Federal Judge Allows Lawsuit Against Rittenhouse To Proceed

His own immaturity will be his downfall. He will spend the rest of his miserable existence trying to find new ways to avoid paying off on his wanton murder of innocents.

He was Reich Wing Media Darling for his few minutes of fame, but as the story goes, all glory is fleeting.
Unfortunately, the likelihood exists that Rittenhouse’s fellow conservatives come to his rescue, bail him out, and he ends up a freshly minted Republican member of Congress.
 
You know what's ironic about your attempt to be humorous, Mike? The violent liberal mobs looting and burning American cities didn't face "consequences"...but the protesters that stormed the Capital have been prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Americans are supposed to have equal protection under the law. That isn't the case anymore though. We have two tiers of law enforcement now...one that applies to liberals and one that applies to conservatives.
You know what's ironic about using direct quotes from Donald Trump and the MAGAt propagandists in the radical right media in your attempts to sound informed Oldstyle?

It has just the opposite effect.

See, they spun this false narrative about a "two tiered" justice system back when the first prosecutions of the Jan. 6th insurgents started in order to draw some false equivalency between the summer of 2020 BLM street riots and the failed coup attempt of Jan. 6th 2021.
First of all they aren't the same.

Pissed off Americans rioting in the streets over police brutality and a REAL, ACTUAL two-tiered approach by law enforcement toward black citizens as opposed to white citizens is NOT the same as a bunch of crazed cultists trying to lay seige on The U.S. Capitol to overthrow American demicracy simply because they did not like the election results.

The BLM riots only had to happen because all the PEACEFUL protests that had been going on already (like taking a knee during The National Anthem) weren't getting the right people's attention.
That's the way it works.
If people aren't paying attention to the peaceful message you've gotta get louder.
Break shit.
Burn shit.

The Jan. 6th insurgents didn't really even have a justifiable "cause" for their actions.
Their RUSE was they thought tgey were trying to "save" America from a "fraudulent" election.
But they knew better.
63 election challenges had already been thrown out of federal courts.
Pretty much EVERYBODY in the "know" outside of the cult was saying the sane thing.
The election was NOT stolen!
You LOST.
Get over it.
But they still did their damage anyway.

So no, the two things are not equal.

But even if they were your cult's narrative is still full of shit.
There were PLENTY of arrests and convictions of the BLM rioters from that summer.
The difference is THOSE people haven't been sitting in jails whining about being "politically persecuted."

 
Rittenmouse was NOT defending himself, he did even live in Kenosha Wisconsin he lived out of sate.

He want be part of the riot, that is all. He was NOT defending his community, he was NOT defending himself. He killed people for the sake of killing them and will be liable for doing so.
 
Rittenmouse attacked them, not the other way around, which is why he can be held liable for their murders.
Objectively false. You are ignorant of fact, insane, a liar, or some combination therein. I'd go with all 3.
 
Gunning innocent civilians in the street and getting away with it
Non-sequitur, retard, this is about Kyle Rittenhouse killing two of five members of the lynch mob of Antifa filth that attacked him, all of which deserved death.
 
Rittenmouse was NOT defending himself
Objectively false.
, he did even live in Kenosha Wisconsin he lived out of sate.
Irrelevant. He worked in Kenosha, his dad lives in Kenosha, his best friend lives in Kenosha, and this is a short drive. You don't lose the right to lose self-defense when you are not currently in the state where your mom lives, retard.
He want be part of the riot, that is all.
Objectively false.
He was NOT defending his community
Objectively false.
he was NOT defending himself
Objectively false.
He killed people for the sake of killing them
Objectively false.
 
Everyone should hope Rittenhouse is made to pay dearly, to demonstrate that his racism and advocacy of violence will not be condoned.
Here's the fun part, had he been concealed carrying then he probably would have an excellent claim to sue the estates of the Bags for attacking him. Without the rifle he's just a dude running through a crowd of hostiles.
 
You whining about taking out violent criminals in the act?
it "You talking about taking out criminals who will commit crimes in the future?" was a reply to: "Think of all the future damage those criminals would have caused. And can't."

please try and keep up, then try really, really hard to be honest
 
it "You talking about taking out criminals who will commit crimes in the future?" was a reply to: "Think of all the future damage those criminals would have caused. And can't."

please try and keep up, then try really, really hard to be honest
You're already talking about five violent criminals in the midst of performing yet another violent crime (attempted murder) while they were at a riot to burn and destroy, yet more violent crimes.

Honestly, death is an ideal way to prevent them from doing more harm than they already have. Shame about the other 3 scumbags.
 
it "You talking about taking out criminals who will commit crimes in the future?" was a reply to: "Think of all the future damage those criminals would have caused. And can't."

please try and keep up, then try really, really hard to be honest

The violent felons are dead. Honestly.
 

Forum List

Back
Top