First Batch of Biden Emails Released

[Oldestyle]

Except Joe didn't run in 2016. Because he realized that he couldn't win against the machine Hillary had assembled.


No, and neither did Clinton. Clinton lied (or had a different opinion about what constitutes "Sex") to a court.

Of course Clinton lied, Joey. Not as much as Joe Biden lies...but you don't get the nickname "Slick Willie" because you're so gosh darned honest!

And Biden didn't run in 2016 because he knew that without Barack Obama's endorsement he didn't have a prayer.

 

[Oldestyle]

You mean he was nominated by a Republican and Republican Senators voted for him? You kind of made my point.

If your "point" is that the Senate is a "good ole boys club" and they give each other's friends and shiftless relatives positions that they're not remotely qualified to hold...then you're right, Joey! The Senate voted 100% for Hunter's confirmation! Not because he was so qualified...but because he was Joe Biden's son! That was just the start of Hunter riding the DC gravy train...which actually makes MY point! But thanks for playing!

 

[JoeB131]

Of course Clinton lied, Joey. Not as much as Joe Biden lies...but you don't get the nickname "Slick Willie" because you're so gosh darned honest!

Oh, I'm sure that he lied all the time.
But he didn't lie to Congress about Lewinsky. By the time Congress decided that whether or not he got a bee jay or not was a matter of national importance, he admitted he had a relationship.

And Biden didn't run in 2016 because he knew that without Barack Obama's endorsement he didn't have a prayer.

Except the general feeling in the party was that it was Hillary's turn. Shouldn't have been, but it was.

For the record, Reagan didn't endorse Bush, either.
Bush Jr. didn't endorse McCain.
Ike didn't endorse Nixon.

The fact is, most sitting presidents don't endorse a successor. Clinton endorsing Gore was an exception.

 

[Oldestyle]

Oh, I'm sure that he lied all the time.
But he didn't lie to Congress about Lewinsky. By the time Congress decided that whether or not he got a bee jay or not was a matter of national importance, he admitted he had a relationship.




Except the general feeling in the party was that it was Hillary's turn. Shouldn't have been, but it was.

For the record, Reagan didn't endorse Bush, either.
Bush Jr. didn't endorse McCain.
Ike didn't endorse Nixon.

The fact is, most sitting presidents don't endorse a successor. Clinton endorsing Gore was an exception.

Are you deliberately trying to be wrong, Joey? Reagan did endorse Bush. W. did endorse McCain. Ike did endorse Nixon. Why do you pretend that you know things? It's obvious that you're clueless.

 

[Quasar44]

Fake news has blocked out any coverage of Biden impeachment

 

[beagle9]

Gee even obvious truth bother you guys. Denial runs deep in the republican party. Oh well everyone needs an enemy in order to make up stuff in which to believe in.

Trump will be guilty on any number of cases he now faces.

Only if Biden goes first.

The idiocy of people who think like you do, is that it's all politics, and nothing about law and order or getting at the truth with you people.

Ignoring Biden shows just how one sided politically corrupt that you people are, and it is my hopes that when you throw your stones, then you will be known as the hypocrite that you are when giving Biden a pass.

 

[JoeB131]

Are you deliberately trying to be wrong, Joey? Reagan did endorse Bush. W. did endorse McCain. Ike did endorse Nixon. Why do you pretend that you know things? It's obvious that you're clueless.

Reagan didn't endorse Bush until the primaries were over... just like Obama didn't endorse Biden until the primaries were over.

AIDE STRESSES REAGAN'S NEUTRALITY IN G.O.P. RACE (Published 1986)

www.nytimes.com

Are you deliberately trying to be wrong, or are you just clueless.

 

[JoeB131]

Fake news has blocked out any coverage of Biden impeachment

Well, when your own witnesses say there's no evidence, it's kind of hard to pretend you have a case.

