FBI Now Mercs For Hire? FBI Helped Hillary Undermine Trump Campaign

[Lisa558]

Here’s an MSNBC opinion cheering on illegal activity by the goons. Leave it to the Dems to decide which laws to follow, and which laws are good to violate.

Opinion | The protest outside Brett Kavanaugh's house isn't the problem. Here's what is.

The Supreme Court should not be considered immune to citizen feedback.

www.msnbc.com

 

[Nostra]

Small groups of protesters show up at Supreme Court justices' homes to push for Roe v. Wade

Fox News on MSN.com7d​

If you have a problem with the Trump goons savaging the police defending democracy at the Capitol, and protestors trespassing on private property, surely the jurists whose property has allegedly been violated know the law and are fully capable of articulating any illegality and demanding enforcement.

Have the homeowners, intimately familiar with the matter and thoroughly conversant in the law, criticized the police?

Do you have a link to these convictions of someone "savaging the police" on Jan 6?

 

[berg80]

Congress needs to step up and shut the FBI down pending a full outside review of the FBI from top to bottom...starting with Wray.

At the same time, defense lawyers for the scientists say it is Mr. Durham’s indictment that is misleading. Their clients, they say, believed their hypothesis was a plausible explanation for the odd data they had uncovered — and still do.

The Alfa Bank results “have been validated and are reproducible. The findings of the researchers were true then and remain true today; reports that these findings were innocuous or a hoax are simply wrong,” said Jody Westby and Mark Rasch, lawyers for David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist and one of the researchers whom the indictment discussed but did not name.

Steven A. Tyrrell, a lawyer for Rodney Joffe, an internet entrepreneur and another of the four data experts, said his client had a duty to share the information with the F.B.I. and that the indictment “gratuitously presents an incomplete and misleading picture” of his role.

Trump Server Mystery Produces Fresh Conflict (Published 2021)

A recent indictment suggested that researchers who found strange internet links between a Russian bank and the Trump Organization did not really believe their own work. They are pushing back.

www.nytimes.com

 

[schmidlap]

It’s a matter for the FBI, but they are in the side of the goons on the lawns.

Have you any credible evidence of that? Has any supreme court justice or responsible public servant made such a baseless claim?

Clearly, these small groups of protestors may be in violation of the applicable statute:

U.S. Code 18, section 1507 states: "Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."​

​

I have no reason to contrive some paranoid fantasy about the complicity of any U.S. intelligence services.

 

[Lisa558]

Have you any credible evidence of that? Has any supreme court justice or responsible public servant made such a baseless claim?

Of course! We have Democrats in Congress, including Pelosi and Schumer, cheering them on!

Clearly, these small groups of protestors may be in violation of the applicable statute:

U.S. Code 18, section 1507 states: "Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."​

​

I have no reason to contrive some paranoid fantasy about the complicity of any U.S. intelligence services.

Depends on your definition of “complicit.” To me, it means enabling it by allowing illegal activity, when done by liberals of course, to continue,

That you can’t see the glaring double standards being applied depending on whether lawbreakers are conservative or liberal reveals how much you’ve been brainwashed.

 

[schmidlap]

Do you have a link to these convictions of someone "savaging the police" on Jan 6?

‘Stomped, beaten, tased’: Police testify in US Capitol riot probe​

January 6 rioter gets nearly four years in prison for assaulting police officer​

Alabama man accused of hitting officer with flagpole on Jan. 6​

Ex-NYPD Officer Found Guilty Of Assaulting Cop During Jan. 6 Riot​

ETC.

​

https://www4.bing.com/search?q=janu...36&sk=&cvid=D059F58B9E2E468AA5E00F56A1110D86#​

https://www4.bing.com/search?q=poli...36&sk=&cvid=0C614D2A180140D6AD8F7956ACA1C262#​

 

[Lisa558]

‘Stomped, beaten, tased’: Police testify in US Capitol riot probe​

January 6 rioter gets nearly four years in prison for assaulting police officer​

Alabama man accused of hitting officer with flagpole on Jan. 6​

Ex-NYPD Officer Found Guilty Of Assaulting Cop During Jan. 6 Riot​

ETC.

View attachment 648191​

https://www4.bing.com/search?q=january 6 convicted attacking police&qs=n&form=QBRE&=%eManage Your Search History%E&sp=-1&pq=january 6 convicted attacking police&sc=0-36&sk=&cvid=D059F58B9E2E468AA5E00F56A1110D86#​

https://www4.bing.com/search?q=police attacted testify capitol riot&qs=n&form=QBRE&=%eManage Your Search History%E&sp=-1&pq=police attacted testify capitol riot&sc=0-36&sk=&cvid=0C614D2A180140D6AD8F7956ACA1C262#​

Still pales in comparison to the savages during the Summer of Love, which was 1000x worse, impacting hundreds of towns and cities, causing dozens of murders, thousands of assaults, and billions in damages.

