Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How quickly you have justified my complaint, Daws !!the truth about the jfk assassination is simple, on the other hand the conspiracy legend that has grown around it is complicated.And, sadly, just the sort of answer I have come to expect from you and the other trolls swarming about this topic.
No facts, no rational arguments or rebuttals, not even logic -- just insults, and fluff, and non sequiturs.
What kind of silly statement is that?
Mythology is simple -- science is complex.
Lies are often simple, and truth is usually complicated.
As so often, you have written something which makes no sense.
.
now that's fucking hilarious ... coming from the most ignorant person ever reason.....you have no idea what reason even means!!!!!I cannot believe anybody would actually try to reason with dawgshit.
He wont watch videos that corner him with facts there were multiple shooters so its kinda fool hardly to keep feeding the troll.You've heard the old saying.![]()
you already know who did it.. accepting it as fact, seems to be beyond your comprehension...If it is simple then give us the answer. Who did it?
Are you too afraid to give us a name?
How quickly you have justified my complaint, Daws !!the truth about the jfk assassination is simple, on the other hand the conspiracy legend that has grown around it is complicated.
What kind of silly statement is that?
Mythology is simple -- science is complex.
Lies are often simple, and truth is usually complicated.
As so often, you have written something which makes no sense.
.
Dawgshit is actually telling the truth on his first statement here that the truth about the JFK assassination is simple.
Its simple to see that the CIA killed him.
I already proved that in post #139 on page 10 which every magic bullet theorist troll on here ignored,ran off and did not address knowing they were cornered...http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...-s-there-was-a-conspiracy-to-kill-jfk-10.html so yeah the truth about the JFK assassination IS simple.
Its simple to see that it was a conspiracy carried out by elements in the CIA and its simple to see that Lee Harvey Oswald was innocent.Here in fact I proved on this thread that was made sometime back in post #154 on this page that oswald was innocent.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/285978-kennedy-assassination-question-11.html
Look at Dawgshits reply to it in post# 155.as always,he knows he is cornered and cant refute the facts so look at the reply he comes back with.priceless.
He sure showed me and put me in my place with that great rebutall.![]()
you already know who did it.. accepting it as fact, seems to be beyond your comprehension...
Are you too afraid to give us a name?
He is too afraid to tell the truth that he has been taken to school throughout this entire thread by everybody that there is no evidence that oswald was the lone assassin but plenty of evidence given that there were multiple shooters there acting on orders by rogue elements in the CIA.![]()
and I did!Are you too afraid to give us a name?
He is too afraid to tell the truth that he has been taken to school throughout this entire thread by everybody that there is no evidence that oswald was the lone assassin but plenty of evidence given that there were multiple shooters there acting on orders by rogue elements in the CIA.![]()
I asked daws to answer, NOT YOU.
and I did!He is too afraid to tell the truth that he has been taken to school throughout this entire thread by everybody that there is no evidence that oswald was the lone assassin but plenty of evidence given that there were multiple shooters there acting on orders by rogue elements in the CIA.![]()
I asked daws to answer, NOT YOU.
you already know who did it my first answer stands ..and I did!I asked daws to answer, NOT YOU.
No you didn't. You gave a cowardly "you already know who did it.. accepting it as fact, seems to be beyond your comprehension..."
Who did it daws? Does he/she/they have a name(s)?
While munching on shit, 9/11 Rimjob posts more stupid nonsense.
9/11 Rimjob, the shit eater, cannot even comprehend that President Kennedy WAS shot from behind.
you already know who did it my first answer stands ..and I did!
No you didn't. You gave a cowardly "you already know who did it.. accepting it as fact, seems to be beyond your comprehension..."
Who did it daws? Does he/she/they have a name(s)?
your answer just proves my point.
And, sadly, just the sort of answer I have come to expect from you and the other trolls swarming about this topic.Just the sort of answer I expected... all blow and no go..That is a very curious point of view -- one which would make me doubt the sanity of anyone who espoused it, or else make me wonder who they worked for.
Clearly, the most important reason for uncovering a conspiracy is to make sure it doesn't happen again!!!!!!
Those who killed Kennedy got away with their crime!!!
At the very least, this fact would embolden others to follow the same path!!!
To uncover conspiracies, to punish and revile the conspirators and their allies to the maximum extent possible, to undertake steps to prevent such crimes in the future -- that is the best method guarding against such outrages.
I certainly wonder how many great crimes of state might have been prevented if people had known the truth about Kennedy -- and been on the lookout for similar conspracies.
For one thing, 9/11 probably would not have happened.
It is supremely important to reveal the truth about all conspiracies to the maximum extent possible.
It might destroy the childish illusions people have about the societies in which they live, it might make them more suspicious of their rulers, it might undermine the foundations of corrupt governments. That would create problems, but the alternative of great crimes being unpunished and unrevealed -- that, step by step, would lead to greater and greater crimes, as the most vile dregs of society and government discover that they can "get away with it."
