everybody should be packing iron

[M14 Shooter]

Geaux.......Hickock 45 tests the UTS-15 here.......

Awesome weapon for the zombie apocalypse but IDK......$1,500 is a lot of dough and the thing is sorta hoaky when loading but you do get 15 rounds!! Pretty sick gun.....

Pump-action as well, therefore immune to any of the usual 'assault weapon' BS from the know-nothings.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Just like a trigger lock, this can be defeated by anyone with minimal skills and basic tools.
Futher, it is imposible to implement this given the hundreds of millions of guns already in existence.

Besides the only product I've seen is an after market product. Gun manufacturers are not installing them on the firearms.

Just pass a law. Got to start somewhere, over time, older guns become obsolete.

Yeah.... those mid/late-19th century Winchesters and Colts are -so- obsolete that they're still made today.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Just pass a law. Got to start somewhere, over time, older guns become obsolete.

A colt 1911 will never be obsolete.

You could also mandate that new guns have barrels that would be slightly larger, meaning larger bullets that wouldn't fit into old guns. Problem solved.

Its pretty clear that your dumbassery is intentional.

 

[Spiderman]

A colt 1911 will never be obsolete.

You could also mandate that new guns have barrels that would be slightly larger, meaning larger bullets that wouldn't fit into old guns. Problem solved.

Its pretty clear that your dumbassery is intentional.

You give him too much credit.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Ah, let them have their peashooters. They need to feel safe and sound...

Thank you for continuing to prove that anti-gun loons can only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

 

[Bumberclyde]

Not everyone should pack iron. Only responsible people should.

Although there really wouldn't be any need for anyone to if we kept the lunatics and criminals locked up.

That's not what the 2nd amendment says, so even mental cases, retards and criminals should have as many guns as they want.

Thank yo ufor continuing to prove that anti-gun loons can only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

Hey parrot, what part of the 2nd Amendment denies psychos guns?

 

[Bumberclyde]

You could also mandate that new guns have barrels that would be slightly larger, meaning larger bullets that wouldn't fit into old guns. Problem solved.

Its pretty clear that your dumbassery is intentional.

You give him too much credit.

You can't attack the valid point, so you attack the person. How mature. YAWN!

 

[Spiderman]

Its pretty clear that your dumbassery is intentional.

You give him too much credit.

You can't attack the valid point, so you attack the person. How mature. YAWN!

I'm not attacking you.

Grow a set will you?

 

[M14 Shooter]

That's not what the 2nd amendment says, so even mental cases, retards and criminals should have as many guns as they want.

Thank yo ufor continuing to prove that anti-gun loons can only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

Hey parrot, what part of the 2nd Amendment denies psychos guns?

I'm sorry.... I'm still waiting for you to:

1: Define the additional gun control measures you seek
2: Show the necessity for these measures.
3: Show that these measures will meet the need you described
4: Show that these measures do not infringe upon the rights of the law abiding
5: Do all of this without arguing from emotion, ignorance, dishonesty or any other logical fallacies.

Your last attempte needed 10 re-writes to rise to the level of a dismal failure; I'm sure your next attempt will be no better.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Its pretty clear that your dumbassery is intentional.

You give him too much credit.

You can't attack the valid point, so you attack the person. How mature. YAWN!

That fact that you don't realize, or will not admit, your point was invalid speaks volumes.

 

[Bumberclyde]

You give him too much credit.

You can't attack the valid point, so you attack the person. How mature. YAWN!

That fact that you don't realize, or will not admit, your point was invalid speaks volumes.

Except you can't point out the invalid part, now, can you? You just attack me like a schoolyard bully. I bet your gun makes you feel real tough.

 

[Dr Grump]

Ah, let them have their peashooters. They need to feel safe and sound...

Thank you for continuing to prove that anti-gun loons can only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

1) It is an emotional issue
2) What am I ignorant of?
3) How am I being dishonest?

Take your time...

 

[Geaux4it]

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Besides the only product I've seen is an after market product. Gun manufacturers are not installing them on the firearms.

Just pass a law. Got to start somewhere, over time, older guns become obsolete.

A colt 1911 will never be obsolete.

True.

After 100 years most firearms technology is still viable, useful, and effective.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Just pass a law. Got to start somewhere, over time, older guns become obsolete.

A colt 1911 will never be obsolete.

You could also mandate that new guns have barrels that would be slightly larger, meaning larger bullets that wouldn't fit into old guns. Problem solved.

lol

Didn’t know there was a ‘problem’ to be ‘solved.’

Otherwise, this makes no sense.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You can't attack the valid point, so you attack the person. How mature. YAWN!

That fact that you don't realize, or will not admit, your point was invalid speaks volumes.

Except you can't point out the invalid part, now, can you?

On the contrary.... Its easily done.

Problem is you will refuse to muster the intellectual honesty necessary to accept that criticism and admit that you were proven wrong, so there's no ssense in trying.

Please - contunie to prove the point that anti-gun loons can only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Ah, let them have their peashooters. They need to feel safe and sound...

Thank you for continuing to prove that anti-gun loons can only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

1) It is an emotional issue

Case rested. Thank you.

 

[Dr Grump]

Thank you for continuing to prove that anti-gun loons can only argue from emotion, ignorance and/or dishonesty.

1) It is an emotional issue

Case rested. Thank you.

Er, but you're emotional about it, too...

 

[Politico]

You could also mandate that new guns have barrels that would be slightly larger, meaning larger bullets that wouldn't fit into old guns. Problem solved.

Its pretty clear that your dumbassery is intentional.

You give him too much credit.

I agree.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Just pass a law. Got to start somewhere, over time, older guns become obsolete.

A colt 1911 will never be obsolete.

True.

After 100 years most firearms technology is still viable, useful, and effective.

You're right..............the Colt 1911 is still effective, and hasn't gone obsolete.

However.....................they only fired 6 rounds before having to be reloaded.

Can anyone explain why you have to have 15 rounds (in a standard 9mm clip) to 30 rounds (in an expanded 9mm clip that was shot at Gabby Giffords)?

Sorry, but if you can't take your target down in 5 rounds or less, you shouldn't be shooting a gun.


I'm also wondering why you need to have 30 to 60 rounds in an AK-47 or AR-15 to hit your target or "hunt" as some of you gun nuts say.

If it's for home defense, you shouldn't need more than 5 to 9 rounds. If it's hunting, if you can't kill it after 3 rounds, you deserve to go hungry.

Why do we need 30 to 100 rounds in a single gun?