Former CIA officer & Nat Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz: Former CIA Dir Brennan Suppressed Evidence Russia Favored Hillary In 2016

[colfax_m]

Former CIA officer and National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said that, in fact, former CIA head John Brennan ignored intelligence that Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, wanted Hillary Clinton to win.



“The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that ‘all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence’ and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they ‘were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.’”

House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump.

“More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.”


“Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”



The theory pushed from the start by the Obama administration, proven conspirators, Democrats, and snowflakes that the Russians preferred Trump to win the Presidency while selling Obama / Hillary / Democrats information assessed to be Russian Intelligence Service Counter-Intelligence propaganda for the Obama administration to use to attempt to take down Trump and his team NEVER MADE ANY SENSE.

These have always been actions the Russians would be expected to take if they wanted Trump to LOSE and HILLARY to win!

Leave it to Dems to suppress the real truth and snowflakes to push the coup cover-up narrative that never made any sense. Once again, it seems, they attempted to project / accuse others falsely of what hey were engaged in.

Former NSC Chief of Staff: John Brennan Suppressed Intelligence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary in 2016

FILE – In this May 23, 2017, file photo, former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol

www.redstate.com

.

Hey stupid. Putin didn't want Hillary to win:



But nice try.

Oh really?

Former NSC Chief Of Staff: John Brennan Buried Evidence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary In 2016

Former National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin actually favored Hillary Clinton In 2016.

dailycaller.com

The person uses the partisan report from the House Intelligence Committee (authored by Republicans and voted for only by Republicans) to contradict the bipartisan Senate report.

It draws questions about their motives if you ask me.

Why would Putin prefer Trump over Clinton?
Clinton already had a working relationship with Putin.

Clinton’s relationship with Putin was adversarial. It wasn’t much of a working relationship. Trump is naive and easily manipulated.

 

[bripat9643]

Former CIA officer and National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said that, in fact, former CIA head John Brennan ignored intelligence that Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, wanted Hillary Clinton to win.



“The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that ‘all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence’ and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they ‘were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.’”

House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump.

“More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.”


“Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”



The theory pushed from the start by the Obama administration, proven conspirators, Democrats, and snowflakes that the Russians preferred Trump to win the Presidency while selling Obama / Hillary / Democrats information assessed to be Russian Intelligence Service Counter-Intelligence propaganda for the Obama administration to use to attempt to take down Trump and his team NEVER MADE ANY SENSE.

These have always been actions the Russians would be expected to take if they wanted Trump to LOSE and HILLARY to win!

Leave it to Dems to suppress the real truth and snowflakes to push the coup cover-up narrative that never made any sense. Once again, it seems, they attempted to project / accuse others falsely of what hey were engaged in.

Former NSC Chief of Staff: John Brennan Suppressed Intelligence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary in 2016

FILE – In this May 23, 2017, file photo, former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol

www.redstate.com

.

Hey stupid. Putin didn't want Hillary to win:



But nice try.

Oh really?

Former NSC Chief Of Staff: John Brennan Buried Evidence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary In 2016

Former National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin actually favored Hillary Clinton In 2016.

dailycaller.com

The person uses the partisan report from the House Intelligence Committee (authored by Republicans and voted for only by Republicans) to contradict the bipartisan Senate report.

It draws questions about their motives if you ask me.

Why would Putin prefer Trump over Clinton?
Clinton already had a working relationship with Putin.

Clinton’s relationship with Putin was adversarial. It wasn’t much of a working relationship. Trump is naive and easily manipulated.

Yeah, real "adversarial."

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Former CIA officer and National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said that, in fact, former CIA head John Brennan ignored intelligence that Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, wanted Hillary Clinton to win.



“The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that ‘all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence’ and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they ‘were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.’”

House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump.

“More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.”


“Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”



The theory pushed from the start by the Obama administration, proven conspirators, Democrats, and snowflakes that the Russians preferred Trump to win the Presidency while selling Obama / Hillary / Democrats information assessed to be Russian Intelligence Service Counter-Intelligence propaganda for the Obama administration to use to attempt to take down Trump and his team NEVER MADE ANY SENSE.

These have always been actions the Russians would be expected to take if they wanted Trump to LOSE and HILLARY to win!

Leave it to Dems to suppress the real truth and snowflakes to push the coup cover-up narrative that never made any sense. Once again, it seems, they attempted to project / accuse others falsely of what hey were engaged in.

Former NSC Chief of Staff: John Brennan Suppressed Intelligence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary in 2016

FILE – In this May 23, 2017, file photo, former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol

www.redstate.com

.

Hey stupid. Putin didn't want Hillary to win:



But nice try.

Oh really?

Former NSC Chief Of Staff: John Brennan Buried Evidence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary In 2016

Former National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin actually favored Hillary Clinton In 2016.

dailycaller.com

The person uses the partisan report from the House Intelligence Committee (authored by Republicans and voted for only by Republicans) to contradict the bipartisan Senate report.

