For the last Time, "skeptics," the SUN is NOT the cause of climate change, and "solar cycle" was put out by the fraud

All heat producing energy comes from the sun foolish


Which is precisely ZERO evidence that the SUN is anything other than a constant in the issue of climate CHANGE.... DUH...
 
And what determines the ice thickness imbecile ?


Great question. Why are Antarctic ICE AGE glaciers 2.5 miles thick? Why are GREENLAND ICE AGE glaciers under 2 miles thick?

Age of ice age? Greenland 1 million, Antarctica 40 million....

One of the great things about absolute science invalid morons like Dag here is that they think Greenland and Antarctica have been "melting" the past two decades....

Really...

To believe that is to completely misunderstand what a glacier is and what it does = how it grows...

Climate "science" has used something called "ice cores" from both. An "ice core" is a cylindrical cut of the ice, from which we get annual data. This is because EVERY YEAR another LAYER OF ICE is ADDED to BOTH GREENLAND AND ANTARCTICA, even as "Dag" can PARROT they are "melting..."



Cores from the Antarctic Ice Sheet preserve up to 800,000 years. Researchers continually strive to extract older ice, so these ice-core-age limits will likely increase.


The problem with that, of course, is that if an ice core layer is under 800k others, it gets squeezed by the force of gravity, which is considerable.




So here is the question for DAG. How is Antarctica "melting" if its entire ice sheet ADDS A NEW LAYER OF ICE CORE EVERY YEAR???
 
So, you’re smarter than ALL climate research institutes ?


CLASSIC - right under the PARROT image = Dag insists only PARROTING matters....


Your side LIES. It has been busted lying over and over. The data never supported the conclusions of the Co2 fraud. Indeed, the Co2 fraud never

NEVER
provided any evidence that increasing Co2 warms the atmosphere. In real science, that means

THEORY REJECTED....


We have TWO and ONLY TWO measures of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons...



satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.

Scientists were left with two choices: either the atmosphere wasn't warming up, or something was wrong with the data




LMAO!!!!

Co2 went up, atmospheric temps did NOT = THEORY REJECTED = two highly correlated data series...




So instead of admitting their THEORY is COMPLETELY WRONG and has NO EVIDENCE to support it, the Co2 FRAUD FUDGED both data series with "orbit wobble" and "shade issues" for balloons.


No conflict there. Admit Co2 does NOTHING and there is no reason to fund the Co2 fraud....



That is not the practice of science, anymore than Enron was practicing accounting...
 
There has never been a question as to the sun’s initiation of climate changes. But they have always been cyclic. The difference is simply this. Never has the world’s climate while man has been on earth change so RAPIDLY as it has since the start of out industrial resolution. There are no graphs that show otherwise. None nada, nix, nothing. AGW is about the RATE OF CHANGE.
Anyone who sets himself up as an authority with more knowledge then the collected science of every climate research facility in the world, is blowing smoke up his ass.
Stupid fk
 
What’s a ‘no response bubba’ look like?
1685269382709.jpeg
 
and tell us, which way would the wind be blowing to melt Antarctica's ice?

Which way to melt Greenland's ice?

So your explanation as to why Greenland froze while North america thawed is because the wind....

And you claim others are in "LA LA Land"

Antarctica doesn't care which way the wind blows. It has been growing ice for 40 million years....

Polar Easterlies blow whether the weather ... both Antarctica and Greenland ... Atmospheric Circulation stupid ...

I've never claimed anyone was from Los Angeles ... aka LA LA Land ... get it?, LA = Los Angeles ... best climate in the First World ...

You don't know what dt is ... so there's no way you'll understand why the wind blows the way it does ... it just magic to you, and you use magical forces to prove your points ... and why we're all laughing at you ...

(I know, I speaking to surface winds ... the moron wouldn't understand the difference) ...
 
Polar Easterlies blow whether the weather ... both Antarctica and Greenland ... Atmospheric Circulation stupid ...

I've never claimed anyone was from Los Angeles ... aka LA LA Land ... get it?, LA = Los Angeles ... best climate in the First World ...

You don't know what dt is ... so there's no way you'll understand why the wind blows the way it does ... it just magic to you, and you use magical forces to prove your points ... and why we're all laughing at you ...

(I know, I speaking to surface winds ... the moron wouldn't understand the difference) ...


The wind, he insists, it must be the wind!!!


Wind is WEATHER not CLIMATE. Wind circulates air. So what. It does nothing regarding air temperature, atmospheric thickness, humidity or ocean level, because all of that is controlled by ice, and ice is all about where land is.

90% Earth ice on Antarctica
7% on Greenland

and if you claim "the wind" is responsible...



R.f07e1807c72566c03e0787136917b2c4
 
The wind, he insists, it must be the wind!!!


