Federal Judge Allows Lawsuit Against Rittenhouse To Proceed

[C_Clayton_Jones]

And he only succeeded in killing a couple of white felons who attacked him.

Rittenhouse is the ultimate rightwing fantasy.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Nope. Sane people still exist and will refuse yet another payday for Dim scumbags....like you.

Everyone should hope Rittenhouse is made to pay dearly, to demonstrate that his racism and advocacy of violence will not be condoned.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

His own immaturity will be his downfall. He will spend the rest of his miserable existence trying to find new ways to avoid paying off on his wanton murder of innocents.

He was Reich Wing Media Darling for his few minutes of fame, but as the story goes, all glory is fleeting.

Unfortunately, the likelihood exists that Rittenhouse’s fellow conservatives come to his rescue, bail him out, and he ends up a freshly minted Republican member of Congress.

 

[mak2]

Rittenhouse is the ultimate rightwing fantasy.

Remember Zimmerman?

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Everyone should hope Rittenhouse is made to pay dearly, to demonstrate that his racism and advocacy of violence will not be condoned.

Herpaderp. You have no evidence of either, retard.

 

[MagicMike]

You know what's ironic about your attempt to be humorous, Mike? The violent liberal mobs looting and burning American cities didn't face "consequences"...but the protesters that stormed the Capital have been prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Americans are supposed to have equal protection under the law. That isn't the case anymore though. We have two tiers of law enforcement now...one that applies to liberals and one that applies to conservatives.

You know what's ironic about using direct quotes from Donald Trump and the MAGAt propagandists in the radical right media in your attempts to sound informed Oldstyle?

It has just the opposite effect.

See, they spun this false narrative about a "two tiered" justice system back when the first prosecutions of the Jan. 6th insurgents started in order to draw some false equivalency between the summer of 2020 BLM street riots and the failed coup attempt of Jan. 6th 2021.
First of all they aren't the same.

Pissed off Americans rioting in the streets over police brutality and a REAL, ACTUAL two-tiered approach by law enforcement toward black citizens as opposed to white citizens is NOT the same as a bunch of crazed cultists trying to lay seige on The U.S. Capitol to overthrow American demicracy simply because they did not like the election results.

The BLM riots only had to happen because all the PEACEFUL protests that had been going on already (like taking a knee during The National Anthem) weren't getting the right people's attention.
That's the way it works.
If people aren't paying attention to the peaceful message you've gotta get louder.
Break shit.
Burn shit.

The Jan. 6th insurgents didn't really even have a justifiable "cause" for their actions.
Their RUSE was they thought tgey were trying to "save" America from a "fraudulent" election.
But they knew better.
63 election challenges had already been thrown out of federal courts.
Pretty much EVERYBODY in the "know" outside of the cult was saying the sane thing.
The election was NOT stolen!
You LOST.
Get over it.
But they still did their damage anyway.

So no, the two things are not equal.

But even if they were your cult's narrative is still full of shit.
There were PLENTY of arrests and convictions of the BLM rioters from that summer.
The difference is THOSE people haven't been sitting in jails whining about being "politically persecuted."

Records rebut claims of unequal treatment of Jan. 6 rioters

It's a common refrain from some of those charged in the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol and their Republican allies: The Justice Department is treating them harshly because of their political views while those arrested during last year's protests over racial injustice were given leniency.

apnews.com

 

[0311]

he shouldnt off but he was and he had right to protect hmself from these thugs trying to kill him

Rittenmouse attacked them, not the other way around, which is why he can be held liable for their murders.

 

[0311]

Herpaderp. You have no evidence of either, retard.

Neither do you. But you use really bad personal attacks proves that.

 

[0311]

Rittenhouse is the ultimate rightwing fantasy.

Gunning innocent civilians in the street and getting away with it, every Reich Wing Gun Nuts dream.

 

[0311]

Rittenmouse was NOT defending himself, he did even live in Kenosha Wisconsin he lived out of sate.

He want be part of the riot, that is all. He was NOT defending his community, he was NOT defending himself. He killed people for the sake of killing them and will be liable for doing so.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Rittenmouse attacked them, not the other way around, which is why he can be held liable for their murders.

Objectively false. You are ignorant of fact, insane, a liar, or some combination therein. I'd go with all 3.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Neither do you.

This isn't even a coherent response. It parses as nothing.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Gunning innocent civilians in the street and getting away with it

Non-sequitur, retard, this is about Kyle Rittenhouse killing two of five members of the lynch mob of Antifa filth that attacked him, all of which deserved death.

 

[progressive hunter]

That the reprehensible right has made a ‘hero’ of the likes of Rittenhouse comes as no surprise.

I dont consider him a hero,, but he did rid the world of some bad people,,

you dont want pedos out in public do you??

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Rittenmouse was NOT defending himself

Objectively false.

, he did even live in Kenosha Wisconsin he lived out of sate.

Irrelevant. He worked in Kenosha, his dad lives in Kenosha, his best friend lives in Kenosha, and this is a short drive. You don't lose the right to lose self-defense when you are not currently in the state where your mom lives, retard.

He want be part of the riot, that is all.

Objectively false.

He was NOT defending his community

Objectively false.

he was NOT defending himself

Objectively false.

He killed people for the sake of killing them

Objectively false.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Rittenmouse attacked them, not the other way around, which is why he can be held liable for their murders.

What about the skateboard?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Everyone should hope Rittenhouse is made to pay dearly, to demonstrate that his racism and advocacy of violence will not be condoned.

Here's the fun part, had he been concealed carrying then he probably would have an excellent claim to sue the estates of the Bags for attacking him. Without the rifle he's just a dude running through a crowd of hostiles.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

You whining about taking out violent criminals in the act?

it "You talking about taking out criminals who will commit crimes in the future?" was a reply to: "Think of all the future damage those criminals would have caused. And can't."

please try and keep up, then try really, really hard to be honest

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

it "You talking about taking out criminals who will commit crimes in the future?" was a reply to: "Think of all the future damage those criminals would have caused. And can't."

please try and keep up, then try really, really hard to be honest

You're already talking about five violent criminals in the midst of performing yet another violent crime (attempted murder) while they were at a riot to burn and destroy, yet more violent crimes.

Honestly, death is an ideal way to prevent them from doing more harm than they already have. Shame about the other 3 scumbags.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

it "You talking about taking out criminals who will commit crimes in the future?" was a reply to: "Think of all the future damage those criminals would have caused. And can't."

please try and keep up, then try really, really hard to be honest

The violent felons are dead. Honestly.