For the Anarchists on this site?

Levant

Platinum Member
Apr 27, 2020
2,112
1,376
918
Northeast Oklahoma
Is this what you want? There are some very active members who have defended anarchy as the ultimate in freedom. Do you feel free? Do you still support anarchy? Are you going to join the war?

Many of you who have defended and supported anarchy up to now are talking about how terrible the riots are... But it is anarchists doing the dirty work. YOU are part of it, whether you have the guts to say so on this thread or not.

IF you're an anarchist - own up or forever shut your pussy mouth.
 
Is this what you want? There are some very active members who have defended anarchy as the ultimate in freedom. Do you feel free? Do you still support anarchy? Are you going to join the war?

Many of you who have defended and supported anarchy up to now are talking about how terrible the riots are... But it is anarchists doing the dirty work. YOU are part of it, whether you have the guts to say so on this thread or not.

IF you're an anarchist - own up or forever shut your pussy mouth.

Anarchy is the friend of no one with their feet planted on the ground. Anarchy is also the most ancient self-fulfilling prophecy, a snake consuming its own tail. Freedom for the anarchist lasts only as long as the next anarchist takes to loot his home, rape his wife, burn his dwelling to the ground. None of the agents provocateur at work behind the scenes of the Floyd riots are true anarchists because no man in history ever was one. Anarchy is a state of being and an actionable philosophy that requires a hive of human minds drunk on mob insanity to truly desire and to truly bring about. The intelligence behind the Floyd riots? Whoever is running the show is anything but an anarchist. They're far too deliberate, far too strategic and wholly well thought out.
 
Anarchy is the friend of no one with their feet planted on the ground. Anarchy is also the most ancient self-fulfilling prophecy, a snake consuming its own tail. Freedom for the anarchist lasts only as long as the next anarchist takes to loot his home, rape his wife, burn his dwelling to the ground. None of the agents provocateur at work behind the scenes of the Floyd riots are true anarchists because no man in history ever was one. Anarchy is a state of being and an actionable philosophy that requires a hive of human minds drunk on mob insanity to truly desire and to truly bring about. The intelligence behind the Floyd riots? Whoever is running the show is anything but an anarchist. They're far to deliberate, far too strategic and wholly well thought out.
Dude, read the links I posted and stop embarrassing yourself....Anarchy isn't anything like what you've been told it is, by the chattering classes and the educrats.
 
Last edited:
Anarchy is the friend of no one with their feet planted on the ground. Anarchy is also the most ancient self-fulfilling prophecy, a snake consuming its own tail. Freedom for the anarchist lasts only as long as the next anarchist takes to loot his home, rape his wife, burn his dwelling to the ground. None of the agents provocateur at work behind the scenes of the Floyd riots are true anarchists because no man in history ever was one. Anarchy is a state of being and an actionable philosophy that requires a hive of human minds drunk on mob insanity to truly desire and to truly bring about. The intelligence behind the Floyd riots? Whoever is running the show is anything but an anarchist. They're far to deliberate, far too strategic and wholly well thought out.
Dude, read the links I posted and stop embarrassing yourself....Anarchy isn't anything like what you've been told it is, by the chattering classes and the educrats.

The theory may not be like he says but the reality is actually just like we're seeing in the riots.

If we had anarchy in North America (no more United States then, right?), then you have anarchy until the biggest guy on the block takes your shit, and I didn't mention in my last post on this but, as night_son accurately states, rapes your wife.

Then what? After he does that to you and your wife, and your friends and their wives, the next thing that will happen is that he'll take your wife. And many wives (not wanting to insult yours so not her) will go voluntarily - they prefer the protection of strength over weak, skinny-jeans-wearing, soy-boys.

Then, you and all your friends get together and decide you're going to work together to fight Mr. Big. And you win. And you get most of your shit back and even your wives. But now you have government: you have a group of people working together to provide the services that they can't provide individually.

If you don't group together to fight Mr. Big, then he becomes King Big and you become serfs.

Either way, anarchy is a wonderful theory but a practical impossibility.
 
Anarchy is the friend of no one with their feet planted on the ground. Anarchy is also the most ancient self-fulfilling prophecy, a snake consuming its own tail. Freedom for the anarchist lasts only as long as the next anarchist takes to loot his home, rape his wife, burn his dwelling to the ground. None of the agents provocateur at work behind the scenes of the Floyd riots are true anarchists because no man in history ever was one. Anarchy is a state of being and an actionable philosophy that requires a hive of human minds drunk on mob insanity to truly desire and to truly bring about. The intelligence behind the Floyd riots? Whoever is running the show is anything but an anarchist. They're far to deliberate, far too strategic and wholly well thought out.
Dude, read the links I posted and stop embarrassing yourself....Anarchy isn't anything like what you've been told it is, by the chattering classes and the educrats.

The theory may not be like he says but the reality is actually just like we're seeing in the riots.

If we had anarchy in North America (no more United States then, right?), then you have anarchy until the biggest guy on the block takes your shit, and I didn't mention in my last post on this but, as night_son accurately states, rapes your wife.

Then what? After he does that to you and your wife, and your friends and their wives, the next thing that will happen is that he'll take your wife. And many wives (not wanting to insult yours so not her) will go voluntarily - they prefer the protection of strength over weak, skinny-jeans-wearing, soy-boys.

Then, you and all your friends get together and decide you're going to work together to fight Mr. Big. And you win. And you get most of your shit back and even your wives. But now you have government: you have a group of people working together to provide the services that they can't provide individually.

If you don't group together to fight Mr. Big, then he becomes King Big and you become serfs.

Either way, anarchy is a wonderful theory but a practical impossibility.
Wrong....Nearly all anarchists are peaceful people who want nothing more than to mind their own business and be left alone.

You talk about gubmint as though if we didn't have it, some despotic King Big would take over and make us serfs....Well what the fuck do you call what we have right now?....According to your description, we have anarchy via bureaucracy and technocracy....And we're all forced to pay for it and knuckle under to its arbitrary demands, under the threat of physical aggression to play along with its arbitrary and capricious edicts.

But muh freeeeeeedumb! :laugh2:
 
Last edited:
Is this what you want? There are some very active members who have defended anarchy as the ultimate in freedom. Do you feel free? Do you still support anarchy? Are you going to join the war?

Many of you who have defended and supported anarchy up to now are talking about how terrible the riots are... But it is anarchists doing the dirty work. YOU are part of it, whether you have the guts to say so on this thread or not.

IF you're an anarchist - own up or forever shut your pussy mouth.
Pete7469, said it correctly. Antifa rioters are nothing but Communists and while he's thinking they might be Socialists, I doubt that. Strict Socialism is actually, Communism. China has been subtly inserting its Communist manifesto ideology via our public educational system for many years.
I agree with the president that it should be declared a "Domestic Terrorist" organization. As any actual anarchists, you will find them living "off-the-grid" in the remote areas of Alaska, or deep in our lower-forty eight states forests.
 
What makes anarchy so dangerous are the screw loose dumb fucks who actually are in love with the concept.
They are like flat earthers in that they have developed a whole rationale around their insanity and convinced
a small percentage of other mental defectives to join in.
 
Is this what you want? There are some very active members who have defended anarchy as the ultimate in freedom. Do you feel free? Do you still support anarchy? Are you going to join the war?

Many of you who have defended and supported anarchy up to now are talking about how terrible the riots are... But it is anarchists doing the dirty work. YOU are part of it, whether you have the guts to say so on this thread or not.

IF you're an anarchist - own up or forever shut your pussy mouth.
They are an ignorant bunch. Young people I sort of understand. They are naive. But older people who preach this nonsense are beyond help
 
What makes anarchy so dangerous are the screw loose dumb fucks who actually are in love with the concept.
They are like flat earthers in that they have developed a whole rationale around their insanity and convinced
a small percentage of other mental defectives to join in.
This is precisely what anarchists believe of those who grovel and supplicate under the jackboots of The State.
 
RobetHiggsQuote.jpg
 
Wrong....Nearly all anarchists are peaceful people who want nothing more than to mind their own business and be left alone.

You talk about gubmint as though if we didn't have it, some despotic King Big would take over and make us serfs....Well what the fuck do you call what we have right now?....According to your description, we have anarchy via bureaucracy and technocracy....And we're all forced to pay for it and knuckle under to its arbitrary demands, under the threat of physical aggression to play along with its arbitrary and capricious edicts.

