Former election commissioner: Cohen and Trump didn't violate campaign finance law

[bripat9643]

You just blew your own question out of the water!

The payment to Stormy was therefore an illegal campaign contribution.

Well if that's so then the money the DNC and Hitlery paid to Steele for the fake Trump dossier should be considered a campaign contribution.

Is this topic about hillary? The ***** grabber has to pay foe breaking laws...get off his penis a bit. Unless if you like ***** grabbers who happen to be criminals.

And there's the second logical fallacy of Claudette's sentence. That old standby of every pseudocon, the red herring.

So Hillary's crimes don't matter, only Trump's? Not only did you just prove you're stupid, you also demonstrated that you're a totally amoral reptile.

And there's the third fallacy. Probably the most favorite one in the pseudocon kit. The tu quoque. Whataboutism.

It's all the poor bastards can do when confronted with Cowardly Lyin' Donald's crimes. They can only blubber, "B-b-b-b-b-b-b-but Hiilary!" or "B-b-b-b-b-b-b-but Obama!"

Karma is ***** slapping them with a vengeance.

Sad.

You're squealing like a stuck pig. The truth hurts, doesn't it?

 

[Claudette]

Oh and since when is it illegal to pay off someone accusing you of having an affair with your own money??

Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 payment. So how could it have been his own money?

[/QUOT

Oh and since when is it illegal to pay off someone accusing you of having an affair with your own money??

Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 payment. So how could it have been his own money?

Sure before the election.

Giuliani told The Washington Post that Trump did not know about the payment at the time it was made in October 2016. He also said he did not know when Trump learned of it. He said he spoke to Trump “about two weeks ago” about the payment, and it was at that time that Trump “probably” got “the full picture for the first time” about the payment.

You just blew your own question out of the water!

The payment to Stormy was therefore an illegal campaign contribution.

Well if that's so then the money the DNC and Hitlery paid to Steele for the fake Trump dossier should be considered a campaign contribution.

Its a campaign expense.
When you pay for something, its an expense for you.

(and nothing in dossier has been disproved)

Oh and since when is it illegal to pay off someone accusing you of having an affair with your own money??

Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 payment. So how could it have been his own money?

[/QUOT

Oh and since when is it illegal to pay off someone accusing you of having an affair with your own money??

Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 payment. So how could it have been his own money?

Sure before the election.

Giuliani told The Washington Post that Trump did not know about the payment at the time it was made in October 2016. He also said he did not know when Trump learned of it. He said he spoke to Trump “about two weeks ago” about the payment, and it was at that time that Trump “probably” got “the full picture for the first time” about the payment.

You just blew your own question out of the water!

The payment to Stormy was therefore an illegal campaign contribution.

Well if that's so then the money the DNC and Hitlery paid to Steele for the fake Trump dossier should be considered a campaign contribution.

Its a campaign expense.
When you pay for something, its an expense for you.

(and nothing in dossier has been disproved)

Well the DNC and Hitlery paid for the Dossier. That makes the money spent a campaign expense.

Oh and lots of the dossier has been disproven and some is still under investigation.

 

[g5000]

Well if that's so then the money the DNC and Hitlery paid to Steele for the fake Trump dossier should be considered a campaign contribution.

Is this topic about hillary? The ***** grabber has to pay foe breaking laws...get off his penis a bit. Unless if you like ***** grabbers who happen to be criminals.

And there's the second logical fallacy of Claudette's sentence. That old standby of every pseudocon, the red herring.

So Hillary's crimes don't matter, only Trump's? Not only did you just prove you're stupid, you also demonstrated that you're a totally amoral reptile.

And there's the third fallacy. Probably the most favorite one in the pseudocon kit. The tu quoque. Whataboutism.

It's all the poor bastards can do when confronted with Cowardly Lyin' Donald's crimes. They can only blubber, "B-b-b-b-b-b-b-but Hiilary!" or "B-b-b-b-b-b-b-but Obama!"

Karma is ***** slapping them with a vengeance.

Sad.

You're squealing like a stuck pig. The truth hurts, doesn't it?

