LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,938
- 18,224
- 2,250
Hello again Candytroll.
FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core
- Thread starter Christophera
- Start date
you are still a fucking idiot
another fucking idiot
Alex Jones knew he could rely on morons like these
and he laughs all the way to the bank
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #8,885
How this to the PE.
Ask him if he knows what butt plates look like? Ask him if butt plates can be used to join sections of core columns. Ask him if steel core columns need gusset plates over lapping where beams connect? Ask him if a core structure of columns needs diagonal bracing.
When he says "no", core columns need to be 100% deep fillet welded at all joints, you'll know (and everybody else will too) that simply using the information of Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 which describes a concrete core is the most competent way to procede.
When the PE says that gusset plates are needs as well as diagonal braces, you'll know (and everybody else will too) that the independent verification of the engineer of record that the core was concrete which is why you are here doing disinfo, agent.
Oh, . . . now its certain you will not communicate with a PE. Oh, . . . logically you never intended to anyway. You are a text liar 'cause evidence is har to make lie, and can be exposed like gumjobs botched photoshopping of the WTC lobby interior placing the WTC exterior footbridge outside the windows. However, the footbridge windows bleeding through the perimeter columns of WTC 2 expose the fake.
Ask him if he knows what butt plates look like? Ask him if butt plates can be used to join sections of core columns. Ask him if steel core columns need gusset plates over lapping where beams connect? Ask him if a core structure of columns needs diagonal bracing.
When he says "no", core columns need to be 100% deep fillet welded at all joints, you'll know (and everybody else will too) that simply using the information of Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 which describes a concrete core is the most competent way to procede.
When the PE says that gusset plates are needs as well as diagonal braces, you'll know (and everybody else will too) that the independent verification of the engineer of record that the core was concrete which is why you are here doing disinfo, agent.
Oh, . . . now its certain you will not communicate with a PE. Oh, . . . logically you never intended to anyway. You are a text liar 'cause evidence is har to make lie, and can be exposed like gumjobs botched photoshopping of the WTC lobby interior placing the WTC exterior footbridge outside the windows. However, the footbridge windows bleeding through the perimeter columns of WTC 2 expose the fake.
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #8,886
Show this to the PE.
Ask him if he knows what butt plates look like? Ask him if butt plates can be used to join sections of core columns. Ask him if steel core columns need gusset plates over lapping where beams connect? Ask him if a core structure of columns needs diagonal bracing.
When he says "no", core columns need to be 100% deep fillet welded at all joints, you'll know (and everybody else will too) that simply using the information of Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 which describes a concrete core is the most competent way to procede.
When the PE says that gusset plates are needs as well as diagonal braces, you'll know (and everybody else will too) that the independent verification of the engineer of record that the core was concrete which is why you are here doing disinfo, agent.
Oh, . . . now its certain you will not communicate with a PE. Oh, . . . logically you never intended to anyway. You are a text liar 'cause evidence is hard to make lie, (you're an agent anyway and don't give a crap) and can be exposed like gumjobs botched photoshopping of the WTC lobby interior placing the WTC exterior footbridge outside the windows. However, the footbridge windows bleeding through the perimeter columns of WTC 2 expose the fake.
Ask him if he knows what butt plates look like? Ask him if butt plates can be used to join sections of core columns. Ask him if steel core columns need gusset plates over lapping where beams connect? Ask him if a core structure of columns needs diagonal bracing.
When he says "no", core columns need to be 100% deep fillet welded at all joints, you'll know (and everybody else will too) that simply using the information of Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 which describes a concrete core is the most competent way to procede.
When the PE says that gusset plates are needs as well as diagonal braces, you'll know (and everybody else will too) that the independent verification of the engineer of record that the core was concrete which is why you are here doing disinfo, agent.
Oh, . . . now its certain you will not communicate with a PE. Oh, . . . logically you never intended to anyway. You are a text liar 'cause evidence is hard to make lie, (you're an agent anyway and don't give a crap) and can be exposed like gumjobs botched photoshopping of the WTC lobby interior placing the WTC exterior footbridge outside the windows. However, the footbridge windows bleeding through the perimeter columns of WTC 2 expose the fake.
Last edited:
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #8,889
An agent would never recognize depravations of right and violations of law, and sure enough you have done that again. Estoppel under equity common law shows the county deprived me of what I needed for income to pay child support. The calendered hearing was never heard.
Government has made a promise to follow laws. Here they failed to appear on subpoena depriving me of records needed for medical care, records that also validate information creating substantial income.
Government has made a promise to follow laws. Here they failed to appear on subpoena depriving me of records needed for medical care, records that also validate information creating substantial income.
Last edited:
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #8,891
You won't know what a deprivation of a right is until you are rightfully imprisioned following criminal trial where all of your rights are observed. Only then will you have an idea of what your participation in treason by working to conceal it deprives Americans of their rights.
you should stop using copyrighted materials
and you are too fucking delusional to even know what rights you have
you do NOT have a right to not support your children
stannrodd
Active Member
- Mar 29, 2010
- 209
- 52
- 28
From this website forum.. Goofo fuckwitt rides again on his blurry view of things ..
DEMAND 9/11 TRUTH NOW ! - 12160
Comment by Christopher A. Brown on December 26, 2010 at 6:39pm
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jN1aWMHkRvk"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jN1aWMHkRvk[/ame]
Fluffy spherical cloud developing around the base ?? Did the tower FART Chris ??
And of course you can realize so much information from this brilliant piece of distant blurry video .. NOT !!
And where did you learn ..
Bottom of the barrel now Chris .. desperate for new views of your delusion.
One thing for certain is that this vid shows that the alleged "concrete core" was in a state of collapse when taken with respect to the series of stills by Aman Zafar .. one of which is Chris's signature photo of the Colgate Clock. Not as he has claimed .. that the core was standing
DEMAND 9/11 TRUTH NOW ! - 12160
Comment by Christopher A. Brown on December 26, 2010 at 6:39pm
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jN1aWMHkRvk"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jN1aWMHkRvk[/ame]
Fluffy spherical cloud developing around the base ?? Did the tower FART Chris ??
And of course you can realize so much information from this brilliant piece of distant blurry video .. NOT !!
And where did you learn ..
Bottom of the barrel now Chris .. desperate for new views of your delusion.
One thing for certain is that this vid shows that the alleged "concrete core" was in a state of collapse when taken with respect to the series of stills by Aman Zafar .. one of which is Chris's signature photo of the Colgate Clock. Not as he has claimed .. that the core was standing
Last edited:
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #8,894
Waz a matta stun? Got no evidence of the steel core columns from 9-11? Show the core you assert existed on 9-11.
Or was it an "air core" instead of "invisisteel"?
Or was it an "air core" instead of "invisisteel"?
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #8,895
stun the NZ disinfo working to dispense with the US Constitution has no evidence as is confirmed by his failure to produce an image of steel core columns in the core area on 9-11.
There were no steel core columns. The core was concrete just as this image from 9-11 shows the WTC 2 core.
Just like the engineer of record identifies in the days after 9-11.
Just like Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 identifies.
There were no steel core columns. The core was concrete just as this image from 9-11 shows the WTC 2 core.
Just like the engineer of record identifies in the days after 9-11.
Just like Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 identifies.
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #8,897
Since the opposite of what agents post is most often closest to the truth, your post confirms that L.E. Robertson gave the concrete core info to Katherine Stroup of Newsweek publiched on 9/13/01
Newsweek was infiltrated and their server response changed with a redirect to a new page, but the archive faithfully reproduces the original story.
Newsweek was infiltrated and their server response changed with a redirect to a new page, but the archive faithfully reproduces the original story.
WRONG, the archive shows an error filled story that was corrected to reflect the truth
even in your link, no where does it show HIM saying that
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #8,899
As long as the reporter does not make the retraction, the retraction is not valid.
The reporter logically made an audio tape of a phone conversation. The particular passage describing a concrete core, was compiled from a number of general descriptions.
Newsweek
It has been very important to get rid of Robertsons efforts to provide an accurate description.
The reporter logically made an audio tape of a phone conversation. The particular passage describing a concrete core, was compiled from a number of general descriptions.
Newsweek
It has been very important to get rid of Robertsons efforts to provide an accurate description.
LOL your link is dead again
Data Retrieval Failure.
We're sorry. We were unable to retrieve the requested data. We may be experiencing technical difficulties and suggest that you try again later.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
Waitress at black-owned bar holds up “F-the-blacks” sign
- Started by Lisa558
- Replies: 2
-
Latest Discussions
-
-
-
-
Australia's Albanese claims election victory, riding anti-Trump wave
- Latest: The Sage of Main Street
