For 8 years the right has been called racist.

[Esmeralda]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

The problem with your assertion is that the language of sexism and the language of racism are used to denigrate. We don't just base it on you don't like them, but the way Obama and his family have been discussed, in racist terms. It will be, and has been, the same for Mrs. Clinton--if people don't like her or her policies, that's one thing, but when they use sexist language and imagery whilst downgrading her, then it is, indeed, sexism. Face reality as it is, not what you want it to be.

 

[2aguy]

Race-Baiting is a weapon. It's a dirty lowdown Democrat tactic. It's a Communist Organizer's favorite weapon of choice. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.'

It's all in Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals.' Hopefully one day most Americans will see it for what it is. Racial Division is being used as a weapon by the Democrat Party. Simple as that.

amazing you're more upset about people pointing out racism than you are actual racists

no. wait. not amazing. sad and predictable.

It's division incitement. Nothing more, nothing less. Does Racism still exist? Of course it does. But nowhere near the extent the Democrat Party is pushing.

Democrats use Race-Baiting as a weapon. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.' Hopefully Americans will catch on at some point. They're being manipulated.

The democrat party is the party of racism...they are obsessed with it and use it as a tool to acquire power......

 

[jillian]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

Poor dear. You might not be racist. But your candidate sure dog whistles like one.

Your candidate -your responsibility.

But the advance whining is pretty funny.

 

[jillian]

Race-Baiting is a weapon. It's a dirty lowdown Democrat tactic. It's a Communist Organizer's favorite weapon of choice. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.'

It's all in Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals.' Hopefully one day most Americans will see it for what it is. Racial Division is being used as a weapon by the Democrat Party. Simple as that.

amazing you're more upset about people pointing out racism than you are actual racists

no. wait. not amazing. sad and predictable.

It's division incitement. Nothing more, nothing less. Does Racism still exist? Of course it does. But nowhere near the extent the Democrat Party is pushing.

Democrats use Race-Baiting as a weapon. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.' Hopefully Americans will catch on at some point. They're being manipulated.

The democrat party is the party of racism...they are obsessed with it and use it as a tool to acquire power......

Yeah George Wallace and his white supremacists used to say it was everyone else who was racist too.

Now go cheer for more unarmed black men Ronnie murderers by police.

And tell us you aren't a bigot so we can laugh at you.

 

[owebo]

Race-Baiting is a weapon. It's a dirty lowdown Democrat tactic. It's a Communist Organizer's favorite weapon of choice. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.'

It's all in Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals.' Hopefully one day most Americans will see it for what it is. Racial Division is being used as a weapon by the Democrat Party. Simple as that.

amazing you're more upset about people pointing out racism than you are actual racists

no. wait. not amazing. sad and predictable.

It's division incitement. Nothing more, nothing less. Does Racism still exist? Of course it does. But nowhere near the extent the Democrat Party is pushing.

Democrats use Race-Baiting as a weapon. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.' Hopefully Americans will catch on at some point. They're being manipulated.

The democrat party is the party of racism...they are obsessed with it and use it as a tool to acquire power......

Yeah George Wallace and his white supremacists used to say it was everyone else who was racist too.

Now go cheer for more unarmed black men Ronnie murderers by police.

And tell us you aren't a bigot so we can laugh at you.

You mean Wallace the democrat? Huh.....you bigoted kkk democrat fucktard....

 

[Correll]

I don't have a party, dumbass.
I am just tired of stupid white people.
It is time to wake the **** up.

If I said I was tired of "stupid black people" you would say that was racist so how the **** is your statement any different? Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Dumbfuck

They are so used to using an accusation of "racism" as a meaningless smear that they don't register the irony of being racist while pretending to find racism offensive.


Liberals: All the self awareness of a turnip, and the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.

Yep. They know it puts their target on the defensive and usually allows them to avoid the conversation.

The fact that conversation is critical to healing racial wounds does not matter to them, and it's entirely possible they don't want it to happen at all, for obvious reasons.
.

It is very depressing.

And all trends point to this paradigm growing stronger and stronger for the foreseeable future.


How long is half the nation going to put up with ALWAYS being dismissed and vilified?