I'm actually enjoying myself. We can all see who is hurting.

You aren't fooling anyone.

 

[g5000]

Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 payment. So how could it have been his own money?

[/QUOT

Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 payment. So how could it have been his own money?

Sure before the election.

Giuliani told The Washington Post that Trump did not know about the payment at the time it was made in October 2016. He also said he did not know when Trump learned of it. He said he spoke to Trump “about two weeks ago” about the payment, and it was at that time that Trump “probably” got “the full picture for the first time” about the payment.

You just blew your own question out of the water!

The payment to Stormy was therefore an illegal campaign contribution.

Well if that's so then the money the DNC and Hitlery paid to Steele for the fake Trump dossier should be considered a campaign contribution.

Its a campaign expense.
When you pay for something, its an expense for you.

(and nothing in dossier has been disproved)

Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 payment. So how could it have been his own money?

[/QUOT

Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 payment. So how could it have been his own money?

Sure before the election.

Giuliani told The Washington Post that Trump did not know about the payment at the time it was made in October 2016. He also said he did not know when Trump learned of it. He said he spoke to Trump “about two weeks ago” about the payment, and it was at that time that Trump “probably” got “the full picture for the first time” about the payment.

You just blew your own question out of the water!

The payment to Stormy was therefore an illegal campaign contribution.

Well if that's so then the money the DNC and Hitlery paid to Steele for the fake Trump dossier should be considered a campaign contribution.

Its a campaign expense.
When you pay for something, its an expense for you.

(and nothing in dossier has been disproved)

Well the DNC and Hitlery paid for the Dossier. That makes the money spent a campaign expense.

Oh and lots of the dossier has been disproven and some is still under investigation.

You've never read the dossier, have you.

 

[Claudette]

Sure before the election.

Giuliani told The Washington Post that Trump did not know about the payment at the time it was made in October 2016. He also said he did not know when Trump learned of it. He said he spoke to Trump “about two weeks ago” about the payment, and it was at that time that Trump “probably” got “the full picture for the first time” about the payment.

You just blew your own question out of the water!

The payment to Stormy was therefore an illegal campaign contribution.

Well if that's so then the money the DNC and Hitlery paid to Steele for the fake Trump dossier should be considered a campaign contribution.

Its a campaign expense.
When you pay for something, its an expense for you.

(and nothing in dossier has been disproved)

Sure before the election.

Giuliani told The Washington Post that Trump did not know about the payment at the time it was made in October 2016. He also said he did not know when Trump learned of it. He said he spoke to Trump “about two weeks ago” about the payment, and it was at that time that Trump “probably” got “the full picture for the first time” about the payment.

You just blew your own question out of the water!

The payment to Stormy was therefore an illegal campaign contribution.

Well if that's so then the money the DNC and Hitlery paid to Steele for the fake Trump dossier should be considered a campaign contribution.

Its a campaign expense.
When you pay for something, its an expense for you.

(and nothing in dossier has been disproved)

Well the DNC and Hitlery paid for the Dossier. That makes the money spent a campaign expense.

Oh and lots of the dossier has been disproven and some is still under investigation.

You've never read the dossier, have you.

Nope but I've read about it.

According to what I've read some of its been corroborated but loads of it can't be proven or disproven.

 

[Lesh]

According to what I've read some of its been corroborated but loads of it can't be proven or disproven.

And in your addled mind that makes it "fake"?

Hardly

 

[Claudette]

According to what I've read some of its been corroborated but loads of it can't be proven or disproven.

And in your addled mind that makes it "fake"?

Hardly

Oh and in your addled mind its all real??

Hardly

 

[hunarcy]

Oh and since when is it illegal to pay off someone accusing you of having an affair with your own money??

Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 payment. So how could it have been his own money?

[/QUOT

Oh and since when is it illegal to pay off someone accusing you of having an affair with your own money??

Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 payment. So how could it have been his own money?

Sure before the election.

