FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Christophera]

If agents refuse to admit that diagonal bracing and gusset plates are needed for a core of steel columns, then they are simply serving their masters.

They don't have any rebuttal to the fact that this totally looks exactly as a concrete tubular core should look under the conditions.

And they certainly cannot and have not shown the steel core columns on 9-11.

 

[DiveCon]

If agents refuse to admit that diagonal bracing and gusset plates are needed for a core of steel columns, then they are simply serving their masters.

They don't have any rebuttal to the fact that this totally looks exactly as a concrete tubular core should look under the conditions.



And they certainly cannot and have not shown the steel core columns on 9-11.

there are NO agents here you delusional fucktard
and even YOU have shown photos of the steel core
you are just too ******* delusional to admit it

 

[Fizz]

==delusional bullshit removed==

same old delusional bullshit over and over again that has already been debunked...


1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.

3. A picture of a silhouetted object covered in smoke is a concrete core. debunked

4. No pictures exist of a steel core on 9/11 (accompanied by FEMA drawing). debunked

5. Butt plates are used to join steel core columns and are too weak. debunked

6. Diagonal bracing of steel core columns is actually part of the crane structure. debunked

7. Anyone that disagrees with the concrete core hoax is a secret government agent. (totally delusional. needs no debunking)

 

[DiveCon]

==delusional bullshit removed==

same old delusional bullshit over and over again that has already been debunked...


1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.

3. A picture of a silhouetted object covered in smoke is a concrete core. debunked

4. No pictures exist of a steel core on 9/11 (accompanied by FEMA drawing). debunked

5. Butt plates are used to join steel core columns and are too weak. debunked

6. Diagonal bracing of steel core columns is actually part of the crane structure. debunked

7. Anyone that disagrees with the concrete core hoax is a secret government agent. (totally delusional. needs no debunking)

that pretty much covers all his delusional rantings

 

[Christophera]

==delusional bullshit removed==

same old delusional bullshit over and over again that has already been debunked...


1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.

3. A picture of a silhouetted object covered in smoke is a concrete core. debunked

4. No pictures exist of a steel core on 9/11 (accompanied by FEMA drawing). debunked

5. Butt plates are used to join steel core columns and are too weak. debunked

6. Diagonal bracing of steel core columns is actually part of the crane structure. debunked

7. Anyone that disagrees with the concrete core hoax is a secret government agent. (totally delusional. needs no debunking)

that pretty much covers all his delusional rantings

#1 Attempted debunking will show an overly complex set of pages working to misrepresent photos with various alignments. It's conclusion is completely unsupported by any single image showing what is claimed.

#2 The assertion that the engineer of record provided info that was reported erroneously is not accompanied by a correction of the Globally published magazine. It has no logic presented for this shortcoming when 3,000 people are killed in 20 seconds.

#3 No alternative image of a horizontally complete core of columns is provided and the only such image of the core of a Twin tower is not reasonably explained

#4 Images used in attempts to show steel core columns do not show steel columns clearly in the core area and needed interconnecting braces for a steel core are never seen.

#5 With no diagonal braces and no gusset plates and no reasonable explanation for the one image of a horizontally intact, complete core, and no statement from engineers stating that steel columns 1,350 feet tall may be assembled into one column by connecting with butt plates is provided. Lifting eyes are not on the top of column sections, they are on the side. The top is needed clear so joining can be done.

#6 No image of the diagonal bracing not on the same plane as the interior box columns which surrounded the core is ever seen. Joints between diagonals and beams must have gusset plates. If diagonals seen are not seen on 9-11 they were not apart of the structure.

#7 Anyone without plans from official sources who fails to recognize that the info needed to clarify this issue of the core was stolen from public offices depriving the public of true knowledge of the towers structure, arguing for a structure they cannot show, counter to independently verified evidence, is effectively an agent protecting secret methods of mass murder.

 

[DiveCon]

same old delusional bullshit over and over again that has already been debunked...


1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.

3. A picture of a silhouetted object covered in smoke is a concrete core. debunked

4. No pictures exist of a steel core on 9/11 (accompanied by FEMA drawing). debunked

5. Butt plates are used to join steel core columns and are too weak. debunked

6. Diagonal bracing of steel core columns is actually part of the crane structure. debunked

7. Anyone that disagrees with the concrete core hoax is a secret government agent. (totally delusional. needs no debunking)

that pretty much covers all his delusional rantings

#1 Attempted debunking will show an overly complex set of pages working to misrepresent photos with various alignments. It's conclusion is completely unsupported by any single image showing what is claimed.