But muh freeeeeeedumb! :laugh2:

If you all got a world where everyone around you was an anarchist and all their descendents were anarchists and no one got greedy, you'd have the utopia you dream of. Just like in Communism, where the rich don't participate, there will be greedy people in your anarchist world and your world will last about 24 hours before it ends.

What we have now is government. It's not perfect, no doubt. But that it's not perfect has nothing to do with whether anarchy is possible. You're distracting because you can't answer the logic I gave as to why anarchy will never work, can never work, not even remotely possible that it would work.
 

Completely useless response. The dream of having my own stuff without intervention from anyone else, and everyone cooperating so we can still innovate in total love and honesty and cooperation is a wonderful dream.

Did the anarchists stop the killing of 6 million jews? Would anarchists ever have been able to stop the killing of a single Jew? Did anarchists stand against any of those atrocities?

It still doesn't matter, though. Anarchy wouldn't last a day.
 

Completely useless response. The dream of having my own stuff without intervention from anyone else, and everyone cooperating so we can still innovate in total love and honesty and cooperation is a wonderful dream.

Did the anarchists stop the killing of 6 million jews? Would anarchists ever have been able to stop the killing of a single Jew? Did anarchists stand against any of those atrocities?

It still doesn't matter, though. Anarchy wouldn't last a day.
Neither the mass murder of Jews, the Holomodor, nor the Great Leap Forward would have happened in the absence of The State....That's the fact, jack.
 
Wrong....Nearly all anarchists are peaceful people who want nothing more than to mind their own business and be left alone.

You talk about gubmint as though if we didn't have it, some despotic King Big would take over and make us serfs....Well what the fuck do you call what we have right now?....According to your description, we have anarchy via bureaucracy and technocracy....And we're all forced to pay for it and knuckle under to its arbitrary demands, under the threat of physical aggression to play along with its arbitrary and capricious edicts.

But muh freeeeeeedumb! :laugh2:

If you all got a world where everyone around you was an anarchist and all their descendents were anarchists and no one got greedy, you'd have the utopia you dream of. Just like in Communism, where the rich don't participate, there will be greedy people in your anarchist world and your world will last about 24 hours before it ends.

What we have now is government. It's not perfect, no doubt. But that it's not perfect has nothing to do with whether anarchy is possible. You're distracting because you can't answer the logic I gave as to why anarchy will never work, can never work, not even remotely possible that it would work.
Straw man argument...No anarchist I've met has ever claimed that Utopia or perfection are possible....In fact, the fist thing they'll tell you is that perfection is not and cannot be an option.

Your opinion that anarchy isn't possible and can't work is irrelevant, as you have no baseline from which to make the claim.

Notwithstanding all of that, the roving goon squads of violent punks rioting in the streets are the farthest thing from anarchists that you will find, making the premise of this thread total bunk.
 
The assholes inciting these riots aren't real anarchists...I suggest you pull your head out of your ass and familiarize yourself with the non-aggression principle (NAP), which any anarchist worth his weight in stockpiled coin and ammo does their best to adhere to.


Then familiarize yourself with ancaps and agorists....



You're welcome.

I read your three links. None of them save anarchy. Non-aggression principle works until someone is aggressive against you. And if they're bigger than you, you will need some help from your non-aggressive neighbors or submit to the will of the aggressor. How do you propose to remain non-aggressive?

You mention that "nearly all" anarchists are non-aggressive. It only takes one. In fact, if you're all non-aggressive, it doesn't even take the biggest among you to take your shit. A skinny-jeans-wearing soy-boy can come get your shit.
 
Neither the mass murder of Jews, the Holomodor, nor the Great Leap Forward would have happened in the absence of The State....That's the fact, jack.

And unless you believe that universal anarchy and non-aggression are possible then bad things will happen somewhere in the world and there will be no one to stand against it. Even cavemen had government.
 
Is this what you want? There are some very active members who have defended anarchy as the ultimate in freedom. Do you feel free? Do you still support anarchy? Are you going to join the war?

Many of you who have defended and supported anarchy up to now are talking about how terrible the riots are... But it is anarchists doing the dirty work. YOU are part of it, whether you have the guts to say so on this thread or not.

IF you're an anarchist - own up or forever shut your pussy mouth.
I once had a first edition copy of The Anarchist Cookbook
I bet it would be worth about 1500 today
Like a dummy I threw it away when doing some house cleaning before it became valuable
 

Forum List

Back
Top