Giuliani told The Washington Post that Trump did not know about the payment at the time it was made in October 2016. He also said he did not know when Trump learned of it. He said he spoke to Trump “about two weeks ago” about the payment, and it was at that time that Trump “probably” got “the full picture for the first time” about the payment.

You just blew your own question out of the water!

The payment to Stormy was therefore an illegal campaign contribution.

Well if that's so then the money the DNC and Hitlery paid to Steele for the fake Trump dossier should be considered a campaign contribution.

Its a campaign expense.
When you pay for something, its an expense for you.

(and nothing in dossier has been disproved)

And nothing in the dossier has been proven...THAT is the standard you should follow. It's truthfulness was almost immediately under fire.

The Trump Dossier Is Fake -- And Here Are The Reasons Why

 

[Lesh]

Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 payment. So how could it have been his own money?

[/QUOT

Trump said he didn't know about the $130,000 payment. So how could it have been his own money?

Sure before the election.

Giuliani told The Washington Post that Trump did not know about the payment at the time it was made in October 2016. He also said he did not know when Trump learned of it. He said he spoke to Trump “about two weeks ago” about the payment, and it was at that time that Trump “probably” got “the full picture for the first time” about the payment.

You just blew your own question out of the water!

The payment to Stormy was therefore an illegal campaign contribution.

Well if that's so then the money the DNC and Hitlery paid to Steele for the fake Trump dossier should be considered a campaign contribution.

Its a campaign expense.
When you pay for something, its an expense for you.

(and nothing in dossier has been disproved)

And nothing in the dossier has been proven...THAT is the standard you should follow. It's truthfulness was almost immediately under fire.

The Trump Dossier Is Fake -- And Here Are The Reasons Why

Does Putin pay this guy in cash??

 

[rightwinger]

Thankfully, a judge will decide whether Trump violated campaign finance law

 

[bripat9643]

You just blew your own question out of the water!

The payment to Stormy was therefore an illegal campaign contribution.

Well if that's so then the money the DNC and Hitlery paid to Steele for the fake Trump dossier should be considered a campaign contribution.

Its a campaign expense.
When you pay for something, its an expense for you.

(and nothing in dossier has been disproved)

You just blew your own question out of the water!

The payment to Stormy was therefore an illegal campaign contribution.

Well if that's so then the money the DNC and Hitlery paid to Steele for the fake Trump dossier should be considered a campaign contribution.

Its a campaign expense.
When you pay for something, its an expense for you.

(and nothing in dossier has been disproved)

Well the DNC and Hitlery paid for the Dossier. That makes the money spent a campaign expense.

Oh and lots of the dossier has been disproven and some is still under investigation.

You've never read the dossier, have you.

Nope but I've read about it.

According to what I've read some of its been corroborated but loads of it can't be proven or disproven.

None of it has been verified that isn't public knowledge. Most of it isn't even verifiable.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Hope you are holding your breath for that to happen.

Well, at this rate, the fat baby man-m may drop dead first.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Even if he was, what does that have to do with Russian collusion?

well, considering some of those crimes will likely be money laundering for Russian kleptocrats, it would have quite a bit to do with it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

but loads of it can't be proven or disproven.

*As far as you know. Do you expect Mueller to brief you?

 

[hunarcy]

Thankfully, a judge will decide whether Trump violated campaign finance law

So you don't think he'll be allowed to have a jury trial?

 

[JimH52]

Mueller has nothing. If he did his report would be out.

As for Trump forcing Cohen?? I call bullshit on that.

How could Trump force his attorney to do something?

That's my point. He couldn't

If Cohen did something illegal he did it on his own.

So if I hire a hit man, I am not guilty.

Wow.

The purpose of election campaign laws is to make matters transparent and equal for all the candidates. Voters are entitled to knowing the facts about each candidate. trump and Cohen took the voter's opportunity away to knowing the facts about the orange idiot's affairs. The money was paid to hide who would have been a very embarrassing story, shortly before the election.

If Hillary or a campaign associate had paid the media to hide the issue about her computer server, she would have been guilty of campaign finance law. Does that help? Naw, trumpettes are always going to be trumpettes....

