For whom would Republicans vote?

[Thinker101]

Anyone that is not Hillary, Liz, Bernie or Joe.

Okay. Here's a quick what-if.

The Republican is Nikki Haley.
The Democrat is Tulsi Gabbard.

Who gets your vote, and why?

Well, if Democrats decide to run on something other than anti-Trump, anti-America we'll have to see.

No answer huh.

With the Democrats current policy it would be Nikki.

She would be another Bush.....

She wouldn't be another Obama.

 

[eagle1462010]

I'm down with discussing any of them, but #41 is my favorite, because it makes it abundantly clear that the general welfare clause has been used as an illegitimate excuse to expand federal power.

I agree with this ...........thought changing that part of the constitution was a very stupid move...........by changing that the Federal Gov't has decided it can spend money on anything it pleases.......which leads to corrupt bought off politicians.............which is exactly why the Founders limited the Federal Gov't and reserved the power to the states...........The term .......as local as possible was a prime theme and I agree.

Pathetic excuses for perpetuating stupidity.

If we'd listened to you................the Real world would have stacked the Supreme Court with Hillary winning.........we stopped that..........and that is real..........voting for a candidate that can't win didn't stop it..........the only thing missing in your ideological world is the pom poms..........

Because you are doing nothing from the cheap seats in the stands..........telling everyone how wrong they are..............Again..........we chose to live and vote in the REAL WORLD..........Are you getting a nose bleed up there............from the cheap seats........

We stopped her................and I'm DAMN PROUD OF IT.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Putin's not an American.

Why are you working for a Russian takeover?

Yeah dammit! We want our socialist/communist downfall to come with the proper birth certificate!

I'd rather see Hillary and Bernie run in Russia.

So you'd trade Bernie and Hillary for Putin and a player to be named later.

No one mentioned a trade, sluggo.

You're being dishonest as always.

The Russians can have Felonia Milhouse Von Pantsuit free, we want nothing in return - all gifts are final.

 

[John Shaw]

Republicans really would vote for an authoritarian dictator before Joe Biden, which is hilarious to me. Trump is a wannabe dictator, so I guess the shoe fits.

You’re an idiot.

Convincing argument.

Nothing else needs to be said considering your prepubescent accusation.

That makes no sense.

You made an unfounded unsupported accusation. That in turn makes you an idiot.

Seems to be pretty well-founded in the context of this thread. Look who's winning.

 

[Thinker101]

Okay. Here's a quick what-if.

The Republican is Nikki Haley.
The Democrat is Tulsi Gabbard.

Who gets your vote, and why?

Well, if Democrats decide to run on something other than anti-Trump, anti-America we'll have to see.

No answer huh.

With the Democrats current policy it would be Nikki.

I didn't mean which party would you vote for. I mean which individual.

You do understand they're different things, right?
I mean look at Rump for a ready example.

I think when Mac lumped all those names together it became a non-starter. Yes, most of them are actually that stupid. Their mind works by clumping things together and thinking in absolutes. If they had more ability to comprehend things in depth they wouldn't be conservative Republicans.

Yeah, we've seen how well idiot liberals comprehend.

 

[Pogo]

Okay. Here's a quick what-if.

The Republican is Nikki Haley.
The Democrat is Tulsi Gabbard.

Who gets your vote, and why?

Well, if Democrats decide to run on something other than anti-Trump, anti-America we'll have to see.

No answer huh.

With the Democrats current policy it would be Nikki.

She would be another Bush.....

She wouldn't be another Obama.

So then are you saying you can't see the difference between individuals and their political party affiliations?

And you just vote for a party regardless who runs with it?

 

[Mac1958]

It isn’t A serious question because a republican wouldnt vote for any of your silly choices

Um, but they did, in the poll. Look at the results.

Maybe you should ask them why.
.

 

[Pogo]

Well, if Democrats decide to run on something other than anti-Trump, anti-America we'll have to see.

No answer huh.

With the Democrats current policy it would be Nikki.

I didn't mean which party would you vote for. I mean which individual.

You do understand they're different things, right?
I mean look at Rump for a ready example.

I think when Mac lumped all those names together it became a non-starter. Yes, most of them are actually that stupid. Their mind works by clumping things together and thinking in absolutes. If they had more ability to comprehend things in depth they wouldn't be conservative Republicans.

Yeah, we've seen how well idiot liberals comprehend.

Actually the poll is limited to "Republicans". Not 'Liberals".

And Putin is pitching a shutout.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Putin's shutting out the opposition completely. Isn't that revealing.

Does he have "an insurance policy" against his opponents to "make sure they'll never be president?"

Can't believe no votes for "I don't have the balls to say".

Why vote in a rigged election?

I live in California, I get enough openly rigged elections as it is.

 

[dave p]

You’re an idiot.

Convincing argument.

Nothing else needs to be said considering your prepubescent accusation.

That makes no sense.

You made an unfounded unsupported accusation. That in turn makes you an idiot.

Seems to be pretty well-founded in the context of this thread. Look who's winning.

You made an accusation that had no factional backing. No one on this thread is winning. If you want to be taken seriously back up why you say with facts that support your stance. You came in made an ignorant statement based on your feelings and opinion. You indeed are an idiot.