It draws questions about their motives if you ask me.

Why would Putin prefer Trump over Clinton?
Clinton already had a working relationship with Putin.

Clinton’s relationship with Putin was adversarial. It wasn’t much of a working relationship. Trump is naive and easily manipulated.

How so?

 

[Nostra]

Former CIA officer and National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said that, in fact, former CIA head John Brennan ignored intelligence that Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, wanted Hillary Clinton to win.



“The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that ‘all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence’ and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they ‘were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.’”

House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump.

“More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.”


“Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”



The theory pushed from the start by the Obama administration, proven conspirators, Democrats, and snowflakes that the Russians preferred Trump to win the Presidency while selling Obama / Hillary / Democrats information assessed to be Russian Intelligence Service Counter-Intelligence propaganda for the Obama administration to use to attempt to take down Trump and his team NEVER MADE ANY SENSE.

These have always been actions the Russians would be expected to take if they wanted Trump to LOSE and HILLARY to win!

Leave it to Dems to suppress the real truth and snowflakes to push the coup cover-up narrative that never made any sense. Once again, it seems, they attempted to project / accuse others falsely of what hey were engaged in.

Former NSC Chief of Staff: John Brennan Suppressed Intelligence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary in 2016

FILE – In this May 23, 2017, file photo, former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol

www.redstate.com

.

Hey stupid. Putin didn't want Hillary to win:



But nice try.

Oh really?

Former NSC Chief Of Staff: John Brennan Buried Evidence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary In 2016

Former National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin actually favored Hillary Clinton In 2016.

dailycaller.com

The person uses the partisan report from the House Intelligence Committee (authored by Republicans and voted for only by Republicans) to contradict the bipartisan Senate report.

It draws questions about their motives if you ask me.

Why would Putin prefer Trump over Clinton?
Clinton already had a working relationship with Putin.

Clinton’s relationship with Putin was adversarial. It wasn’t much of a working relationship. Trump is naive and easily manipulated.

 

[irosie91]

It makes perfect sense that Putin preferred Hillary over Trump since he knew from his dealings with Hillary that she was easily pushed around and hoodwinked. The Russians played Hillary like a fiddle when she was Secretary of State. Putin was not fooled by Trump's talk about getting along with Russia. He knew Trump was a much tougher person than Hillary.

For all of Trump's be-nice talk about Russia, he has been far tougher on Russia than Obama was.

IMHO----Hillary is NOT a pushover----she is just very
susceptible to bribery

 

[colfax_m]

Former CIA officer and National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said that, in fact, former CIA head John Brennan ignored intelligence that Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, wanted Hillary Clinton to win.



“The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that ‘all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence’ and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they ‘were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.’”

House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump.

“More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.”


“Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”



The theory pushed from the start by the Obama administration, proven conspirators, Democrats, and snowflakes that the Russians preferred Trump to win the Presidency while selling Obama / Hillary / Democrats information assessed to be Russian Intelligence Service Counter-Intelligence propaganda for the Obama administration to use to attempt to take down Trump and his team NEVER MADE ANY SENSE.

These have always been actions the Russians would be expected to take if they wanted Trump to LOSE and HILLARY to win!

Leave it to Dems to suppress the real truth and snowflakes to push the coup cover-up narrative that never made any sense. Once again, it seems, they attempted to project / accuse others falsely of what hey were engaged in.

Former NSC Chief of Staff: John Brennan Suppressed Intelligence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary in 2016

FILE – In this May 23, 2017, file photo, former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol

www.redstate.com

.

Hey stupid. Putin didn't want Hillary to win:



But nice try.

Oh really?

Former NSC Chief Of Staff: John Brennan Buried Evidence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary In 2016

Former National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin actually favored Hillary Clinton In 2016.

dailycaller.com

The person uses the partisan report from the House Intelligence Committee (authored by Republicans and voted for only by Republicans) to contradict the bipartisan Senate report.

It draws questions about their motives if you ask me.

Why would Putin prefer Trump over Clinton?
Clinton already had a working relationship with Putin.

Clinton’s relationship with Putin was adversarial. It wasn’t much of a working relationship. Trump is naive and easily manipulated.

How so?
View attachment 327342

When was that picture taken?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Former CIA officer and National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said that, in fact, former CIA head John Brennan ignored intelligence that Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, wanted Hillary Clinton to win.



“The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that ‘all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence’ and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they ‘were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.’”

House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump.

“More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.”


“Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”



The theory pushed from the start by the Obama administration, proven conspirators, Democrats, and snowflakes that the Russians preferred Trump to win the Presidency while selling Obama / Hillary / Democrats information assessed to be Russian Intelligence Service Counter-Intelligence propaganda for the Obama administration to use to attempt to take down Trump and his team NEVER MADE ANY SENSE.

These have always been actions the Russians would be expected to take if they wanted Trump to LOSE and HILLARY to win!

Leave it to Dems to suppress the real truth and snowflakes to push the coup cover-up narrative that never made any sense. Once again, it seems, they attempted to project / accuse others falsely of what hey were engaged in.

Former NSC Chief of Staff: John Brennan Suppressed Intelligence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary in 2016

FILE – In this May 23, 2017, file photo, former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol

www.redstate.com

.

Hey stupid. Putin didn't want Hillary to win:



But nice try.

Oh really?

Former NSC Chief Of Staff: John Brennan Buried Evidence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary In 2016

Former National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin actually favored Hillary Clinton In 2016.

dailycaller.com

The person uses the partisan report from the House Intelligence Committee (authored by Republicans and voted for only by Republicans) to contradict the bipartisan Senate report.

It draws questions about their motives if you ask me.

Why would Putin prefer Trump over Clinton?
Clinton already had a working relationship with Putin.

Clinton’s relationship with Putin was adversarial. It wasn’t much of a working relationship. Trump is naive and easily manipulated.

How so?
View attachment 327342

When was that picture taken?

At this point what difference does it make?

 

[easyt65]

Clinton’s relationship with Putin was adversarial. It wasn’t much of a working relationship.

Barry, Hillary, Holder, and Mueller all had their part in Barry and Hillary handing Vlad uranium, Crimea, and 2 years of unchallenged hacking/snooping/counter Intel ops using social media that allowed Russia to con snowflakes into organizing and even marching for them....

Bill was paid an ass-load of rubles for giving a speech or two in Russia, and he paid Vlad a personal visit when he could not get an audience with Russian uranium heads.....

The Russian Intel Service was all too happy to sell Hillary and Barry propaganda - through Steele - Barry and his team attempted to use (and did so illegally) to try to take out Trump.....


'Adversarial'?

 

[colfax_m]

Former CIA officer and National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said that, in fact, former CIA head John Brennan ignored intelligence that Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, wanted Hillary Clinton to win.



“The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that ‘all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence’ and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they ‘were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.’”

House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump.

“More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.”


“Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”



The theory pushed from the start by the Obama administration, proven conspirators, Democrats, and snowflakes that the Russians preferred Trump to win the Presidency while selling Obama / Hillary / Democrats information assessed to be Russian Intelligence Service Counter-Intelligence propaganda for the Obama administration to use to attempt to take down Trump and his team NEVER MADE ANY SENSE.

These have always been actions the Russians would be expected to take if they wanted Trump to LOSE and HILLARY to win!

Leave it to Dems to suppress the real truth and snowflakes to push the coup cover-up narrative that never made any sense. Once again, it seems, they attempted to project / accuse others falsely of what hey were engaged in.

Former NSC Chief of Staff: John Brennan Suppressed Intelligence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary in 2016

FILE – In this May 23, 2017, file photo, former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol

www.redstate.com

.

Hey stupid. Putin didn't want Hillary to win:



But nice try.

Oh really?

Former NSC Chief Of Staff: John Brennan Buried Evidence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary In 2016

Former National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin actually favored Hillary Clinton In 2016.

dailycaller.com

The person uses the partisan report from the House Intelligence Committee (authored by Republicans and voted for only by Republicans) to contradict the bipartisan Senate report.

It draws questions about their motives if you ask me.

Why would Putin prefer Trump over Clinton?
Clinton already had a working relationship with Putin.

Clinton’s relationship with Putin was adversarial. It wasn’t much of a working relationship. Trump is naive and easily manipulated.

How so?
View attachment 327342

When was that picture taken?

At this point what difference does it make?

A lot. Especially if you’re trying to make the point that I think you’re trying to make.

Y’all need to brush up on history, otherwise you’re easily manipulated.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Former CIA officer and National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said that, in fact, former CIA head John Brennan ignored intelligence that Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, wanted Hillary Clinton to win.



“The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that ‘all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence’ and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they ‘were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.’”

House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump.

“More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.”


“Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”



The theory pushed from the start by the Obama administration, proven conspirators, Democrats, and snowflakes that the Russians preferred Trump to win the Presidency while selling Obama / Hillary / Democrats information assessed to be Russian Intelligence Service Counter-Intelligence propaganda for the Obama administration to use to attempt to take down Trump and his team NEVER MADE ANY SENSE.

These have always been actions the Russians would be expected to take if they wanted Trump to LOSE and HILLARY to win!

Leave it to Dems to suppress the real truth and snowflakes to push the coup cover-up narrative that never made any sense. Once again, it seems, they attempted to project / accuse others falsely of what hey were engaged in.

Former NSC Chief of Staff: John Brennan Suppressed Intelligence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary in 2016

FILE – In this May 23, 2017, file photo, former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol

www.redstate.com

.

Hey stupid. Putin didn't want Hillary to win:



But nice try.

Oh really?

Former NSC Chief Of Staff: John Brennan Buried Evidence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary In 2016

Former National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin actually favored Hillary Clinton In 2016.

dailycaller.com

The person uses the partisan report from the House Intelligence Committee (authored by Republicans and voted for only by Republicans) to contradict the bipartisan Senate report.

It draws questions about their motives if you ask me.

Why would Putin prefer Trump over Clinton?
Clinton already had a working relationship with Putin.

Clinton’s relationship with Putin was adversarial. It wasn’t much of a working relationship. Trump is naive and easily manipulated.

How so?
View attachment 327342

When was that picture taken?

At this point what difference does it make?

A lot. Especially if you’re trying to make the point that I think you’re trying to make.

Y’all need to brush up on history, otherwise you’re easily manipulated.

No it really doesnt.
It shows Hillary sucking up to Russia.

 

[colfax_m]

Clinton’s relationship with Putin was adversarial. It wasn’t much of a working relationship.

Barry, Hillary, Holder, and Mueller all had their part in Barry and Hillary handing Vlad uranium, Crimea, and 2 years of unchallenged hacking/snooping/counter Intel ops using social media that allowed Russia to con snowflakes into organizing and even marching for them....

Bill was paid an ass-load of rubles for giving a speech or two in Russia, and he paid Vlad a personal visit when he could not get an audience with Russian uranium heads.....

The Russian Intel Service was all too happy to sell Hillary and Barry propaganda - through Steele - Barry and his team attempted to use (and did so illegally) to try to take out Trump.....


'Adversarial'?

You only have unhinges allegations, none of which make any sense.

You’re claiming that Russia tried to get Clinton elected by giving them information that Clinton didn’t use and wasn’t made public until after the election. You know that doesn’t make any sense, right?

Meanwhile, Russia hacks and releases thousands of emails from the DNC to harm the Clinton campaign. That seems to have been forgotten here.

 

[colfax_m]

Former CIA officer and National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said that, in fact, former CIA head John Brennan ignored intelligence that Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, wanted Hillary Clinton to win.



“The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that ‘all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence’ and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they ‘were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.’”

House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump.

“More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.”


“Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”



The theory pushed from the start by the Obama administration, proven conspirators, Democrats, and snowflakes that the Russians preferred Trump to win the Presidency while selling Obama / Hillary / Democrats information assessed to be Russian Intelligence Service Counter-Intelligence propaganda for the Obama administration to use to attempt to take down Trump and his team NEVER MADE ANY SENSE.

These have always been actions the Russians would be expected to take if they wanted Trump to LOSE and HILLARY to win!

Leave it to Dems to suppress the real truth and snowflakes to push the coup cover-up narrative that never made any sense. Once again, it seems, they attempted to project / accuse others falsely of what hey were engaged in.

Former NSC Chief of Staff: John Brennan Suppressed Intelligence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary in 2016

FILE – In this May 23, 2017, file photo, former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol

www.redstate.com

.

Hey stupid. Putin didn't want Hillary to win:



But nice try.

Oh really?

Former NSC Chief Of Staff: John Brennan Buried Evidence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary In 2016

Former National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin actually favored Hillary Clinton In 2016.

dailycaller.com

The person uses the partisan report from the House Intelligence Committee (authored by Republicans and voted for only by Republicans) to contradict the bipartisan Senate report.

It draws questions about their motives if you ask me.

Why would Putin prefer Trump over Clinton?
Clinton already had a working relationship with Putin.

Clinton’s relationship with Putin was adversarial. It wasn’t much of a working relationship. Trump is naive and easily manipulated.

How so?
View attachment 327342

When was that picture taken?

At this point what difference does it make?

A lot. Especially if you’re trying to make the point that I think you’re trying to make.

Y’all need to brush up on history, otherwise you’re easily manipulated.

No it really doesnt.
It shows Hillary sucking up to Russia.

When?

Nevermind. I’ll answer since you don’t want to have to think about it.

March 2009. You know, a lot of shit happened after that photo was taken including Putin returning to the presidency (Medvedev was president during this photo) in a 2011 rigged election which Clinton was vocal in condemning.

Russia became convinced Clinton would pursue regime change. Trump? Not so much.

 

[easyt65]

You only have unhinges allegations, none of which make any sense.

You’re claiming that Russia tried to get Clinton elected by giving them information that Clinton didn’t use and wasn’t made public until after the election. You know that doesn’t make any sense, right?

Meanwhile, Russia hacks and releases thousands of emails from the DNC to harm the Clinton campaign. That seems to have been forgotten here.

1. You once again refuse to acknowledge actual evidence that Brennan and Clapper suppressed Intel evidence of Russia favoring and attempting to help Hillary in 2016.

2. Evidence shows/proves the Russian Intel Service gave Steele - a Trump-hating, lying, proven untrustworthy, agenda-driven foreign spy working for Russians - propaganda the FBI assessed to be / confirmed was propaganda already being used against US Foreign Policy.....this information was sold to Hillary and the FBI...and evidence proves Obama and his criminal coup-attempting clown posse, who had already protected Hillary from indictment / prosecution from proven crimes, intentionally used that Russian propaganda to attempt to take out Trump, committing Perjury, Obstruction, FISA Court abuses, and more in the process.

