FBI opens investigation into Letitia James

[justoffal]

She has a statue in NYC.............LOL

I noticed they didn't put a name on the statue but it sure looks like her

 

[Marener]

The FBI will probably look into charging her under RICO statutes, as they should. There's a history of conspiracy to defraud going back decades.

That makes absolutely no sense.

 

[Blisterfinger]

It’s been two days of people trying to claim Deutsche Bank did independent appraisals of Trump’s properties with zero evidence to support that.

It’s blisteringly obvious it’s just made up.

Your TDS clouds your credibility. It's blatantly obvious. Also you lied when you said you weren't a Democrat. Everyone knows

 

[justoffal]

Ooooh.................good one..............didn't think of that.

That's a bingo.

Lawfare is always a bad idea because everyone can use it. Fanny Willis found out, Stacy Abrams found out and now James is going to find out.
Don't do stupid shit and people won't do stupid shit back to you.

 

[Delldude]

You know the dates. You know the statute of limitations.

Funny you mention that.

It’s important to note that the clock on the statute of limitations generally starts ticking when the crime is committed. However, in cases where the fraud is not immediately discovered, the clock may start at the time of discovery, a concept known as the discovery rule. This rule is particularly relevant in complex fraud cases where the fraudulent activity is meticulously concealed.

For example, in wire fraud cases, which involve the use of telecommunications or the internet to commit fraud, the statute of limitations may extend to ten years if certain aggravating factors are present, such as the involvement of a financial institution. This extended period reflects the serious nature of these offenses and the challenges in uncovering them.

Statute of Limitations for Federal Fraud Charges: Time Limits Explained - Leppard Law - Top Rated Orlando DUI Lawyers & Criminal Attorneys in Orlando

ON THIS PAGE: Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Federal Fraud Key Factors Influencing Time Limits for Federal Fraud Charges Exceptions and Extensions to the Statute of Limitations in Federal Fraud Cases Legal Implications of the Statute of Limitations on Federal Fraud Defense What is...

leppardlaw.com

 

[Marener]

Your TDS clouds your credibility. It's blatantly obvious. Also you lied when you said you weren't a Democrat. Everyone knows

lol. Okay.

 

[marvin martian]

That makes absolutely no sense.

It's a good RICO case; multiple conspirators, a systematic history of fraud, and public corruption. It's pure organized crime. This is what RICO was made for.

 

[Marener]

Funny you mention that.

It’s important to note that the clock on the statute of limitations generally starts ticking when the crime is committed. However, in cases where the fraud is not immediately discovered, the clock may start at the time of discovery, a concept known as the discovery rule. This rule is particularly relevant in complex fraud cases where the fraudulent activity is meticulously concealed.

For example, in wire fraud cases, which involve the use of telecommunications or the internet to commit fraud, the statute of limitations may extend to ten years if certain aggravating factors are present, such as the involvement of a financial institution. This extended period reflects the serious nature of these offenses and the challenges in uncovering them.

Statute of Limitations for Federal Fraud Charges: Time Limits Explained - Leppard Law - Top Rated Orlando DUI Lawyers & Criminal Attorneys in Orlando

ON THIS PAGE: Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Federal Fraud Key Factors Influencing Time Limits for Federal Fraud Charges Exceptions and Extensions to the Statute of Limitations in Federal Fraud Cases Legal Implications of the Statute of Limitations on Federal Fraud Defense What is...

leppardlaw.com

Good to know. You probably have a good point.

 

[Marener]

It's a good RICO case; multiple conspirators, a systematic history of fraud, and public corruption. It's pure organized crime. This is what RICO was made for.

What conspirators? What public corruption?

 

[ThisIsMe]

The law. The judges.

If Trump lied to the bank about his net worth, it’s fraud. It’s that simple. The bank’s opinion has nothing to do with the matter.

Did you read the article I linked? According to them, they seem to think trump didn't break any laws. Over estimating your value is a common practice for wealthy people in real estate.


There was no evidence that the banks changed their rates based on trumps assessment.

Also, how did they end up with a 350M+ when the prosecutors own expert said trump only saved about 168M. And who gets the money should be have to pay it? The banks should, right? Not new york...

 

[struth]

The quote says the appraisal was done by a different bank refinancing Trump Tower. Deutsche Bank didn’t do the appraisal.

You are too fucking dumb to even comprehend what you’re reading.

Why would they pay to do another one when they had this one?

 

[Blisterfinger]

lol. Okay.

You've turned out to be basically just a funny little man. LOL

 

[Meathead]

Didn’t you guys say that what Trump did was perfectly legal?

No. Just that it wasn't a capitol crime.

 

[struth]

Banks are indeed pretty dumb sometimes.

I think Deutsche Bank knew Trump’s numbers were fraudulent.

This maybe the dumbest statement ever

So who was the fraud committed against??

 

[justoffal]

It's a good RICO case; multiple conspirators, a systematic history of fraud, and public corruption. It's pure organized crime. This is what RICO was made for.

Trump's lawyer said about 2 months ago:

" We're gonna put her fat ass in jail".....

 

[Marener]

Did you read the article I linked? According to them, they seem to think trump didn't break any laws. Over estimating your value is a common practice for wealthy people in real estate.

I don’t think that something becomes legal just because it is common.

 

[marvin martian]

What conspirators? What public corruption?

James and her father/husband, to start. Whether or not the banks and various attorneys who created the fraudulent POAs were in on the scam is yet to be determined, but the FBI will find out.

If any of these crimes took place during her tenure as a public servant (and it looks like some of them did), it's public corruption. Especially if she influenced anyone to lie or defraud on her behalf, by using her public office or her political power as leverage.

It's not looking good for your Trump hunter.

 

[Marener]

James and her father/husband, to start. Whether or not the banks and various attorneys who created the fraudulent POAs were in on the scam is yet to be determined, but the FBI will find out.

If any of these crimes took place during her tenure as a public servant (and it looks like some of them did), it's public corruption. Especially if she influenced anyone to lie or defraud on her behalf, by using her public office or her political power as leverage.

It's not looking good for your Trump hunter.

Soooooooo many assumptions.

 

[justoffal]

Did you read the article I linked? According to them, they seem to think trump didn't break any laws. Over estimating your value is a common practice for wealthy people in real estate.


There was no evidence that the banks changed their rates based on trumps assessment.

Also, how did they end up with a 350M+ when the prosecutors own expert said trump only saved about 168M. And who gets the money should be have to pay it? The banks should, right? Not new york...

The entire state of New York practices real estate exactly the same way especially in New York City.
I don't know technically about the legalities but I do know that it's an extremely commonplace thing and is done all the time by all the rich people including Bloomberg who has five times Trump's Fortune and property holdings.

 

[marvin martian]

Soooooooo many assumptions.

Yes, that's why the FBI is investigating.