bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,329
- 2,180
How would anyone know whether he had any recollection? Claiming he lied is a dubious claim on its face. That has to be the thinnest excuse to charge someone with lying that I have ever seen. Hillary claim she "couldn't recall" something like 70 times when she testified before the Grand Jury.Wait, so are you saying the notes that you claim exonerate Flynn were fake? Because those are the notes that Sullivan based his ruling on.Judge Sullivan’s ruling was based on false information. You don’t get that. And I have read every document that has come out. Something you obviously have not done. He even called Flynn and traitor and treasonous, based on fake articles! NOT evidence, but FAKE media!
The ruling:
As to Mr. Flynn’s first set of false statements, see SOF, ECF No. 4 at 2-3 ¶ 3, the interviewing FBI agents’ handwritten notes, draft interview reports, and the final FD-302 confirm that Mr. Flynn falsely stated that he had no recollection about his request to the Russian Ambassador to refrain from escalating the situation in response to U.S. sanctions, and that Mr. Flynn falsely stated that he did not have a long conversation about that issue.
Page 43 FYI