3. The Russians had nothing to do with the release of damning information from the DNC's server. You and other snowflakes continue to push that lie despite all the evidence to the contrary:

- The DNC never allowed the FBI to take / analyze their server to confirm their BS claim.

- Barry and the DNC cut a deal with a private company to investigate / analyze the server
-- Since when does the FBI ever allow to a private company to do its job when national security is involved?
-- Barry ended up giving the founder of this company a Cabinet position after Dems declared the company had verified the Russians hacked their server
-- THIS COMPANY RECENTLY DECLARED THEY NEVER ANALYZED / INVESTIGATED THE SERVER, NEVER DECLARED THE FRUSSIANS HACKD IT, AND THAT ONLY THEIR COMPANY'S PR DEPARTMENT WAS HIRED BY THE DNC

All evidence shows the Democrats hired Pakistani spies to maintain their servers in Congress and violated the law requiring them to do background checks onthese criminals
- Had they followed the law they would have learned Awan was connected to terrorists & he and his brother were being investigated for holding his mother captive and spending their father's fortune after his death, of which they were suspected.
-- These spies down-loaded TERA-bytes of data from Congressional servers, from classified committees that dealt with Foreign Relations and other critical areas....and the Democrats pushed their excuse that the TERA-bytes of information they downloaded consisted of their kids' homework and family photos.....they had loaded onto Classified Congressional Servers?

WTF?

Oh, it gets better.....AFTER they were busted and booted from Congress, no longer allowed to access Congressional Computers & AFTER some of the family fled to Pakistan where the were protected by the Pakistani govt, new DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz HIRED AWAN BACK TO WORK FOR HER AND THE DNC....DWC NOT ONLY GAVE AWAN ACCESS TO CONGRESSONAL SERVERS AGAIN BUT TO DNC SERVERS AS WELL AS THE USERNAMES AND PASSWORDS OF ALL THE DEMOCRATS WHO HAD ACCESS TO /USED THE SERVER......

AND COINCIDENCES OF COINCDENCES, SEVERALDAYS LATER ALL THE SKELETONS CAME POURING OUT OF THE DNC'S CLOSET, LEAKED FROM THEIR SERVER....

....RACIST, SEXIST, HOMOPHOBIC, ANTI-SEMITIC DEM E-MAILS....
....EVIDENCE THE DEMOCRATS RIGGED THEIR PRIMARIES AND SCREWED BEERNIE FOR HILLARY, FED HER DEBAT QUESTIONS, ETC....

WTF?

Oh, but wait - it gets BETTER....

As all of this explodes in the Democrats' faces and they scramble to create the diversion to save their asses -- that was 'Pay no attention to the content that was hacked / released - we are victims - the Russians hacked our server and released information because Trump told them to do it' -- the DC police reveals that DWC had given Awan all this access again to Democrat (and DNC) servers AFTER THEYHAD BEEN BANNED FROM HAVING ANY MORE ACCESS TO IT...

DWC was IMMEDIATELY fired by the DNC....and that same day she went straight to Hillary and her campaign....and was hired on that same day.



Of course this was all covered in great length at the time in numerous threads on this board with at least 50 - 60 links, articles, reports, etc.... on it...and many more since then reporting how the lie about the server unraveled when the company the Dems had claimed for so long confirmed their Russian Hack BS actually came out and said 'WE NEVEFR DID THAT'.......

...BUT YOU HAVE DRIVEN THE POINT HOME OVER AND OVER YOU DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT FACTS / LINKS AND DON;T USE THEM. The last time I challenged you directly to post one, your response was 'Nne for you'.

Bwuhahahahaha......

EVERY BS excuse, false narrative, false accusation, failed coup attempt, crime, and spin have been exposed the last 4 years...and it keeps on being debunked as more and more comes out..... It's amazing how snowflakes cling to the lies and spin in today's world where today's technology allows us to look up the facts within seconds.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Former CIA officer and National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said that, in fact, former CIA head John Brennan ignored intelligence that Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, wanted Hillary Clinton to win.



“The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that ‘all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence’ and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they ‘were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.’”

House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump.

“More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.”


“Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”



The theory pushed from the start by the Obama administration, proven conspirators, Democrats, and snowflakes that the Russians preferred Trump to win the Presidency while selling Obama / Hillary / Democrats information assessed to be Russian Intelligence Service Counter-Intelligence propaganda for the Obama administration to use to attempt to take down Trump and his team NEVER MADE ANY SENSE.

These have always been actions the Russians would be expected to take if they wanted Trump to LOSE and HILLARY to win!

Leave it to Dems to suppress the real truth and snowflakes to push the coup cover-up narrative that never made any sense. Once again, it seems, they attempted to project / accuse others falsely of what hey were engaged in.