No facts, no rational arguments or rebuttals, not even logic -- just insults, and fluff, and non sequiturs.
One is led to wonder why it is so important to you that no truth about this assassination be revealed.
.
Amazing how there are so many american sheople here STILL in denial about this all these years later that there was at least one other shooter involved in the assassination of JFK.![]()
It was no surprise to see the usual trolls Whitehall,Predfan,rightwinger and other lone nut theorist trolls play dodgeball and dodge all the facts and evidence that there was a conspiracy to kill JFK on this thread here
http://www.usmessageboard.com/conspiracy-theories/285978-kennedy-assassination-question.html
and as usual,it got highjacked by the paid trolls i have listed in my sig and this thread will as well by them as well no doubt.
Its pretty clear cut that posters like whitehall, predfan,and rightwinger who never watch videos or read links that shread to pieces the warren commission,have ever done any research into this and everything they know about this event is what they got from the CIA controlled mainstream media and their textbooks in our corrupt school system which STILL to this day tells the official lie that oswald was the lone assassin.
Whats really funny about that is even the house select committe on investigations in the 1970's concluded the warren commission was wrong,that there was a second shooter and a probable conspiracy and yet there are so many idiots here like those I mentioned, who STILL say oswald was the lone assassin even though they THEMSELVES admitted they were wrong.
Truthseeker tried to spell it out to them dummies style with this post below but they ignored it of course.no surprise.
What do you mean hard evidence? The United States House Select Committee on Assassinations ruled President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. And chastised the Warren Commission for it's inept investigation and only looking at the lone gunman theory.
well MAYBE they will take it seriosuly if they hear it from wikipedia then.I wouldnt hold my breath or bet on it though.It would be a miracle if they actutally read the link.
United States House Select Committee on Assassinations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
With the benefit of 50 years worth of hindsight I think it was a coup de etat.
how unoriginal, the coward ploy..btw you've answered your question .you already know who did it my first answer stands ..No you didn't. You gave a cowardly "you already know who did it.. accepting it as fact, seems to be beyond your comprehension..."
Who did it daws? Does he/she/they have a name(s)?
your answer just proves my point.
WOW, you truly are a coward. If I knew who did it I would provide a name. But I honestly don't know who did it. I do know it was not one gunman with a bolt action rifle. But you made the claim 'the truth about the jfk assassination is simple'
Why are you so afraid to tell us who did it?
how unoriginal, the coward ploy..btw you've answered your question .you already know who did it my first answer stands ..
your answer just proves my point.
WOW, you truly are a coward. If I knew who did it I would provide a name. But I honestly don't know who did it. I do know it was not one gunman with a bolt action rifle. But you made the claim 'the truth about the jfk assassination is simple'
Why are you so afraid to tell us who did it?
also ,you have no proof it was not one man with a bolt action rifle ..just unprovable speculation.
ear witness testimony unreliable and not evidence.how unoriginal, the coward ploy..btw you've answered your question .WOW, you truly are a coward. If I knew who did it I would provide a name. But I honestly don't know who did it. I do know it was not one gunman with a bolt action rifle. But you made the claim 'the truth about the jfk assassination is simple'
Why are you so afraid to tell us who did it?
also ,you have no proof it was not one man with a bolt action rifle ..just unprovable speculation.
1) Numerous witnesses including Secret Service Agents and local lawmen said the cadence of the shots was:
BANG.........................BANG BANG.
The last two shots were almost simultaneous. IMPOSSIBLE with the 6.5 mm Mannlicher Carcano. And the particular weapon recovered was not a fast acting rifle. According to one of the Warren Commission testers: "the pressure to open the bolt was so great that we tended to move the rifle off the target"
2) Prior to November 22, 1963 Lee Harvey Oswald was a nobody. Please tell me WHY a month before the assassination someone visited the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City impersonating Lee Harvey Oswald?
ear witness testimony unreliable and not evidence.how unoriginal, the coward ploy..btw you've answered your question .
also ,you have no proof it was not one man with a bolt action rifle ..just unprovable speculation.
1) Numerous witnesses including Secret Service Agents and local lawmen said the cadence of the shots was:
BANG.........................BANG BANG.
The last two shots were almost simultaneous. IMPOSSIBLE with the 6.5 mm Mannlicher Carcano. And the particular weapon recovered was not a fast acting rifle. According to one of the Warren Commission testers: "the pressure to open the bolt was so great that we tended to move the rifle off the target"
2) Prior to November 22, 1963 Lee Harvey Oswald was a nobody. Please tell me WHY a month before the assassination someone visited the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City impersonating Lee Harvey Oswald?
you want fries with that?