Daryl Hunt
Your Worst Nightmare
- Banned
- #1
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer of Moscow Mitch who refuses to allow it to go to committee much less the senate floor.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Im all for congress not passing unconstitutional law.
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer of Moscow Mitch who refuses to allow it to go to committee much less the senate floor.
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer
Wrong.Im all for congress not passing unconstitutional law.
So when the Supreme court rules that an act of congress is unconstitutional, does that mean that the act was constitutional up until the time that the Supreme court made it's ruling?Wrong.Im all for congress not passing unconstitutional law.
All acts of Congress are presumed to be Constitutional until the Supreme Court rules otherwise (see, e.g., US v. Morrison (2000)).
And it comes as no surprise that conservatives would oppose legislation that would protect voting rights.
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer of Moscow Mitch who refuses to allow it to go to committee much less the senate floor.
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer
What bill?
Got a number, or a name??
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer of Moscow Mitch who refuses to allow it to go to committee much less the senate floor.
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer
What bill?
Got a number, or a name??
So you are feigning ignorance once again. For the umptenth time, here is is again
H.R.1 - For the People Act of 2019
Not all of us should be considered as is the usual case of a HR bill. But there are some really good points that the Senate, if given the chance, can rewrite it and present it back to the house. That's the way it "Used to Be" done before the Party of the Rump. Sen. Bennett is correct.
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer of Moscow Mitch who refuses to allow it to go to committee much less the senate floor.
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer
What bill?
Got a number, or a name??
So you are feigning ignorance once again. For the umptenth time, here is is again
H.R.1 - For the People Act of 2019
Not all of us should be considered as is the usual case of a HR bill. But there are some really good points that the Senate, if given the chance, can rewrite it and present it back to the house. That's the way it "Used to Be" done before the Party of the Rump. Sen. Bennett is correct.
REALLY? So for 2 years Reid did not sit on hundreds of bills from the Republican House?
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer of Moscow Mitch who refuses to allow it to go to committee much less the senate floor.
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer
What bill?
Got a number, or a name??
So you are feigning ignorance once again. For the umptenth time, here is is again
H.R.1 - For the People Act of 2019
Not all of us should be considered as is the usual case of a HR bill. But there are some really good points that the Senate, if given the chance, can rewrite it and present it back to the house. That's the way it "Used to Be" done before the Party of the Rump. Sen. Bennett is correct.
REALLY? So for 2 years Reid did not sit on hundreds of bills from the Republican House?
PolitiFact - Rep. Lynn Jenkins blames Harry Reid for 'do-nothing Senate'
The count was said to be 342. But most were NOT sitting idly on Reids desk. Most were sent to committee. And for a lot of reasons, they were held up by the committee. Read the real scoop. But in Moscow Mitch's case, he's sitting on well over 500 that have not even been considered for the Committee. H.R.1 is just one of them.
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer of Moscow Mitch who refuses to allow it to go to committee much less the senate floor.
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer
What bill?
Got a number, or a name??
So you are feigning ignorance once again. For the umptenth time, here is is again
H.R.1 - For the People Act of 2019
Not all of us should be considered as is the usual case of a HR bill. But there are some really good points that the Senate, if given the chance, can rewrite it and present it back to the house. That's the way it "Used to Be" done before the Party of the Rump. Sen. Bennett is correct.
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer of Moscow Mitch who refuses to allow it to go to committee much less the senate floor.
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer
What bill?
Got a number, or a name??
So you are feigning ignorance once again. For the umptenth time, here is is again
H.R.1 - For the People Act of 2019
Not all of us should be considered as is the usual case of a HR bill. But there are some really good points that the Senate, if given the chance, can rewrite it and present it back to the house. That's the way it "Used to Be" done before the Party of the Rump. Sen. Bennett is correct.
That a law might be ‘wrong’ or ‘bad’ is subjective, having nothing to do with its constitutionality.So when the Supreme court rules that an act of congress is unconstitutional, does that mean that the act was constitutional up until the time that the Supreme court made it's ruling?Wrong.Im all for congress not passing unconstitutional law.
All acts of Congress are presumed to be Constitutional until the Supreme Court rules otherwise (see, e.g., US v. Morrison (2000)).
And it comes as no surprise that conservatives would oppose legislation that would protect voting rights.
Members of congress have the duty to vote against bills if they believe that such legislation would be unconstitutional law. This goes along with their oath to protect the constitution. For example, if would be wrong for congress to pass a law making it illegal to criticize the president because that would be blatantly unconstitutional. And people would be correct to hold the opinion that such a law is unconstitutional even before the Supreme Court rules on the law.
I agree. I did not say that bad or wrong law equals unconstitutional.That a law might be ‘wrong’ or ‘bad’ is subjective, having nothing to do with its constitutionality.
Moreover, comparing the For the People Act to a measure making it illegal to criticize the president fails as a fallacy, as the two are nothing alike.
The will of the people is paramount, as expressed by their elected representatives – the courts as a consequence defer to that will, and reluctantly resort to invalidating acts of Congress unless constitutionally compelled to do so.
As a partisan rightist you oppose the measure because you believe it will benefit Democrats politically, having nothing to do with its constitutionality.
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer of Moscow Mitch who refuses to allow it to go to committee much less the senate floor.
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer
What bill?
Got a number, or a name??
So you are feigning ignorance once again. For the umptenth time, here is is again
H.R.1 - For the People Act of 2019
Not all of us should be considered as is the usual case of a HR bill. But there are some really good points that the Senate, if given the chance, can rewrite it and present it back to the house. That's the way it "Used to Be" done before the Party of the Rump. Sen. Bennett is correct.
Correction. That's the way it used to be before democrats turned communist and became the enemy of all things American.
the bill promotes honesty and accountability of election funding Daryl
methinks we both know why it's never going to see the light of Congressional approval
~S~
So the devil in the 'we the people' details is really the crux of this bill Daryl
I get that much in my pointy little farm boy head
~S~
This bill sits in the bottom desk drawer of Moscow Mitch who refuses to allow it to go to committee much less the senate floor.
When the country goes to the shitter, then there will be almost 200,000,000 armed citizens going to look for blood.“Cloward-Piven Strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.