Even HUD is hyper-partisan now

It was the campaign and it doesn't matter.

Campaign, government, government, campaign, when Dems run on government doing everything for everyone the point becomes moot.

Yep, this has been another episode of clueless rw nutbag shitting himself in public.
 
You're smart enough to understand the difference, but you choose not to because you're just that partisan.

This is what Trump does. He takes intelligent people and forces them to act like morons.

Nope, Marty has always been a dumb partisan tool all on his own, nobody forced him.

In fact I think the whole premise is backwards. Trump didn't make them as much as they made Trump by being unprincipled bullshit eating partisans.

1759327970792.webp
 
Last edited:
It certainly has never been like it is under Trump. The guy has zero shame, zero interest in impartiality of the institutions that serve the people.

Take your false equivalancy and shove it you know where.
INPARTIALITY, not IDOLATARY. Any party any person
 
At least I can tell the difference between campaigning and government sponsored partisanship.

You pretend "they're the same" to justify whatever Trump does, even though you're smart enough to tell the difference.

You pretend that when it comes to Dems there is any difference.

O'Brien from 1984 would be proud of your doublethink.
 
Nope, Marty has always been a dumb partisan tool all on his own, nobody forced him.

In fact I think the whole premise is backwards. Trump didn't make them as much as they made Trump by being unprincipled bullshit eating partisans.

View attachment 1168358

Obama could say the same thing.
 
You pretend that when it comes to Dems there is any difference.

Well, there he goes again.

Anything negative on the right MUST have equality on the left in this fool's head.

Not because it's so, based on examination of facts, but simply because it's rhetorically convenient.
 
Can the president force government workers to campaign for Republicans now?

When it comes to a Dem president no force is needed.

The Hatch act is toothless tiger.
 
You pretend that when it comes to Dems there is any difference.

O'Brien from 1984 would be proud of your doublethink.

I think there is a difference when something comes from the campaign and when it comes from government.

Because there is a difference.
 
We've already put to the test your ability to cite facts to support your equality claims.

You had none.

I have what we see every day when Dems are in office, and when Republicans are in office.

The Civil service is in bed with the Dems, and you guys complain about a banner on a webpage caused by a shutdown caused by Dems.

Don't. *******. Care.
 
I think there is a difference when something comes from the campaign and when it comes from government.

Because there is a difference.

There is no difference in reality when it comes to Dems, because the bureaucracy is in bed with the Dems.

Or at least it is now, maybe this gives Trump the chance for a true purge.
 
I think there is a difference when something comes from the campaign and when it comes from government.

Because there is a difference.

Of course there is vast difference, you have to be completely clueless to not understand that campaigns are expressly political machinery that have one main job - serve their candidate's personal electoral goals.

Saying that our government, which is designed to serve the people is somehow same thing is pure ignorant stupidity.
 
Last edited:
When it comes to a Dem president no force is needed.

The Hatch act is toothless tiger.

Imagine that. Free choice and free association.

If Trump tells government employees to campaign for him, they should do it, right?

The Hatch act is law but it’s okay to ignore laws if you’re Trump. Right?
 
15th post
Imagine that. Free choice and free association.

If Trump tells government employees to campaign for him, they should do it, right?

The Hatch act is law but it’s okay to ignore laws if you’re Trump. Right?

Sorry, but that doesn't work when you work for government as a civil service employee. The whole point was to have a bunch of apolitical cogs executing the will of the elected President based on the laws passed by congress.

Your question is a strawman.

Has the Hatch act ever been successfully applied in the past decade or two?
 
It takes a lot to shock me at this point, but this one came pretty close. HUD is the Department of Housing & Urban Development. HUD's current home page:

YQJP7jR.jpg


I know that MAGA will defend this because it speaks their language, but there was a time when federal departments stayed completely out of partisan politics. For obvious reasons. Now, it's just another partisan organization.

Our Founders warned against this kind of division, but We the People evidently just don't care about that any more.
Clearly, this has Dotard written all over it.
 
NO one is taking the high road. We have lost our way,
Political party idolatry, Over those who would work in the best interests of the General population.
Are you saying the democrap party has "lost their way?" I think "lost their way" is a very nice way of saying "completely fucked up." They lost their way, ended up on another continent and are asking the worst people for directions.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom