Orangecat
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 16,631
- 18,403
- 2,288
Athletics are 99% trading and 1% competition. They’re still being active.And deciding not to compete supports that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Athletics are 99% trading and 1% competition. They’re still being active.And deciding not to compete supports that?
Men have taken over women's sports.
Their chances are already dead. Going to the MALES who crush them in sport.
Duh.
That's the point, dummy.
... and I'd like to say, good on the girls who refused to compete against trans whingers!Good on the girls who refused to compete against the trans losers!
Good on those girls!
You truly are too stupid to understand that demeaning these girls at this early age will lead to them not wanting to compete as they get older and the advantages these mentally ill BOYS have will only get greater.
Men have taken over women's sports.
When you boil it all down and stick it into a nutshell? Yes. That's everything that needs to be said about it.Because trannies can not win against real men.....
No matter what the rules say, men will always win these kinds of competitions.Ummm no.
The NCAA doesn't have the same stupid rules as some local high schools.
Try again slugger.
You truly are too stupid to understand that demeaning these girls at this early age will lead to them not wanting to compete as they get older and the advantages these mentally ill BOYS have will only get greater..
What do you call it when girls haven't got a chance of scoring? I do, however, give you credit (and plus points) for not disagreeing with the "truly too stupid" part of the post.Demeaning?
Well it’s a shot-put competition. you really don’t score in it. You throw your shot put and they measure the distance you threw it.What do you call it when girls haven't got a chance of scoring?
What do you call it when girls haven't got a chance of scoring? I do, however, give you credit (and plus points) for not disagreeing with the "truly too stupid" part of the post.
It is apparent to me that you have never competed in any sport so let me rearrange latern2814's statement and turn it into a question: Are you truly too stupid to understand that demeaning these girls at this early age will lead to them not wanting to compete as they get older and the advantages these mentally ill BOYS have will only get greater?Well it’s a shot-put competition. you really don’t score in it. You throw your shot put and they measure the distance you threw it.
Which is your SCORE!Well it’s a shot-put competition. you really don’t score in it. You throw your shot put and they measure the distance you threw it.
Well it’s a shot-put competition. you really don’t score in it. You throw your shot put and they measure the distance you threw it.
Yes ....... Sheesh!Which is your SCORE!
SHEESH
LOL...It is apparent to me that you have never competed in any sport so let me rearrange latern2814's statement and turn it into a question: Are you truly too stupid to understand that demeaning these girls at this early age will lead to them not wanting to compete as they get older and the advantages these mentally ill BOYS have will only get greater?
Yes ....... Sheesh!
Nothing keeps someone from “scoring” in shot put.What do you call it when girls haven't got a chance of scoring?
You have never competed in any sport so maybe you shouldn't make such ridiculous comments.Nothing keeps someone from “scoring” in shot put.
The subject has nothing to do with me... perhaps you should have tried harder when you were in middle school... So you losing a middle school track meet turned you into the loser you are?
You poor sod.... you turned out to be a real idiot.
SeriouslyAbsolutely nothing.
Shot put (like every track and field event) is non contact. Throwing your shot put is what you do. If you don't win the competition that is one thing...if you don't try...that is a completely different matter.
That being said...if the sport were a contact sport, I couldn't blame any female for not wanting to compete against a dude. It should never be sanctioned by any governing body. Anyone has the right to identify however they wish. Society is under no obligation to make accommodations for it however.
But back to the event at hand...non contact--middle school. No stakes; no problem.
Shot put (like every track and field event) is non contact. Throwing your shot put is what you do. If you don't win the competition that is one thing...if you don't try...that is a completely different matter..
A VERY good question but you're not going to get an answer.Seriously
Wtf is wrong with you
They took the field. They just refused to participate in a farce with a pre-determined outcome. Them “competing “ with him would be like a high school varsity football team “competing “ with an NFL team. There is no point even trying.By choosing not to take the field? In middle school? What was the harm of coming in 2nd or 3rd place in such a competition?
Should Troy State just refuse to play Alabama next year? Nobody in the universe thinks they are going to win.
What was the harm of coming in 2nd or 3rd place.
That's right. In all sporting events, there is a 2nd. and 3rd. place result. But up until now the 1st. place winner was disqualified if found guilty of cheating.... They just refused to participate in a farce with a pre-determined outcome. Them “competing “ with him would be like a high school varsity football team “competing “ with an NFL team. There is no point even trying.