FISA Court: FBI Illegally Spied On US Senators, On Americans on J6

Et tu, Wray?

Former CIA Director Brennan was caught Illegally spying on Congress, exposed by D-Feinstein. For his crimes he was allowed to bexspared Indictment if he agreed to appear before Congress and promise not to do it again.

Now the very FISA Court the FBI has violated thousnds of times, by their own admission, has exposed FBI Director Wray's and his FBI's joining Brennan & his CIA in criminally spying on Congress.

Despite the rogue, criminally weaponized FBI's crimes you can expect Wray to be spared Indictment as Brennan was.


“FBI employees wrongly searched foreign surveillance data for the last names of a U.S. senator and a state senator, according to a court opinion released Friday,” reports the Associated Press.

“Another FBI employee improperly queried the Social Security number of a state judge who alleged civil rights violations by a municipal chief of police, according to the opinion by the chief judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court."


WRAY: FBI Director Christopher Wray said in a statement that the FBI is reforming its practices."

What BULLSHIT. The laws the FBI are required to obey are clear - they either Obey them, or they do not. Currently Wray and tbe FBI do NOT obey the law.

US IG Horowitz reported that the FBI has defrauded the FISA Court and illegally spied on Americans approx 1 MILLION TIMES under Wray SO FAR. This was pointed out to Wray, who when asked had no idea how many times he and his agency had broken the law, during Congressional hearings. Wray responded with the same old bullshit - 'the FBI is WORKING ON IMPROVING COMPLIANCE.

Again, you either comply with the law or you don't.

In the immortal words of Master Yoda: 'Do or do NOT - there is no 'try'.'

Having perpetrated over a million illegal spying operations on Anericans ... and Senators ... Wray and his FBI aren't 'trying' to comply with the law at all.

Time for Wray to go, the criminal leadership be gutted from the FBI, and compliance to the law be reintroduced to the FBI and enforced.




After the events of Jan 6th. I'm surprised they didn't do more. Remember some republicans were cheering on the domestic terrorists.
 
I have no animosity toward anyone because of their skin color or ethnicity.
I call out people (and an entire culture) who frame their entire existence on skin color.
That would be YOU.
And I’m self-employed. Have been for decades.
So you're self-employed, that's nice but it's still not a reason why you could not or would not attend a rally or march in order to fight for your constitutional rights or the rights of others. Doesn't being self-employed give you a greater ability to take time off if needed for things that are important to you? Instead of attempting to use "I have a real job" as an excuse for not having ever done the things I asked about, you could have simply stated that you're not interested in participating in such activities. That would have been the honest thing to do.

As for your ability when it comes to deductive reasoning, well it's abysmal because you're wrong on every single point you've attempted to make when it comes to your assessment of me. I can usually accurately surmise your meaning based on your previous comments to this message board however substituting culture for race or ethnicity is an old and worn out tactic used by those who think they're superior to others solely because of the race they were born into. A tactic we're very much aware of.

Any who, being self-employed doesn't make you better than anyone else or give the job you do more validity than the jobs done by people who work for others. And whether you realize it or not you do have a classification, per our government, although I don't believe it to be a considered a "culture" per se anymore than your designation of me (and others) is a "culture". Why can't you speak freely and say what you mean?
 
So you're self-employed, that's nice but it's still not a reason why you could not or would not attend a rally or march in order to fight for your constitutional rights or the rights of others. Doesn't being self-employed give you a greater ability to take time off if needed for things that are important to you? Instead of attempting to use "I have a real job" as an excuse for not having ever done the things I asked about, you could have simply stated that you're not interested in participating in such activities. That would have been the honest thing to do.

As for your ability when it comes to deductive reasoning, well it's abysmal because you're wrong on every single point you've attempted to make when it comes to your assessment of me. I can usually accurately surmise your meaning based on your previous comments to this message board however substituting culture for race or ethnicity is an old and worn out tactic used by those who think they're superior to others solely because of the race they were born into. A tactic we're very much aware of.

Any who, being self-employed doesn't make you better than anyone else or give the job you do more validity than the jobs done by people who work for others. And whether you realize it or not you do have a classification, per our government, although I don't believe it to be a considered a "culture" per se anymore than your designation of me (and others) is a "culture". Why can't you speak freely and say what you mean?
You just confirmed my estimation of you.
You frame your existence by skin color and when I called that out you went right back to skin color.
 
No, I have a real job.
Only one, back in the sixties; it was very dangerous for me. My father was very much a racist and if he found out that I went to one he would have killed me. Coal miners had a very strict code back then. They regularly burnt crosses on the column banks ( large heaps of useless, slag coal ) sometimes with black men on them. It was horrible and it was part of our shameful history. Fear makes people do terrible things.
 
Your conspiracy theories are funny.