Former NSC Chief of Staff: John Brennan Suppressed Intelligence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary in 2016

FILE – In this May 23, 2017, file photo, former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol

www.redstate.com

.

Hey stupid. Putin didn't want Hillary to win:



But nice try.

Oh really?

Former NSC Chief Of Staff: John Brennan Buried Evidence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary In 2016

Former National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin actually favored Hillary Clinton In 2016.

dailycaller.com

The person uses the partisan report from the House Intelligence Committee (authored by Republicans and voted for only by Republicans) to contradict the bipartisan Senate report.

It draws questions about their motives if you ask me.

Why would Putin prefer Trump over Clinton?
Clinton already had a working relationship with Putin.

Clinton’s relationship with Putin was adversarial. It wasn’t much of a working relationship. Trump is naive and easily manipulated.

How so?
View attachment 327342

When was that picture taken?

At this point what difference does it make?

A lot. Especially if you’re trying to make the point that I think you’re trying to make.

Y’all need to brush up on history, otherwise you’re easily manipulated.

No it really doesnt.
It shows Hillary sucking up to Russia.

When?

Nevermind. I’ll answer since you don’t want to have to think about it.

March 2009. You know, a lot of shit happened after that photo was taken including Putin returning to the presidency (Medvedev was president during this photo) in a 2011 rigged election which Clinton was vocal in condemning.

Russia became convinced Clinton would pursue regime change. Trump? Not so much.

Was she sucking up to Russia or not?

 

[easyt65]

March 2009. You know, a lot of shit happened after that photo was taken including Putin returning to the presidency (Medvedev was president during this photo) in a 2011 rigged election which Clinton was vocal in condemning.

Russia became convinced Clinton would pursue regime change. Trump? Not so much.

Clinton was a Joke - a greedy, power-hungry corrupt *****...one they could manipulate or pay off to get what they wanted....and did....

2009:

Hillary giggles like a school girl as she hands the Russian Ambassador a prop made out of plastic and wood that had a plague on it that read 'Overcharge' in Russian instead of the intended word 'RESET' ... as the Russian Ambassador laughed at her. (She continued to giggle and laugh, having no idea he was laughing at her and her incompetence, unable to get the word 'Reset' in Russian on a friggin' plastic prop.)


2012:


Obama is caught on a 'hot mike' telling the Putin-puppet to pass onto his master that he - Obama - would be more 'flexible' after re-election.

2014:




Barry and Hillary give Vlad uranium, Crimea, and 2 years of un-challenged hacking, spying, counter-Intel ops, and 'Interference'......and Barry got in return Putin's permission to INVADE SYRIA....


2016:



Vlad / the RIS sell Barry and Hillary information the FBI assessed as Russian propaganda already being used against Russian US Foreign Policy...which they intentionally used to try to take down Trump anyway

 

[The VOR]

You only have unhinges allegations, none of which make any sense.

You’re claiming that Russia tried to get Clinton elected by giving them information that Clinton didn’t use and wasn’t made public until after the election. You know that doesn’t make any sense, right?

Meanwhile, Russia hacks and releases thousands of emails from the DNC to harm the Clinton campaign. That seems to have been forgotten here.

1. You once again refuse to acknowledge actual evidence that Brennan and Clapper suppressed Intel evidence of Russia favoring and attempting to help Hillary in 2016.

2. Evidence shows/proves the Russian Intel Service gave Steele - a Trump-hating, lying, proven untrustworthy, agenda-driven foreign spy working for Russians - propaganda the FBI assessed to be / confirmed was propaganda already being used against US Foreign Policy.....this information was sold to Hillary and the FBI...and evidence proves Obama and his criminal coup-attempting clown posse, who had already protected Hillary from indictment / prosecution from proven crimes, intentionally used that Russian propaganda to attempt to take out Trump, committing Perjury, Obstruction, FISA Court abuses, and more in the process.

3. The Russians had nothing to do with the release of damning information from the DNC's server. You and other snowflakes continue to push that lie despite all the evidence to the contrary:

- The DNC never allowed the FBI to take / analyze their server to confirm their BS claim.

- Barry and the DNC cut a deal with a private company to investigate / analyze the server
-- Since when does the FBI ever allow to a private company to do its job when national security is involved?
-- Barry ended up giving the founder of this company a Cabinet position after Dems declared the company had verified the Russians hacked their server
-- THIS COMPANY RECENTLY DECLARED THEY NEVER ANALYZED / INVESTIGATED THE SERVER, NEVER DECLARED THE FRUSSIANS HACKD IT, AND THAT ONLY THEIR COMPANY'S PR DEPARTMENT WAS HIRED BY THE DNC

All evidence shows the Democrats hired Pakistani spies to maintain their servers in Congress and violated the law requiring them to do background checks onthese criminals
- Had they followed the law they would have learned Awan was connected to terrorists & he and his brother were being investigated for holding his mother captive and spending their father's fortune after his death, of which they were suspected.
-- These spies down-loaded TERA-bytes of data from Congressional servers, from classified committees that dealt with Foreign Relations and other critical areas....and the Democrats pushed their excuse that the TERA-bytes of information they downloaded consisted of their kids' homework and family photos.....they had loaded onto Classified Congressional Servers?

WTF?

Oh, it gets better.....AFTER they were busted and booted from Congress, no longer allowed to access Congressional Computers & AFTER some of the family fled to Pakistan where the were protected by the Pakistani govt, new DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz HIRED AWAN BACK TO WORK FOR HER AND THE DNC....DWC NOT ONLY GAVE AWAN ACCESS TO CONGRESSONAL SERVERS AGAIN BUT TO DNC SERVERS AS WELL AS THE USERNAMES AND PASSWORDS OF ALL THE DEMOCRATS WHO HAD ACCESS TO /USED THE SERVER......

AND COINCIDENCES OF COINCDENCES, SEVERALDAYS LATER ALL THE SKELETONS CAME POURING OUT OF THE DNC'S CLOSET, LEAKED FROM THEIR SERVER....

....RACIST, SEXIST, HOMOPHOBIC, ANTI-SEMITIC DEM E-MAILS....
....EVIDENCE THE DEMOCRATS RIGGED THEIR PRIMARIES AND SCREWED BEERNIE FOR HILLARY, FED HER DEBAT QUESTIONS, ETC....

WTF?

Oh, but wait - it gets BETTER....

As all of this explodes in the Democrats' faces and they scramble to create the diversion to save their asses -- that was 'Pay no attention to the content that was hacked / released - we are victims - the Russians hacked our server and released information because Trump told them to do it' -- the DC police reveals that DWC had given Awan all this access again to Democrat (and DNC) servers AFTER THEYHAD BEEN BANNED FROM HAVING ANY MORE ACCESS TO IT...

DWC was IMMEDIATELY fired by the DNC....and that same day she went straight to Hillary and her campaign....and was hired on that same day.



Of course this was all covered in great length at the time in numerous threads on this board with at least 50 - 60 links, articles, reports, etc.... on it...and many more since then reporting how the lie about the server unraveled when the company the Dems had claimed for so long confirmed their Russian Hack BS actually came out and said 'WE NEVEFR DID THAT'.......

...BUT YOU HAVE DRIVEN THE POINT HOME OVER AND OVER YOU DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT FACTS / LINKS AND DON;T USE THEM. The last time I challenged you directly to post one, your response was 'Nne for you'.

Bwuhahahahaha......

EVERY BS excuse, false narrative, false accusation, failed coup attempt, crime, and spin have been exposed the last 4 years...and it keeps on being debunked as more and more comes out..... It's amazing how snowflakes cling to the lies and spin in today's world where today's technology allows us to look up the facts within seconds.

So Twinkle Toes, to sum up this post, and everything else you've ever posted:

Bad, bad, bad Democrats...bad, bad...
Good, good, good Republicans...good, good...

My side is always right.
Your side is always wrong.

SSDD 24/7

 

[BlindBoo]

The Russians played Hillary like a fiddle when she was Secretary of State.

Hogwash. Putinbear was pissed that he was duped into buying a bunch of dirt mine that produce 4% of what America burns in our Nuclear reactors. I mean all the money he spend to get his hands on our uranium too.

I also heard that she rubbed it in his face one day, the fact that the USA had purchases 500 tons worth of highly enriched uranium from warheads Russia could no longer afford to maintain.

He hates her with a blind atomic passion.

Kind of like how the Banana Republicans hate everything not Trumpybear, with a passion.

Megatons to Megawatts - Centrus Energy Corp

The Megatons to Megawatts program recycled bomb-grade uranium from 20,000 Russian nuclear warheads into fuel for American nuclear power plants.

www.centrusenergy.com

 

[westwall]

Former CIA officer and National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said that, in fact, former CIA head John Brennan ignored intelligence that Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, wanted Hillary Clinton to win.



“The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that ‘all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence’ and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they ‘were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.’”

House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump.

“More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.”


“Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”



The theory pushed from the start by the Obama administration, proven conspirators, Democrats, and snowflakes that the Russians preferred Trump to win the Presidency while selling Obama / Hillary / Democrats information assessed to be Russian Intelligence Service Counter-Intelligence propaganda for the Obama administration to use to attempt to take down Trump and his team NEVER MADE ANY SENSE.

These have always been actions the Russians would be expected to take if they wanted Trump to LOSE and HILLARY to win!

Leave it to Dems to suppress the real truth and snowflakes to push the coup cover-up narrative that never made any sense. Once again, it seems, they attempted to project / accuse others falsely of what hey were engaged in.

Former NSC Chief of Staff: John Brennan Suppressed Intelligence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary in 2016

FILE – In this May 23, 2017, file photo, former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol

www.redstate.com

.

