Because the article's fascism is for subscribers only, we will post excerpts here so that non-subscribers can read it:
12 Aug 2019 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Debate Over Dyslexia Bill Reignites 'Reading Wars'
Public Hearing Tuesday on Startlingly Partisan Issue
It seems innocuous enough. A bill making its way through the Legislature would require the state Department of Public Instruction to create an informational guidebook on dyslexia and related disorders for schools and parents. Across the country, in all but seven states, lawmakers have passed similar legislation aiming at helping children who struggle with a neurologically based learning disorder that makes it difficult for them to learn to read, write and spell.
But the Wisconsin bill, like past measures intended to address dyslexia, has drawn concerns and outright opposition from some educators. The debate is a microcosm of the broader "reading wars" that have raged among educators for decades. It stems from the growing frustrations of parents who complain that schools, which parents say often eschew the term, are not doing enough to help their children. "Schools will dance around it....They'll say, 'We don't test for dyslexia,' or they'll avoid using the word," said Jennifer Kelly of Decoding Dyslexia Wisconsin, part of a national, parent-led organization that is promoting legislation across the country.
"We're not asking for anything earth-shattering," she said. "Reading is a life skill. And if you can't read, you're going to be considered disabled." Repeated efforts by the Journal Sentinel to speak with leaders of the Wisconsin State Reading Association, the only organization to oppose the bill, have not been successful. But its legislative chairman, Kathy Champeau, provided a copy of her testimony before the Assembly Education Committee in April. In it, she raise concerns about the bill's definition of dyslexia, potential financial conflicts of interest among those who might be selected to help draft the guidebook and the idea of tailoring legislation to a particular disability.
"The proposed guidebook should inform all literacy (and) reading-related conditions, not to be a marketing tool to promote one condition," said Champeau, whose organization represents about 2,200 members around the state. A coalition of organizations that represent school districts and board members raised similar concerns but said the "concept of creating a guidebook has merit."
The Education Committee approved the bill along party lines, with all Republicans in favor and Democrats opposed. It passed the full Assembly, 76-21, with 13 of 38 Democrats joining the majority, including one Democrat committee member who changed his mind. The bill now moves to the Senate Education Committee, which will hold a public hearing at 10 a.m. Tuesday in Room 411 South of the State Capitol.
Asked why a dyslexia guidebook would be a partisan issue, state Rep. Sondy Pope, D-Mt. Horeb, the ranking member of the Assembly Education Committee, echoed Champeau's arguments, then suggested that "Democrats are just better informed about reading disorders."
Rep. Bob Kulp, R-Stratford, who chaired the 2018 Legislative Council Study Committee on the Identification and Management of Dyslexia, which proposed the bill, called the politicizing of reading instruction "unfortunate." "That kids, parents, teachers and administrators are left without resources that could give (students) a leg up on the opportunities of life, by learning to read, is such a shame," he said.
Tuesday's hearing is expected to be emotionally charged. In April, some witnesses wept as they testified about their own or their children's struggles in learning to read. It comes as school districts are under increased pressure to ensure they provide children with disabilities the free and appropriate education required by law, following a 2017 U.S. Supreme Court ruling. Last month, a Wisconsin district was ordered to pay for an expensive boarding school for a student whose mother says she struggled for years to get the district to acknowledge that he is dyslexic.'