Ignoring Biden shows just how one sided politically corrupt that you people are, and it is my hopes that when you throw your stones, then you will be known as the hypocrite that you are when giving Biden a pass.

Except you haven't provided any "evidence". Just a lot of accusations and no documentation.

What Hunter did was unsavory, but nearly every relative of someone in Washington is doing something equally unsavory.

 

[0311]

Reagan didn't endorse Bush until the primaries were over... just like Obama didn't endorse Biden until the primaries were over.

AIDE STRESSES REAGAN'S NEUTRALITY IN G.O.P. RACE (Published 1986)

www.nytimes.com

Are you deliberately trying to be wrong, or are you just clueless.

A little bit of both.

 

[0311]

Are you deliberately trying to be wrong, Joey? Reagan did endorse Bush. W. did endorse McCain. Ike did endorse Nixon. Why do you pretend that you know things? It's obvious that you're clueless.

In way your right, yes the Ronnie god did endorse the shrub, but only AFTER the primaries. When telling the truth, tell the whole truth, which I know is very for hard MAGA MAGGOTS to do.

 

[0311]

And Biden didn't run in 2016 because he knew that without Barack Obama's endorsement he didn't have a prayer.

No, he did not run because he had lost his son Beau and still grieving his loss.

 

[0311]

Fake news has blocked out any coverage of Biden impeachment

Even Jonathan Turly said there was no evidence to support an impeachment. All you people have are ccusations and hearsay. You're really big on accuations and hearsay but you have no proof. You need physical evidence and you have none.

Comer has proven nothing of what he has said.

Your tin foil hat is a bit to tight.

 

[Oldestyle]

Reagan didn't endorse Bush until the primaries were over... just like Obama didn't endorse Biden until the primaries were over.

AIDE STRESSES REAGAN'S NEUTRALITY IN G.O.P. RACE (Published 1986)

www.nytimes.com

Are you deliberately trying to be wrong, or are you just clueless.

You claimed that Reagan didn't endorse Bush...then you walked that back. He did endorse Bush...he just didn't do until after the primaries were held. You were wrong on that just like you were wrong on the other endorsements. Those other Presidents ALL endorsed their VP's.
Obama NEVER endorsed in 2016...he endorsed Hillary. Obama made his thoughts on Joe quite clear when he told a group of people never to underestimate Joe Biden's ability to fuck things up!

 

[Oldestyle]

Even Jonathan Turly said there was no evidence to support an impeachment. All you people have are ccusations and hearsay. You're really big on accuations and hearsay but you have no proof. You need physical evidence and you have none.

Comer has proven nothing of what he has said.

Your tin foil hat is a bit to tight.

Did you even listen to Turley's testimony? He said he didn't think enough evidence existed at the moment to impeach Joe Biden but more than enough evidence existed to justify an investigation of Biden and then laid out that evidence point by point.

 

[JoeB131]

You claimed that Reagan didn't endorse Bush...then you walked that back. He did endorse Bush...he just didn't do until after the primaries were held. You were wrong on that just like you were wrong on the other endorsements. Those other Presidents ALL endorsed their VP's.
Obama NEVER endorsed in 2016...he endorsed Hillary. Obama made his thoughts on Joe quite clear when he told a group of people never to underestimate Joe Biden's ability to fuck things up!

I pretty explicitly stated that Reagan was neutral during the PRIMARIES in 1988, just like Obama was neutral in the primaries in 2020.

In 2016, Biden didn't run, because the Clintons had spent nearly a decade building up a campaign machine that dominated the primaries.

Also, there's no evidence Obama ever said that about Biden.

All of your hatred of Biden is based on hearsay and conjecture.

Did you even listen to Turley's testimony? He said he didn't think enough evidence existed at the moment to impeach Joe Biden but more than enough evidence existed to justify an investigation of Biden and then laid out that evidence point by point.

Except they've been investigating for five years now... talk about beating a dead horse.

