Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
But if we had leadership all of their Fed funding would be history.Discrimination is discrimination.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/02/doj-to...g-to-fight-against-affirmative-action-report/
Discrimination is discrimination.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/02/doj-to...g-to-fight-against-affirmative-action-report/
Consent degrees...
Janitor became custodian
garbage man became sanitation engineer
etc, etc
change the name all you want, it's still the same thing
Discrimination is discrimination.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/02/doj-to...g-to-fight-against-affirmative-action-report/
Affirmative Action has become a code word used by racists to claim reverse discrimination. It is not used commonly and has been replaced by legal decisions called consent decrees, agreements which support an effort to recruit a diverse work force which represents the demographics of the community (town, city, county, parish, local subdivisions of those and the States).
Critics of consent decrees argue that the courts gave too much power to the protected classes. They contend that these conditions imposed on local and state governments usurp the power of the states.
I wonder how many White Males would feel if their community had only black police officers?
Discrimination is discrimination.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/02/doj-to...g-to-fight-against-affirmative-action-report/
Affirmative Action has become a code word used by racists to claim reverse discrimination. It is not used commonly and has been replaced by legal decisions called consent decrees, agreements which support an effort to recruit a diverse work force which represents the demographics of the community (town, city, county, parish, local subdivisions of those and the States).
Critics of consent decrees argue that the courts gave too much power to the protected classes. They contend that these conditions imposed on local and state governments usurp the power of the states.
I wonder how many White Males would feel if their community had only black police officers?
Discrimination is discrimination.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/02/doj-to...g-to-fight-against-affirmative-action-report/
Affirmative Action has become a code word used by racists to claim reverse discrimination. It is not used commonly and has been replaced by legal decisions called consent decrees, agreements which support an effort to recruit a diverse work force which represents the demographics of the community (town, city, county, parish, local subdivisions of those and the States).
Critics of consent decrees argue that the courts gave too much power to the protected classes. They contend that these conditions imposed on local and state governments usurp the power of the states.
I wonder how many White Males would feel if their community had only black police officers?
Positions should be on merit and not because of the colour of someone's skin, handing positions out based on the criteria of someone's skin colour is racist.
This Affirmative Action situation is a racist and discriminating programme, it deliberately awards people positions because of the colour of their skin and nothing else.
Discrimination is discrimination.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/02/doj-to...g-to-fight-against-affirmative-action-report/
Affirmative Action has become a code word used by racists to claim reverse discrimination. It is not used commonly and has been replaced by legal decisions called consent decrees, agreements which support an effort to recruit a diverse work force which represents the demographics of the community (town, city, county, parish, local subdivisions of those and the States).
Critics of consent decrees argue that the courts gave too much power to the protected classes. They contend that these conditions imposed on local and state governments usurp the power of the states.
I wonder how many White Males would feel if their community had only black police officers?
Positions should be on merit and not because of the colour of someone's skin, handing positions out based on the criteria of someone's skin colour is racist.
This Affirmative Action situation is a racist and discriminating programme, it deliberately awards people positions because of the colour of their skin and nothing else.
A little background on the issue of AA might provide some perspective:
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Discrimination is discrimination.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/02/doj-to...g-to-fight-against-affirmative-action-report/
Affirmative Action has become a code word used by racists to claim reverse discrimination. It is not used commonly and has been replaced by legal decisions called consent decrees, agreements which support an effort to recruit a diverse work force which represents the demographics of the community (town, city, county, parish, local subdivisions of those and the States).
Critics of consent decrees argue that the courts gave too much power to the protected classes. They contend that these conditions imposed on local and state governments usurp the power of the states.
I wonder how many White Males would feel if their community had only black police officers?
Positions should be on merit and not because of the colour of someone's skin, handing positions out based on the criteria of someone's skin colour is racist.
This Affirmative Action situation is a racist and discriminating programme, it deliberately awards people positions because of the colour of their skin and nothing else.
A little background on the issue of AA might provide some perspective:
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
So you are advocating that people should not be awarded positions on merit, they should just be handed things because of the colour of their skin.
