Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How would anyone know whether he had any recollection? Claiming he lied is a dubious claim on its face. That has to be the thinnest excuse to charge someone with lying that I have ever seen. Hillary claim she "couldn't recall" something like 70 times when she testified before the Grand Jury.Wait, so are you saying the notes that you claim exonerate Flynn were fake? Because those are the notes that Sullivan based his ruling on.Judge Sullivan’s ruling was based on false information. You don’t get that. And I have read every document that has come out. Something you obviously have not done. He even called Flynn and traitor and treasonous, based on fake articles! NOT evidence, but FAKE media!
The ruling:
As to Mr. Flynn’s first set of false statements, see SOF, ECF No. 4 at 2-3 ¶ 3, the interviewing FBI agents’ handwritten notes, draft interview reports, and the final FD-302 confirm that Mr. Flynn falsely stated that he had no recollection about his request to the Russian Ambassador to refrain from escalating the situation in response to U.S. sanctions, and that Mr. Flynn falsely stated that he did not have a long conversation about that issue.
Page 43 FYI
Deep down you know that you're a lying douchebag.Alright man, whatever floats your boat.i'm pretty aware of what i was doing. you see, this is why it's such bullshit to talk to you. i can tell you what i'm doing and why and you go "no you weren't"Trolling and satire are not the same thing.i don't think you understand counter-trolling.I don't think you understand satire.you have said both that admitting guilt meant you're guilty and then it also meant you may not be.What about being "at ease" makes it okay to lie to the FBI? Nothing. Zero.or flynn counted on protocol where you simply don't do what the FBI did here and therefor was at ease with the questions.New to the scene? Good grief. He's a general who reached the top echelons of military command and was appointed to highly sensitive positions. Not an idiot.Hey, sounds pretty stupid to me. But people said that Flynn didn’t know it was illegal to lie to the FBI so that’s the new standard.Maybe he didn’t intend to alter it? Maybe he didn’t know that was illegal?Great. So the guilty plea of Clinesmith is in no way validation or evidence of any illegal action.He was "caught" doing nothing illegal, moron. And, yes, a guilty is not proof of anything, especially when a establishment douchebag like Mueller is the prosecutor. Thousands of people who plead guilty were later found to be innocent and set free.He actually was caught red handed.Remember. Pleading guilty doesn’t actually mean you did anything illegal.
if you are referring to Flynn, the fbi agents stated they didn’t think he had lied. He was threatened into pleading guilty, so they wouldn’t also break financially his son, as they had done to him. Big difference. Total faux comparison.
Flynn was caught red handed too.
Everyone who pleads guilty does so because of the threat of a worse sentence.
So therefore there’s no proof he did anything wrong since a guilty plea doesn’t mean a crime has been committed. That’s the stupid world we live in thanks to Billy Barr.
Congrats. Our country just got dumber because of you.
You don't think that altering a document in order to get the FISA court to approve of a surveillance warrant isn't illegal?
Of course not. He's a lawyer. How could he possibly know it wasn't legal.
He didn't know it was an official investigation. He was new to the scene. When he asked Comey if he should get his lawyers first, Comey told him it wasn't necessary. It was a few off the record questions.
Off the record? Two FBI agents sitting in front of him taking notes suggests it's "off the record"?
Y'all have a really low opinion of Flynn's intelligence.
spin doctors in surgery today.
This is all spin on your part.
way to take a stand there, dickens.
I was satirizing Billy Barr's nutty statements that feed the frenzy from the village rabble. That guy is a political hack.
you wanna troll your stupid shit, i can do the same. you wanna drop bullshit and talk honestly, i can do that. i just follow the lead of the conversation.
You weren’t counter trolling. You’re just being oblivious. Your posts here are little more than emotional outbursts from someone existing in a toxic media bath.
Being honest, dude needs to go to jail. He plead guilty because he’s guilty.
So did Flynn.
This is probably the biggest fish you’re going to get in your counter narrative of FBI corruption. Some low level dude that no one ever heard of. And it’s not because someone is “protecting” Comey or anyone else. It’s because there isn’t evidence to support charges against anyone else.
how in the fuck do you know? you don't so you're making shit up and lying.
as for my "emotional outbursts" - part of the troll man. don't really give a shit if you like it or not.
You know I'm right. Deep down, you know that this is about as good as it gets for your little conspiracy theory about the FBI out to get Trump.
"The "original" 302 is nothing more than a first draft."The original 302 is still missing!!!The 302 was presented to Flynn and the 302 accurately reflects the handwritten notes.Those notes that exonerate Flynn were never presented to the court until after the fact. They were withheld! They came to light after the fact!Wait, so are you saying the notes that you claim exonerate Flynn were fake? Because those are the notes that Sullivan based his ruling on.Judge Sullivan’s ruling was based on false information. You don’t get that. And I have read every document that has come out. Something you obviously have not done. He even called Flynn and traitor and treasonous, based on fake articles! NOT evidence, but FAKE media!
The ruling:
As to Mr. Flynn’s first set of false statements, see SOF, ECF No. 4 at 2-3 ¶ 3, the interviewing FBI agents’ handwritten notes, draft interview reports, and the final FD-302 confirm that Mr. Flynn falsely stated that he had no recollection about his request to the Russian Ambassador to refrain from escalating the situation in response to U.S. sanctions, and that Mr. Flynn falsely stated that he did not have a long conversation about that issue.
Page 43 FYI
The "original" 302 is nothing more than a first draft. The official signed 302 never went missing.
You guys are grasping at straws.
Oh he doesn't have to go that deep.Deep down you know that you're a lying douchebag.Alright man, whatever floats your boat.i'm pretty aware of what i was doing. you see, this is why it's such bullshit to talk to you. i can tell you what i'm doing and why and you go "no you weren't"Trolling and satire are not the same thing.i don't think you understand counter-trolling.I don't think you understand satire.you have said both that admitting guilt meant you're guilty and then it also meant you may not be.What about being "at ease" makes it okay to lie to the FBI? Nothing. Zero.or flynn counted on protocol where you simply don't do what the FBI did here and therefor was at ease with the questions.New to the scene? Good grief. He's a general who reached the top echelons of military command and was appointed to highly sensitive positions. Not an idiot.Hey, sounds pretty stupid to me. But people said that Flynn didn’t know it was illegal to lie to the FBI so that’s the new standard.Maybe he didn’t intend to alter it? Maybe he didn’t know that was illegal?Great. So the guilty plea of Clinesmith is in no way validation or evidence of any illegal action.He was "caught" doing nothing illegal, moron. And, yes, a guilty is not proof of anything, especially when a establishment douchebag like Mueller is the prosecutor. Thousands of people who plead guilty were later found to be innocent and set free.He actually was caught red handed.Remember. Pleading guilty doesn’t actually mean you did anything illegal.
if you are referring to Flynn, the fbi agents stated they didn’t think he had lied. He was threatened into pleading guilty, so they wouldn’t also break financially his son, as they had done to him. Big difference. Total faux comparison.
Flynn was caught red handed too.
Everyone who pleads guilty does so because of the threat of a worse sentence.
So therefore there’s no proof he did anything wrong since a guilty plea doesn’t mean a crime has been committed. That’s the stupid world we live in thanks to Billy Barr.
Congrats. Our country just got dumber because of you.
You don't think that altering a document in order to get the FISA court to approve of a surveillance warrant isn't illegal?
Of course not. He's a lawyer. How could he possibly know it wasn't legal.
He didn't know it was an official investigation. He was new to the scene. When he asked Comey if he should get his lawyers first, Comey told him it wasn't necessary. It was a few off the record questions.
Off the record? Two FBI agents sitting in front of him taking notes suggests it's "off the record"?
Y'all have a really low opinion of Flynn's intelligence.
spin doctors in surgery today.
This is all spin on your part.
way to take a stand there, dickens.
I was satirizing Billy Barr's nutty statements that feed the frenzy from the village rabble. That guy is a political hack.
you wanna troll your stupid shit, i can do the same. you wanna drop bullshit and talk honestly, i can do that. i just follow the lead of the conversation.
You weren’t counter trolling. You’re just being oblivious. Your posts here are little more than emotional outbursts from someone existing in a toxic media bath.
Being honest, dude needs to go to jail. He plead guilty because he’s guilty.
So did Flynn.
This is probably the biggest fish you’re going to get in your counter narrative of FBI corruption. Some low level dude that no one ever heard of. And it’s not because someone is “protecting” Comey or anyone else. It’s because there isn’t evidence to support charges against anyone else.
how in the fuck do you know? you don't so you're making shit up and lying.
as for my "emotional outbursts" - part of the troll man. don't really give a shit if you like it or not.
You know I'm right. Deep down, you know that this is about as good as it gets for your little conspiracy theory about the FBI out to get Trump.
www.foxnews.com
ONE PERSON ALONE COULD NOT DO WHAT WAS DONE SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUTMeans nothing. Another sacrificial lamb to appease the masses.
So it's your opinion that one person alone created this witch hunt and attacks against the president?"Prosecutors are not expected to reveal any evidence of a broad anti-Trump conspiracy among law enforcement officials."
He just wants to do what ever he can to try to not see their party go down in flames."The "original" 302 is nothing more than a first draft."The original 302 is still missing!!!The 302 was presented to Flynn and the 302 accurately reflects the handwritten notes.Those notes that exonerate Flynn were never presented to the court until after the fact. They were withheld! They came to light after the fact!Wait, so are you saying the notes that you claim exonerate Flynn were fake? Because those are the notes that Sullivan based his ruling on.Judge Sullivan’s ruling was based on false information. You don’t get that. And I have read every document that has come out. Something you obviously have not done. He even called Flynn and traitor and treasonous, based on fake articles! NOT evidence, but FAKE media!