Looking at it from a political (yuck) perspective, one of the things it will take is for the Republican party to improve its message and its messaging and to use better messengers. I'm dead serious about that.

I realize that it goes against its core to single out individual groups - and I agree and sympathize with that - but the party needs to see that it's the only way this can be done. The notion that "we are for everyone" simply will not work after generations of the Democrats' strategy of singling them out and isolating them.

The message, messaging and messengers need to be upgraded. That would be a start.
.

Can't work for three reasons.

1. Our messages will not be heard, due to filtering by the media and by being drowned out by the lies.

I was talking to NAT yesterday, and I said that Hillary had rode her husbands career to a position of power. He came back to me and ridiculed me for claim that no woman could ever rise to high office on her own.

That is how the media and pop culture presents our message to the people. As long as that is the case we will never make any headway.


2. The only way to pander to any group other than whites would mean betraying the interests of their base in order to ATTEMPT to reach out to other groups. And they would fail, anyways, and lose support from their base in the process. This only accelerates the arrival of the One Party State that is our almost certain future.

3. And if the GOP is betraying the interests of my group, (the largest single group in the nation) and/or the nation as a whole to pander to the interests of minorities, then what is the point? At that point, me and mine are are out in the Cold forever, with our interests and agenda to never again be the platform of any national party.

 

[Correll]

Race-Baiting is a weapon. It's a dirty lowdown Democrat tactic. It's a Communist Organizer's favorite weapon of choice. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.'

It's all in Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals.' Hopefully one day most Americans will see it for what it is. Racial Division is being used as a weapon by the Democrat Party. Simple as that.

amazing you're more upset about people pointing out racism than you are actual racists

no. wait. not amazing. sad and predictable.

It's division incitement. Nothing more, nothing less. Does Racism still exist? Of course it does. But nowhere near the extent the Democrat Party is pushing.

Democrats use Race-Baiting as a weapon. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.' Hopefully Americans will catch on at some point. They're being manipulated.

The democrat party is the party of racism...they are obsessed with it and use it as a tool to acquire power......

Yeah George Wallace and his white supremacists used to say it was everyone else who was racist too.

Now go cheer for more unarmed black men Ronnie murderers by police.

And tell us you aren't a bigot so we can laugh at you.

What is your view on the 230 point bonus blacks get in Ivy League College admissions?

Is that racism? To get special treatment for being a certain race?


Which party supports that?

 

[Correll]

Only some Republicans are racists...the rest are just assholes

I always enjoy when Republicans show how great their party was.......150 years ago

No. It shows how bad your party was and still is.

Bad?

Seems every minority group wants nothing to do with the once grand, now only old party

1. Because of the constant lies about the GOP being racist.

2. And because now legal racism is about Dems giving racist special treatment to minorities at the expense of whites.

 

[Mac1958]

If I said I was tired of "stupid black people" you would say that was racist so how the **** is your statement any different? Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Dumbfuck

They are so used to using an accusation of "racism" as a meaningless smear that they don't register the irony of being racist while pretending to find racism offensive.


Liberals: All the self awareness of a turnip, and the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.

Yep. They know it puts their target on the defensive and usually allows them to avoid the conversation.

The fact that conversation is critical to healing racial wounds does not matter to them, and it's entirely possible they don't want it to happen at all, for obvious reasons.
.

It is very depressing.

And all trends point to this paradigm growing stronger and stronger for the foreseeable future.


How long is half the nation going to put up with ALWAYS being dismissed and vilified?

Looking at it from a political (yuck) perspective, one of the things it will take is for the Republican party to improve its message and its messaging and to use better messengers. I'm dead serious about that.

I realize that it goes against its core to single out individual groups - and I agree and sympathize with that - but the party needs to see that it's the only way this can be done. The notion that "we are for everyone" simply will not work after generations of the Democrats' strategy of singling them out and isolating them.

The message, messaging and messengers need to be upgraded. That would be a start.
.

Can't work for three reasons.

1. Our messages will not be heard, due to filtering by the media and by being drowned out by the lies.

I was talking to NAT yesterday, and I said that Hillary had rode her husbands career to a position of power. He came back to me and ridiculed me for claim that no woman could ever rise to high office on her own.

