it is a liberal policy.
He wants to make major adjustments to compensate for global warming or whatever they call it now...climate change I think is the most recent term. That too, to me, is a liberal belief...so any policy compensating for it is a liberal policy.
He is s strong advocate for "spread the wealth" ideas.....I see that as a liberal policy...

But I am a conservative....so I see Bush as a liberal....so dont go by what I say.

First, outside of these political message boards, the vast majority of scientists and people believe in man-made climate change, left and right.

And I see you've returned to the "spread the wealth" quote. As much as conservatives love to pull that quote out (simply because it sounds communist) - what exactly has Obama done to "spread the wealth"?

Spread the wealth is not "communist" to me. It is a belief that is actually very commendable...but not what I believe in as it pertains to personal responsibility.

if one says "whats wrong with spreading the wealth a little" is one that I see as a liberal. I do not hold it against them...but as a conservative, I would never see anyone as anything other than one with liberal values if he uses a line like that.

It is not a stab at him. I dont hold it against him just as I dont hold it against anyone who believes in that....but it defines a persons political belief in my eyes..,..and one that believes in spreading the wealth is one of a liberal belief...IN MY EYES.

 

[Sinatra]

No matter how many polls you post Sinatra, it doesn't take away from the fact that you've been talking about how Obama's poll numbers are falling like a stone - but in reality, his numbers have been pretty much the same for the last 6 months.
______


LOL. Keep confusing reality with your own hopes n dreams pard!!

Obama saw Gallup approval at 52% about six months ago, and dissaproval at 41%.

Todays numbers show a net loss of -12 in just 6 months. That is a significant - and steady, drop in just that short amount of time, far from the "pretty much the same" you are attempting to spin.

Obama is proving a complete and utter failure and is joined by his moronic pals Pelosi and Reid in helping him along to political oblivion...

 

[theDoctorisIn]

He supports C and T....and contrary to what you may believe, I beleieve it is a liberal policy.
He wants to make major adjustments to compensate for global warming or whatever they call it now...climate change I think is the most recent term. That too, to me, is a liberal belief...so any policy compensating for it is a liberal policy.
He is s strong advocate for "spread the wealth" ideas.....I see that as a liberal policy...

But I am a conservative....so I see Bush as a liberal....so dont go by what I say.

First, outside of these political message boards, the vast majority of scientists and people believe in man-made climate change, left and right.

And I see you've returned to the "spread the wealth" quote. As much as conservatives love to pull that quote out (simply because it sounds communist) - what exactly has Obama done to "spread the wealth"?

Spread the wealth is not "communist" to me. It is a belief that is actually very commendable...but not what I believe in as it pertains to personal responsibility.

if one says "whats wrong with spreading the wealth a little" is one that I see as a liberal. I do not hold it against them...but as a conservative, I would never see anyone as anything other than one with liberal values if he uses a line like that.

It is not a stab at him. I dont hold it against him just as I dont hold it against anyone who believes in that....but it defines a persons political belief in my eyes..,..and one that believes in spreading the wealth is one of a liberal belief...IN MY EYES.

I think you're mistaking his rhetoric for what he really is.

Of course his rhetoric is liberal - that's why he won. But Washington is a machine - and he's a machine part. The machine doesn't allow anything that far from the status quo.

 

[Sinatra]

+

No matter how many polls you post Sinatra, it doesn't take away from the fact that you've been talking about how Obama's poll numbers are falling like a stone - but in reality, his numbers have been pretty much the same for the last 6 months.
______


LOL. Keep confusing reality with your own hopes n dreams pard!!

Obama saw Gallup approval at 52% about six months ago, and dissaproval at 41%.

Todays numbers show a net loss of -12 in just 6 months. That is a significant - and steady, drop in just that short amount of time, far from the "pretty much the same" you are attempting to spin.

Obama is proving a complete and utter failure and is joined by his moronic pals Pelosi and Reid in helping him along to political oblivion...

 

[Oldandtired]

First, outside of these political message boards, the vast majority of scientists and people believe in man-made climate change, left and right.

And I see you've returned to the "spread the wealth" quote. As much as conservatives love to pull that quote out (simply because it sounds communist) - what exactly has Obama done to "spread the wealth"?

Spread the wealth is not "communist" to me. It is a belief that is actually very commendable...but not what I believe in as it pertains to personal responsibility.

if one says "whats wrong with spreading the wealth a little" is one that I see as a liberal. I do not hold it against them...but as a conservative, I would never see anyone as anything other than one with liberal values if he uses a line like that.

It is not a stab at him. I dont hold it against him just as I dont hold it against anyone who believes in that....but it defines a persons political belief in my eyes..,..and one that believes in spreading the wealth is one of a liberal belief...IN MY EYES.

I think you're mistaking his rhetoric for what he really is.

Of course his rhetoric is liberal - that's why he won. But Washington is a machine - and he's a machine part. The machine doesn't allow anything that far from the status quo.

Do me a favor...read what I am about to say and dont jump to conclusions...I am not reliving the campaign.......but read what I am saying.

I define a man by what he surrounds himself with. Not just in politics..but in life..

He belonged to a very radical church with a liberal ideology...and I am not damming him for it...but he was there for 20 years.
He has played a role in Acorn...an organization that is NOT CORRUPT except for some on the inside, but one that is of a liberal ideology....does good things, yes....but from a liberal standpoint....and he has strong ties there.
He used the term "spread the wealth"
He has admitted liberals around him in the WH....as advisors.....good people perhaps, but they are liberal in nature.

