Well, seeing how ads basically buy elections, it's actually a big deal.
The problem here is that the Russians can't hope to outspend the Koch Brothers and others out there who will basically be telling America what to think, and there are enough lemmings who will be hypnotized into jumping off the cliff the money tells them to jump off.
Then why didn't Hillary win? She spent far more than Trump did. Funny how all that Clinton money being spent isn't magically hypnotizing people into jumping off a cliff, but Republican money somehow does.
So which is it? Are Republicans able to hypnotize people through ads and Dems aren't (even though Dems tell everyone what they want to hear, "more free stuff for you")? Or are you just full of it?
Because it's not a simple case of money automatically buys you support.
Also Trump managed to harness part of the media to work for him.
The problem here seems to be you want a simple answer. But you won't get simple, but life isn't simple.
You're the one that stated money basically buys elections. You got called out and can't explain why Dems spending money is OK, but Republicans spending money on campaigns and ads is "telling America what to think".
Well I'm not wrong. The problem is you have just taken what I said and made it very simple.
I didn't say Democrats spending money is okay and Republicans spending it is "telling America what to think", did I?
The simple fact is that Trump went into an election with money. He also went into the election with name recognition. Name recognition can often cost people a lot of money. Trump's money and he TV entertainment job had already bought this.
He also managed to harness the power of the media, get it working for him. He took a big risk in doing what he did, but it worked for him. He didn't need to spend the money. But Trump isn't ordinary and most people wouldn't have gotten away with what he did. So while Trump spent less money, we don't actually know how much money was spent by super PAC and the like.
This is the problem here.
There were two sides to the whole affair. There were those who didn't want Trump in the Republican Party, and those who once Trump was candidate, didn't want Hillary to be President. They wanted that Supreme Court justice and thought they could live with Trump for four years.
The Koch Brothers, as an example because they appear to be spending the most amount of money on politics, got the power to spend unlimited amounts of money on politics through the Supreme Court. I'd assume they take it very seriously to keep the Supreme Court right wing.
I'd say Trump being President is less important to them than who sits on the Supreme Court.
Let's try this
Tracking the 2016 Presidential Money Race
Trump raised $82 million for super PACS, $564 million for campaign spending. Yet the Koch Brothers poured in $900 million. So not all the money thre Republicans spent went on Trump.
In fact I think the Koch Brothers are spending lots of money on POLICIES rather than on the politicians necessarily.
How The Koch Brothers Are Secretly Manipulating The 2016 Election (VIDEO)
This article has plenty of evidence for that.
So they push for the Supreme Court justice, this benefits Trump directly. How many people voted for issues like that rather than actually wanting Trump to be President?