Why would you support such a blatantly racist and discriminating programme? Why do Blacks need helping up a ladder like this programme helps them? Without Affirmative Action are you saying that Blacks wouldn't be able to achieve anything solely on merit?
Discrimination is discrimination.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/02/doj-to...g-to-fight-against-affirmative-action-report/
Affirmative Action has become a code word used by racists to claim reverse discrimination. It is not used commonly and has been replaced by legal decisions called consent decrees, agreements which support an effort to recruit a diverse work force which represents the demographics of the community (town, city, county, parish, local subdivisions of those and the States).
Critics of consent decrees argue that the courts gave too much power to the protected classes. They contend that these conditions imposed on local and state governments usurp the power of the states.
I wonder how many White Males would feel if their community had only black police officers?
Positions should be on merit and not because of the colour of someone's skin, handing positions out based on the criteria of someone's skin colour is racist.
This Affirmative Action situation is a racist and discriminating programme, it deliberately awards people positions because of the colour of their skin and nothing else.
A little background on the issue of AA might provide some perspective:
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
So you are advocating that people should not be awarded positions on merit, they should just be handed things because of the colour of their skin.
Why would you support such a blatantly racist and discriminating programme? Why do Blacks need helping up a ladder like this programme helps them? Without Affirmative Action are you saying that Blacks wouldn't be able to achieve anything solely on merit?
That is not what I wrote or what I believe, and it's pretty clear you didn't read the link or understand it. Your premise in the first paragraph is untrue, and in the second a clear example of a Straw Man logical fallacy.
One of my many jobs was to manage the recruitment and background checks of prospective LEO's. In that capacity I had the responsibility to make the final decision as to who would advance in the process and who would not. Color, race, ethnicity, religion had zero influence on my decision, since most were weeded out before I saw them and before their first interview (Written applications have a tear off section asking their race / ethnicity which remained with HR and I did not see, nor did my staff).
On average, of the 100 apps received, only three made it to the streets, and even then they were on Probation for a full 12 months. As part of the consent decree I did speak on High School and Jr. college campuses on a career in Law Enforcement and encouraged women and colored men and women how important it is for those they would encounter - victims, witnesses and suspects - who looked like them.
Discrimination is discrimination.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/02/doj-to...g-to-fight-against-affirmative-action-report/
Affirmative Action has become a code word used by racists to claim reverse discrimination. It is not used commonly and has been replaced by legal decisions called consent decrees, agreements which support an effort to recruit a diverse work force which represents the demographics of the community (town, city, county, parish, local subdivisions of those and the States).
Critics of consent decrees argue that the courts gave too much power to the protected classes. They contend that these conditions imposed on local and state governments usurp the power of the states.
I wonder how many White Males would feel if their community had only black police officers?
Positions should be on merit and not because of the colour of someone's skin, handing positions out based on the criteria of someone's skin colour is racist.
This Affirmative Action situation is a racist and discriminating programme, it deliberately awards people positions because of the colour of their skin and nothing else.
A little background on the issue of AA might provide some perspective:
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Discrimination is discrimination.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/02/doj-to...g-to-fight-against-affirmative-action-report/
Affirmative Action has become a code word used by racists to claim reverse discrimination. It is not used commonly and has been replaced by legal decisions called consent decrees, agreements which support an effort to recruit a diverse work force which represents the demographics of the community (town, city, county, parish, local subdivisions of those and the States).
Critics of consent decrees argue that the courts gave too much power to the protected classes. They contend that these conditions imposed on local and state governments usurp the power of the states.
I wonder how many White Males would feel if their community had only black police officers?
Positions should be on merit and not because of the colour of someone's skin, handing positions out based on the criteria of someone's skin colour is racist.
This Affirmative Action situation is a racist and discriminating programme, it deliberately awards people positions because of the colour of their skin and nothing else.
A little background on the issue of AA might provide some perspective:
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
So you are advocating that people should not be awarded positions on merit, they should just be handed things because of the colour of their skin.
Why would you support such a blatantly racist and discriminating programme? Why do Blacks need helping up a ladder like this programme helps them? Without Affirmative Action are you saying that Blacks wouldn't be able to achieve anything solely on merit?
That is not what I wrote or what I believe, and it's pretty clear you didn't read the link or understand it. Your premise in the first paragraph is untrue, and in the second a clear example of a Straw Man logical fallacy.
One of my many jobs was to manage the recruitment and background checks of prospective LEO's. In that capacity I had the responsibility to make the final decision as to who would advance in the process and who would not. Color, race, ethnicity, religion had zero influence on my decision, since most were weeded out before I saw them and before their first interview (Written applications have a tear off section asking their race / ethnicity which remained with HR and I did not see, nor did my staff).
On average, of the 100 apps received, only three made it to the streets, and even then they were on Probation for a full 12 months. As part of the consent decree I did speak on High School and Jr. college campuses on a career in Law Enforcement and encouraged women and colored men and women how important it is for those they would encounter - victims, witnesses and suspects - who looked like them.
Discrimination is discrimination.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/02/doj-to...g-to-fight-against-affirmative-action-report/
Affirmative Action has become a code word used by racists to claim reverse discrimination. It is not used commonly and has been replaced by legal decisions called consent decrees, agreements which support an effort to recruit a diverse work force which represents the demographics of the community (town, city, county, parish, local subdivisions of those and the States).
Critics of consent decrees argue that the courts gave too much power to the protected classes. They contend that these conditions imposed on local and state governments usurp the power of the states.
I wonder how many White Males would feel if their community had only black police officers?
Positions should be on merit and not because of the colour of someone's skin, handing positions out based on the criteria of someone's skin colour is racist.
This Affirmative Action situation is a racist and discriminating programme, it deliberately awards people positions because of the colour of their skin and nothing else.
A little background on the issue of AA might provide some perspective:
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
There is no link that I see.
Affirmative Action has become a code word used by racists to claim reverse discrimination. It is not used commonly and has been replaced by legal decisions called consent decrees, agreements which support an effort to recruit a diverse work force which represents the demographics of the community (town, city, county, parish, local subdivisions of those and the States).
Critics of consent decrees argue that the courts gave too much power to the protected classes. They contend that these conditions imposed on local and state governments usurp the power of the states.
I wonder how many White Males would feel if their community had only black police officers?
Positions should be on merit and not because of the colour of someone's skin, handing positions out based on the criteria of someone's skin colour is racist.
This Affirmative Action situation is a racist and discriminating programme, it deliberately awards people positions because of the colour of their skin and nothing else.
A little background on the issue of AA might provide some perspective:
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
So you are advocating that people should not be awarded positions on merit, they should just be handed things because of the colour of their skin.
Why would you support such a blatantly racist and discriminating programme? Why do Blacks need helping up a ladder like this programme helps them? Without Affirmative Action are you saying that Blacks wouldn't be able to achieve anything solely on merit?
That is not what I wrote or what I believe, and it's pretty clear you didn't read the link or understand it. Your premise in the first paragraph is untrue, and in the second a clear example of a Straw Man logical fallacy.
One of my many jobs was to manage the recruitment and background checks of prospective LEO's. In that capacity I had the responsibility to make the final decision as to who would advance in the process and who would not. Color, race, ethnicity, religion had zero influence on my decision, since most were weeded out before I saw them and before their first interview (Written applications have a tear off section asking their race / ethnicity which remained with HR and I did not see, nor did my staff).
On average, of the 100 apps received, only three made it to the streets, and even then they were on Probation for a full 12 months. As part of the consent decree I did speak on High School and Jr. college campuses on a career in Law Enforcement and encouraged women and colored men and women how important it is for those they would encounter - victims, witnesses and suspects - who looked like them.
How about the NBA? That's pretty discriminatory towards whites, you know.
Discrimination is discrimination.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/02/doj-to...g-to-fight-against-affirmative-action-report/
Affirmative Action has become a code word used by racists to claim reverse discrimination. It is not used commonly and has been replaced by legal decisions called consent decrees, agreements which support an effort to recruit a diverse work force which represents the demographics of the community (town, city, county, parish, local subdivisions of those and the States).
Critics of consent decrees argue that the courts gave too much power to the protected classes. They contend that these conditions imposed on local and state governments usurp the power of the states.
I wonder how many White Males would feel if their community had only black police officers?
Positions should be on merit and not because of the colour of someone's skin, handing positions out based on the criteria of someone's skin colour is racist.
This Affirmative Action situation is a racist and discriminating programme, it deliberately awards people positions because of the colour of their skin and nothing else.
Discrimination is discrimination.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/02/doj-to...g-to-fight-against-affirmative-action-report/
Affirmative Action has become a code word used by racists to claim reverse discrimination. It is not used commonly and has been replaced by legal decisions called consent decrees, agreements which support an effort to recruit a diverse work force which represents the demographics of the community (town, city, county, parish, local subdivisions of those and the States).
Critics of consent decrees argue that the courts gave too much power to the protected classes. They contend that these conditions imposed on local and state governments usurp the power of the states.
I wonder how many White Males would feel if their community had only black police officers?
Affirmative Action is twenty years overdue for disposal.
Protected classes are unconstitutional.
Discrimination is discrimination.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/02/doj-to...g-to-fight-against-affirmative-action-report/
Affirmative Action has become a code word used by racists to claim reverse discrimination. It is not used commonly and has been replaced by legal decisions called consent decrees, agreements which support an effort to recruit a diverse work force which represents the demographics of the community (town, city, county, parish, local subdivisions of those and the States).
Critics of consent decrees argue that the courts gave too much power to the protected classes. They contend that these conditions imposed on local and state governments usurp the power of the states.
I wonder how many White Males would feel if their community had only black police officers?
Affirmative Action is twenty years overdue for disposal.
Protected classes are unconstitutional.
Whites have been protected for 241 years.
Affirmative Action has become a code word used by racists to claim reverse discrimination. It is not used commonly and has been replaced by legal decisions called consent decrees, agreements which support an effort to recruit a diverse work force which represents the demographics of the community (town, city, county, parish, local subdivisions of those and the States).
Critics of consent decrees argue that the courts gave too much power to the protected classes. They contend that these conditions imposed on local and state governments usurp the power of the states.
I wonder how many White Males would feel if their community had only black police officers?
Positions should be on merit and not because of the colour of someone's skin, handing positions out based on the criteria of someone's skin colour is racist.
This Affirmative Action situation is a racist and discriminating programme, it deliberately awards people positions because of the colour of their skin and nothing else.
A little background on the issue of AA might provide some perspective:
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
So you are advocating that people should not be awarded positions on merit, they should just be handed things because of the colour of their skin.
Why would you support such a blatantly racist and discriminating programme? Why do Blacks need helping up a ladder like this programme helps them? Without Affirmative Action are you saying that Blacks wouldn't be able to achieve anything solely on merit?
That is not what I wrote or what I believe, and it's pretty clear you didn't read the link or understand it. Your premise in the first paragraph is untrue, and in the second a clear example of a Straw Man logical fallacy.
One of my many jobs was to manage the recruitment and background checks of prospective LEO's. In that capacity I had the responsibility to make the final decision as to who would advance in the process and who would not. Color, race, ethnicity, religion had zero influence on my decision, since most were weeded out before I saw them and before their first interview (Written applications have a tear off section asking their race / ethnicity which remained with HR and I did not see, nor did my staff).
On average, of the 100 apps received, only three made it to the streets, and even then they were on Probation for a full 12 months. As part of the consent decree I did speak on High School and Jr. college campuses on a career in Law Enforcement and encouraged women and colored men and women how important it is for those they would encounter - victims, witnesses and suspects - who looked like them.
How about the NBA? That's pretty discriminatory towards whites, you know.
