Fantastic Day in Court for Trump!

[Rawley]

'For that reason, rather than prematurely decide now whether application of 18 U.S.C. § 793(e) in these circumstances yields unsalvageable vagueness despite the asserted judicial glosses, the Court elects to deny the Motion without prejudice, to be raised as appropriate in connection with jury-instruction briefing and/or other appropriate motions."

You do understand what that means right?

It means they lost a long shot.

 

[BluesLegend]

Sue Democrats, it's your patriotic duty! If Dems want to have a lawfare war lets have one!

 

[kyzr]

Alvin's "hush money" case is coming up the end of March, so we'll see how that goes.

Fani's "election interference" case could be shit-canned tomorrow, we'll see.

Smith's J6 case is going nowhere fast

Smith's mishandling classified docs case looks horrible after Biden was just given a pass for stealing them.

Trump is still facing an uphill battle, but he hasn't lost a case yet...

 

[Winco]

...and the Leftest scum leaders of this Banana Republic are telling all you stupid TDS afflicted Moon Bats that all political opponents of the Leftest regime must be punished.

OMG I just get tired of this ^^^ bullshit every day.
You ramble on like the tired old man you represent.
Ad Nauseam......

Just take a nap.

 

[j-mac]

It’s called ‘recusal’. She’ll get a fair hearing, before she’s booted out the door.

Fascist.

 

[CowboyTed]

So, now judges that won’t rule the way you want, just throw em out, right?

Cannon has been overruled a number of times in this area...

Cannon is a very inexperienced judge for this role and it shows...

This is a pretty horrendous mistake:

List of witnesses against Trump cannot be secret in documents case, judge rules

US district court judge Aileen Cannon also scheduled a hearing to start the discovery process for classified documents

www.theguardian.com

Those witnesses recieved death threats and if anything was to happen to them then Cannon would held responsible and removed from the case... I used to think she was biased but I think she really lacks the experience and doesn't seem to properly advised.

 

[Smokin' OP]

President Trump had a great day in court today! Judge Cannon really let into Smith for everything he tried to get over in the court. Listen to this video

Welcome to "truthville" USA, I am Q?
That sums up his delusions.

 

[j-mac]

Cannon has been overruled a number of times in this area...

Cannon is a very inexperienced judge for this role and it shows...

This is a pretty horrendous mistake:

List of witnesses against Trump cannot be secret in documents case, judge rules

US district court judge Aileen Cannon also scheduled a hearing to start the discovery process for classified documents

www.theguardian.com

Those witnesses recieved death threats and if anything was to happen to them then Cannon would held responsible and removed from the case... I used to think she was biased but I think she really lacks the experience and doesn't seem to properly advised.

According to who? You?

 

[Smokin' OP]

Cannon has been overruled a number of times in this area...

Cannon is a very inexperienced judge for this role and it shows...

This is a pretty horrendous mistake:

List of witnesses against Trump cannot be secret in documents case, judge rules

US district court judge Aileen Cannon also scheduled a hearing to start the discovery process for classified documents

www.theguardian.com

Those witnesses recieved death threats and if anything was to happen to them then Cannon would held responsible and removed from the case... I used to think she was biased but I think she really lacks the experience and doesn't seem to properly advised.

In a 2023 federal trial of an Alabama man accused of running a child pornography website, Cannon closed the jury selection to the public on the basis of space restrictions and also failed to swear in the jury.

She is biased and has been for a long time.

In the case of Christopher Tavorris Wilkins, a 34-year-old man from Palm Beach Gardens who, in court, threw a chair at and threatened to kill a federal prosecutor, Cannon in April 2022 added 6.5 years of imprisonment to his existing 17.5 year sentence for gun charges.

In the case of Paul Vernon Hoeffer, a 60-year-old man from Palm Beach Gardens who pleaded guilty to making death threats against three Democrats: Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and prosecutor Kim Foxx, with federal sentencing guidelines recommending 33 and 41 months in prison, and prosecutors proposing 41 months, Cannon in April 2022 sentenced Hoeffer to 18 months in prison and then three years of supervised release, and also fined him $2,000.

 

[j-mac]

In a 2023 federal trial of an Alabama man accused of running a child pornography website, Cannon closed the jury selection to the public on the basis of space restrictions and also failed to swear in the jury.

She is biased and has been for a long time.

In the case of Christopher Tavorris Wilkins, a 34-year-old man from Palm Beach Gardens who, in court, threw a chair at and threatened to kill a federal prosecutor, Cannon in April 2022 added 6.5 years of imprisonment to his existing 17.5 year sentence for gun charges.

In the case of Paul Vernon Hoeffer, a 60-year-old man from Palm Beach Gardens who pleaded guilty to making death threats against three Democrats: Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and prosecutor Kim Foxx, with federal sentencing guidelines recommending 33 and 41 months in prison, and prosecutors proposing 41 months, Cannon in April 2022 sentenced Hoeffer to 18 months in prison and then three years of supervised release, and also fined him $2,000.

Oh, well, that must mean what your accusing….

 

[j-mac]

Cannon has been overruled a number of times in this area...

Cannon is a very inexperienced judge for this role and it shows...

This is a pretty horrendous mistake:

List of witnesses against Trump cannot be secret in documents case, judge rules

US district court judge Aileen Cannon also scheduled a hearing to start the discovery process for classified documents

www.theguardian.com

Those witnesses recieved death threats and if anything was to happen to them then Cannon would held responsible and removed from the case... I used to think she was biased but I think she really lacks the experience and doesn't seem to properly advised.

