Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I suspect OldLady has anyone who even resembles an alpha male on ignoreUntil a week or two ago, I had you on ignore
It's okay, folks. Y'all are too brainwashed to see it, but don't worry. Those of us who are clear eyed will keep you safe, just like those mean parents that won't let you play in the street. We won't let fascism take over this country.
Do you doubt it?It's okay, folks. Y'all are too brainwashed to see it, but don't worry. Those of us who are clear eyed will keep you safe, just like those mean parents that won't let you play in the street. We won't let fascism take over this country.
Facebook has also banned and deleted poster who reposted Trump's tweets.. saying it was an effort to evade Trup's banishment.
Do you doubt it?It's okay, folks. Y'all are too brainwashed to see it, but don't worry. Those of us who are clear eyed will keep you safe, just like those mean parents that won't let you play in the street. We won't let fascism take over this country.
Facebook has also banned and deleted poster who reposted Trump's tweets.. saying it was an effort to evade Trup's banishment.
Based on what he's been saying recently, there is no reason at all to allow him back on FB. I don't know what is giving Zuck pause here.Do you doubt it?It's okay, folks. Y'all are too brainwashed to see it, but don't worry. Those of us who are clear eyed will keep you safe, just like those mean parents that won't let you play in the street. We won't let fascism take over this country.
Facebook has also banned and deleted poster who reposted Trump's tweets.. saying it was an effort to evade Trup's banishment.
Trump is still trying to get even and promote violence.
They shouldnt be posting trumps words! They should stick to muzzie terrorists and them threatening genocide.It's okay, folks. Y'all are too brainwashed to see it, but don't worry. Those of us who are clear eyed will keep you safe, just like those mean parents that won't let you play in the street. We won't let fascism take over this country.
Facebook has also banned and deleted poster who reposted Trump's tweets.. saying it was an effort to evade Trup's banishment.
They shouldnt be posting trumps words! They should stick to muzzie terrorists and them threatening genocide.It's okay, folks. Y'all are too brainwashed to see it, but don't worry. Those of us who are clear eyed will keep you safe, just like those mean parents that won't let you play in the street. We won't let fascism take over this country.
Facebook has also banned and deleted poster who reposted Trump's tweets.. saying it was an effort to evade Trup's banishment.
Until a week or two ago, I had you on ignore
Trump lost fair and square.
If there had been evidence of a malfunction of voting machines nationwide or a Democratic conspiracy to stuff mail in ballots and 60 judges bribed to ignore it, it would have been the biggest news story of the century
and every news organization in the country would have been all over it. They'd sell their grandmothers for a story like that.
You're not fooling me--I know exactly what he said both during the speech and afterward via video and tweet.
Then post it. Show us what you think is a banible offense.You're not fooling me--I know exactly what he said both during the speech and afterward via video and tweet. He was adding fuel to the fire and he deserved to have his accounts suspendedCalling rioters "thugs" and telling people to "peacefully make their voices heard" isnt a violation of their policy. They said it was a violation, but obviously that isnt a violation. This clear bias and unfair treatment is why they will face extreme repercussions from the GOP the moment they have the power in Congress to do so. Anyone who thinks otherwise is fucking delusional.For those who don't remember what the ban was about,I'd rather not have government intervention,, if FB would say they dont allow conservative POV then I would be fine with it,, but even their own people said they violated their own rules in banning trump,,You're parroting the same excuses liberals use when they try to justify government intervention. If you don't like the corporate charter, we can talk. That can be changed. But for fuck's sake don't use it as an excuse for Big Brother.when did I say that??well corps. are a creation of government,,Public accommodations. ie a horseshit excuse for government intervention.my house is private property,, facebook is open to the public my house isnt,,Whats the differencefacebook isnt private property,, its a public accommodation,,,It wasn't against the law for CITIZENS (key word) to not want to conduct their private property as they see fit.You don't like that the law that bans bakeries from discriminating against a group of citizens? What part of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution don't you get? And no...banning Rump isn't discrimination. Look up the term.Yeah, how dare a private firm decide what's in their best interest. Private enterprise...bah humbug.Good, this will hurt Facebook. Im surprised they were dumb enough to do it, but you lefties are as dumb as they get.They announced it this morning. trump can't go back to Facebook.
They have the right to decide who can be on their site. trump violated the rules over and over again. He made very bad choices so he should take personal responsibility, bad consequences comes with bad choices. He should have been taught that as a child.
I guess that doesn't apply to bakeries though if they happen to be Christian. And I never knew a business where it was "in their interest" to ban millions of accounts from speaking an opinion in a free society-- -- -- especially one that not one of them can prove is wrong.
Right-wingers are so funny. They scream night and day that they love the Constitution and the laws of the land until it goes against them! LOL
In fact, PA laws trample on several constitutional rights for CITIZENS (again, key word)
Do you understand now?
Yes, yes. "You didn't build that". We all owe our left nut to the government. Sorry, no.
when you sign a contract with the government there are strings attached,,
thats why I like the free market system better and have worked in it for 30 yrs,,
In 2015 when he was still only a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, Mr Trump posted a video calling for a ban on Muslims entering the US.
Facebook refused to take it down and created the “newsworthiness” policy that allowed posts which broke their own guidelines to remain up because of public interest.
During 2020 Mr Trump used Facebook to post a string of misleading information about Covid-19 and attacked racial justice protesters as “thugs.”
With criticism of the company’s approach to Mr Trump deepening, Facebook announced in June 2020 that it would put labels on posts that violated hate speech and other policies, even if they were from politicians such as Mr Trump.
And they committed to remove any posts which incited violence or voter suppression, regardless of newsworthiness.
But it was Mr Trump’s response to his own supporters attacking the Capitol on 6 January, in an attempt to block the certification of Joe Biden’s election victory, that finally brought about his ban.
Five people, including a police officer died, in the MAGA riot, and Mr Trump eventually posted a video on Facebook and Instagram urging his supporters to leave the Capitol and go home.
But infamously Mr Trump also took the opportunity to tell them: “We love you, you’re very special.”
After the video was posted, Facebook immediately suspended Mr Trump for 24 hours, and Mr Zuckerberg announced on 7 January that the ban was indefinite.
“We believe the risks of allowing the President to continue to use our service during this period are simply too great,” he said.
What did Trump post to get himself banned from Facebook?
Facebook Oversight Board announces decision on ex-president’s access to platformwww.independent.co.uk
This is no noble fight to express your truth. T**** repeatedly violated the posting guidelines, he was warned, his posts were flagged, he responded by going to war over Section 230 of the Communications Act to get payback.
He's just an asshole troll.
If you've been living on a deserted island for the past year, I suggest you google it and get caught up. I'm not the research librarian around here.Then post it. Show us what you think is a banible offense.You're not fooling me--I know exactly what he said both during the speech and afterward via video and tweet. He was adding fuel to the fire and he deserved to have his accounts suspendedCalling rioters "thugs" and telling people to "peacefully make their voices heard" isnt a violation of their policy. They said it was a violation, but obviously that isnt a violation. This clear bias and unfair treatment is why they will face extreme repercussions from the GOP the moment they have the power in Congress to do so. Anyone who thinks otherwise is fucking delusional.For those who don't remember what the ban was about,I'd rather not have government intervention,, if FB would say they dont allow conservative POV then I would be fine with it,, but even their own people said they violated their own rules in banning trump,,You're parroting the same excuses liberals use when they try to justify government intervention. If you don't like the corporate charter, we can talk. That can be changed. But for fuck's sake don't use it as an excuse for Big Brother.when did I say that??well corps. are a creation of government,,Public accommodations. ie a horseshit excuse for government intervention.my house is private property,, facebook is open to the public my house isnt,,Whats the differencefacebook isnt private property,, its a public accommodation,,,It wasn't against the law for CITIZENS (key word) to not want to conduct their private property as they see fit.You don't like that the law that bans bakeries from discriminating against a group of citizens? What part of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution don't you get? And no...banning Rump isn't discrimination. Look up the term.Yeah, how dare a private firm decide what's in their best interest. Private enterprise...bah humbug.Good, this will hurt Facebook. Im surprised they were dumb enough to do it, but you lefties are as dumb as they get.They announced it this morning. trump can't go back to Facebook.
They have the right to decide who can be on their site. trump violated the rules over and over again. He made very bad choices so he should take personal responsibility, bad consequences comes with bad choices. He should have been taught that as a child.
I guess that doesn't apply to bakeries though if they happen to be Christian. And I never knew a business where it was "in their interest" to ban millions of accounts from speaking an opinion in a free society-- -- -- especially one that not one of them can prove is wrong.
Right-wingers are so funny. They scream night and day that they love the Constitution and the laws of the land until it goes against them! LOL
In fact, PA laws trample on several constitutional rights for CITIZENS (again, key word)
Do you understand now?
Yes, yes. "You didn't build that". We all owe our left nut to the government. Sorry, no.
when you sign a contract with the government there are strings attached,,
thats why I like the free market system better and have worked in it for 30 yrs,,
In 2015 when he was still only a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, Mr Trump posted a video calling for a ban on Muslims entering the US.
Facebook refused to take it down and created the “newsworthiness” policy that allowed posts which broke their own guidelines to remain up because of public interest.
During 2020 Mr Trump used Facebook to post a string of misleading information about Covid-19 and attacked racial justice protesters as “thugs.”
With criticism of the company’s approach to Mr Trump deepening, Facebook announced in June 2020 that it would put labels on posts that violated hate speech and other policies, even if they were from politicians such as Mr Trump.
And they committed to remove any posts which incited violence or voter suppression, regardless of newsworthiness.
But it was Mr Trump’s response to his own supporters attacking the Capitol on 6 January, in an attempt to block the certification of Joe Biden’s election victory, that finally brought about his ban.
Five people, including a police officer died, in the MAGA riot, and Mr Trump eventually posted a video on Facebook and Instagram urging his supporters to leave the Capitol and go home.
But infamously Mr Trump also took the opportunity to tell them: “We love you, you’re very special.”
After the video was posted, Facebook immediately suspended Mr Trump for 24 hours, and Mr Zuckerberg announced on 7 January that the ban was indefinite.
“We believe the risks of allowing the President to continue to use our service during this period are simply too great,” he said.
What did Trump post to get himself banned from Facebook?
Facebook Oversight Board announces decision on ex-president’s access to platform
This is no noble fight to express your truth. T**** repeatedly violated the posting guidelines, he was warned, his posts were flagged, he responded by going to war over Section 230 of the Communications Act to get payback.
He's just an asshole troll.
She thinks "protest peacefully" is ban worthy because she is racist against orange peopleThen post it. Show us what you think is a banible offense.You're not fooling me--I know exactly what he said both during the speech and afterward via video and tweet. He was adding fuel to the fire and he deserved to have his accounts suspendedCalling rioters "thugs" and telling people to "peacefully make their voices heard" isnt a violation of their policy. They said it was a violation, but obviously that isnt a violation. This clear bias and unfair treatment is why they will face extreme repercussions from the GOP the moment they have the power in Congress to do so. Anyone who thinks otherwise is fucking delusional.For those who don't remember what the ban was about,I'd rather not have government intervention,, if FB would say they dont allow conservative POV then I would be fine with it,, but even their own people said they violated their own rules in banning trump,,You're parroting the same excuses liberals use when they try to justify government intervention. If you don't like the corporate charter, we can talk. That can be changed. But for fuck's sake don't use it as an excuse for Big Brother.when did I say that??well corps. are a creation of government,,Public accommodations. ie a horseshit excuse for government intervention.my house is private property,, facebook is open to the public my house isnt,,Whats the differencefacebook isnt private property,, its a public accommodation,,,It wasn't against the law for CITIZENS (key word) to not want to conduct their private property as they see fit.You don't like that the law that bans bakeries from discriminating against a group of citizens? What part of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution don't you get? And no...banning Rump isn't discrimination. Look up the term.Yeah, how dare a private firm decide what's in their best interest. Private enterprise...bah humbug.Good, this will hurt Facebook. Im surprised they were dumb enough to do it, but you lefties are as dumb as they get.They announced it this morning. trump can't go back to Facebook.
They have the right to decide who can be on their site. trump violated the rules over and over again. He made very bad choices so he should take personal responsibility, bad consequences comes with bad choices. He should have been taught that as a child.
I guess that doesn't apply to bakeries though if they happen to be Christian. And I never knew a business where it was "in their interest" to ban millions of accounts from speaking an opinion in a free society-- -- -- especially one that not one of them can prove is wrong.
Right-wingers are so funny. They scream night and day that they love the Constitution and the laws of the land until it goes against them! LOL
In fact, PA laws trample on several constitutional rights for CITIZENS (again, key word)
Do you understand now?
Yes, yes. "You didn't build that". We all owe our left nut to the government. Sorry, no.
when you sign a contract with the government there are strings attached,,
thats why I like the free market system better and have worked in it for 30 yrs,,
In 2015 when he was still only a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, Mr Trump posted a video calling for a ban on Muslims entering the US.
Facebook refused to take it down and created the “newsworthiness” policy that allowed posts which broke their own guidelines to remain up because of public interest.
During 2020 Mr Trump used Facebook to post a string of misleading information about Covid-19 and attacked racial justice protesters as “thugs.”
With criticism of the company’s approach to Mr Trump deepening, Facebook announced in June 2020 that it would put labels on posts that violated hate speech and other policies, even if they were from politicians such as Mr Trump.
And they committed to remove any posts which incited violence or voter suppression, regardless of newsworthiness.
But it was Mr Trump’s response to his own supporters attacking the Capitol on 6 January, in an attempt to block the certification of Joe Biden’s election victory, that finally brought about his ban.
Five people, including a police officer died, in the MAGA riot, and Mr Trump eventually posted a video on Facebook and Instagram urging his supporters to leave the Capitol and go home.
But infamously Mr Trump also took the opportunity to tell them: “We love you, you’re very special.”
After the video was posted, Facebook immediately suspended Mr Trump for 24 hours, and Mr Zuckerberg announced on 7 January that the ban was indefinite.
“We believe the risks of allowing the President to continue to use our service during this period are simply too great,” he said.
What did Trump post to get himself banned from Facebook?
Facebook Oversight Board announces decision on ex-president’s access to platform
This is no noble fight to express your truth. T**** repeatedly violated the posting guidelines, he was warned, his posts were flagged, he responded by going to war over Section 230 of the Communications Act to get payback.
He's just an asshole troll.
Ive seen it, and so have you, which is why youre refusing to post his words because, you know how stupid your argument is going to sound once they are laid out for everyone to see. He never said anything that he should have been banned for.If you've been living on a deserted island for the past year, I suggest you google it and get caught up. I'm not the research librarian around here.Then post it. Show us what you think is a banible offense.You're not fooling me--I know exactly what he said both during the speech and afterward via video and tweet. He was adding fuel to the fire and he deserved to have his accounts suspendedCalling rioters "thugs" and telling people to "peacefully make their voices heard" isnt a violation of their policy. They said it was a violation, but obviously that isnt a violation. This clear bias and unfair treatment is why they will face extreme repercussions from the GOP the moment they have the power in Congress to do so. Anyone who thinks otherwise is fucking delusional.For those who don't remember what the ban was about,I'd rather not have government intervention,, if FB would say they dont allow conservative POV then I would be fine with it,, but even their own people said they violated their own rules in banning trump,,You're parroting the same excuses liberals use when they try to justify government intervention. If you don't like the corporate charter, we can talk. That can be changed. But for fuck's sake don't use it as an excuse for Big Brother.when did I say that??well corps. are a creation of government,,Public accommodations. ie a horseshit excuse for government intervention.my house is private property,, facebook is open to the public my house isnt,,Whats the differencefacebook isnt private property,, its a public accommodation,,,It wasn't against the law for CITIZENS (key word) to not want to conduct their private property as they see fit.You don't like that the law that bans bakeries from discriminating against a group of citizens? What part of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution don't you get? And no...banning Rump isn't discrimination. Look up the term.Yeah, how dare a private firm decide what's in their best interest. Private enterprise...bah humbug.Good, this will hurt Facebook. Im surprised they were dumb enough to do it, but you lefties are as dumb as they get.They announced it this morning. trump can't go back to Facebook.
They have the right to decide who can be on their site. trump violated the rules over and over again. He made very bad choices so he should take personal responsibility, bad consequences comes with bad choices. He should have been taught that as a child.
I guess that doesn't apply to bakeries though if they happen to be Christian. And I never knew a business where it was "in their interest" to ban millions of accounts from speaking an opinion in a free society-- -- -- especially one that not one of them can prove is wrong.
Right-wingers are so funny. They scream night and day that they love the Constitution and the laws of the land until it goes against them! LOL
In fact, PA laws trample on several constitutional rights for CITIZENS (again, key word)
Do you understand now?
Yes, yes. "You didn't build that". We all owe our left nut to the government. Sorry, no.
when you sign a contract with the government there are strings attached,,
thats why I like the free market system better and have worked in it for 30 yrs,,
In 2015 when he was still only a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, Mr Trump posted a video calling for a ban on Muslims entering the US.
Facebook refused to take it down and created the “newsworthiness” policy that allowed posts which broke their own guidelines to remain up because of public interest.
During 2020 Mr Trump used Facebook to post a string of misleading information about Covid-19 and attacked racial justice protesters as “thugs.”
With criticism of the company’s approach to Mr Trump deepening, Facebook announced in June 2020 that it would put labels on posts that violated hate speech and other policies, even if they were from politicians such as Mr Trump.
And they committed to remove any posts which incited violence or voter suppression, regardless of newsworthiness.
But it was Mr Trump’s response to his own supporters attacking the Capitol on 6 January, in an attempt to block the certification of Joe Biden’s election victory, that finally brought about his ban.
Five people, including a police officer died, in the MAGA riot, and Mr Trump eventually posted a video on Facebook and Instagram urging his supporters to leave the Capitol and go home.
But infamously Mr Trump also took the opportunity to tell them: “We love you, you’re very special.”
After the video was posted, Facebook immediately suspended Mr Trump for 24 hours, and Mr Zuckerberg announced on 7 January that the ban was indefinite.
“We believe the risks of allowing the President to continue to use our service during this period are simply too great,” he said.
What did Trump post to get himself banned from Facebook?
Facebook Oversight Board announces decision on ex-president’s access to platform
This is no noble fight to express your truth. T**** repeatedly violated the posting guidelines, he was warned, his posts were flagged, he responded by going to war over Section 230 of the Communications Act to get payback.
He's just an asshole troll.
If you've been living on a deserted island for the past year, I suggest you google it and get caught up. I'm not the research librarian around here.
Dude is talking about being against fascism and says trump should have been killed for making unproven claims.A bannable offense is Trump claiming that he won an election that he clearly lost. Most democracies would have that 'put down' with one well placed bullet.
Leave it to rot and fester and America becomes at risk of losing its police to fascism.
Many police officers are already a risk of being swayed by a would-be fascist leader. Many became police officers because the job offers a possibility of acting out their tendencies toward violence.
Gun owners with a license to use them to kill people.
Look no further than the police or the military.
And fwiw, if you're looking for an arsonist, start looking at your local fire department.
The world would have perhaps avoided a world war if some brave German citizen been able to put a bullet in Hitler's head in 1936.Dude is talking about being against fascism and says trump should have been killed for making unproven claims.A bannable offense is Trump claiming that he won an election that he clearly lost. Most democracies would have that 'put down' with one well placed bullet.
Leave it to rot and fester and America becomes at risk of losing its police to fascism.
Many police officers are already a risk of being swayed by a would-be fascist leader. Many became police officers because the job offers a possibility of acting out their tendencies toward violence.
Gun owners with a license to use them to kill people.
Look no further than the police or the military.
And fwiw, if you're looking for an arsonist, start looking at your local fire department.
And OL thanked it.
Goddamn, you cant make this shit up
Uh this is 2021 not 1960 etc. We have been compromised badly, but you choose to place your head in the laps of your Democrat handlers, uh in hopes that they will rock you to sleep while speaking sweet nothings in your ears. Wake up already.Until a week or two ago, I had you on ignore, but it doesn't surprise me one bit that you swallowed T****'s bullshit whole. Always knew you weren't as smart as you claim.You're not fooling me--I know exactly what he said both during the speech and afterward via video and tweet. He was adding fuel to the fire and he deserved to have his accounts suspendedCalling rioters "thugs" and telling people to "peacefully make their voices heard" isnt a violation of their policy. They said it was a violation, but obviously that isnt a violation. This clear bias and unfair treatment is why they will face extreme repercussions from the GOP the moment they have the power in Congress to do so. Anyone who thinks otherwise is fucking delusional.For those who don't remember what the ban was about,I'd rather not have government intervention,, if FB would say they dont allow conservative POV then I would be fine with it,, but even their own people said they violated their own rules in banning trump,,You're parroting the same excuses liberals use when they try to justify government intervention. If you don't like the corporate charter, we can talk. That can be changed. But for fuck's sake don't use it as an excuse for Big Brother.when did I say that??well corps. are a creation of government,,Public accommodations. ie a horseshit excuse for government intervention.my house is private property,, facebook is open to the public my house isnt,,Whats the differencefacebook isnt private property,, its a public accommodation,,,It wasn't against the law for CITIZENS (key word) to not want to conduct their private property as they see fit.You don't like that the law that bans bakeries from discriminating against a group of citizens? What part of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution don't you get? And no...banning Rump isn't discrimination. Look up the term.Yeah, how dare a private firm decide what's in their best interest. Private enterprise...bah humbug.Good, this will hurt Facebook. Im surprised they were dumb enough to do it, but you lefties are as dumb as they get.They announced it this morning. trump can't go back to Facebook.
They have the right to decide who can be on their site. trump violated the rules over and over again. He made very bad choices so he should take personal responsibility, bad consequences comes with bad choices. He should have been taught that as a child.
I guess that doesn't apply to bakeries though if they happen to be Christian. And I never knew a business where it was "in their interest" to ban millions of accounts from speaking an opinion in a free society-- -- -- especially one that not one of them can prove is wrong.
Right-wingers are so funny. They scream night and day that they love the Constitution and the laws of the land until it goes against them! LOL
In fact, PA laws trample on several constitutional rights for CITIZENS (again, key word)
Do you understand now?
Yes, yes. "You didn't build that". We all owe our left nut to the government. Sorry, no.
when you sign a contract with the government there are strings attached,,
thats why I like the free market system better and have worked in it for 30 yrs,,
In 2015 when he was still only a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, Mr Trump posted a video calling for a ban on Muslims entering the US.
Facebook refused to take it down and created the “newsworthiness” policy that allowed posts which broke their own guidelines to remain up because of public interest.
During 2020 Mr Trump used Facebook to post a string of misleading information about Covid-19 and attacked racial justice protesters as “thugs.”
With criticism of the company’s approach to Mr Trump deepening, Facebook announced in June 2020 that it would put labels on posts that violated hate speech and other policies, even if they were from politicians such as Mr Trump.
And they committed to remove any posts which incited violence or voter suppression, regardless of newsworthiness.
But it was Mr Trump’s response to his own supporters attacking the Capitol on 6 January, in an attempt to block the certification of Joe Biden’s election victory, that finally brought about his ban.
Five people, including a police officer died, in the MAGA riot, and Mr Trump eventually posted a video on Facebook and Instagram urging his supporters to leave the Capitol and go home.
But infamously Mr Trump also took the opportunity to tell them: “We love you, you’re very special.”
After the video was posted, Facebook immediately suspended Mr Trump for 24 hours, and Mr Zuckerberg announced on 7 January that the ban was indefinite.
“We believe the risks of allowing the President to continue to use our service during this period are simply too great,” he said.
What did Trump post to get himself banned from Facebook?
Facebook Oversight Board announces decision on ex-president’s access to platform
This is no noble fight to express your truth. T**** repeatedly violated the posting guidelines, he was warned, his posts were flagged, he responded by going to war over Section 230 of the Communications Act to get payback.
He's just an asshole troll.
Bag Lady, everybody fools you. It was a noble act to stand up in defense of honest and fair elections. Never thought I'd live to see a presidential election defrauded. Kudos to the heroes at the Capitol who took it on the chin for liberty and integrity. Unlike you, I think my vote counts! I WANT my vote to count. I'd rather lose honestly than win by cheating, lying and stealing like you democrats-- -- worse, to put a brainless corrupted career twat like Bidden in office?
Trump lost fair and square. If there had been evidence of a malfunction of voting machines nationwide or a Democratic conspiracy to stuff mail in ballots and 60 judges bribed to ignore it, it would have been the biggest news story of the century and every news organization in the country would have been all over it. They'd sell their grandmothers for a story like that. IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