 

[John Shaw]

Convincing argument.

Nothing else needs to be said considering your prepubescent accusation.

That makes no sense.

You made an unfounded unsupported accusation. That in turn makes you an idiot.

Seems to be pretty well-founded in the context of this thread. Look who's winning.

You made an accusation that had no factional backing. No one on this thread is winning. If you want to be taken seriously back up why you say with facts that support your stance. You came in made an ignorant statement based on your feelings and opinion. You indeed are an idiot.

So you're saying that Putin is not an authoritarian dictator? Hmm ...

 

[Uncensored2008]

Illegitimate poll is illegitimate.

So you voted for the third choice, I take it?
.

I don't vote for fraud.

I would not vote for the Bolshevik party.

I would not vote for the KGB thug.

I have plenty of balls to say that I'd vote for neither.

Illegitimate poll is illegitimate.

 

[eagle1462010]

It isn’t A serious question because a republican wouldnt vote for any of your silly choices

Um, but they did, in the poll. Look at the results.

Maybe you should ask them why.
.

It's a What if LOADED POLL..............given a scenario that would never happen.............I answered the scenario as given..........doesn't mean I agree with voting for any of them. I don't..............Hypothetical polls can be interpreted hypothetically.................For Putin to run..........he'd have to be a natural born citizen.........which he isn't..........

So I could vote for him .......he wins.......then get thrown out for for violating the constitution.

 

[ptbw forever]

Well, if Democrats decide to run on something other than anti-Trump, anti-America we'll have to see.

No answer huh.

With the Democrats current policy it would be Nikki.

She would be another Bush.....

She wouldn't be another Obama.

So then are you saying you can't see the difference between individuals and their political party affiliations?

And you just vote for a party regardless who runs with it?

Democrats don’t allow their candidates to be individuals.

 

[dave p]

Nothing else needs to be said considering your prepubescent accusation.

That makes no sense.

You made an unfounded unsupported accusation. That in turn makes you an idiot.

Seems to be pretty well-founded in the context of this thread. Look who's winning.

You made an accusation that had no factional backing. No one on this thread is winning. If you want to be taken seriously back up why you say with facts that support your stance. You came in made an ignorant statement based on your feelings and opinion. You indeed are an idiot.

So you're saying that Putin is not an authoritarian dictator? Hmm ...

That isn’t what I said. Try to apply comprehension to your reading.

 

[Pogo]

I'm down with discussing any of them, but #41 is my favorite, because it makes it abundantly clear that the general welfare clause has been used as an illegitimate excuse to expand federal power.

I agree with this ...........thought changing that part of the constitution was a very stupid move...........by changing that the Federal Gov't has decided it can spend money on anything it pleases.......which leads to corrupt bought off politicians.............which is exactly why the Founders limited the Federal Gov't and reserved the power to the states...........The term .......as local as possible was a prime theme and I agree.

Pathetic excuses for perpetuating stupidity.

If we'd listened to you................the Real world would have stacked the Supreme Court with Hillary winning.........we stopped that..........and that is real..........voting for a candidate that can't win didn't stop it..........the only thing missing in your ideological world is the pom poms..........

Because you are doing nothing from the cheap seats in the stands..........telling everyone how wrong they are..............Again..........we chose to live and vote in the REAL WORLD..........Are you getting a nose bleed up there............from the cheap seats........

We stopped her................and I'm DAMN PROUD OF IT.

"Stopped her" --- in the same way the Katrina flood waters "stopped" the fires of burning buildings.
----- at the water line anyway.

So then you got a fire AND a flood.

 

[BookShaka]

I don’t think I’d vote unless I had EXTREMELY good reason to believe Putin would conform to American values and not executive order just about everything he wants to change. If Putin was trustworthy to keep America and its citizens safe and allow our government the leeway to work as our founders intended, I’d vote for him over the other candidates, but I don’t think he’s the type of man who wants to change the way he governs. There’s no way he could ever run for president anyway so I find this question a bit silly.

Are you asking if Putin was American, would I vote for him based on his beliefs?

 

[Anathema]

Conservatives would vote for Putin. Republicans would probably be split.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I'd rather see Hillary and Bernie run in Russia.

So would I.

Vlad Putin tends to kill anyone who runs against him.

Not that I'm wishing anything bad on Stumbles McMyturn...

The pro-life crowd, everyone.

Wishing death on people yet again. Hmm ...

The ******* liar crowd, ******* lying yet again. Hmm.....

 

[John Shaw]

That makes no sense.

You made an unfounded unsupported accusation. That in turn makes you an idiot.

Seems to be pretty well-founded in the context of this thread. Look who's winning.

You made an accusation that had no factional backing. No one on this thread is winning. If you want to be taken seriously back up why you say with facts that support your stance. You came in made an ignorant statement based on your feelings and opinion. You indeed are an idiot.

So you're saying that Putin is not an authoritarian dictator? Hmm ...

That isn’t what I said. Try to apply comprehension to your reading.

What was the unfounded accusation? The one that is supported by this poll?

Hmm ...