That is how the media and pop culture presents our message to the people. As long as that is the case we will never make any headway.


2. The only way to pander to any group other than whites would mean betraying the interests of their base in order to ATTEMPT to reach out to other groups. And they would fail, anyways, and lose support from their base in the process. This only accelerates the arrival of the One Party State that is our almost certain future.

3. And if the GOP is betraying the interests of my group, (the largest single group in the nation) and/or the nation as a whole to pander to the interests of minorities, then what is the point? At that point, me and mine are are out in the Cold forever, with our interests and agenda to never again be the platform of any national party.

Oh, I disagree, it can work. And giving up before really trying is just playing right into the hands of the Left. If you (a) want to improve the relationship between the party and Black Americans, and (b) truly & sincerely believe that the party is better for them personally, then you have no choice - you have to give it your best shot, don't you?

Look at how the Left has done it - a clear, consistent message over time. It won't happen overnight. They have been patient with their message and their messaging, and it has paid off handsomely for them. And the media CANNOT IGNORE a clear, consistent message if delivered at every opportunity and en masse.

This may blow your mind, but I give Trump great credit for at least trying. Yes, he's a horrific messenger, and yes, his "what have you got to lose" thing was predictably ham-handed and sloppy, but at least he TRIED.

What do the REPUBLICANS have to lose?
.

 

[Correll]

Anybody pointed out yet that for 8 years the right said the only reason Obama was elected is because he's black?

And when he started and was popular they cons went out of their way to say he's 1/2 white .

And then in desperation they began calling him a Muslim to stir more hatred against him.

1. The way the blacks abandoned Hillary in the Primaries and the way the Media turned their partisan bias up to eleven was certainly huge race based advantages.

2. Pointing out his mutli-racial background is no more racist than celebrating the "First Black President".

3. So, you are part of the large group of people that believe that a person's childhood environment does NOT effect him. Got it. It is not racist of me to believe that a person's childhood environment DOES effect him.


4. You are both race baiters.

 

[Correll]

They are so used to using an accusation of "racism" as a meaningless smear that they don't register the irony of being racist while pretending to find racism offensive.


Liberals: All the self awareness of a turnip, and the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.

Yep. They know it puts their target on the defensive and usually allows them to avoid the conversation.

The fact that conversation is critical to healing racial wounds does not matter to them, and it's entirely possible they don't want it to happen at all, for obvious reasons.
.

It is very depressing.

And all trends point to this paradigm growing stronger and stronger for the foreseeable future.


How long is half the nation going to put up with ALWAYS being dismissed and vilified?

Looking at it from a political (yuck) perspective, one of the things it will take is for the Republican party to improve its message and its messaging and to use better messengers. I'm dead serious about that.

I realize that it goes against its core to single out individual groups - and I agree and sympathize with that - but the party needs to see that it's the only way this can be done. The notion that "we are for everyone" simply will not work after generations of the Democrats' strategy of singling them out and isolating them.

The message, messaging and messengers need to be upgraded. That would be a start.
.

Can't work for three reasons.

1. Our messages will not be heard, due to filtering by the media and by being drowned out by the lies.

I was talking to NAT yesterday, and I said that Hillary had rode her husbands career to a position of power. He came back to me and ridiculed me for claim that no woman could ever rise to high office on her own.

That is how the media and pop culture presents our message to the people. As long as that is the case we will never make any headway.


2. The only way to pander to any group other than whites would mean betraying the interests of their base in order to ATTEMPT to reach out to other groups. And they would fail, anyways, and lose support from their base in the process. This only accelerates the arrival of the One Party State that is our almost certain future.

3. And if the GOP is betraying the interests of my group, (the largest single group in the nation) and/or the nation as a whole to pander to the interests of minorities, then what is the point? At that point, me and mine are are out in the Cold forever, with our interests and agenda to never again be the platform of any national party.

Oh, I disagree, it can work. And giving up before really trying is just playing right into the hands of the Left. If you (a) want to improve the relationship between the party and Black Americans, and (b) truly & sincerely believe that the party is better for them personally, then you have no choice - you have to give it your best shot, don't you?

