For the record: He never said it and he never will.

[jc456]

you can hear it from Trump himself if you have a minute.

Didn’t hear anything

 

[Nostra]

you can hear it from Trump himself if you have a minute.

He clearly said no when asked if he would direct the DOJ to go after them.

Moron.

 

[dudmuck]

Didn’t hear anything

at time 0:36 he says for they did they should go to jail.

 

[Foxfyre]

Shut up with your alternative facts, Foxfyre, you liar.

Has President-elect Trump said he would punish his political enemies?

Yes, President-elect Trump has made statements suggesting he would seek retribution against his political enemies. In a recent interview, he alluded to the possibility of jailing members of the House committee that investigated the January 6th Capitol attack 12. He has also made numerous threats to prosecute or punish perceived opponents 34. These comments have raised concerns among his critics and legal experts about the potential misuse of power.5

Not until you show me the unedited video or audio in its full context do you have any credibility whatsoever. Or any authority to tell anybody to shut up.

 

[jc456]

at time 0:36 he says for they did they should go to jail.

I agree, they lied and punished innocent people, obstructed justice by hiding and getting rid of evidence. Do you think they are above the law?

 

[Foxfyre]

I already have, Trumpster. And exactly as I predicted, it didn't matter.

I'm done trying to get through to cultists. If you don't like that, too bad.

Translation of Mac1958's post: "I have nothing that proves Trump promised revenge or retribution on political opponents. The closest thing to it is he has said the best revenge/retribution is winning the election and putting them out of power. So since I can't get anybody to believe a lie that I want them to believe, I'll take my toys and go home."

 

[Nostra]

at time 0:36 he says for they did they should go to jail.

So? Where did he say he will go after them? Oh, he didn’t.


In fact, when asked if he would direct the DOJ to go after them he said no.

You should watch your own video, Simp.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Not until you show me the unedited video or audio in its full context do you have any credibility whatsoever. Or any authority to tell anybody to shut up.

I gave you factual proof.

The standard is vetted material, not what you will or not accept. Step off. You have no more authority with your opinion than to tell me not to tell you to shut your lies.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Translation of Mac1958's post: "I have nothing that proves Trump promised revenge or retribution on political opponents. The closest thing to it is he has said the best revenge/retribution is winning the election and putting them out of power. So since I can't get anybody to believe a lie that I want them to believe, I'll take my toys and go home."

I gave you factual proof.

 

[Foxfyre]

I gave you factual proof.

The standard is vetted material, not what you will or not accept. Step off. You have no more authority with your opinion than to tell me not to tell you to shut your lies.

You gave me nothing factual or proof of any kind. Have I suggested to you that you should join a good remedial reading comprehension course? If not I suggest you should look into that along with a lot of others who can't seem to distinguish between gaslighting/lying/misrepresenting/propaganda and what is the truth.

 

[Foxfyre]

I gave you factual proof.

No. You didn't/

 

[HikerGuy83]

I know this is a waste of time -- you can't prove anything to a Trumpster -- but just for fun:

What are you saying ?

He told them he was their retribution, he was their revenge.

Not his.

Just electing him was our payback to the deep state.

So, no this isn't an example.

You fail.

Again.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Not a single Trump quote.

Weird.

Or not......

It's just that John Edgar Slow Horses has been drinking way to much Kool-Aid.

 

[Lesh]

I know this is a waste of time -- you can't prove anything to a Trumpster -- but just for fun:

Kinda blew this thread up

 

[Nostra]

Kinda blew this thread up

Not at all. That was a major fail, Simp.

 

[dudmuck]

I agree, they lied and punished innocent people, obstructed justice by hiding and getting rid of evidence. Do you think they are above the law?

are you referring to the jan 6th committee? There were no prosecutions of anyone, and the evidence is published for all to see.

Jail threats for investigation committee that did nothing wrong.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You gave me nothing factual or proof of any kind. Have I suggested to you that you should join a good remedial reading comprehension course? If not I suggest you should look into that along with a lot of others who can't seem to distinguish between gaslighting/lying/misrepresenting/propaganda and what is the truth.

You can blart all you want, but you are unable to refute the material.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

No. You didn't/

You saying I did not without refuting the material is nonsense of the worst sense.

 

[Foxfyre]

You can blart all you want, but you are unable to refute the material.

I stand by the OP and put a perfectly reasonable challenge out there for you to provide evidence for the accusations and innuendo. So far not a single one of you has refuted my statements in the OP with ANYTHING even close.

 

[Foxfyre]

You saying I did not without refuting the material is nonsense of the worst sense.

If you cannot provide full context video or audio or somebody credible using full context, you are spewing nonsense of the worst sense. (Hint: Nobody who uses full unedited context is saying Trump has said he will get revenge on his political opponents.)