easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,076
- 2,645
Former CIA officer and National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz said that, in fact, former CIA head John Brennan ignored intelligence that Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, wanted Hillary Clinton to win.
“The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that ‘all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence’ and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they ‘were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.’”
House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump.
“More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.”
“Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”
The theory pushed from the start by the Obama administration, proven conspirators, Democrats, and snowflakes that the Russians preferred Trump to win the Presidency while selling Obama / Hillary / Democrats information assessed to be Russian Intelligence Service Counter-Intelligence propaganda for the Obama administration to use to attempt to take down Trump and his team NEVER MADE ANY SENSE.
These have always been actions the Russians would be expected to take if they wanted Trump to LOSE and HILLARY to win!
Leave it to Dems to suppress the real truth and snowflakes to push the coup cover-up narrative that never made any sense. Once again, it seems, they attempted to project / accuse others falsely of what hey were engaged in.
.
“The Senate Intelligence Committee report falsely claims that ‘all analytical lines are supported with all-source intelligence’ and that analysts who wrote the intelligence community assessment consistently said they ‘were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.’”
House Intelligence Committee staff members discovered exactly the opposite and told him that there is ample evidence that Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election, but not necessarily on behalf of Trump.
“More gravely, they said that [then-] CIA Director John Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.”
“Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”
The theory pushed from the start by the Obama administration, proven conspirators, Democrats, and snowflakes that the Russians preferred Trump to win the Presidency while selling Obama / Hillary / Democrats information assessed to be Russian Intelligence Service Counter-Intelligence propaganda for the Obama administration to use to attempt to take down Trump and his team NEVER MADE ANY SENSE.
These have always been actions the Russians would be expected to take if they wanted Trump to LOSE and HILLARY to win!
Leave it to Dems to suppress the real truth and snowflakes to push the coup cover-up narrative that never made any sense. Once again, it seems, they attempted to project / accuse others falsely of what hey were engaged in.
.