Wind is WEATHER not CLIMATE. Wind circulates air. So what. It does nothing regarding air temperature, atmospheric thickness, humidity or ocean level, because all of that is controlled by ice, and ice is all about where land is.

90% Earth ice on Antarctica
7% on Greenland

and if you claim "the wind" is responsible...



R.f07e1807c72566c03e0787136917b2c4
You really have no idea what climate change or AGW is about do you ?
 


No it is not.


There's a well written article ... especially if they actual put the word "trap" in quotation marks ... the author is picky about documented facts ... I disagree with some of his opinions, but this is someone who looks at the dissent ... and tries to keep things real ...

Weather patterns are not changing ... not a single one ... and they won't change ... not until gravity changes ... Iowa corn farmers will be getting enough rain through the summer ... just growing season will be a week or two longer ... the weather pattern remains the same ...
 
You really have no idea what climate change or AGW is about do you ?


LOL!!!

We are still waiting...

How did Co2 melt North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?

Co2 did not do that, tectonic plate movement did....



R.f07e1807c72566c03e0787136917b2c4




 
The wind, he insists, it must be the wind!!!


Wind is WEATHER not CLIMATE. Wind circulates air. So what. It does nothing regarding air temperature, atmospheric thickness, humidity or ocean level, because all of that is controlled by ice, and ice is all about where land is.

90% Earth ice on Antarctica
7% on Greenland

and if you claim "the wind" is responsible...



R.f07e1807c72566c03e0787136917b2c4

Heat transport ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HA HAW HAW HAW HAW ...

Just ignore the Law of Thermodynamics, my friend ... this is funny ...
 
LOL!!!

We are still waiting...

How did Co2 melt North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?

Co2 did not do that, tectonic plate movement did....



R.f07e1807c72566c03e0787136917b2c4




It’s not your made up shit.
 
LOL!!!

We are still waiting...

How did Co2 melt North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?

Co2 did not do that, tectonic plate movement did....



R.f07e1807c72566c03e0787136917b2c4




We’re waiting for you to provide evidence that you’re anything but a fraud.
 
Last edited:
Many Republicans who watch Fox "News" think the Sun is the source of climate change on Earth. They parrot every single piece of this BS they can.

The Data - during the past million years, GREENLAND FROZE WHILE NORTH AMERICA THAWED

The SUN did NOT do that.

Earth climate change is not about the entire planet warming or cooling. It is about the position of land near the poles...

That is the DATA...


Greenland





This is what North America looked like 1 million years ago, but the map is WRONG because it has Greenland frozen, and Greenland was not frozen...


Here’s Why We’re Not Living in an Ice Age (And Why That Matters for the Future) | Smart News ...




So please, you are not helping the cause of destroying Algore's fraud by parroting Fox and the "solar cycle."

"Solar cycle" is debunked the same way co2 is, by THE ACTUAL DATA....

Was Greenland in the middle of the Atlantic back then?
 
Many Republicans who watch Fox "News" think the Sun is the source of climate change on Earth. They parrot every single piece of this BS they can.

The Data - during the past million years, GREENLAND FROZE WHILE NORTH AMERICA THAWED

The SUN did NOT do that.

Earth climate change is not about the entire planet warming or cooling. It is about the position of land near the poles...

That is the DATA...


Greenland





This is what North America looked like 1 million years ago, but the map is WRONG because it has Greenland frozen, and Greenland was not frozen...


Here’s Why We’re Not Living in an Ice Age (And Why That Matters for the Future) | Smart News ...




So please, you are not helping the cause of destroying Algore's fraud by parroting Fox and the "solar cycle."

"Solar cycle" is debunked the same way co2 is, by THE ACTUAL DATA....
Of course the sun is the engine that drives climate and climate change. But it’s man and the use of the suns derived fossil fuel energy sources that changed the rate, thus producing AGW. Really, you going to keep pretending you’re smarter then every climate science related institute in the entire world ?
 
Last edited:
Was Greenland in the middle of the Atlantic back then?

Only in the sense North America was in the middle of the Atlantic, except it wasn't middle then ... and that Greenland is a part of North America ... see how the Atlantic splits through Iceland, not Baffin Bay ...

We've some serious stupid going on here ... just like a house cat, EMH can't learn ...
 
It depends on what is regarded as climate change.
If it is the rhetoric spewed by bureaucrats about rising levels of co2 and it's getting warmer because of it, then that is bullshit. But that can be understood if you're talking about the sun and its expansions and contractions during its cycles. But I suspect the weather is manipulated in one form or another to give the impression of the 1st statement on climate change.
Suspecting really means shit. There is no climate science related institute in the world that goes along with bullshit.
 
Heat transport ... HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HA HAW HAW HAW HAW ...

Just ignore the Law of Thermodynamics, my friend ... this is funny ...


Why does the air cool as it passes over Antarctica??
 

Forum List

Back
Top