The ruling:
As to Mr. Flynn’s first set of false statements, see SOF, ECF No. 4 at 2-3 ¶ 3, the interviewing FBI agents’ handwritten notes, draft interview reports, and the final FD-302 confirm that Mr. Flynn falsely stated that he had no recollection about his request to the Russian Ambassador to refrain from escalating the situation in response to U.S. sanctions, and that Mr. Flynn falsely stated that he did not have a long conversation about that issue.
Page 43 FYI
The "original" 302 is nothing more than a first draft. The official signed 302 never went missing.
You guys are grasping at straws.
You win the troph for dumbest claim of the month.
302s are official legal documents. They are supposed to be a record of the evidence, not a work of fiction. Editing them is a crime.
come on man you can't believe Barr and Durham can you? lolYou have to know that Obama and OBiden are shaking in their leather wing tip shoes....they never thought that Barr would get this close....I think this is one of the reasons why Biden is not answering questions....
You know we can edit titles now. ( to correct misspellings etc...)...and it starts with Klinesith's guilty plea to Durham.
Trump suggests Clinesmith guilty plea 'just the beginning' of Durham probe fallout
President Trump said Friday the news that former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith will plead guilty to making a false statement is "just the beginning" of the fallout from U.S. Attorney John Durham's review of the Russia investigation.
.
The next up the chain should be Stzrok, McCabe, Comey and maybe Brennan and some others inbetween. Rosenstein may have lied - we know Schiff has lied repeatedly ( but not under oath ---yet)...and it starts with Klinesith's guilty plea to Durham.
Trump suggests Clinesmith guilty plea 'just the beginning' of Durham probe fallout
President Trump said Friday the news that former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith will plead guilty to making a false statement is "just the beginning" of the fallout from U.S. Attorney John Durham's review of the Russia investigation.
.
i'm sorry - can you provide the facts on this? i believe you just chided me about doing these types of things.I just told you, dumbass. They went to the NSA database.They spied on him, moron. These days you don't need a physical wiretap since the NSA records every phone call you make. All you have to do is get permission to access them. That's what FISA warrants are for. The claim that "there was no wiretap" is a leftwing diversion.Think about this for a moment...
This attorney falsified public records used to obtain an illegal wire tap on a presidential candidate and then on a SITTING US PRESIDENT. This means everything they did was ILLEGAL from the get go. This makes the case solid as bedrock on everyone else.
This makes the intentional (premeditated) Fraud on the FISA court valid charges to follow up with. Given who knew and when they were told, this makes everyone in the chain right up to and including Obama and Biden culpable in the Coup.
This one case makes all the others possible. The next bomb could be 35+ indictments... And it could happen very early next week. What IF Biden is named in an indictment? What will democrats do? Biden is still just a citizen and does not gain exemption from prosecution.
I need lots of popcorn....
There was no wire tap, legal or illegal on a presidential candidate or a sitting U.S. president. Where do you guys come up with this whacked out stuff?
Specifically where was Trump spied on and when both prior and post election?
And they specifically pulled Trump's calls phone calls and pre election?
wow. that didn't take long.
VIVA la RESISTANCE!
Ex-F.B.I. Lawyer Expected to Plead Guilty in Review of Russia Inquiry (Published 2020)
Prosecutors did not reveal any evidence of the kind of broad anti-Trump conspiracy among law enforcement officials that the president has long alleged.www.nytimes.com
Glorious News. The first of the criminal conspiracists who tried to undermine our Government---GOING DOWN.
I can't read the whole article, as I would never in a million years, give any money to the New York Times. Buy, they generally get the story first and SPIN it to sound like it is nothing.
More will come soon from HONEST REPORTING.
This particular FBI Co-conspirator is also a Pussy, so he will be signing like a canary trying to avoid too much time as Big Bubba's wife in a Federal Pen.
MORE TO COME!
GOOD DAY FOR AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Very ignorant."The "original" 302 is nothing more than a first draft."The original 302 is still missing!!!The 302 was presented to Flynn and the 302 accurately reflects the handwritten notes.Those notes that exonerate Flynn were never presented to the court until after the fact. They were withheld! They came to light after the fact!Wait, so are you saying the notes that you claim exonerate Flynn were fake? Because those are the notes that Sullivan based his ruling on.Judge Sullivan’s ruling was based on false information. You don’t get that. And I have read every document that has come out. Something you obviously have not done. He even called Flynn and traitor and treasonous, based on fake articles! NOT evidence, but FAKE media!
The ruling:
As to Mr. Flynn’s first set of false statements, see SOF, ECF No. 4 at 2-3 ¶ 3, the interviewing FBI agents’ handwritten notes, draft interview reports, and the final FD-302 confirm that Mr. Flynn falsely stated that he had no recollection about his request to the Russian Ambassador to refrain from escalating the situation in response to U.S. sanctions, and that Mr. Flynn falsely stated that he did not have a long conversation about that issue.
Page 43 FYI
The "original" 302 is nothing more than a first draft. The official signed 302 never went missing.
You guys are grasping at straws.
You win the troph for dumbest claim of the month.
302s are official legal documents. They are supposed to be a record of the evidence, not a work of fiction. Editing them is a crime.
