Another challenge apart from amino acid music is to use the numbers denoting the frequencies of notes. A testing format can be adapted to reading problems:
'Specialized Pathways for Reading Words and Reading Numbers: Why? Why does our cognitive system allocate two separate processing pathways to words and numbers, two cultural inventions that are very recent in evolutionary terms? Dehaene and Amedi considered this question with respect to the mechanisms of visual analysis of words and numbers which, as they showed, are implemented in different brain ares -- the so-called visual word form area (VWFA) and visual number form area (VNFA). They pointed out that the reason for this neural separation is unlikely because to be the visual properties of letters versus digits, because letters and digits are visually quite similar....They proposed that the reason for the neural separation between the VWFA and VNFA is the connectivity patterns of these brain areas with the rest of the brain, in particular the regions that make use of the parsed visual information.
....
The architecture we proposed here, where reading is dominated by structural processing, offers a complementary explanation for the separation of words and numbers. Although the visual properties of letters and digits are quite similar to each other, the structural properties of letter strings and digit strings are very different from each other: the decimal structure of digits is completely different from the morphological structure of words....When a processing stage is structure-insensitive, it may be shared for words and numbers, as seems to be the case for early processes that precede the numeric/orthographic visual analyzers (McCloskey and Schubert, 2014, Shared Versus Separate Processes for Letter and Digit Identification, Cognitive Neuropsychology 31:437-60) and for post-phonological-retrieval processes (Shalev, et al 2014, Dissociation Processes Between Numbers and Words, First Conference on Cognition Research, Akko, Israel).
....
One thing is quite clear: the specialization of different cognitive processes to words and numbers is quite rigid. The growing number of word-number dissociations demonstrates that at least in some cases, a well-functioning processing of words cannot overtake an impaired processing of numbers, and vice versa, even when the impairment is developmental and presumably existed from birth. This rigidity of word-number separation accords with the rigidity we observe within each of these domains: an intact process is sometimes unable to compensate for an impaired process, even when two processes encode information that appears to be redundant (Dotan and Friedmann, 2018, A Cognitive Model for Multidigit Number Reading: Inferences from Individuals with Selective Impairments, Cortex) *
https://doi-org/10/1016/j.cortex.2017.10.025
*
This research was supported by a grant from the Bettencourt-Schueller Foundation, by the Israel Science Foundation, by the Human Frontiers Science Program, and by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Cognition and Its Disorders
ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders
(Dotan D, Friedmann N, Separate Mechanisms for Number Reading and Word Reading: Evidence from Selective Impairments, Cortex [2018] 30:1-17)