"Flooding the Zone"

[berg80]

There is no better alternative to Trump at this time

He's literally the worst possible option. Ignorant, corrupt, egotistical, dishonest, uninformed, narcissistic, vindictive, petulant, divisive, bigoted, immoral, unethical, criminal.

 

[berg80]

This isn't "rule by the worst." This is Trump finally flooding the zone with people who aren't captured by the DC blob.

The left's real terror isn't incompetence... it's competence in the service of the wrong team.

The people trump has surrounded himself with are uniquely unqualified except in the virtue he values the most. A willingness to enable his illegal, immoral, unethical actions.

 

[Ropey]

The people trump has surrounded himself with are uniquely unqualified except in the virtue he values the most. A willingness to enable his illegal, immoral, unethical actions.

That is classic projection mixed with moving goalposts.

Biden's picks included obvious patronage (Hunter associates, Buttigieg, Mayorkas, Karine Jean-Pierre) and ideologues over operators.

The issue? Loyalty to the Constitution and election outcomes > loyalty to the permanent administrative state.

Track records on outcomes matter more than media vibes about "weird" outsiders.

 

[Mac-7]

He's literally the worst possible option. Ignorant, corrupt, egotistical, dishonest, uninformed, narcissistic, vindictive, petulant, divisive, bigoted, immoral, unethical, criminal.

Who is better?

 

[berg80]

Oh, and I just heard

You hear a lot of stuff on the leftwing media that stretches from unproven to outright lies

Or so you've been told to believe.

Federal Panel Approves Trump’s Plans for a 250-Foot Arch in Washington​

The Commission of Fine Arts on Thursday approved President Trump’s plan to build a 250-foot triumphal arch in Washington, even after the president rejected the panel’s suggestion to make the structure smaller by removing a towering, winged angel and two golden eagles.

The arts panel, which is filled with Mr. Trump’s appointees, has an advisory role on the design of the project but no enforcement power. The same panel also fast-tracked approval of Mr. Trump’s $400 million ballroom, bypassing the normal review process on a project that would transform the profile of the White House.

Federal Panel Approves Trump’s Plans for a 250-Foot Arch in Washington

The panel, whose members were selected by President Trump, has an advisory role on the design of the project but no enforcement power.

www.nytimes.com

What would be ideal is to tie up this monstrosity in court until the project can be cancelled when order is restored to the presidency.

 

[Mac-7]

Or so you've been told to believe.

Federal Panel Approves Trump’s Plans for a 250-Foot Arch in Washington​

The Commission of Fine Arts on Thursday approved President Trump’s plan to build a 250-foot triumphal arch in Washington, even after the president rejected the panel’s suggestion to make the structure smaller by removing a towering, winged angel and two golden eagles.

The arts panel, which is filled with Mr. Trump’s appointees, has an advisory role on the design of the project but no enforcement power. The same panel also fast-tracked approval of Mr. Trump’s $400 million ballroom, bypassing the normal review process on a project that would transform the profile of the White House.

Federal Panel Approves Trump’s Plans for a 250-Foot Arch in Washington

The panel, whose members were selected by President Trump, has an advisory role on the design of the project but no enforcement power.

www.nytimes.com

What would be ideal is to tie up this monstrosity in court until the project can be cancelled when order is restored to the presidency.

I dont know about the arch and dont care

I asked you for your presidential preference

Which is…?

 

[berg80]

That is classic projection

Actually, it's not. It's an examination of the misfits and nitwits trump has burdened the country with. Like a second rate, weekend broadcaster on a GOP propaganda network with a drinking problem chosen because Don likes hearing his ego get stroked on Faux. Did he have any administrative experience other than running a couple of veterans groups in to the ground while drinking excessively? No. His tenure has been marked by a litany of egregious mistakes and mishaps that would have resulted in his firing if he were a member of a competent admin.

 

[berg80]

I dont know about the arch and dont care

That's the standard answer when R congressmen get asked potentially embarrassing questions on their opinion of things trump has done.

 

[sealybobo]

Trump’s economy “sucks”... says the derp who cheered Biden’s inflation bonfire that torched wages and groceries. Even CNN admitted it.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/14/politics/fact-check-biden-inflation-when-he-became-president

Shutup, piggy.



Trade war?

The bum that actually pressured China while energy dominance made America a net exporter and the new Saudi Arabia.

It wasn't Biden's fault. But all that we are suffering through now is Trump's doing so shut up you pig.

 

[sealybobo]

That is classic projection mixed with moving goalposts.

Biden's picks included obvious patronage (Hunter associates, Buttigieg, Mayorkas, Karine Jean-Pierre) and ideologues over operators.

The issue? Loyalty to the Constitution and election outcomes > loyalty to the permanent administrative state.

Track records on outcomes matter more than media vibes about "weird" outsiders.

Hunter? Can you imagine if Biden took Hunter to China with him and Hunter did business in China on that trip? You lost the right to bring up Hunter Biden. What about Uday and Qusay Trump?

You guys cried when Clinton "ran into" Loretta Lynch when she was investigating Clinton. Remember that?

The query is likely referring to the infamous June 2016 private tarmac meeting between former President Bill Clinton and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch in Phoenix, Arizona. Occurring during the FBI's active probe into Hillary Clinton's private email server

This guy works for Trump. Do you think he would investigate Melania Trump? HA

In fact this guy recently awarded Trump $1bill776MILL. Can you imagine if Clinton sued the tax payers and Loretta signed off on it? That's what these scumbags did.

 

[sartre play]

you all can't define what a woman is, and think men can get pregnant...

and you want to talk about a Kakistocracy? hahahahha

SIMPLE...WOMEN an adult female human being.
Please give me the names of 10 men who have publicly said they have or could get pregnant
Such a non issue compared with Wars going on, and other not so good things.
Try not to get distracted, focus on a better life for are whole country.

 

[struth]

SIMPLE...WOMEN an adult female human being.
Please give me the names of 10 men who have publicly said they have or could get pregnant
Such a non issue compared with Wars going on, and other not so good things.
Try not to get distracted, focus on a better life for are whole country.

yeah

i can't

issue over

 

[Ropey]

Actually, it's not. It's an examination of the misfits and nitwits trump has burdened the country with. Like a second rate, weekend broadcaster on a GOP propaganda network with a drinking problem chosen because Don likes hearing his ego get stroked on Faux.

Not projection, just more faux pattern recognition from the same people who called Biden’s cabinet “the most qualified in history” while it racked up record border crossings, Afghanistan humiliation, inflation spikes, and recruitment crises.

Did he have any administrative experience other than running a couple of veterans groups in to the ground while drinking excessively? No. His tenure has been marked by a litany of egregious mistakes and mishaps that would have resulted in his firing if he were a member of a competent admin.

This specific swipe (clearly at Hegseth) is lazy ad hominem.

He’s a combat veteran with multiple deployments, not some random drunk. Yes, he’s a Fox host and a veterans advocate who’s spent years publicly exposing Pentagon waste, DEI dogma, lowered standards, and failure to win wars, exactly why the military-industrial blob hates him.

The real test is whether they deliver on securing the military from politicization and endless failure.

And that’s the actual “burden” voters rejected.

 

[Mac-7]

That's the standard answer when R congressmen get asked potentially embarrassing questions on their opinion of things trump has done.

Whats wrong with an arch?