Your Russia Collusion hoax is so… you know,,,, yesterday.
They have to keep hope alive.... 😂

Trump is their ticket to Utopia, otherwise if they can just get around him somehow, but what's funny is that Trump is the most easy going on the issues, and just wants all Americans to prosper. 😂

Their lies about Trump is as severe as what they attempted to do with the Russian Hoax etc, and it's on going.
 
Et tu, Wray?

Former CIA Director Brennan was caught Illegally spying on Congress, exposed by D-Feinstein. For his crimes he was allowed to bexspared Indictment if he agreed to appear before Congress and promise not to do it again.

Now the very FISA Court the FBI has violated thousnds of times, by their own admission, has exposed FBI Director Wray's and his FBI's joining Brennan & his CIA in criminally spying on Congress.

Despite the rogue, criminally weaponized FBI's crimes you can expect Wray to be spared Indictment as Brennan was.


“FBI employees wrongly searched foreign surveillance data for the last names of a U.S. senator and a state senator, according to a court opinion released Friday,” reports the Associated Press.

“Another FBI employee improperly queried the Social Security number of a state judge who alleged civil rights violations by a municipal chief of police, according to the opinion by the chief judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court."


WRAY: FBI Director Christopher Wray said in a statement that the FBI is reforming its practices."

What BULLSHIT. The laws the FBI are required to obey are clear - they either Obey them, or they do not. Currently Wray and tbe FBI do NOT obey the law.

US IG Horowitz reported that the FBI has defrauded the FISA Court and illegally spied on Americans approx 1 MILLION TIMES under Wray SO FAR. This was pointed out to Wray, who when asked had no idea how many times he and his agency had broken the law, during Congressional hearings. Wray responded with the same old bullshit - 'the FBI is WORKING ON IMPROVING COMPLIANCE.

Again, you either comply with the law or you don't.

In the immortal words of Master Yoda: 'Do or do NOT - there is no 'try'.'

Having perpetrated over a million illegal spying operations on Anericans ... and Senators ... Wray and his FBI aren't 'trying' to comply with the law at all.

Time for Wray to go, the criminal leadership be gutted from the FBI, and compliance to the law be reintroduced to the FBI and enforced.




I'm not surprised Trump's FBI was out of control.

This just goes to show we are fortunate Biden won the election and straightened it out.

Maybe Gym should throw Trump a subpoena and ask him some questions about what his FBI was doing?

Good post Easyt65!
 
I'm not surprised Trump's FBI was out of control.

This just goes to show we are fortunate Biden won the election and straightened it out.

Maybe Gym should throw Trump a subpoena and ask him some questions about what his FBI was doing?

Good post Easyt65!
Trump's FBI who ran with the pee pee tapes, Russia, Russia Russia?

Mueller already answered your questions for you.

Are you an idiot?
 
Embarrassed of your previously meaningless post so this is your response?

Too funny.
You are too funny....maybe ask Gym.

Maybe Gym should throw Trump a subpoena and ask him some questions about what his FBI was doing?
Maybe Gym can toss Him a subpoena and ask Trump's FBI why they were trying to perform a coup?

You are too funny....
 
You are too funny....maybe ask Gym.


Maybe Gym can toss Him a subpoena and ask Trump's FBI why they were trying to perform a coup?

You are too funny....
What coup?

Do you know what coup means?

Are you going to tell me what question I asked (post 87) or were you just typing from a card?
 
You don't think FBI kicking around wearing a wire to go 25A on Trump isn't a soft coup?

If conducted legally, of course not.

Completed by Trump hating democrat lawyers? Were they masquerading as republicans?
No. Mueller was appointed by a republican who was appointed by Trump. Who they appointed isn't the problem of Democrats even if your "wahhh everyone hates Trump it's not fair" was true.
 
If conducted legally, of course not.
How do you legally entrap a president to attempt to remove Him under 25A?
No. Mueller was appointed by a republican who was appointed by Trump. Who they appointed isn't the problem of Democrats even if your "wahhh everyone hates Trump it's not fair" was true.
Doesn't matter who appointed him, it's who the investigators were and their political make up that counts. IIRC, several were bounced from the investigation for that very reason, several left FBI in shame.
 
How do you legally entrap a president to attempt to remove Him under 25A?

You can't; I don't think.

Who was charged/convicted of that?

Doesn't matter who appointed him, it's who the investigators were and their political make up that counts. IIRC, several were bounced from the investigation for that very reason, several left FBI in shame.
It does matter who appointed him.

When Mueller was appointed, Republicans had control of the executive and legislative branches.

How could Democrats have been responsible?

Do you think the 8 or 9 Benghazi investigations were Democrat investigations?

I mean really, there is no small amount of irony here. The only republican investigation that was even remotely effective in uncovering crimes and getting convictions in the last...30 years(?) or so, and was paid for nearly entirely by the criminals, and Republicans don't want to own it?

What is wrong with you guys?
 
If I were Trump I would have teams of federal marshals standing ready to go into the DOJ and the lead FBI building in DC to escort everyone out empty handed right after the swearing in....
 

Forum List

Back
Top