Look at how the Left has done it - a clear, consistent message over time. It won't happen overnight. They have been patient with their message and their messaging, and it has paid off handsomely for them. And the media CANNOT IGNORE a clear, consistent message if delivered at every opportunity and en masse.

This may blow your mind, but I give Trump great credit for at least trying. Yes, he's a horrific messenger, and yes, his "what have you got to lose" thing was predictably ham-handed and sloppy, but at least he TRIED.

What do the REPUBLICANS have to lose?
.

1. Trump's brash New York City persona is actually PERFECT "messaging" to reach out to "urban" blacks. And the only effect has been increased vitriol from the media that blacks have accepted and internalized.


2. Trump's plank of trying to bring back manufacturing jobs would disproportionately benefit blacks. And it was like throwing a pebble into the ocean. Plop, and zero ripples.

3. Trump's plank of deporting illegals and limiting further immigration would disproportionately benefit blacks. Nothing.

4. Thank you for giving Trump credit for trying.

 

[Correll]

So now "endorsement" is your best example to prove racism? So that would likewise mean the NRA never endorsing any democrat validates the democrat party's desire to do away with the second amendment. Let's try sticking to actual historical facts over an ideological endorsement shall we? At least you can ATTEMPT to bring more credibility to your argument.

Kind of went right over your head....didn't it big fella?

The point is Byrd changed. So much so that he had an admirable record on Civil Rights
Republicans also changed, from the party of Lincoln, a party that fought for civil rights....to a party that opposes rights for women, blacks, gays and minorities

You have yet to actually show that the GOP is a party that endorses racism and equal rights to blacks. I already gave Senator Byrd as a historical evidence of where your argument failed.

However here is one example of how democrats receive the vast amount of the African American vote. In Connecticut, a group of fire fighters were denied a promotion after taking an exam, due to the fact that African Americans were not also found in the group. Now they were all given the same exam, received the same opportunity of training, yet because those African Americans who took the same exam had not passed, those who earned their promotion was denied.

"The 20 firefighters, one of whom is Hispanic, sued in 2004 after the city refused to honor the results of a civil service exam"
New Haven: City To Award $2 Million In Damages Plus Enhanced Pension Benefits To Firefighters In Reverse Discrimination Lawsuit

Now last I checked, allowing a promotion or showing favoritism towards a certain group of individuals solely based on their racial background IS racism. Yet the policy of rewarding an individual based on race, over their own ability to pass the same exam as part of their emoooyment or even acceptance into a university based on their ethnicity, is actually endorsed by the Democrat party. When should race ever be more important or valued than an individual's effort?

It has been 12 years since that case

How did those firefighters do on the job?

2011 is 20 years? Where do you learn your math? Especially since Justice Sotomayor also commented on the case

Still didn't answer

How did they do on the job?

You cons made such a fuss over their hiring. I'm sure you have all kinds of horror stories about what horrible firefighters they made

But wait...there aren't any

Actually it was about promotions, not hiring.


And if the situation was reversed, you would ridicule any suggesting that the lower scoring whites doing an acceptable job (maybe) would be justification for discriminating against MORE qualified blacks.

 

[Correll]

We're seeing racism and misogyny everywhere in the Republican party. There is no denying it.

Trying to cry foul--and say OH no we're not like that, is actually laughable.

...

Google Groups

That claim is denied ALL THE TIME, and very credibly by people who should know, as they are often personally accused.


Meanwhile you lefties pretend to know what we are thinking even better than we do ourselves while being so Vulcan that the incredible self interest you have in defining us as "racist" magically does not effect your analysis.



THAT Is what is absurd. Your claims.

I am not a lefty--I am a Republican that changed my party status to Independent--because like the article states, it became more than evident this party is no longer the party of Lincoln or Reagan, it is now the party of TRUMP. Stuffed full of ignorance, fear, bigotry, misogyny and extremism.

And it couldn't be better stated than in a 3 minute video from a long time friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN.

EDIA]

There is no denying that you are a lefty.

(see what I did there?, how did you like it?)


Sorry, I generally don't do video links. YOu have a point to make, make it. Use your words.

 

[Mac1958]

Yep. They know it puts their target on the defensive and usually allows them to avoid the conversation.