If I have to define the man as liberal, moderate or conservative, I see nothing that says anything but liberal.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Spread the wealth is not "communist" to me. It is a belief that is actually very commendable...but not what I believe in as it pertains to personal responsibility.

if one says "whats wrong with spreading the wealth a little" is one that I see as a liberal. I do not hold it against them...but as a conservative, I would never see anyone as anything other than one with liberal values if he uses a line like that.

It is not a stab at him. I dont hold it against him just as I dont hold it against anyone who believes in that....but it defines a persons political belief in my eyes..,..and one that believes in spreading the wealth is one of a liberal belief...IN MY EYES.

I think you're mistaking his rhetoric for what he really is.

Of course his rhetoric is liberal - that's why he won. But Washington is a machine - and he's a machine part. The machine doesn't allow anything that far from the status quo.

Do me a favor...read what I am about to say and dont jump to conclusions...I am not reliving the campaign.......but read what I am saying.

I define a man by what he surrounds himself with. Not just in politics..but in life..

He belonged to a very radical church with a liberal ideology...and I am not damming him for it...but he was there for 20 years.
He has played a role in Acorn...an organization that is NOT CORRUPT except for some on the inside, but one that is of a liberal ideology....does good things, yes....but from a liberal standpoint....and he has strong ties there.
He used the term "spread the wealth"
He has admitted liberals around him in the WH....as advisors.....good people perhaps, but they are liberal in nature.

If I have to define the man as liberal, moderate or conservative, I see nothing that says anything but liberal.

Actually ACORN has lost all its licenses in the State of Ohio under RICO statutes. I would say that kind of makes them a corrupt organization.


ACORN Settles Ohio RICO Case, Folds State Operation ? Ohio Constitution.com

 

[Xenophon]

Barry's decent into Bush country continues.

So I guess now the excuse will be Gallup is an outlier, ala Rassmusen.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Yea he's become Jimmy Carter on Roids as far as i'm concerned. These Socialists are marching us rapidly towards Third World Misery. It really is sad.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

 

[Truthmatters]

Enjoy this time.

In 90 days from sunday when the preexsisting conditions and 26 years olds being able to stay on their parents insurance policies coupled with the medical savings your R days will be numbered.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Oh such hubris. I heard that Conservatives & Republicans were already dead & buried. I'm pretty sure the Hopey Changeys will be wrong again on declaring them dead. Hubris can be a pretty funny thing to observe. I guess we'll see if the Hopey Changeys are correct in their predictions. Make 2010 count people.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Enjoy this time.

In 90 days from sunday when the preexsisting conditions and 26 years olds being able to stay on their parents insurance policies coupled with the medical savings your R days will be numbered.

We'll see. I am not convinced that this will stand up to the Constitution anyway they try to pass it.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Spread the wealth is not "communist" to me. It is a belief that is actually very commendable...but not what I believe in as it pertains to personal responsibility.

if one says "whats wrong with spreading the wealth a little" is one that I see as a liberal. I do not hold it against them...but as a conservative, I would never see anyone as anything other than one with liberal values if he uses a line like that.

It is not a stab at him. I dont hold it against him just as I dont hold it against anyone who believes in that....but it defines a persons political belief in my eyes..,..and one that believes in spreading the wealth is one of a liberal belief...IN MY EYES.

I think you're mistaking his rhetoric for what he really is.

Of course his rhetoric is liberal - that's why he won. But Washington is a machine - and he's a machine part. The machine doesn't allow anything that far from the status quo.

Do me a favor...read what I am about to say and dont jump to conclusions...I am not reliving the campaign.......but read what I am saying.

I define a man by what he surrounds himself with. Not just in politics..but in life..

He belonged to a very radical church with a liberal ideology...and I am not damming him for it...but he was there for 20 years.
He has played a role in Acorn...an organization that is NOT CORRUPT except for some on the inside, but one that is of a liberal ideology....does good things, yes....but from a liberal standpoint....and he has strong ties there.
He used the term "spread the wealth"
He has admitted liberals around him in the WH....as advisors.....good people perhaps, but they are liberal in nature.

If I have to define the man as liberal, moderate or conservative, I see nothing that says anything but liberal.

You're right, actually.

He was a liberal. In fact, that's what got him elected, and why I voted for him.

But he hasn't really been one since he was elected - just like every bright-eyed idealist, it only took a month or two until he was a DC machine part.

The system doesn't allow for ideology - only reality. And there's quite a bit about Washington that will never change.

 

[gautama]

Gallup shows Obama at an all time low with just a 46% overall job approval score - and only 38% think Obama is helping to make America prosperous.

Ouch!!!

Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval



Obama Not Meeting Americans' Lofty Expectations on Issues

Is any of you eternal anti-american blathering going to un-elect Obama?

The answer is an OBVIOUS.....YES !

If you are an Obamarrhoidal Idiot and you don't recognize REALITY then it's time to get a brain transplant.

 

[WillowTree]

YouTube - Ludacris - How Low(Can You Go) ((New Music 2009))

there ain't no low that's too low for democwats to go..

 

[WillowTree]

Enjoy this time.

In 90 days from sunday when the preexsisting conditions and 26 years olds being able to stay on their parents insurance policies coupled with the medical savings your R days will be numbered.

now why would a 26 year old still need mama's teat?