Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #1,341
no, it is not logical to assume he would have read itwrong again
it is VERY logical to say that when the PLANS for the building dont show a concrete core
and since the reporter did not put quotation marks around that part of the story, the reporter is not even making the claim you are
It is not logical to believe that because the information is not a direct quote that it is automatically erroneous. The perpetrators would want you to encourage distortions in people minds.
The building plans were taken with the NYC WTC documents, so your wrong. There are no official building plans.
and the plans for that complex were not just in ONE place
you would have to be fucking stupid to think they were
You don't do reason, evidence and logic and the perps told you to post like none of that matters. So your post is less substancial than the electrical signal that defines it.
I never said the NYC WTC documents had the only plans, I just said they were taken. The other set of plans was in the towers. The port authority denies they have any.
Remember, ............ 3,000 people died in 20 seconds and I cannot tolerate that due process has not been served, and I know it has not been.
I know that you work to keep the methods of mass murder secret. I know this woman feels a huge loss from the loss of a loved one.

I know people are complacent and apathetic and divided and confused.
I know that with evidence and reason justice can and will be found.
Last edited: