C
chloe
Guest
I get it !! It's one of those trick deals---You ARE a doctor !
I only play Doctor with you Dillo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I get it !! It's one of those trick deals---You ARE a doctor !
I only play Doctor with you Dillo
I think this is rather different than not having shots. It's a case of an infant with a clearly preventable illness whose parents will not take it to the hospital because of their religious beliefs. I don't think that ought to be permitted.
I agree with that. But a case of parents deciding for an infant is quite different.
That is a good point, but a good place to start is: when the belief physically causes harm to another person it should be outlawed just to protect the other person, if the harm is only done to the one choosing to follow the belief, let them have at it.
Oh, special note, I don't trust docs myself for personal reasons and the only thing I go to them for is if I am hurting enough that I can barely move.
So circumcision would be outlawed?
See?
It all sounds so simple, till you try to apply it in real life, then it gets muddled by the details.
You will (statistically speaking) live longer if you stick to that system, KK.
I would postulate that those cases have a lot to do with stress and worry about their life. Relaxed living is longer living, in a vacuum.That is one of the strange things I have noticed as well. The statistics show that those who don't go to the doctors, smoke, and drink live longer than those who go to the doctors all the time, never smoke, and never drink. How odd is that?
There are crazy people with every type of belief.This is why many atheists think religion is an illness, and sometimes I have to agree with them.
What commendable aspects are not practiced?Some aspects certainly are. Other aspects are quite commendable. But the commendable aspects aren't usually those practiced by religious conservatives in this country, which is why it's always assumed that I'm an atheist when I condemn them.
Is that a bad thing that we don't have COMPLETE religious freedom?There's no way to come down on this that doesn't violate some cherished principle or the other.
On one hand few of us wants the government to start deciding which of our religious beliefs is okay.
On the other hand, none of us wants to allow every goofy religious belief or practice to get a pass, either.
We do NOT have complete freedom of religion, folks, and we never will.
It would not be possible to actually have complete freedom of religion, because there's always some religion out there waiting to make something most of us think is or should be a CRIME part of their religious practice.
Remember folks, one man's deeply held religious belief is another man's psychotic delusion.
That is generally a good starting position.That is a good point, but a good place to start is: when the belief physically causes harm to another person it should be outlawed just to protect the other person, if the harm is only done to the one choosing to follow the belief, let them have at it.
They should be allowed to kill people?they should be allowed to practice there religion
Did you have a deathly illness during your childhood?I never saw doctors in my entire childhood and I never had shots... so what?
What commendable aspects are not practiced?
Why, thank you.Fisty The Badger. That is the funniest name i've seen on here in a while.
I would postulate that those cases have a lot to do with stress and worry about their life. Relaxed living is longer living, in a vacuum.