 

[Oldestyle]

I pretty explicitly stated that Reagan was neutral during the PRIMARIES in 1988, just like Obama was neutral in the primaries in 2020.

In 2016, Biden didn't run, because the Clintons had spent nearly a decade building up a campaign machine that dominated the primaries.

Also, there's no evidence Obama ever said that about Biden.

All of your hatred of Biden is based on hearsay and conjecture.



Except they've been investigating for five years now... talk about beating a dead horse.

You're a buffoon if you call what the Biden DOJ has been doing an "investigation", Joey! The FBI and especially the Garland DOJ have been STONEWALLING any investigations into Joe Biden for years! The testimony of the FBI and IRS whistleblowers make that quite obvious. The House investigators have exposed more evidence against the Biden family in six months then the DOJ has unearthed in YEARS!

 

[JoeB131]

You're a buffoon if you call what the Biden DOJ has been doing an "investigation", Joey! The FBI and especially the Garland DOJ have been STONEWALLING any investigations into Joe Biden for years! The testimony of the FBI and IRS whistleblowers make that quite obvious. The House investigators have exposed more evidence against the Biden family in six months then the DOJ has unearthed in YEARS!

What evidence? Even Turley has admitted they don't have any evidence.

Should also point out that these investigations started under Trump, and after 5 years, nowhere near an indictment.

As opposed to Trump, 91 counts, baby.

 

[Kilroy2]

Only if Biden goes first.

The idiocy of people who think like you do, is that it's all politics, and nothing about law and order or getting at the truth with you people.

Ignoring Biden shows just how one sided politically corrupt that you people are, and it is my hopes that when you throw your stones, then you will be known as the hypocrite that you are when giving Biden a pass.

See that is called reflection. You project your own issues on to some else

Trump has so many issues that statements that you made are delusional.

You ignore the fact that Trump had classified documents in his possession and was raided. They found these documents and its real.

Trump incited the riot. He specifically said that they should "stop the steal". Yet how could they stop the steal. An official government function was disrupted based on the egging on of one man.


Trump taxes. The evidence is clear he devalued his properties when tax time came along. But when applying for loan , he increases the value.

The election was stolen again. The calls made to the two states and the states refutes everything that he says. But he still continues to push the lies.

Let see with you have the whistleblower , his son made money, and Comer has found nothing.

Trumps daughter made money in her china sweatshop deal and she was one of Trump's advisors. An official government position. Where is the outrage.


Compare that to Hunter (who i will grant is an idiot) yet he is not an government employee.

Republican party is so delusional that it has become paranoid


They will do anything to get back at the democrats for impeaching Trump by impeaching Biden.

the slightest twitch in their world is blamed on Joe Biden.

 

[0311]

You claimed that Reagan didn't endorse Bush...then you walked that back. He did endorse Bush...he just didn't do until after the primaries were held. You were wrong on that just like you were wrong on the other endorsements. Those other Presidents ALL endorsed their VP's.
Obama NEVER endorsed in 2016...he endorsed Hillary. Obama made his thoughts on Joe quite clear when he told a group of people never to underestimate Joe Biden's ability to fuck things up!

NO, I said the Ray-Gun endorsed the Shrub AFTER THE PRIMARIES, which he did. Before the primaries Ray-Gun did NOT endorse the shrub.

 

[Oldestyle]

What evidence? Even Turley has admitted they don't have any evidence.

Should also point out that these investigations started under Trump, and after 5 years, nowhere near an indictment.

As opposed to Trump, 91 counts, baby.

As usual, Joey...you're wrong! Turley didn't say there wasn't evidence...he said that the evidence hadn't yet reached the point of impeachment for him but that there was enough evidence that an impeachment inquiry was needed!

You're not going to get an indictment from the Biden DOJ. That's obvious at this point...hence the need for a House impeachment inquiry. That doesn't mean Biden is innocent...it simply points out how corrupt the DOJ has been under Merrick Garland!