The fact that conversation is critical to healing racial wounds does not matter to them, and it's entirely possible they don't want it to happen at all, for obvious reasons.
.

It is very depressing.

And all trends point to this paradigm growing stronger and stronger for the foreseeable future.


How long is half the nation going to put up with ALWAYS being dismissed and vilified?

Looking at it from a political (yuck) perspective, one of the things it will take is for the Republican party to improve its message and its messaging and to use better messengers. I'm dead serious about that.

I realize that it goes against its core to single out individual groups - and I agree and sympathize with that - but the party needs to see that it's the only way this can be done. The notion that "we are for everyone" simply will not work after generations of the Democrats' strategy of singling them out and isolating them.

The message, messaging and messengers need to be upgraded. That would be a start.
.

Can't work for three reasons.

1. Our messages will not be heard, due to filtering by the media and by being drowned out by the lies.

I was talking to NAT yesterday, and I said that Hillary had rode her husbands career to a position of power. He came back to me and ridiculed me for claim that no woman could ever rise to high office on her own.

That is how the media and pop culture presents our message to the people. As long as that is the case we will never make any headway.


2. The only way to pander to any group other than whites would mean betraying the interests of their base in order to ATTEMPT to reach out to other groups. And they would fail, anyways, and lose support from their base in the process. This only accelerates the arrival of the One Party State that is our almost certain future.

3. And if the GOP is betraying the interests of my group, (the largest single group in the nation) and/or the nation as a whole to pander to the interests of minorities, then what is the point? At that point, me and mine are are out in the Cold forever, with our interests and agenda to never again be the platform of any national party.

Oh, I disagree, it can work. And giving up before really trying is just playing right into the hands of the Left. If you (a) want to improve the relationship between the party and Black Americans, and (b) truly & sincerely believe that the party is better for them personally, then you have no choice - you have to give it your best shot, don't you?

Look at how the Left has done it - a clear, consistent message over time. It won't happen overnight. They have been patient with their message and their messaging, and it has paid off handsomely for them. And the media CANNOT IGNORE a clear, consistent message if delivered at every opportunity and en masse.

This may blow your mind, but I give Trump great credit for at least trying. Yes, he's a horrific messenger, and yes, his "what have you got to lose" thing was predictably ham-handed and sloppy, but at least he TRIED.

What do the REPUBLICANS have to lose?
.

1. Trump's brash New York City persona is actually PERFECT "messaging" to reach out to "urban" blacks. And the only effect has been increased vitriol from the media that blacks have accepted and internalized.


2. Trump's plank of trying to bring back manufacturing jobs would disproportionately benefit blacks. And it was like throwing a pebble into the ocean. Plop, and zero ripples.

3. Trump's plank of deporting illegals and limiting further immigration would disproportionately benefit blacks. Nothing.

4. Thank you for giving Trump credit for trying.

The manufacturing and immigration arguments are perfectly valid, but they are examples of my point: They are indirect benefits. While the GOP is saying "our agenda will help everyone, including you", the Democrats are talking specifically at American Blacks (and every other imaginable group or piece of a group) and saying "our agenda will help YOU". And THAT is the difference.

And Trump's point - "what have you got to lose" - could easily be honed into a message in which ALL Republicans stop being afraid of bringing it up and start tossing it right in the face of the race pimps. I'm sure we can agree that this is what's happening - they're terrified of being called racists and are too damn scared to bring it up.

I know we won't agree here. I just think the party is missing out on a BIG opportunity.
.

 

[Correll]

Tax cuts have historically increased revenue.

The only thing that increases deficits and debt is spending

I see you are committed to proving me 100% correct by displaying that you conservatives are operating on blatant falsehoods.



Tax cuts have not "historically increased revenue". The claim is nothing but a rightwing myth based on piss-poor understanding of revenue drivers (out of which long term economic growth, not minor tax-rate adjustments is a primary factor).

We've had record high revenues in 1990s and record LOW revenues since early 2000. Are you going to tell me that Clinton passed tax cuts and Bush expired them?

