Federal Judge Prevents Biden From Ending Trump 'Remain In Mexico' Policy

[struth]

Your disagreement with his policy decisions doesn’t remove the authority the constitution grants to the executive.

This unelected judge is unconstitutionally seizing authority the people have entrusted to an elected official.

hahaha you are an idiot…the President has to follow the law, the Administrative Procedure Act. Sorry.

The Court said the same thing when trump attempted to end DACA

 

[Marener]

hahaha you are an idiot…the President has to follow the law, the Administrative Procedure Act. Sorry.

The Court said the same thing when trump attempted to end DACA

Clearly I know much more than you.

 

[Marener]

You're not answering my question. Tell us how you know this court is acting illegally?

Because I can read the law and previous decisions.

 

[struth]

From Chief Justice Roberts:
We begin with jurisdiction. The Government contends that the injunction the District Court entered was barred by 8 U. S. C. §1252(f )(1). That provision reads as follows:

“Regardless of the nature of the action or claim or of the identity of the party or parties bringing the action, no court (other than the Supreme Court) shall have jurisdiction or authority to enjoin or restrain the operation of [8 U. S. C. §§1221–1232], other than with respect to the application of such provisions to an individual alien against whom proceedings under [those provisions] have been initiated.”

that doesn’t say lower courts can’t issue an injuction

moreover 8 USC 1252 deals with enjoining final orders of removal of aliens. That has nothing to do with this case, this case is about the Administrative Procedure Act, a lower court can issue injuctions related to that law

 

[struth]

Clearly I know much more than you.

no you don’t…you don’t even know the issue of this case and you think the president can simply violate federal law

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Because I can read the law and previous decisions.

Oh, ok, so since you can read, I guess this gives you full authority then to make these claims.

Me, I'll wait for a higher court to weigh in. Until then, we'll have to go with what this court has ruled.

 

[easyt65]

Your disagreement with his policy decisions doesn’t remove the authority the constitution grants to the executive.

This unelected judge is unconstitutionally seizing authority the people have entrusted to an elected official.

The Judge is responsible for evaluating and enforcing the Constitution, and Biden has already been slapped down several times for policies / actions that violate the Constitution.

I will trust judges over dementia, criminal Joe.

 

[struth]

Because I can read the law and previous decisions.

the SCOTuS prior decision sent the case back to the lower court. The lower court issued an injunction related to the fact the president violated the Administrative Procedure Act…so it’s painfully obvious you either didn’t read anything or simply can’t comprehend what you read

 

[Marener]

that doesn’t say lower courts can’t issue an injuction

moreover 8 USC 1252 deals with enjoining final orders of removal of aliens. That has nothing to do with this case, this case is about the Administrative Procedure Act, a lower court can issue injuctions related to that law

Your response demonstrates you have no idea what you’re talking about.

Do you see the word “enjoin”? I take it you don’t know what that means.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

No. Not really. Not at all disappointed with the material support for the Ukraine war. Not at all worried about being under some Putin Nuclear threat, as it sure ain't the first time, though nobody telling me to practice hiding under my school desk this time and I didn't blame Kennedy for that time. It was night time in the turret of a tank, when I listened to Reagan make his "godless Russian" speech,but wasn't excited then either. As you can guess, I am not one of the Trumpists Russia supporters on the board. I have seen inflation a lot worse than this and got through it just fine and wasn't nearly as financially stable as now. The way the debt and deficit have been rising, ever since Bill Clinton got out of office and the fall of the idea of balancing the budget, I knew it was only a matter of time and some bubbles take longer than others. I blame the stock market traders along with reactions to the Fed for the stock market ups and down, though glad I am not heavily invested and my funds though not growing as fast, are invested, so they cannot lose, as most investors my age should be. The climate hooplah doesn't even upset my boat. Not rich by any means, but never better positioned to just go about my life and observe than at any other time in my life. Actually more concerned of whether my knees are up to my upcoming ski trip in CO, remembering how they were after my last vacation this fall in the mountains above Gattlinburg. I will leave the histrionics to you and your interpretations of blame and be just fine.

So because you're not hurting means that much of America isn't? You know, perhaps if we started voting for what's good for the entire country instead of just ourselves, we might be in much better shape today.

 

[Blaster]

It was weak leadership on Biden's part , period and It's not exactly pointless. It needs to go down as part of Biden's legacy

Biden isn't a leader.

 

[struth]

Your response demonstrates you have no idea what you’re talking about.

Do you see the word “enjoin”? I take it you don’t know what that means.

did you not read the article on the OP? the issue is the Admin Procedure Act, not a final order of deportation

geez you are clueless

 

[White 6]

So because you're not hurting means that much of America isn't? You know, perhaps if we started voting for what's good for the entire country instead of just ourselves, we might be in much better shape today.

I do. I also take personal responsibility for my positioning on economic matters. Seems a good combination. On the voting side, it helps, owing no allegiance to a party, as they both (and their leaders) suck, to I usually vote the one that sucks the least at the moment, pretty sure they will do things that suck before they leave office.

 

[Marener]

did you not read the article on the OP? the issue is the Admin Procedure Act, not a final order of deportation

geez you are clueless

I read much more than the article in the OP. You know very little about this issue.

 

[busybee01]

'A federal judge has prevented the Biden administration from ending the “Remain in Mexico” immigration policy introduced by the Trump administration, ruling on Thursday that it should stay in place while legal challenges play out. '

Its not like Biden is enforcing it anyway - a reported 1400 illegals are crossing a day, and Mexico's military is reportedly escorting bus-loads of illegals to the border.

Federal judge prevents Biden from ending Trump-era ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy

A federal judge has prevented the Biden administration from ending the “Remain in Mexico” immigration policy introduced by the Trump administration, ruling on Thursday that it should stay in place …

thehill.com

This is another crooked Trump federal judge. The Supreme Court has already ruled that Biden can rescind the policy.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I do. I also take personal responsibility for my positioning on economic matters. Seems a good combination. On the voting side, it helps, owing no allegiance to a party, as they both (and their leaders) suck, to I usually vote the one that sucks the least at the moment, pretty sure they will do things that suck before they leave office.

Oh, is that why you said you would vote for the one that sucks the most for the country next election?

 

[White 6]

Oh, is that why you said you would vote for the one that sucks the most for the country next election?

Don't be a pain, Ray. So we don't agree. Big deal. Move on.

 

[struth]

I read much more than the article in the OP. You know very little about this issue.

your the one that didn’t even know it was about the Admin Procedure Act