Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #1,381
posting the same photos over and over IS Spamyou'll have to rise up several levels to get to mine
Such from you is always offered without proof when the obvious behaviors contradict, ................ disgustingly.
The official cause of death on 9-11 is invalid because it is first called a collapse. The agency charged with analysing the building potential for collapse as seen was decieved by FEMA.
FEMA said the core structure was like this.
![]()
In reality the core of WTC 2 is nothing like that,
![]()
It looks exactly as would be expected by the information of Leslie E. Robertson from September 13, 2001 in Newsweek magazine.
Leslie Robertson, Architect Of The World Trade Center Towers
Still, Robertson, whose firm is responsible for three of the six tallest buildings in the world, feels a sense of pride that the massive towers, supported by a steel-tube exoskeleton and a reinforced concrete core, held up as well as they did—managing to stand for over an hour despite direct hits from two massive commercial jetliners.
And you have no evidence of anything which is verified, so no matter what you say it is wrong.
When it is done to counter treasonous behavior it's okay,
and falsely attributing those words to Mr Robertson is LYING
Lying to support the demise of the Constitution is treason.
Since there is independent verification of his words, your acts of treason are obvious.