Yeah, he needs to spend the rest of his life making small rocks, out of big ones.

 

[colfax_m]

You once again refuse to acknowledge actual evidence that Brennan and Clapper suppressed Intel evidence of Russia favoring and attempting to help Hillary in 2016.

No evidence has been presented. Just a guy claiming to have been told a thing. In other words, hearsay

intentionally used that Russian propaganda to attempt to take out Trump, committing Perjury, Obstruction, FISA Court abuses, and more in the process.

But they didn’t use it to affect the election, did they

The Russians had nothing to do with the release of damning information from the DNC's server. You and other snowflakes continue to push that lie despite all the evidence to the contrary

The only ones that believe that are gullible fools who listen to Russian propaganda over facts

Barry and the DNC cut a deal with a private company to investigate / analyze the server

Obama has nothing to do with it. Crowdstrike is a highly respected agency. The RNC did exactly the same thing, hired Crowdstrike to investigate and analyze their servers

Since when does the FBI ever allow to a private company to do its job when national security is involved?

The DNC is a private organization. The FBI doesn’t get to tell them how to investigate their own property. And for the record, it happens that way all the damn time

Barry ended up giving the founder of this company a Cabinet position after Dems declared the company had verified the Russians hacked their server

Which is completely

THIS COMPANY RECENTLY DECLARED THEY NEVER ANALYZED / INVESTIGATED THE SERVER, NEVER DECLARED THE FRUSSIANS HACKD IT, AND THAT ONLY THEIR COMPANY'S PR DEPARTMENT WAS HIRED BY THE DNC

Also intrue

All evidence shows the Democrats hired Pakistani spies to maintain their servers in Congress and violated the law requiring them to do background checks onthese criminals

Also untrue.

DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz HIRED AWAN BACK TO WORK FOR HER AND THE DNC.

Remains untrue

DWC NOT ONLY GAVE AWAN ACCESS TO CONGRESSONAL SERVERS AGAIN BUT TO DNC SERVERS AS WELL AS THE USERNAMES AND PASSWORDS OF ALL THE DEMOCRATS WHO HAD ACCESS TO /USED THE SERVER

Again, untrue.

I’m sure you can find links to back up your assertions, but you’d have to be a complete idiot to believe everything you read on the internet.

Then again, you are an idiot.

 

[colfax_m]

Former CIA officer and National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said that, in fact, former CIA head John Brennan ignored intelligence that Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, wanted Hillary Clinton to win.



“The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that ‘all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence’ and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they ‘were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.’”

House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump.

“More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.”


“Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”



The theory pushed from the start by the Obama administration, proven conspirators, Democrats, and snowflakes that the Russians preferred Trump to win the Presidency while selling Obama / Hillary / Democrats information assessed to be Russian Intelligence Service Counter-Intelligence propaganda for the Obama administration to use to attempt to take down Trump and his team NEVER MADE ANY SENSE.

These have always been actions the Russians would be expected to take if they wanted Trump to LOSE and HILLARY to win!

Leave it to Dems to suppress the real truth and snowflakes to push the coup cover-up narrative that never made any sense. Once again, it seems, they attempted to project / accuse others falsely of what hey were engaged in.

Former NSC Chief of Staff: John Brennan Suppressed Intelligence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary in 2016

FILE – In this May 23, 2017, file photo, former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol

www.redstate.com

.

Hey stupid. Putin didn't want Hillary to win:



But nice try.

Oh really?

Former NSC Chief Of Staff: John Brennan Buried Evidence That Putin Actually Favored Hillary In 2016

Former National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said Wednesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin actually favored Hillary Clinton In 2016.

dailycaller.com

The person uses the partisan report from the House Intelligence Committee (authored by Republicans and voted for only by Republicans) to contradict the bipartisan Senate report.

It draws questions about their motives if you ask me.

Why would Putin prefer Trump over Clinton?
Clinton already had a working relationship with Putin.

Clinton’s relationship with Putin was adversarial. It wasn’t much of a working relationship. Trump is naive and easily manipulated.

How so?
View attachment 327342

When was that picture taken?

At this point what difference does it make?

A lot. Especially if you’re trying to make the point that I think you’re trying to make.

Y’all need to brush up on history, otherwise you’re easily manipulated.

No it really doesnt.
It shows Hillary sucking up to Russia.

When?

Nevermind. I’ll answer since you don’t want to have to think about it.

March 2009. You know, a lot of shit happened after that photo was taken including Putin returning to the presidency (Medvedev was president during this photo) in a 2011 rigged election which Clinton was vocal in condemning.

Russia became convinced Clinton would pursue regime change. Trump? Not so much.

Was she sucking up to Russia or not?

I wouldn’t put it that way. She was trying to make a deal.

This is what sucking up looks like.

Read the full transcript of the Helsinki press conference

Standing next to Putin, Trump slammed US intelligence agencies, Democrats, and the Mueller investigation.

www.vox.com