Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You don't need to respect the science and the consensus of the world's climatologists and of virtually all the world's nations concerning the consequences of millions of tonnes of industrial wastes being spewed into the atmosphere if your ideological dogma makes acceptance of the reality a taboo.
Who is "we"???? China has nearly 2 times as much emissions than the USA and are building more coal power plants.
China is building six times more new coal plants than other countries, report finds.
A new report finds that last year China permitted the equivalent of two coal plants per week. China's renewable sector is also booming.
.
Sounds like you are China lover excusing THEM for doing 2 times as much CO2 emissions in less than 50 years compared to the USA in 100 years !
Now there are several totally less expensive options than EVs.
A)Have you ever heard of Carbon capture and storage (CCS), is a process in which a relatively pure stream of carbon dioxide (CO2) from industrial sources is separated, treated and transported to a long-term storage location. Carbon capture and storage - Wikipedia
B)CO2 can be used to produce fuels and chemical intermediates through several conversion routes but require significant energy input.
The chief cost factor is typically electricity, accounting for between 40-70% of the production costs, and hence very low average grid electricity prices are required for CO2-derived methanol and methane to be competitive,
So Electricity is the biggest COST!!! Wow...so the cost of EV conversions of just Trucks in the USA of building 33,153 nuclear power plants will be definitely more than using CO2 to produce fuels!!! People... there are some truly ignorant people in CHARGE!!!
Putting CO2 to Use – Analysis - IEA
Putting CO2 to Use - Analysis and key findings. A report by the International Energy Agency.www.iea.org
These two solutions to reducing CO2 are combined totally less expensive i.e.
So AGAIN if 80% of the 166 million private trucks or 132 million are EVs and each truck at 100,000 average miles per truck/ year
source:How Many Miles Do Truckers Drive a Year?
Each truck average 1.89 kWh per Mile Per Truck : Fact: Battery capacity and recharging needs for electric buses in city transit service (Journal Article) | OSTI.GOV
Lets do the math: 132 million trucks at 100,000 miles/year/truck equals 13,200,000,000,000 miles.
13,200,000,000,000 miles at 1.89 kWh per mile or 24,948,000,000,000 kWh and that's just EV Trucks in the USA!
Right NOW....11,070 power plants generate 4,165,030,000,000 kWh or per power plant: 376,244,806 kWh each per year.
FACT: Electricity generation, capacity, and sales in the United States - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
FACT: One power plant at $752,489,612 will generate 376,244,806 kWh per year.
So how many more nuclear power plants will have to be built (if EVEN at a 50% error factor),JUST for EV trucks total usage of 12,474,000,000,000 kWh?
Divide 12,474,000,000,000 kWh by 376,244,806 kWh generated per power plant, or an additional 33,153 nuclear power plants have to be built!
33,153 NEW nuclear power plants at the cost of $752,489,612 EACH plant or total of $24,948,000,000,000!
Just half of the cost to build 33,153 NEW power plants to provide JUST USA EV Trucks could be used to further develop either of the above 2 opportunities!
View attachment 789349
The ideological paranoia that induces anthropological climate change denial (as well as election denial) must have its victims in a constant state of rage.Your appeal to the masses is falling flat as hell commie. Is that graph based on raw data or data that has been adjusted by one of the cardinals in the church of AWG? And who are you freaks to say the pre-industrial climate was in any way optimal? Have you have any clue how much wood and coal was burned?
.
must have its victims in a constant state of rage
The amount of data YOU have posted here wouldn't cover my pinkie nail.You are the one spazzing out, fruitcake fascist communist whatever.
All we do is POST DATA that refutes the BULLSHIT you PARROT...
The ideological paranoia that induces anthropological climate change denial (as well as election denial) must have its victims in a constant state of rage.
The world progresses as they sputter and fume, wallowing in their baseless dogma.
Just as no one is contesting the results of the 2020 election in any legislative body or court anywhere in the land in any venue where credible evidence is demanded, no nation or scientific authority anywhere on earth is refusing to acknowledge the scientific reality.
A 5 year old's understanding of CC.You can't control the weather. Duh! Idiots.
The amount of data YOU have posted here wouldn't cover my pinkie nail.
I am not concerned about the residue of climate change deniers whose ideological dogma makes science anathema to them.Wow, another appeal to the masses, have you ever had an original thought in your life? Nah, you're just another one of those commiebots.
.
... Nobody is willing to say what the average temperature of the earth was in 1880 and every decade since.
Wonderful! So please tell us, what was the average temperature of the earth in 1880 and what was it ever decade since. Remember we're talking temperatures here (like what we got w/ the sun) not "anomalies" or such. Real temperatures....That is absolutely untrue. NOAA, NASA, JMA, Berkely Earth, HadCRU have ALL published temperature data back that far and their methods are completely transparent....
I am not concerned about the residue of climate change deniers whose ideological dogma makes science anathema to them.
Recognition of the reality is now virtually-universal among nations and scientific bodies, and it is a matter of how expeditiously necessary remedial measures will be adopted.
I am not concerned about the residue of climate change deniers whose ideological dogma makes science anathema to them.
Recognition of the reality is now virtually-universal among nations and scientific bodies, and it is a matter of how expeditiously necessary remedial measures will be adopted.
You appear to be in a tizzy because not a single nation on earth, nor a single scientific body, is pandering to the crackpot climate change deniers. The overwhelming empirical data confirming the reality of the impact of industrial emissions on climate has vanquished the ideologically-driven dogma.Translation - evidence matters not, pushing higher taxes and bigger government over FUDGE and FRAUD does
Sick fucking treasonous sub human leech you are...
I have not appointed myself to remedy the situation, nor would I.So tell the class, what EXACTLY, in YOUR assessment needs to be done and what will it cost? I don't want to hear canned commie talking points either. Use YOUR own words, if you're capable.
.
the overwhelming empirical data
Your ideological dogma does not comport with the empirical data.shows
NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE
NO WARMING in the Oceans
NO ONGOING NET ICE MELT
NO BREAKOUT in Canes
NO Ocean Rise
What your side has is FUDGE, and you are TOO STUPID to understand the difference between FUDGE and DATA.
If you intend to debate NASA
You tell 'em!NASA tends to post DATA....
NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses
A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.www.nasa.gov
the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.
Which BUSTS the FRAUD and FUDGE of the IPCC
"The good news is that Antarctica is not currently contributing to sea level rise, but is taking 0.23 millimeters per year away,” Zwally said. “But this is also bad news. If the 0.27 millimeters per year of sea level rise attributed to Antarctica in the IPCC report is not really coming from Antarctica, there must be some..."
SERIOUS FUDGE BAKING FRAUD ONGOING AT IPCC
And that's why we know you're a pseudoscience-babbling political kook. Your idiot cult theories can't be falsified. That's because they're entirely religious in nature. I know. I've asked many times, and none of the denier fanatics here has ever been able to list something that would falsify their religious beliefs.No, but in science, if a theory is not falsifiable,
And that's why we know you're a pseudoscience-babbling political kook. Your idiot cult theories can't be falsified. That's because they're entirely religious in nature. I know. I've asked many times, and none of the denier fanatics here has ever been able to list something that would falsify their religious beliefs.
In contrast, AGW theory is real science, so it can be falsified in many ways. We've listed those ways here before many times.
Only the most desperate cult liars pretend AGW theory can't be falsified. That's you, a devoted propagandist for TheGloryOfTheParty and TheTriumphOfFascism.
