FBI Now Mercs For Hire? FBI Helped Hillary Undermine Trump Campaign

Your deflection is noted. You won't even admit the optics are bad. Nice little sycophant you are.
Be sure to let me know if whining about Hillary Clinton as a time-honored pastime is ever replaced by rabid Republican politicians and prosecutors actually contriving the evidence required for a criminal indictment under our system of jurisprudence.

If you want to insist that they are all woefully deficient in due diligence, prosecute them.
 
Be sure to let me know if whining about Hillary Clinton as a time-honored pastime is ever replaced by rabid Republican politicians and prosecutors actually contriving the evidence required for a criminal indictment under our system of jurisprudence.

If you want to insist that they are all woefully deficient in due diligence, prosecute them.
I am not whining. I gave you facts and asked if at the very least the optics are bad. You deflected like the little sycophant that you are. Also the laptop for Biden. At BEST the optics are bad.
 
I am not whining. I gave you facts and asked if at the very least the optics are bad. You deflected like the little sycophant that you are. Also the laptop for Biden. At BEST the optics are bad.
If you wish to label accounts that fit your political agenda as "facts" and have no problem with their serving as partisan
PR while resulting in no actual criminal indictments (as has been the case with Clinton for decades) good luck with that.

(Reports of her killing Vince Foster was quite entertaining.)
 
If you wish to label accounts that fit your political agenda as "facts" and have no problem with their serving as partisan
PR while resulting in no actual criminal indictments (as has been the case with Clinton for decades) good luck with that.

(Reports of her killing Vince Foster was quite entertaining.)
What crimes has Trump committed?
 
If you wish to label accounts that fit your political agenda as "facts" and have no problem with their serving as partisan
PR while resulting in no actual criminal indictments (as has been the case with Clinton for decades) good luck with that.

(Reports of her killing Vince Foster was quite entertaining.)
Clinton Campaign did destroy blackberries and ipads. This is indisputable. Optics are bad.
 
Clinton Campaign did destroy blackberries and ipads. This is indisputable. Optics are bad.
CNN had reported in 2016 that "a Hillary Clinton aide destroyed some of the former secretary of state’s used mobile devices with hammers."

The FBI had also indicated that Clinton aide Justin Cooper destroyed the then-secretary of state’s Blackberry cell phones on multiple occasions.

Reason(s) unknown.

Why is that timely?

(I thought the "She killed Vince Foster" one to have been much more fun.)
 
CNN had reported in 2016 that "a Hillary Clinton aide destroyed some of the former secretary of state’s used mobile devices with hammers."

The FBI had also indicated that Clinton aide Justin Cooper destroyed the then-secretary of state’s Blackberry cell phones on multiple occasions.

Reason(s) unknown.

Why is that timely?

(I thought the "She killed Vince Foster" one to have been much more fun.)
Because the FBI specifically said not to. LOL

Sheep
 
not to mention xiden, and the rest of the obamagate gang that aided putin and clinton’s hoax
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Russia used Republican political operative Paul Manafort and the WikiLeaks website to try to help now-U.S. President Donald Trump win the 2016 election, a Republican-led Senate committee said in its final review of the matter on Tuesday.

WikiLeaks played a key role in Russia’s effort to assist Republican Trump’s campaign against Democrat Hillary Clinton and likely knew it was helping Russian intelligence, said the 966-page report, which is likely to be the most definitive public account of the 2016 election controversy.

The report found President Vladimir Putin personally directed the Russian efforts to hack computer networks and accounts affiliated with the Democratic Party and leak information damaging to Clinton.

www.reuters.com

Senate committee concludes Russia used Manafort, WikiLeaks to boost Trump in 2016

Russia used Republican political operative Paul Manafort and the WikiLeaks website to try to help now-U.S. President Donald Trump win the 2016 election, a Republican-led Senate committee said in its final review of the matter on Tuesday.
www.reuters.com
www.reuters.com
 
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Russia used Republican political operative Paul Manafort and the WikiLeaks website to try to help now-U.S. President Donald Trump win the 2016 election, a Republican-led Senate committee said in its final review of the matter on Tuesday.

