So why are we paying for PBS "news" or politics programming?

Sayaras

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2023
Messages
6,061
Reaction score
3,740
Points
938
1. Islamic Amna Nawaz's managed PBS Newshour is very biased.
See plenty of examples by newsbusters.org in: News Hour . NewsHour is always on the liberal side.

2. C. Amanpour is obsessively extreme.
Here is her latest.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun points the finger at Iran and its Hezbolah for destruction in South Lebanon

but malicious Amanpour injects "Gaza" to shift him away from blaming the Islamofascists.
 
It's my understanding that we're NOT paying them anymore.
 
1. Islamic Amna Nawaz's managed PBS Newshour is very biased.
See plenty of examples by newsbusters.org in: News Hour . NewsHour is always on the liberal side.

2. C. Amanpour is obsessively extreme.
Here is her latest.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun points the finger at Iran and its Hezbolah for destruction in South Lebanon

but malicious Amanpour injects "Gaza" to shift him away from blaming the Islamofascists.
It's a PUBLIC FORUM.

They provide information from who ever is flipping the bill for it.

If you want your agendas and opinions splattered all over, then YOU TOO can buy your own news event on PBS!!!
 
1. Islamic Amna Nawaz's managed PBS Newshour is very biased.
See plenty of examples by newsbusters.org in: News Hour . NewsHour is always on the liberal side.

2. C. Amanpour is obsessively extreme.
Here is her latest.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun points the finger at Iran and its Hezbolah for destruction in South Lebanon

but malicious Amanpour injects "Gaza" to shift him away from blaming the Islamofascists.
Amanpour is one of the worst
 
It's a PUBLIC FORUM.

They provide information from who ever is flipping the bill for it.

If you want your agendas and opinions splattered all over, then YOU TOO can buy your own news event on PBS!!!
BIASED "Information " PROPAGANDA
 
Public media was created because there was a general belief that the few media news sources were not trustworthy, as they were commercial enterprises energized by the profit motive. At the time there were three networks. Three.

Now, there are literally countless news generators of all political stripes and some - believe it or not - quite neutral or balanced.

Hence, there is no real reason for public radio/television to exist.

There is nothing so permanent in life as a temporary government program.
 
1. Islamic Amna Nawaz's managed PBS Newshour is very biased.
See plenty of examples by newsbusters.org in: News Hour . NewsHour is always on the liberal side.

2. C. Amanpour is obsessively extreme.
Here is her latest.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun points the finger at Iran and its Hezbolah for destruction in South Lebanon

but malicious Amanpour injects "Gaza" to shift him away from blaming the Islamofascists.
who is paying? I stream.......I don't pay for any programming
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom