Fact Checking the Fact Checkers

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
66,576
Reaction score
27,394
Points
2,290
Location
Left Coast, Classified
WSJ has a good piece on how ‘fact’ checkers are not concerned about truth, they are just there to spin a narrative.


Not long ago, Johns Hopkins surgeon Marty Makary published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal which downplayed many of the worst case scenarios for Covid and projected natural herd immunity by April. This article was widely shared via social media like Facebook, who reacted by unleashing the fact checking commissars. This latest WSJ article looks at how leftist social media outlets are doing their best to ensure that debate gives way to dogma.

“…the progressive health clerisy don’t like his projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact.”

“Scientists often disagree over how to interpret evidence. Debate is how ideas are tested and arguments are refined. But Facebook’s fact checkers are presenting their opinions as fact and seeking to silence other scientists whose views challenge their own.”

 

Thoth001

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Messages
3,368
Reaction score
3,023
Points
1,893
I have no doubt the fact checkers are as biased as the MSM. In fact most of them are paid by the same entities that fund the MSM. Corbett does a great report on this.

 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
10,575
Reaction score
2,179
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
WSJ has a good piece on how ‘fact’ checkers are not concerned about truth, they are just there to spin a narrative.


Not long ago, Johns Hopkins surgeon Marty Makary published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal which downplayed many of the worst case scenarios for Covid and projected natural herd immunity by April. This article was widely shared via social media like Facebook, who reacted by unleashing the fact checking commissars. This latest WSJ article looks at how leftist social media outlets are doing their best to ensure that debate gives way to dogma.

“…the progressive health clerisy don’t like his projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact.”

“Scientists often disagree over how to interpret evidence. Debate is how ideas are tested and arguments are refined. But Facebook’s fact checkers are presenting their opinions as fact and seeking to silence other scientists whose views challenge their own.”

What do Trump Humpers care about the truth.
 
OP
Weatherman2020

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
66,576
Reaction score
27,394
Points
2,290
Location
Left Coast, Classified
WSJ has a good piece on how ‘fact’ checkers are not concerned about truth, they are just there to spin a narrative.


Not long ago, Johns Hopkins surgeon Marty Makary published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal which downplayed many of the worst case scenarios for Covid and projected natural herd immunity by April. This article was widely shared via social media like Facebook, who reacted by unleashing the fact checking commissars. This latest WSJ article looks at how leftist social media outlets are doing their best to ensure that debate gives way to dogma.

“…the progressive health clerisy don’t like his projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact.”

“Scientists often disagree over how to interpret evidence. Debate is how ideas are tested and arguments are refined. But Facebook’s fact checkers are presenting their opinions as fact and seeking to silence other scientists whose views challenge their own.”

What do Trump Humpers care about the truth.
TDS foaming at the mouth is so typical of the Left.
 

Thoth001

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Messages
3,368
Reaction score
3,023
Points
1,893
The good news is that I think most people have figured out that the fact checkers are not really fact checkers. They are checkers that spin into the narrative that the corporations and gov want you to believe. They have many paid people to spin it for you. And stop you from thinking for yourself.
 

Thoth001

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Messages
3,368
Reaction score
3,023
Points
1,893
WSJ has a good piece on how ‘fact’ checkers are not concerned about truth, they are just there to spin a narrative.


Not long ago, Johns Hopkins surgeon Marty Makary published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal which downplayed many of the worst case scenarios for Covid and projected natural herd immunity by April. This article was widely shared via social media like Facebook, who reacted by unleashing the fact checking commissars. This latest WSJ article looks at how leftist social media outlets are doing their best to ensure that debate gives way to dogma.

“…the progressive health clerisy don’t like his projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact.”

“Scientists often disagree over how to interpret evidence. Debate is how ideas are tested and arguments are refined. But Facebook’s fact checkers are presenting their opinions as fact and seeking to silence other scientists whose views challenge their own.”

What do Trump Humpers care about the truth.
TDS foaming at the mouth is so typical of the Left.
The WOKE has fallen mostly to this dogma. I think instead of calling them left because they really have gone far beyond left. The WOKE are unawaken fools. That are tools for the Cult.
 

JustAnotherNut

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
8,735
Reaction score
3,753
Points
430
I have to laugh when those fact checkers say 'Missing Content', then give a 'related story' as reference......that has absolutely NOTHING to do with the point of the original post......of which they don't argue. :auiqs.jpg:
 

EvMetro

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
3,945
Reaction score
2,136
Points
970
W
WSJ has a good piece on how ‘fact’ checkers are not concerned about truth, they are just there to spin a narrative.


Not long ago, Johns Hopkins surgeon Marty Makary published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal which downplayed many of the worst case scenarios for Covid and projected natural herd immunity by April. This article was widely shared via social media like Facebook, who reacted by unleashing the fact checking commissars. This latest WSJ article looks at how leftist social media outlets are doing their best to ensure that debate gives way to dogma.

“…the progressive health clerisy don’t like his projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact.”

“Scientists often disagree over how to interpret evidence. Debate is how ideas are tested and arguments are refined. But Facebook’s fact checkers are presenting their opinions as fact and seeking to silence other scientists whose views challenge their own.”

When I am vetting political information, I see lots of "fact checking" stories in my internet search results, but I skip over them because I know that "fact checking" is just lefty spinning.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
10,575
Reaction score
2,179
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
WSJ has a good piece on how ‘fact’ checkers are not concerned about truth, they are just there to spin a narrative.


Not long ago, Johns Hopkins surgeon Marty Makary published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal which downplayed many of the worst case scenarios for Covid and projected natural herd immunity by April. This article was widely shared via social media like Facebook, who reacted by unleashing the fact checking commissars. This latest WSJ article looks at how leftist social media outlets are doing their best to ensure that debate gives way to dogma.

“…the progressive health clerisy don’t like his projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact.”

“Scientists often disagree over how to interpret evidence. Debate is how ideas are tested and arguments are refined. But Facebook’s fact checkers are presenting their opinions as fact and seeking to silence other scientists whose views challenge their own.”

What do Trump Humpers care about the truth.
TDS foaming at the mouth is so typical of the Left.
Trump Humpin ain't easy.
 

Fang

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2012
Messages
7,277
Reaction score
3,034
Points
390
No doubt "fact checkers" are dishonest and only want to push a narrative. The whole idea of a fact checker is ridiculous.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
10,575
Reaction score
2,179
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
WSJ has a good piece on how ‘fact’ checkers are not concerned about truth, they are just there to spin a narrative.


Not long ago, Johns Hopkins surgeon Marty Makary published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal which downplayed many of the worst case scenarios for Covid and projected natural herd immunity by April. This article was widely shared via social media like Facebook, who reacted by unleashing the fact checking commissars. This latest WSJ article looks at how leftist social media outlets are doing their best to ensure that debate gives way to dogma.

“…the progressive health clerisy don’t like his projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact.”

“Scientists often disagree over how to interpret evidence. Debate is how ideas are tested and arguments are refined. But Facebook’s fact checkers are presenting their opinions as fact and seeking to silence other scientists whose views challenge their own.”

What do Trump Humpers care about the truth.
TDS foaming at the mouth is so typical of the Left.
The WOKE has fallen mostly to this dogma. I think instead of calling them left because they really have gone far beyond left. The WOKE are unawaken fools. That are tools for the Cult.
Wow a Trump Humper accusing a group of folks of being a cult.
 

Slade3200

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
40,231
Reaction score
6,578
Points
1,840
W
WSJ has a good piece on how ‘fact’ checkers are not concerned about truth, they are just there to spin a narrative.


Not long ago, Johns Hopkins surgeon Marty Makary published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal which downplayed many of the worst case scenarios for Covid and projected natural herd immunity by April. This article was widely shared via social media like Facebook, who reacted by unleashing the fact checking commissars. This latest WSJ article looks at how leftist social media outlets are doing their best to ensure that debate gives way to dogma.

“…the progressive health clerisy don’t like his projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact.”

“Scientists often disagree over how to interpret evidence. Debate is how ideas are tested and arguments are refined. But Facebook’s fact checkers are presenting their opinions as fact and seeking to silence other scientists whose views challenge their own.”

When I am vetting political information, I see lots of "fact checking" stories in my internet search results, but I skip over them because I know that "fact checking" is just lefty spinning.
Well you should click on them. Any good fact checker has sourced information to draw their conclusions and they lay it out for you to verify. Most do this
 

Thoth001

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Messages
3,368
Reaction score
3,023
Points
1,893
WSJ has a good piece on how ‘fact’ checkers are not concerned about truth, they are just there to spin a narrative.


Not long ago, Johns Hopkins surgeon Marty Makary published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal which downplayed many of the worst case scenarios for Covid and projected natural herd immunity by April. This article was widely shared via social media like Facebook, who reacted by unleashing the fact checking commissars. This latest WSJ article looks at how leftist social media outlets are doing their best to ensure that debate gives way to dogma.

“…the progressive health clerisy don’t like his projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact.”

“Scientists often disagree over how to interpret evidence. Debate is how ideas are tested and arguments are refined. But Facebook’s fact checkers are presenting their opinions as fact and seeking to silence other scientists whose views challenge their own.”

What do Trump Humpers care about the truth.
TDS foaming at the mouth is so typical of the Left.
The WOKE has fallen mostly to this dogma. I think instead of calling them left because they really have gone far beyond left. The WOKE are unawaken fools. That are tools for the Cult.
Wow a Trump Humper accusing a group of folks of being a cult.
I have been accusing Christians of being in a cult long before Trump biatch. You are just slow to catch on. Cause you WOKE! :auiqs.jpg:
 

Thoth001

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Messages
3,368
Reaction score
3,023
Points
1,893
W
WSJ has a good piece on how ‘fact’ checkers are not concerned about truth, they are just there to spin a narrative.


Not long ago, Johns Hopkins surgeon Marty Makary published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal which downplayed many of the worst case scenarios for Covid and projected natural herd immunity by April. This article was widely shared via social media like Facebook, who reacted by unleashing the fact checking commissars. This latest WSJ article looks at how leftist social media outlets are doing their best to ensure that debate gives way to dogma.

“…the progressive health clerisy don’t like his projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact.”

“Scientists often disagree over how to interpret evidence. Debate is how ideas are tested and arguments are refined. But Facebook’s fact checkers are presenting their opinions as fact and seeking to silence other scientists whose views challenge their own.”

When I am vetting political information, I see lots of "fact checking" stories in my internet search results, but I skip over them because I know that "fact checking" is just lefty spinning.
Well you should click on them. Any good fact checker has sourced information to draw their conclusions and they lay it out for you to verify. Most do this
You go to a fact checker because you can't think for yourself. Face it sheepy.
 

Slade3200

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
40,231
Reaction score
6,578
Points
1,840
W
WSJ has a good piece on how ‘fact’ checkers are not concerned about truth, they are just there to spin a narrative.


Not long ago, Johns Hopkins surgeon Marty Makary published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal which downplayed many of the worst case scenarios for Covid and projected natural herd immunity by April. This article was widely shared via social media like Facebook, who reacted by unleashing the fact checking commissars. This latest WSJ article looks at how leftist social media outlets are doing their best to ensure that debate gives way to dogma.

“…the progressive health clerisy don’t like his projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact.”

“Scientists often disagree over how to interpret evidence. Debate is how ideas are tested and arguments are refined. But Facebook’s fact checkers are presenting their opinions as fact and seeking to silence other scientists whose views challenge their own.”

When I am vetting political information, I see lots of "fact checking" stories in my internet search results, but I skip over them because I know that "fact checking" is just lefty spinning.
Well you should click on them. Any good fact checker has sourced information to draw their conclusions and they lay it out for you to verify. Most do this
You go to a fact checker because you can't think for yourself. Face it sheepy.
I go to fact checkers to see sourced information that I can verify for myself. If you ever read past the headline you’d know that
 

Thoth001

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Messages
3,368
Reaction score
3,023
Points
1,893
W
WSJ has a good piece on how ‘fact’ checkers are not concerned about truth, they are just there to spin a narrative.


Not long ago, Johns Hopkins surgeon Marty Makary published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal which downplayed many of the worst case scenarios for Covid and projected natural herd immunity by April. This article was widely shared via social media like Facebook, who reacted by unleashing the fact checking commissars. This latest WSJ article looks at how leftist social media outlets are doing their best to ensure that debate gives way to dogma.

“…the progressive health clerisy don’t like his projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact.”

“Scientists often disagree over how to interpret evidence. Debate is how ideas are tested and arguments are refined. But Facebook’s fact checkers are presenting their opinions as fact and seeking to silence other scientists whose views challenge their own.”

When I am vetting political information, I see lots of "fact checking" stories in my internet search results, but I skip over them because I know that "fact checking" is just lefty spinning.
Well you should click on them. Any good fact checker has sourced information to draw their conclusions and they lay it out for you to verify. Most do this
You go to a fact checker because you can't think for yourself. Face it sheepy.
I go to fact checkers to see sourced information that I can verify for myself. If you ever read past the headline you’d know that
Keep trying to tell yourself that kid and maybe the mind controlled sheep will believe you. :D
 
OP
Weatherman2020

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
66,576
Reaction score
27,394
Points
2,290
Location
Left Coast, Classified
W
WSJ has a good piece on how ‘fact’ checkers are not concerned about truth, they are just there to spin a narrative.


Not long ago, Johns Hopkins surgeon Marty Makary published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal which downplayed many of the worst case scenarios for Covid and projected natural herd immunity by April. This article was widely shared via social media like Facebook, who reacted by unleashing the fact checking commissars. This latest WSJ article looks at how leftist social media outlets are doing their best to ensure that debate gives way to dogma.

“…the progressive health clerisy don’t like his projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact.”

“Scientists often disagree over how to interpret evidence. Debate is how ideas are tested and arguments are refined. But Facebook’s fact checkers are presenting their opinions as fact and seeking to silence other scientists whose views challenge their own.”

When I am vetting political information, I see lots of "fact checking" stories in my internet search results, but I skip over them because I know that "fact checking" is just lefty spinning.
Well you should click on them. Any good fact checker has sourced information to draw their conclusions and they lay it out for you to verify. Most do this
You go to a fact checker because you can't think for yourself. Face it sheepy.
I go to fact checkers to see sourced information that I can verify for myself. If you ever read past the headline you’d know that
Sure you do. Tell us more about how Trump told us to drink bleach and he called white supremests good people.
 

Slade3200

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
40,231
Reaction score
6,578
Points
1,840
W
WSJ has a good piece on how ‘fact’ checkers are not concerned about truth, they are just there to spin a narrative.


Not long ago, Johns Hopkins surgeon Marty Makary published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal which downplayed many of the worst case scenarios for Covid and projected natural herd immunity by April. This article was widely shared via social media like Facebook, who reacted by unleashing the fact checking commissars. This latest WSJ article looks at how leftist social media outlets are doing their best to ensure that debate gives way to dogma.

“…the progressive health clerisy don’t like his projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact.”

“Scientists often disagree over how to interpret evidence. Debate is how ideas are tested and arguments are refined. But Facebook’s fact checkers are presenting their opinions as fact and seeking to silence other scientists whose views challenge their own.”

When I am vetting political information, I see lots of "fact checking" stories in my internet search results, but I skip over them because I know that "fact checking" is just lefty spinning.
Well you should click on them. Any good fact checker has sourced information to draw their conclusions and they lay it out for you to verify. Most do this
You go to a fact checker because you can't think for yourself. Face it sheepy.
I go to fact checkers to see sourced information that I can verify for myself. If you ever read past the headline you’d know that
Keep trying to tell yourself that kid and maybe the mind controlled sheep will believe you. :D
I don’t need to tell myself anything. It is what it is
 
OP
Weatherman2020

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
66,576
Reaction score
27,394
Points
2,290
Location
Left Coast, Classified
WSJ has a good piece on how ‘fact’ checkers are not concerned about truth, they are just there to spin a narrative.


Not long ago, Johns Hopkins surgeon Marty Makary published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal which downplayed many of the worst case scenarios for Covid and projected natural herd immunity by April. This article was widely shared via social media like Facebook, who reacted by unleashing the fact checking commissars. This latest WSJ article looks at how leftist social media outlets are doing their best to ensure that debate gives way to dogma.

“…the progressive health clerisy don’t like his projection because they worry it could lead to fewer virus restrictions. The horror! Health Feedback’s fact checkers disagree with the evidence Dr. Makary cites as well as how he interprets it. Fine. Scientists disagree all the time. Much of conventional health wisdom about red meat, sodium and cardiovascular risk is still fiercely debated.

The same goes for Covid-19. There’s still much we don’t understand about the virus and its transmission and immunity. Yet Facebook’s fact-checkers “cherry-pick,” to borrow their word, studies to support their own opinions, which they present as fact.”

“Scientists often disagree over how to interpret evidence. Debate is how ideas are tested and arguments are refined. But Facebook’s fact checkers are presenting their opinions as fact and seeking to silence other scientists whose views challenge their own.”

What do Trump Humpers care about the truth.
TDS foaming at the mouth is so typical of the Left.
The WOKE has fallen mostly to this dogma. I think instead of calling them left because they really have gone far beyond left. The WOKE are unawaken fools. That are tools for the Cult.
Wow a Trump Humper accusing a group of folks of being a cult.
The Left has no position on anything until their cult leaders tell them what to think.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top