I know you won't take MY word for it, but I do urge you to read up on what SANE, NON-IGNORANT conservatives sound like when it comes to tax-cut effects:

Greg Mankiw's Blog: On Charlatans and Cranks

Here is what Bush's former chair of economic advisors, conservative and tax-cut suporter had to say to after Bush made the tax-cuts-increased-revenues claim in his SoTU speech:

You are smart people. You know that the tax cuts have not fueled record revenues. You know what it takes to establish causality. You know that the first order effect of cutting taxes is to lower tax revenues. We all agree that the ultimate reduction in tax revenues can be less than this first order effect, because lower tax rates encourage greater economic activity and thus expand the tax base. No thoughtful person believes that this possible offset more than compensated for the first effect for these tax cuts. Not a single one. - Andrew Samwick

There is only one group of people that believes that tax-cuts at current rates increase revenues - FAR RIGHT POLITICOS. That's what it takes to believe that nonsense. Conservative economists reject it and high profile Republicans no longer try to claim it.

As a percentage of GDP? That is a very odd standard to use. Why not actual revenue, perhaps per capita?



During the GHWBush vs Clinton election, there was a recession ongoing. It did not end until after the election.

BUT, actually that was not true. Shortly after the voting, revised numbers came out. The Recession ended in the final quarter of the campaign.

The recovery grew and continued during the transition period.

Bill Clinton took over at the beginning of an cyclic upswing. His timing was perfect.


He inherited relatively low tax rates and did not significantly increase them. He had the Peace Dividend. He then was gifted with a Republican Congress to restrain spending and taxing on his part.



And the only reason that tax revenues AS A PERCENTAGE OF GDP dropped during the Reagan Years was because the GDP grew so much for so long.

 

[Correll]

It is very depressing.

And all trends point to this paradigm growing stronger and stronger for the foreseeable future.


How long is half the nation going to put up with ALWAYS being dismissed and vilified?

Looking at it from a political (yuck) perspective, one of the things it will take is for the Republican party to improve its message and its messaging and to use better messengers. I'm dead serious about that.

I realize that it goes against its core to single out individual groups - and I agree and sympathize with that - but the party needs to see that it's the only way this can be done. The notion that "we are for everyone" simply will not work after generations of the Democrats' strategy of singling them out and isolating them.

The message, messaging and messengers need to be upgraded. That would be a start.
.

Can't work for three reasons.

1. Our messages will not be heard, due to filtering by the media and by being drowned out by the lies.

I was talking to NAT yesterday, and I said that Hillary had rode her husbands career to a position of power. He came back to me and ridiculed me for claim that no woman could ever rise to high office on her own.

That is how the media and pop culture presents our message to the people. As long as that is the case we will never make any headway.


2. The only way to pander to any group other than whites would mean betraying the interests of their base in order to ATTEMPT to reach out to other groups. And they would fail, anyways, and lose support from their base in the process. This only accelerates the arrival of the One Party State that is our almost certain future.

3. And if the GOP is betraying the interests of my group, (the largest single group in the nation) and/or the nation as a whole to pander to the interests of minorities, then what is the point? At that point, me and mine are are out in the Cold forever, with our interests and agenda to never again be the platform of any national party.

Oh, I disagree, it can work. And giving up before really trying is just playing right into the hands of the Left. If you (a) want to improve the relationship between the party and Black Americans, and (b) truly & sincerely believe that the party is better for them personally, then you have no choice - you have to give it your best shot, don't you?

Look at how the Left has done it - a clear, consistent message over time. It won't happen overnight. They have been patient with their message and their messaging, and it has paid off handsomely for them. And the media CANNOT IGNORE a clear, consistent message if delivered at every opportunity and en masse.

This may blow your mind, but I give Trump great credit for at least trying. Yes, he's a horrific messenger, and yes, his "what have you got to lose" thing was predictably ham-handed and sloppy, but at least he TRIED.

What do the REPUBLICANS have to lose?
.

1. Trump's brash New York City persona is actually PERFECT "messaging" to reach out to "urban" blacks. And the only effect has been increased vitriol from the media that blacks have accepted and internalized.


2. Trump's plank of trying to bring back manufacturing jobs would disproportionately benefit blacks. And it was like throwing a pebble into the ocean. Plop, and zero ripples.

3. Trump's plank of deporting illegals and limiting further immigration would disproportionately benefit blacks. Nothing.