#2 The assertion that the engineer of record provided info that was reported erroneously is not accompanied by a correction of the Globally published magazine. It has no logic presented for this shortcoming when 3,000 people are killed in 20 seconds.

#3 No alternative image of a horizontally complete core of columns is provided and the only such image of the core of a Twin tower is not reasonably explained

#4 Images used in attempts to show steel core columns do not show steel columns clearly in the core area and needed interconnecting braces for a steel core are never seen.

#5 With no diagonal braces and no gusset plates and no reasonable explanation for the one image of a horizontally intact, complete core, and no statement from engineers stating that steel columns 1,350 feet tall may be assembled into one column by connecting with butt plates is provided. Lifting eyes are not on the top of column sections, they are on the side. The top is needed clear so joining can be done.

#6 No image of the diagonal bracing not on the same plane as the interior box columns which surrounded the core is ever seen. Joints between diagonals and beams must have gusset plates. If diagonals seen are not seen on 9-11 they were not apart of the structure.

#7 Anyone without plans from official sources who fails to recognize that the info needed to clarify this issue of the core was stolen from public offices depriving the public of true knowledge of the towers structure, arguing for a structure they cannot show, counter to independently verified evidence, is effectively an agent protecting secret methods of mass murder.

more delusional bullshit

 

[Christophera]

Agents always say that when confronted with reasoning and evidence that competently refutes their assertions.

 

[DiveCon]

Agents always say that when confronted with reasoning and evidence that competently refutes their assertions.

when you actually post evidence, it will be the first time

 

[Christophera]

See my signature for a lesson in self awareness.

 

[DiveCon]

See my signature for a lesson in self awareness.

your signature contains nothing but more of your paranoid delusions

 

[Christophera]

Reality check - Is there a violations of law here that deprives the public of documents, including 6,000 photos files? Or, does the NYCLU not know law?

 

[DiveCon]

Reality check - Is there a violations of law here that deprives the public of documents, including 6,000 photos files? Or, does the NYCLU not know law?

they made a charge
there was no violation of law
you have had that fact shown to you many times, yet you still hold to your paranoid delusions

seek out professional psychiatric help

 

[Christophera]

Maybe the agent is a moron and not just pretending.

Officials make "charges" private parties and attorneys make "allegations" or complaints. THe NYCLU specializes in countering governmental impropriety and they are pointing out in the letter to the official that a violation of law has been committed.

 

[DiveCon]

Maybe the agent is a moron and not just pretending.

Officials make "charges" private parties and attorneys make "allegations" or complaints. THe NYCLU specializes in countering governmental impropriety and they are pointing out in the letter to the official that a violation of law has been committed.

except the allegation was FALSE you ******* moron

 

[Christophera]

Does the agent purport to know more about law in NY state than the NYCLU?

 

[DiveCon]

Does the agent purport to know more about law in NY state than the NYCLU?

again, dipshit, there are NO agents here

and since no charges were ever filed and no conviction, there was NO VIOLATION OF LAW you ******* moronic dipshit

 

[Christophera]

Uh okay, the agent does purport to know more about law in NY state than the NYCLU.


However, you've offered no proof whereas I've posted the letters of a legal authority.

Also it is well known that the reverse of what agents post is most often true.

Again, your actions support secret methods of mass murder and treason.

 

[DiveCon]

Uh okay, the agent does purport to know more about law in NY state than the NYCLU.


However, you've offered no proof whereas I've posted the letters of a legal authority.

Also it is well known that the reverse of what agents post is most often true.

Again, your actions support secret methods of mass murder and treason.

you are a ******* IDIOT
the NYCLU dropped any case they might have had
when it was proven the documents were copied and returned you moron

 

[Christophera]

More text. Here are links to sources of authority and images.

The Twin Towers had a concrete core and the independently verified evidence proves it.


Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[DiveCon]

More text. Here are links to sources of authority and images.

The Twin Towers had a concrete core and the independently verified evidence proves it.

WRONG
all of that is paranoid delusions
none of that proves the WTC towers had concrete cores, because they didnt