Deflection

 

[dudmuck]

Every single case is falling apart.

In a prerecorded interview that aired Wednesday, Trump effortlessly unraveled the work of his defense team, telling Newsmax’s Greg Kelly point blank that he actually did take the classified documents, describing the process of shamelessly packing them away while leaving office.
“I took ’em very legally,” Trump said. “And I wasn’t hiding them.”
“We had boxes on the front of the—and a lot of those boxes had clothing and a lot of—we were moving out, OK? Unfortunately, we were moving out of the White House. And because we’re moving out of the White House our country is going to hell.”

this is Trump confession, his defense has fallen apart.

 

[luiza]

Fantastic Day in Court for Trump!​

And it was .
But the bleaters and whiners resort to ,
But , if
If , But ,
But , But , and ,
If, if .

Big babies .
English sports people say , Well Done , shake hands and then kick the fuck out of the loser .

 

[j-mac]

It means they lost a long shot.

Yes, it means, for now, Smith’s folly can proceed, until, that is, when jury instructions are given. At which time they may be instructed to not consider his argument.

 

[elektra]

How come Democrats refuse to quote the law? The answer is simple, if anybody reads the law they see that Trump did not violate the law, in any way shape or form

U.S.C. Title 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

18 U.S.C. § 793(e)

§793. Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information​

(a) Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defense, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, fueling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, research laboratory or station or other place connected with the national defense owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control of the United States, or of any of its officers, departments, or agencies, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time of war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared or constructed or stored, information as to which prohibited place the President has determined would be prejudicial to the national defense; or

(b) Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, and with like intent or reason to believe, copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts to copy, take, make, or obtain, any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing, or note of anything connected with the national defense; or

(c) Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain from any person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or

(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or

(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(g) If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.

(h)(1) Any person convicted of a violation of this section shall forfeit to the United States, irrespective of any provision of State law, any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds the person obtained, directly or indirectly, from any foreign government, or any faction or party or military or naval force within a foreign country, whether recognized or unrecognized by the United States, as the result of such violation. For the purposes of this subsection, the term “State” includes a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.

(2) The court, in imposing sentence on a defendant for a conviction of a violation of this section, shall order that the defendant forfeit to the United States all property described in paragraph (1) of this subsection.

(3) The provisions of subsections (b), (c), and (e) through (p) of section 413 of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 853(b), (c), and (e)–(p)) shall apply to—

(A) property subject to forfeiture under this subsection;

(B) any seizure or disposition of such property; and

(C) any administrative or judicial proceeding in relation to such property,


if not inconsistent with this subsection.

(4) Notwithstanding section 524(c) of title 28, there shall be deposited in the Crime Victims Fund in the Treasury all amounts from the forfeiture of property under this subsection remaining after the payment of expenses for forfeiture and sale authorized by law.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 736; Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, §18, 64 Stat. 1003; Pub. L. 99–399, title XIII, §1306(a), Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 898; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 103–359, title VIII, §804(b)(1), Oct. 14, 1994, 108 Stat. 3440; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §607(b), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3511.)

 

[Independentthinker]

In a prerecorded interview that aired Wednesday, Trump effortlessly unraveled the work of his defense team, telling Newsmax’s Greg Kelly point blank that he actually did take the classified documents, describing the process of shamelessly packing them away while leaving office.
“I took ’em very legally,” Trump said. “And I wasn’t hiding them.”
“We had boxes on the front of the—and a lot of those boxes had clothing and a lot of—we were moving out, OK? Unfortunately, we were moving out of the White House. And because we’re moving out of the White House our country is going to hell.”

this is Trump confession, his defense has fallen apart.

And Biden was found to have willfully taken classified documents. Where are his charges? Oh yeah, I forgot, they won't charge him because he's a nice old elderly man with memory issues and, as such, they don't think they could get a jury to convict a senile old man.

 

[Phactotum]

Oh, hell... I thought you clowns actually had something substantial to talk about...

Not some yahoo making an amateur op-ed selfie-video from the cab of a pick-em-up truck...

Your Orange Baboon-God got his nasty a$$ kicked several times over in the law courts today...

Denial of petition to dismiss based upon Constitutional grounds...

Have fun with your, hallucinations, as even The Democratic Party's old reliable "wrag" called msnbc... have admitted that Donald Trump got his way. Once the court "kicked the can down the road" pal. Check out the Dems here weeping and whining about Judge Cannon's decisions:



Therefore you have fun dancing in the, puddles, as it rains on you sorryA$$ Democrats once again.

 

[CowboyTed]

According to who? You?

Loading…

www.reuters.com

She has only days at trail as a federal judge...

She has made numerous mistakes...

She struggling at judicial competency at this level...

 

[dudmuck]

And Biden was found to have willfully taken classified documents. Where are his charges? Oh yeah, I forgot, they won't charge him because he's a nice old elderly man with memory issues and, as such, they don't think they could get a jury to convict a senile old man.

not charged because crimes require Mens Rea aka criminal intent. Biden's lawyers informed authorities about this documents, then fully cooperated with returning the documents.
By contrast, Trump lied about the documents he had, and obstructed the government's efforts to find out what documents he actually had taken. Eventually, after many months of Trump refusing to return the classified docs, they had to do a search. The obstruction is criminal intent.

 

[Zincwarrior]

President Trump had a great day in court today! Judge Cannon really let into Smith for everything he tried to get over in the court. Listen to this video

You are an idiot, a moron, and aggressively ignorant. The appeal was denied, you Russobot Piece of Shit.