4. Thank you for giving Trump credit for trying.

The manufacturing and immigration arguments are perfectly valid, but they are examples of my point: They are indirect benefits. While the GOP is saying "our agenda will help everyone, including you", the Democrats are talking specifically at American Blacks (and every other imaginable group or piece of a group) and saying "our agenda will help YOU". And THAT is the difference.

And Trump's point - "what have you got to lose" - could easily be honed into a message in which ALL Republicans stop being afraid of bringing it up and start tossing it right in the face of the race pimps. I'm sure we can agree that this is what's happening - they're terrified of being called racists and are too damn scared to bring it up.

I know we won't agree here. I just think the party is missing out on a BIG opportunity.
.

If Trump loses, that will empower the Establishment that has no interest in really changing anything. It will be a step backward for the Party,


And the nation will continue down the self destructive path we are on.

 

[Correll]

Now if Hillary is elected that meme will change to sexist.
Liberals just can't fathom that people vehemently disagree with their positions. Their tunnel vision blinds them completely to the fact that their train of thought is but one narrow view of the world.

The problem with your assertion is that the language of sexism and the language of racism are used to denigrate. We don't just base it on you don't like them, but the way Obama and his family have been discussed, in racist terms. It will be, and has been, the same for Mrs. Clinton--if people don't like her or her policies, that's one thing, but when they use sexist language and imagery whilst downgrading her, then it is, indeed, sexism. Face reality as it is, not what you want it to be.

Bullshit.


The constant focus on imagined slights in language is an excuse to avoid valid criticism.

Which works.

At the cost of legitimate concerns not being addressed and good people being vilified.


Your tactics are tearing this nation apart.

 

[Correll]

Race-Baiting is a weapon. It's a dirty lowdown Democrat tactic. It's a Communist Organizer's favorite weapon of choice. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.'

It's all in Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals.' Hopefully one day most Americans will see it for what it is. Racial Division is being used as a weapon by the Democrat Party. Simple as that.

amazing you're more upset about people pointing out racism than you are actual racists

no. wait. not amazing. sad and predictable.

It's division incitement. Nothing more, nothing less. Does Racism still exist? Of course it does. But nowhere near the extent the Democrat Party is pushing.

Democrats use Race-Baiting as a weapon. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.' Hopefully Americans will catch on at some point. They're being manipulated.

The democrat party is the party of racism...they are obsessed with it and use it as a tool to acquire power......

Yeah George Wallace and his white supremacists used to say it was everyone else who was racist too.

Now go cheer for more unarmed black men Ronnie murderers by police.

And tell us you aren't a bigot so we can laugh at you.

You mean like today, when you dems say that it is your opponents who are racists while you support policies that give special treatment based on race?

 

[JakeStarkey]

"If Trump loses," Yes, Trump will lose.

The Establishment has no desire to change at all, and neither does the demagogue Trump.

The one true agent of change was Sanders.

The slights in language from the Far Right are intentional and will not be tolerated in this election's outcome.

 

[owebo]

Race-Baiting is a weapon. It's a dirty lowdown Democrat tactic. It's a Communist Organizer's favorite weapon of choice. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.'

It's all in Saul Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals.' Hopefully one day most Americans will see it for what it is. Racial Division is being used as a weapon by the Democrat Party. Simple as that.

amazing you're more upset about people pointing out racism than you are actual racists

no. wait. not amazing. sad and predictable.

It's division incitement. Nothing more, nothing less. Does Racism still exist? Of course it does. But nowhere near the extent the Democrat Party is pushing.

Democrats use Race-Baiting as a weapon. It's about the 'Divide and Conquer.' Hopefully Americans will catch on at some point. They're being manipulated.

The democrat party is the party of racism...they are obsessed with it and use it as a tool to acquire power......

Yeah George Wallace and his white supremacists used to say it was everyone else who was racist too.

Now go cheer for more unarmed black men Ronnie murderers by police.

And tell us you aren't a bigot so we can laugh at you.

You mean like today, when you dems say that it is your opponents who are racists while you support policies that give special treatment based on race?

Democrats have been indoctrinated to judge people only on the color of their skin....it's a hold over from the days when they permitted themselves to enslave blacks....