The same columns surround the concrete core of WTC 2 in this image.
The same columns/configuration of WTC1 surround WTC2 eh? Is that right Chris? See, the problem with you and why people can see right through you and your core is the simple fact that you continually make shit up as you go along. You change your theory at every turn. Whenever someone provides evidence against your theory, you spew more lies and bullshit to try and cover it.
This is a PERFECT example on how you have told some many lies that you can't remember what you've said and in what forum.
So back to the point. The column configuration of WTC1 is the same as WTC2. That's what you claim now? What about what you said here in an earlier post.
There were only 24 continuos columns that 100% deep fillet welds and they were directly fastened to the concrete core.
Pay close attention to your quote below. I've bolded what contradicts your above quote.
The WTC 2 core base was a totally new design for any building ever. It had a central pedestal with dimensions perhaps 30 feet smaller that the inside core dimension of 80 x 120'. The escalator ran up it. From the pedastal, perpendicuarly outwards from the long axis were walls that went out between the elevator door openings to connect with the interio box columns that are visible from inside the lobby.
People would enter from the lobby then exit from another set of doors on the inside of the same elevator into the core area where a hallway would take them back out to the floors.
The doc showed a cape canaveral launch pad that was used to test the design and the elevator doors were rocket exhaust ports. The gantry weight simulated the core which sat on the perpendicualr walls while the rocket sat on the cenral pedastal.
A pedestal?!?!? With the elevators running up it?!?!? Let's see. That means, in this explanation, there was the outer perimeter of core columns, then the express elevators, then the elevator guide rail support steel THEN the pedestal inside. How could the core columns attach DIRECTLY to the core wall when there were elevators between them?
Can't remember what lies and bullshit you posted anymore Chris?
Your problem is, you've ALWAYS thought the cores were almost identical until I forced you to admit that there were elevator access from outside the core at the lobby level. This threw a HUGE wrench into your theory because there was no 12' concrete wall between the elevator doors and the lobby. They were there, plain as day. That's when you concocted the "cores of the towers were radically different" crap. Just to cover your ass. Now recently, you forgot that lie and went back to your original description only to have me pull out the horseshit drivel I quoted above.
The reason you won't draw any more diagrams is because you KNOW you're wrong and this would just expose you even further.
So, care to explain exactly what the WTC2 core was Chris? Which explanation is correct? Core columns attached to the core wall or was it core columns, then express elevators, then elevator guide rail support steel attached to the pedestal? According to the quote above, there was no wall between the core columns and the express elevators. This picture PROVES that:
This is the same photo that forced you to admit to me that there WAS access to the express elevators from the lobby level from outside the core. A point you held onto for quite sometime.
Your theory is hanging by a thread now.
