First amendment hating Governor tells Christians to deal with homosexual hatred

The freeks have free speech. They just don't understand that in the public forum that free speech does not mean Freedom of Expression that disrupts the orderly nature of the public.
 
The freeks have free speech. They just don't understand that in the public forum that free speech does not mean Freedom of Expression that disrupts the orderly nature of the public.

So every person is merely a cog that has to spin as our betters want it to spin, "or else".

A single baker not wanting to bake a cake does not disrupt the orderly nature of the public.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz
The freeks have free speech. They just don't understand that in the public forum that free speech does not mean Freedom of Expression that disrupts the orderly nature of the public.

So every person is merely a cog that has to spin as our betters want it to spin, "or else".

A single baker not wanting to bake a cake does not disrupt the orderly nature of the public.
It's not about a single baker you dumbshit, its about setting a precedent so that EVERY "baker" can't rally around discriminatory policies.
 
The freeks have free speech. They just don't understand that in the public forum that free speech does not mean Freedom of Expression that disrupts the orderly nature of the public.

Like when black lies matter storm a political rally, or block traffic on a public thoroughfare?
 
The freeks have free speech. They just don't understand that in the public forum that free speech does not mean Freedom of Expression that disrupts the orderly nature of the public.

So every person is merely a cog that has to spin as our betters want it to spin, "or else".

A single baker not wanting to bake a cake does not disrupt the orderly nature of the public.
It's not about a single baker you dumbshit, its about setting a precedent so that EVERY "baker" can't rally around the same discriminatory policy.

Actually it usually is about a single baker. If it was systemic discrimination Jake would actually have a point about disruption of the public, but in the cases we have seen, it has been one person or company politely refusing to provide service, in areas where others are available to provide it. Thus is becomes something NOT about disruption or actual economic harm, but about some people's hurt feelings being more equal than other person's hurt feelings, and the weight of the government being thrown behind whichever side is the "favored" side.

And also, go fuck yourself.
 
The freeks have free speech. They just don't understand that in the public forum that free speech does not mean Freedom of Expression that disrupts the orderly nature of the public.

So every person is merely a cog that has to spin as our betters want it to spin, "or else".

A single baker not wanting to bake a cake does not disrupt the orderly nature of the public.
It's not about a single baker you dumbshit, its about setting a precedent so that EVERY "baker" can't rally around discriminatory policies.

Just Christian bakers, you mean?
 
Misread. He caved to the LGBT pressures. Just like Nazi Germany when otherwise good and decent folks capitulated to fears and economic threats that "they would be next" for the firing squads.

Better vote GOP this time folks. Unless you like rainbow political death camps..
 
Last edited:
The freeks have free speech. They just don't understand that in the public forum that free speech does not mean Freedom of Expression that disrupts the orderly nature of the public.

So every person is merely a cog that has to spin as our betters want it to spin, "or else".

A single baker not wanting to bake a cake does not disrupt the orderly nature of the public.
This is as ignorant as it is ridiculous and wrong.
 
The freeks have free speech. They just don't understand that in the public forum that free speech does not mean Freedom of Expression that disrupts the orderly nature of the public.

So every person is merely a cog that has to spin as our betters want it to spin, "or else".

A single baker not wanting to bake a cake does not disrupt the orderly nature of the public.
This is as ignorant as it is ridiculous and wrong.

How so? Are you going to explain or is this just one of your usual drive by post count pumping responses?
 
The freeks have free speech. They just don't understand that in the public forum that free speech does not mean Freedom of Expression that disrupts the orderly nature of the public.

So every person is merely a cog that has to spin as our betters want it to spin, "or else". A single baker not wanting to bake a cake does not disrupt the orderly nature of the public.
Is that how you think about this? You are wrong about "cogs". And libertarians recognize clearly that the laws must protect all in the public forum.
 
The freeks have free speech. They just don't understand that in the public forum that free speech does not mean Freedom of Expression that disrupts the orderly nature of the public.

Like when black lies matter storm a political rally, or block traffic on a public thoroughfare?
They should be taken down as surely as the Trump thugs who beat their political enemies.

Sane America will not permit militias of the far right or the far left in our country acting out and breaking the law.
 
The freeks have free speech. They just don't understand that in the public forum that free speech does not mean Freedom of Expression that disrupts the orderly nature of the public.

So every person is merely a cog that has to spin as our betters want it to spin, "or else". A single baker not wanting to bake a cake does not disrupt the orderly nature of the public.
Is that how you think about this? You are wrong about "cogs". And libertarians recognize clearly that the laws must protect all in the public forum.

This isn't about protection, its about government endorsing someone's butthurt over someone else's butthurt. Government shouldn't get involved in things like this unless economic or political harm can be proven.

And as for the Georgia law, I thought it went to far and wasn't narrowly constructed enough, but that's typical of things like this, where you get overreach. It gave the Governor an easy out.

The Georgia legislature has to try again and more narrowly construct the law, and see what happens then.
 
What religious freedom is being stopped ? You have all the same freedoms .

Trying to change the laws so business can actively discriminate against gays has nothing to do with religion . Shame on you fake Christians trying to sheild your bigotry by using the bible as a front .
 
The freeks have free speech. They just don't understand that in the public forum that free speech does not mean Freedom of Expression that disrupts the orderly nature of the public.

Like when black lies matter storm a political rally, or block traffic on a public thoroughfare?
They should be taken down as surely as the Trump thugs who beat their political enemies.

Sane America will not permit militias of the far right or the far left in our country acting out and breaking the law.

Yet, you're silent in your condemnation of left wing violence.

I guess you think Rosa Parks should have gotten her ass to the back of the bus?
 
What religious freedom is being stopped ? You have all the same freedoms .

Trying to change the laws so business can actively discriminate against gays has nothing to do with religion . Shame on you fake Christians trying to sheild your bigotry by using the bible as a front .

Otherwise known as "Bake the fucking cake, peasant".
 
The freeks have free speech. They just don't understand that in the public forum that free speech does not mean Freedom of Expression that disrupts the orderly nature of the public.

Like when black lies matter storm a political rally, or block traffic on a public thoroughfare?
They should be taken down as surely as the Trump thugs who beat their political enemies.

Sane America will not permit militias of the far right or the far left in our country acting out and breaking the law.
Yet, you're silent in your condemnation of left wing violence. I guess you think Rosa Parks should have gotten her ass to the back of the bus?
No, that is you who is selective in that your freek side gets to break heads. I just condemned violence above. Rosa Parks was not violent, only those who hated her, like you.
 
What religious freedom is being stopped ? You have all the same freedoms .

Trying to change the laws so business can actively discriminate against gays has nothing to do with religion . Shame on you fake Christians trying to sheild your bigotry by using the bible as a front .

Otherwise known as "Bake the fucking cake, peasant".
Otherwise aka "a public service cannot discriminate".
 
What religious freedom is being stopped ? You have all the same freedoms .

Trying to change the laws so business can actively discriminate against gays has nothing to do with religion . Shame on you fake Christians trying to sheild your bigotry by using the bible as a front .

Otherwise known as "Bake the fucking cake, peasant".
Otherwise aka "a public service cannot discriminate".

Where is that in the constitution again?
 

Forum List

Back
Top