WikiLeaks played a key role in Russia’s effort to assist Republican Trump’s campaign against Democrat Hillary Clinton and likely knew it was helping Russian intelligence, said the 966-page report, which is likely to be the most definitive public account of the 2016 election controversy.

The report found President Vladimir Putin personally directed the Russian efforts to hack computer networks and accounts affiliated with the Democratic Party and leak information damaging to Clinton.

www.reuters.com

Senate committee concludes Russia used Manafort, WikiLeaks to boost Trump in 2016

Russia used Republican political operative Paul Manafort and the WikiLeaks website to try to help now-U.S. President Donald Trump win the 2016 election, a Republican-led Senate committee said in its final review of the matter on Tuesday.
www.reuters.com
www.reuters.com
cool…story

Wikileaks did help but all it did was post publicly the content of the dems emails, exposing their corruption

had they not been corrupt it wouldn’t of helped
 
I accept the American system of jurisprudence, and trust prosecutorial zeal to prove guilty whoever, until then, is innocent, regardless of how stridently or for however long hyper-partisans shriek

View attachment 647705
"LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!"
That's one of the main problems with leftists - to "accept" massive corruption, when it benefits (they think) them.

YES - LOCK HER UP! Absolutely.
 
Peter Strzok was fired from the Mueller Investigation in August of 2018 - the moment his private text messages with Lisa Page became pubic. So that's a complete fabrication on your part.

Both Strzok and Lisa Page received substantial settlements from the Department of Justice is lawsuits for violations of the privacy and First Amendment rights.
That's a complete fucking lie and you know it, lefTARD trash.

You fuckers are great at lying but you ain't got nothing else.
 
That's a complete fucking lie and you know it, lefTARD trash.

You fuckers are great at lying but you ain't got nothing else.

Not a lie at all:


 
cool…story

Wikileaks did help but all it did was post publicly the content of the dems emails, exposing their corruption

had they not been corrupt it wouldn’t of helped
Interesting. What corruption? Give me some details. Surely you aren't hanging your hat on bullshit allegations about the primaries, are you?

 
That's one of the main problems with leftists - to "accept" massive corruption, when it benefits (they think) them.

YES - LOCK HER UP! Absolutely.
Trumpies will persist in whining, no doubt.

"Massive corruption" is a hyper-partisan myth, of course, exposed by the conspicuous lack of any prosecutorial initiatives by Republicans concerning their vast, steal of a mythical "Landslide!"

Were there actual, credible evidence of such monumental corruption, Trump cult lawyers and politicians would be organizing investigations and issuing indictments across the land.

Instead, even as hundreds of Trump goons are prosecuted for their attack on the Capitol, the weird worshipers have no legal actions underway anywhere, not a single suspect named, in such an alleged, unprecedented, pervasive scam.

They'll keep shrieking that Americans who displease their Cry Baby Loser should all be incarcerated, but it's all just flatulence until they substantiate their nonsense.

Instead, they just bleat their petty snivels at anyone who points out that litigious impotence.
 
Interesting. What corruption? Give me some details. Surely you aren't hanging your hat on bullshit allegations about the primaries, are you?

Getting answers to questions prior to the debate; conspiring with the Clinton campaign to undermine Sander's campaign

Wikileaks Proves Primary Was Rigged: DNC Undermined Democracy​

DNC betrayed Bernie Sanders and the rest of America

Swanson: Donna Brazile Has Revealed the Corrupt State of the DNC in 2016 and We Should All Be Furious​

NEW PROOF THAT THE DNC WAS JUST AS CORRUPT AS YOU THOUGHT IT WAS​


Have you been living under a rock?
 
Not a lie at all:


The love birds made some claims.

YOUR Claim was that they got a settlement. Show us the settlement, liar.

YOUR claim was that Strzok was fired as soon as he emails became public, but it wasn’t until 7 months later, liar.
 

Forum List

Back
Top