Keep deluding yourself if it makes you feel better. Trump will never be indicted for violating campaign contribution laws.

Actually, the entire trump criminal enterprise may be a risk. Even after your orange king leaves office, the Feds and the States are going to investigate the trump shell game to death. He didn't want to win. He didn't think he would win. NOw he is in a corner....he is getting more and more desperate every day.

 

[bripat9643]

How could Trump force his attorney to do something?

That's my point. He couldn't

If Cohen did something illegal he did it on his own.

So if I hire a hit man, I am not guilty.

Wow.

The purpose of election campaign laws is to make matters transparent and equal for all the candidates. Voters are entitled to knowing the facts about each candidate. trump and Cohen took the voter's opportunity away to knowing the facts about the orange idiot's affairs. The money was paid to hide who would have been a very embarrassing story, shortly before the election.

If Hillary or a campaign associate had paid the media to hide the issue about her computer server, she would have been guilty of campaign finance law. Does that help? Naw, trumpettes are always going to be trumpettes....

Keep deluding yourself if it makes you feel better. Trump will never be indicted for violating campaign contribution laws.

Actually, the entire trump criminal enterprise may be a risk. Even after your orange king leaves office, the Feds and the States are going to investigate the trump shell game to death. He didn't want to win. He didn't think he would win. NOw he is in a corner....he is getting more and more desperate every day.

Your fantasies may be ridiculous, but that's what makes them so entertaining.

 

[JimH52]

That's my point. He couldn't

If Cohen did something illegal he did it on his own.

So if I hire a hit man, I am not guilty.

Wow.

The purpose of election campaign laws is to make matters transparent and equal for all the candidates. Voters are entitled to knowing the facts about each candidate. trump and Cohen took the voter's opportunity away to knowing the facts about the orange idiot's affairs. The money was paid to hide who would have been a very embarrassing story, shortly before the election.

If Hillary or a campaign associate had paid the media to hide the issue about her computer server, she would have been guilty of campaign finance law. Does that help? Naw, trumpettes are always going to be trumpettes....

Keep deluding yourself if it makes you feel better. Trump will never be indicted for violating campaign contribution laws.

Actually, the entire trump criminal enterprise may be a risk. Even after your orange king leaves office, the Feds and the States are going to investigate the trump shell game to death. He didn't want to win. He didn't think he would win. NOw he is in a corner....he is getting more and more desperate every day.

Your fantasies may be ridiculous, but that's what makes them so entertaining.

More crimes and more investigations every day. The curtain in coming down on the trump regime...

 

[Mr.Blonde]

That's my point. He couldn't

If Cohen did something illegal he did it on his own.

So if I hire a hit man, I am not guilty.

Wow.

The purpose of election campaign laws is to make matters transparent and equal for all the candidates. Voters are entitled to knowing the facts about each candidate. trump and Cohen took the voter's opportunity away to knowing the facts about the orange idiot's affairs. The money was paid to hide who would have been a very embarrassing story, shortly before the election.

If Hillary or a campaign associate had paid the media to hide the issue about her computer server, she would have been guilty of campaign finance law. Does that help? Naw, trumpettes are always going to be trumpettes....

Keep deluding yourself if it makes you feel better. Trump will never be indicted for violating campaign contribution laws.

Actually, the entire trump criminal enterprise may be a risk. Even after your orange king leaves office, the Feds and the States are going to investigate the trump shell game to death. He didn't want to win. He didn't think he would win. NOw he is in a corner....he is getting more and more desperate every day.

Your fantasies may be ridiculous, but that's what makes them so entertaining.

Funny how it wasn't the "Trump criminal enterprise" when he was giving money to Democrats and on "The Apprentice".

Why would he have thought he couldn't win against a woman who lost the 08 and 16 primaries?

Do you really want to open the door to go after a president or any other politician after he leaves office?

Can the government go after Obama for Fast and Furious and Anwar al-Awlaki?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Can the government go after Obama for Fast and Furious and Anwar al-Awlaki?

Well, they would then have to go after Trump for killing his son.