Progtards always accuse the other side d that which they themselves are exponentially more guilty.

 

[Nostra]

Still pales in comparison to the savages during the Summer of Love, which was 1000x worse, impacting hundreds of towns and cities, causing dozens of murders, thousands of assaults, and billions in damages.

Progtards always accuse the other side d that which they themselves are exponentially more guilty.

It demonstrates the selective law enforcement of the FBI.

 

[berg80]

Still pales in comparison to the savages during the Summer of Love, which was 1000x worse, impacting hundreds of towns and cities, causing dozens of murders, thousands of assaults, and billions in damages.

As destructive as the Floyd murder protests were, they weren't an existential threat to democracy like the Capital riot and attempted coup was.

 

[schmidlap]

Still pales in comparison to the savages during the Summer of Love...

Or that Deerfield Massacre.

Desperate attempt at diversion noted.

"Oh, yeah!
Well, what about...?"​

 

[Nostra]

As destructive as the Floyd murder protests were, they weren't an existential threat to democracy like the Capital riot and attempted coup was.

Yep, we were minutes away from "Democracy" vanishing from the earth forever.

 

[Lisa558]

As destructive as the Floyd murder protests were, they weren't an existential threat to democracy like the Capital riot and attempted coup was.

Neither was the 1/6 protest. That is was positioned as that is part of the double standards the Dems employ. You fell for it, which is what the Dems are counting on.

The true existential threat to democracy is the Dems’ continuing attempts to silence dissenters and block any statements, including Twitter posts, that do not support the leftist agenda.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

View attachment 647233
"LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!"​

Thank you for supplying you voluminous list of all the crimes for which Clinton has been indicted, prosecuted, convicted, and incarcerated.

The Republican prosecutorial diligence of so many years has certainly produced impressive results.

View attachment 647226
"We have achieved precisely as many criminal convictions
of Hillary Clinton as we have exposed suspects in my 'Big Steal!"

View attachment 647241​

Typical schmidlap instead of discussing HRC he brings it back to Trump. Dishonest debater per usual

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Or that Deerfield Massacre.

Desperate attempt at diversion noted.

View attachment 648202
"Oh, yeah!
Well, what about...?"​

Her campaign did destroy multiple blackberries and iPads.
Wonder why

That is a fact you cannot dispute.

 

[berg80]

Neither was the 1/6 protest.

Of course it was. And you know it in your heart. It was a cog in the wheel of Trump's, and his minions, efforts in trying to illegally overturn the election. It's the essence of the stop the steal lie.

Eastman provides new details of Trump’s direct role in legal effort to overturn election

The court filing describes the direct role of Trump himself in developing strategy, detailing “two hand-written notes from former President Trump about information that he thought might be useful for the anticipated litigation.”

www.politico.com

 

[Turtlesoup]

I accept the American system of jurisprudence, and trust prosecutorial zeal to prove guilty whoever, until then, is innocent, regardless of how stridently or for however long hyper-partisans shriek

View attachment 647705
"LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!"​

TRANSLATION: I know Hilliary is guilty as hell, but I will continue to support her corrupt FBI keeping her out of prison where she belongs.

 

[schmidlap]

Typical schmidlap instead of discussing HRC he brings it back to Trump. Dishonest debater per usual

There has been a febrile fatwa directed at Clinton for years, berserkers screeching "Lock her up! Lock her up!"

Republican-controlled congressional investigative hearings targeting her could contrive no charges. Neither did four years of the Trump regime's Justice Department.

She may, some day, be charged with a crime, tried, and found guilt based upon evidence. Until then, she is innocent, despite all the hyper-partisan, hysterical hoopla.

What is it about following the law that you find so upsetting?

 

[schmidlap]

I know Hilliary is guilty as hell, but I will continue to support her corrupt FBI keeping her out of prison where she belongs.

You parrot the dogma you are fed.

Where has it been determined that the FBI is corrupt, and that Clinton should be locked up?

 

[schmidlap]

Her campaign did destroy multiple blackberries and iPads.
Wonder why

That is a fact you cannot dispute.

When was Clinton ever indicted and convicted of such a crime by any of the rabid Clinton-haters and Trumpy lickspittles whose shrill ululations of "Lock her up! Lock her up!" we have long endured.

The contempt for American jurisprudence is blatant, but it, nevertheless, applies to all Americans: Legally innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

 

[Nostra]

When was Clinton ever indicted and convicted of such a crime by any of the rabid Clinton-haters and Trumpy lickspittles whose shrill ululations of "Lock her up! Lock her up!" we have long endured.

View attachment 648228​

The contempt for American jurisprudence is blatant, but it, nevertheless, applies to all Americans: Legally innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

So you are saying Trump has never broken any law.